AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastric PerforationNCT03724513

High Altitude Area- A Risk Factor For Gastric Perforation?

An observational study of Gastric Perforation, run by ADITYA PAWAR at 1 site in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an original case series on soldiers evacuated from HAA(High Altitude Area) over last one year(Sept 2017- Aug 2018) , of which 100% cases were found to have gastric antrum perforation. This is a deviation from the usual trend that is being noted in Indian subcontinent where duodenal perforations are commonest. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, men only
Conditions the study is for
Gastric Perforation
How many people
5 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
15 Sep 2018to 10 Oct 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Young soldiers located in High Altitude Area

Who may be able to join

  • Individuals located in High Altitude Area (>10,000ft).
  • presented as perforation peritonitis.
  • intra-operatively found to be perforated peptic ulcers.

Who cannot join

  • Not located in High Altitude Area.
  • intra-operatively perfoarations sites other then stomach and duodenum.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

India1 site
  • 403 Military Field Hospital

    Leh, Jammu and Kashmir, 194401

Other trials in India

About this study

This is an original case series on soldiers evacuated from HAA(High Altitude Area) over last one year(Sept 2017- Aug 2018) , of which 100% cases were found to have gastric antrum perforation. This is a deviation from the usual trend that is being noted in Indian subcontinent where duodenal perforations are commonest.

Read the detailed description

INTRODUCTION : This is an original case series on soldiers evacuated from HAA(High Altitude Area) over last one year(Sept 2017- Aug 2018) , of which 100% cases were found to have gastric antrum perforation. This is a deviation from the usual trend that is being noted in Indian subcontinent where duodenal perforations are commonest.

DISCUSSION : High altitude associated dyspepsia is a common phenomenon and some studies done in high altitude population have recorded high incidence of antral gastritis and mucosal atrophy on histo-pathological evaluation. This is also supported by high incidence of H.pylori infection. The presence of atrophic gastric mucosa associated with antral gastritis, when exposed to hypobaric hypoxemic conditions faced by soldiers posted to heights above 15000ft , may leads to increased intra-luminal pressure and ischemia which probably predisposes individuals for gastric antrum perforations.

CONCLUSION : This is a relatively untouched topic as we have not found studies on high altitude related gastric perforations and probably this is the first case series of its kind. The acknowledgement of this phenomenon may pave way for further studies for defining the role of high altitude in gastric perforations.

Keywords
High Altitude, Gastric Antrum Perforation, Mucosal Atrophy, Intra Luminal Pressure
Medical subject headings
Altitude Sickness

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assessment of site of perforated peptic ulcers by intra-operative observation in cases evacuated from High Altitude Area.

    Study aims at recording the site of perforated peptic ulcers in cases being evacuated in individuals posted at High Altitude Area.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Oct 2018
  2. Study start15 Sep 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2018
  4. Study completion10 Oct 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
5 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03724513
Sponsor's protocol ID
403HAAPPU
Status last verified
Oct 2018
First submitted
26 Oct 2018
Last updated
31 Oct 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Gastric Perforation, run by ADITYA PAWAR at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assessment of site of perforated peptic ulcers by intra-operative observation in cases evacuated from High Altitude Area. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in