Parkinson DiseaseNCT03724734
Trial of Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation
A study testing Adaptive DBS and Conventional DBS in people with Parkinson Disease, run by St. George's Hospital, London.
Trial summary
Currently, treatment of Parkinson's Disease with deep brain stimulation (DBS) uses continuous high frequency stimulation. The investigators have previously shown that by controlling the stimulation using feedback from the brain and only delivering stimulation when needed side-effects like speech disturbance can be… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson Disease
- What is being tested?
- Adaptive DBS and Conventional DBS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Oct 2019to May 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Study participants will be patients undergoing DBS of the subthalamic nucleus for the treatment of severe Parkinson's disease. Severe Parkinson's disease is defined as marked motor fluctuations (off periods and dyskinesias) despite optimal medical management. This is determined by the patient's clinical team.
- Able to give consent.
Who cannot join
- Cognitive impairment (judged by the clinician taking consent as not having sufficient mental capacity to understand the study and its requirements). This includes anyone who, in the opinion of the clinician taking consent, is unlikely to retain sufficient mental capacity for the duration of their involvement in the study.
- Intracranial bleeding, confusion, cerebrospinal fluid leak or any other complication after the first stage of surgery.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: A Double-blind, Cross-over Comparison of Closed Loop Versus Conventional Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease
Currently, treatment of Parkinson's Disease with deep brain stimulation (DBS) uses continuous high frequency stimulation. The investigators have previously shown that by controlling the stimulation using feedback from the brain and only delivering stimulation when needed side-effects like speech disturbance can be reduced. Here the investigators contrast conventional DBS with adaptive DBS while patients are awake and sleeping.
Read the detailed description
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the major neurological movement disorder in terms of both prevalence and morbidity, and in associated health care and social care costs. In the United Kingdom about 120,000 people are affected and associated costs are estimated at £ 2 billion per year. The current gold standard treatment for PD is levodopa therapy, however its use is limited by the development of motor complications in up to 80% of patients over a 5-10 year period. This has led to a resurgence in functional neurosurgery for PD over the last three decades.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is now accepted treatment for patients with severe PD and is supported by the Food and Drug Administration in the USA and National Institute of Clinical Excellence in the UK with trials providing evidence that it improves quality of life over best medical treatment. However, due to partial efficacy and side effects its potential is relatively limited and it has so far generally been restricted to patients with severe disease and uncontrollable motor complications with medical therapy.
Currently DBS provides continuous and fixed stimulation, but this constant stimulation promotes side-effects like speech disturbance. Research by the investigators has shown that by controlling the stimulation and only delivering it when needed side-effects can be reduced. To show this the investigators developed a form of adaptive DBS in which they controlled how much stimulation is delivered by directly recording the brain's activity from the electrode used for brain stimulation. This provides a feedback signal.
However, although adaptive DBS works in an acute research setting, there are still several questions to be answered before it can be translated in to a durable therapy option. The main remaining questions are whether the amelioration of Parkinsonian symptoms is maintained over periods longer than an hour or so, and whether it is triggered when arousals occur during sleep. The latter is important to ensure that mobility is maintained when turning in bed and during bathroom visits.
The Investigators would like to contrast conventional (continuous) DBS with adaptive DBS when the same patients with Parkinsons are treated while both awake and asleep. Thus they can follow treatment effects during the day and at night, in sleep. Patients will receive the two types of stimulation in randomised order. Patients will not be told which form of stimulation is being applied and the main measures used to evaluate the outcome of the study will be video-taped performance on a number of motor tasks and the video-taping of mobility during arousals and awakenings from sleep. Assessment of video-tapes is desirable as assessors can then be blind to the treatment being applied. Thus assessments should not be biased.
Patients will undergo our standard 2-part DBS implantation. The experiments will be performed whilst the patients are inpatients between the two operations and will therefore not require any extra procedures, extra hospital stay or incur delay in starting therapeutic DBS.
The DBS electrode has four contacts, and the electrodes are bilaterally implanted. Patients will be requested to withhold their usual medication overnight so that they are first assessed off medication on each morning. Each morning we will start with some screening. On the first of day this will involve finding the best contact for adaptive stimulation on the DBS electrode on the two sides. DBS stimulation will be evaluated in order to find the best contact, voltage and stimulation settings for each individual patient. This assessment is similar to the standard clinical procedure experienced by patients when seen as outpatients following surgery. The investigators will confirm that the settings remain appropriate during the morning screening on the next day.
The investigators will use our custom-built externalized research system (ERS) to allow recordings and stimulation. The ERS will be affixed to the subject with sticky tape or a bandage. The device is small and lightweight and communicates with a personal computer. The electrical connections to the DBS leads will be through temporary extensions with appropriate mechanical slack. The temporary extensions will be later replaced at stimulator implant with new sterile extensions. To allow for stimulation return, a conductive clip to the ERS case will be connected to a conducting (ECG) pad placed over chest. Periodic impedance checks will ensure this connection is robust through the course of the experiment. The patient can be ambulant whilst wearing the device. The safety of the ERS will be reviewed independently prior to the start of the study.
Patients will be randomised as to whether they receive conventional DBS or adaptive DBS and will then cross-over to the second type of stimulation. All procedures will be repeated in matched form in the two treatment periods. The patient's usual medication will be started once each screening test is completed and the medication continued through-out the day.
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Being tested
- Adaptive DBS, Conventional DBS
- Keywords
- subthalamic nucleus, deep brain stimulation, closed-loop
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Adaptive DBSDevice
We will use our custom-built externalized research system (ERS) to allow recordings and stimulation. The device is small and lightweight and communicates wirelessly with a personal computer. The electrical connections to the DBS leads will be through temporary extensions with appropriate mechanical slack. To allow for stimulation return, a conductive clip to the ERS case will be connected to a conducting (ECG) pad placed over chest. Periodic impedance checks will ensure this connection is robust through the course of the experiment. The patient can be ambulant whilst wearing the device.
Conventional DBSDevice
We will use our custom-built externalized research system (ERS) to deliver continuous conventional stimulation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adaptive DBS | Experimental | We will use our custom-built externalized research system (ERS) to deliver adaptive stimulation to the subthalamic nuclei. Receives: Device: Adaptive DBS |
| Conventional DBS | Active comparator | We will use our custom-built externalized research system (ERS) to deliver continuous stimulation to the subthalamic nuclei. Receives: Device: Conventional DBS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Daytime Assessment
Average of blinded videoed United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score repeated every 3 hours through the day. Score range 0-108. Higher score is worse outcome.
Measured: 1 day
Night time assessment
Average blinded videoed assessment scores of mobility during sleep arousals and awakenings. Score range 0-10. Higher score is worse outcome.
Measured: 1 night
Secondary outcomes (7)
Energy delivered
Power consumption (total electrical energy delivered, TEED, over 24h). Measure not bounded. Higher values are worse outcome.
Measured: 1 day/night cycle
Tremor severity
Average accelerometer tremor-band power from limb most affected by tremor. Measure not bounded. Higher values are worse outcome.
Measured: 1 day/night cycle
Objective motor impairment
Average of timed finger tapping repeated every 3 hours through the day. Measure not bounded. Higher values are better outcome.
Measured: 1 day
Speech impairment
Average of blinded Speech Intelligibility Test score repeated every 3 hours through the day. Scale 0-100. Higher values are better outcome.
Measured: 1 day
Dyskinesia severity
Average of blinded Part 3 of United Dyskinesia Rating Scale score repeated every 3 hours through the day. Rating scale from 0-55. Higher scores are worse impairment.
Measured: 1 day
Sleep quality: score
Sleep quality scale score. 10 point scale. High score is better outcome.
Measured: 1 night
Power efficiency
Power efficiency (mean United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score divided by the total electrical energy delivered per 24 hours). Measure is not bounded. Higher values are better outcome.
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2018
- Study startOct 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completionJan 2020 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Parkinson DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Patients will be randomised as to whether they receive conventional DBS or adaptive DBS first. Thereafter they will cross-over to the second type of stimulation.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- St. George's Hospital, London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Oxford
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Erlick AC Pereira DM FRCS, St. George's Hospital, London
- Investigators
- Erlick Pereira, DM FRCS, Principal investigator, St George's University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03724734
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 256068
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 26 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 16 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-blind, Cross-over Comparison of Closed Loop Versus Conventional Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03724734
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 256068
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Keywords
- subthalamic nucleus, deep brain stimulation, closed-loop
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- St. George's Hospital, LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Oxford
- Study start
- Oct 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Currently, treatment of Parkinson's Disease with deep brain stimulation (DBS) uses continuous high frequency stimulation. The investigators have previously shown that by controlling the stimulation using feedback from the brain and only delivering stimulation when needed side-effects like speech disturbance can be reduced. Here the investigators contrast conventional DBS with adaptive DBS while patients are awake and sleeping.
Detailed description
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the major neurological movement disorder in terms of both prevalence and morbidity, and in associated health care and social care costs. In the United Kingdom about 120,000 people are affected and associated costs are estimated at £ 2 billion per year. The current gold standard treatment for PD is levodopa therapy, however its use is limited by the development of motor complications in up to 80% of patients over a 5-10 year period. This has led to a resurgence in functional neurosurgery for PD over the last three decades.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is now accepted treatment for patients with severe PD and is supported by the Food and Drug Administration in the USA and National Institute of Clinical Excellence in the UK with trials providing evidence that it improves quality of life over best medical treatment. However, due to partial efficacy and side effects its potential is relatively limited and it has so far generally been restricted to patients with severe disease and uncontrollable motor complications with medical therapy.
Currently DBS provides continuous and fixed stimulation, but this constant stimulation promotes side-effects like speech disturbance. Research by the investigators has shown that by controlling the stimulation and only delivering it when needed side-effects can be reduced. To show this the investigators developed a form of adaptive DBS in which they controlled how much stimulation is delivered by directly recording the brain's activity from the electrode used for brain stimulation. This provides a feedback signal.
However, although adaptive DBS works in an acute research setting, there are still several questions to be answered before it can be translated in to a durable therapy option. The main remaining questions are whether the amelioration of Parkinsonian symptoms is maintained over periods longer than an hour or so, and whether it is triggered when arousals occur during sleep. The latter is important to ensure that mobility is maintained when turning in bed and during bathroom visits.
The Investigators would like to contrast conventional (continuous) DBS with adaptive DBS when the same patients with Parkinsons are treated while both awake and asleep. Thus they can follow treatment effects during the day and at night, in sleep. Patients will receive the two types of stimulation in randomised order. Patients will not be told which form of stimulation is being applied and the main measures used to evaluate the outcome of the study will be video-taped performance on a number of motor tasks and the video-taping of mobility during arousals and awakenings from sleep. Assessment of video-tapes is desirable as assessors can then be blind to the treatment being applied. Thus assessments should not be biased.
Patients will undergo our standard 2-part DBS implantation. The experiments will be performed whilst the patients are inpatients between the two operations and will therefore not require any extra procedures, extra hospital stay or incur delay in starting therapeutic DBS.
The DBS electrode has four contacts, and the electrodes are bilaterally implanted. Patients will be requested to withhold their usual medication overnight so that they are first assessed off medication on each morning. Each morning we will start with some screening. On the first of day this will involve finding the best contact for adaptive stimulation on the DBS electrode on the two sides. DBS stimulation will be evaluated in order to find the best contact, voltage and stimulation settings for each individual patient. This assessment is similar to the standard clinical procedure experienced by patients when seen as outpatients following surgery. The investigators will confirm that the settings remain appropriate during the morning screening on the next day.
The investigators will use our custom-built externalized research system (ERS) to allow recordings and stimulation. The ERS will be affixed to the subject with sticky tape or a bandage. The device is small and lightweight and communicates with a personal computer. The electrical connections to the DBS leads will be through temporary extensions with appropriate mechanical slack. The temporary extensions will be later replaced at stimulator implant with new sterile extensions. To allow for stimulation return, a conductive clip to the ERS case will be connected to a conducting (ECG) pad placed over chest. Periodic impedance checks will ensure this connection is robust through the course of the experiment. The patient can be ambulant whilst wearing the device. The safety of the ERS will be reviewed independently prior to the start of the study.
Patients will be randomised as to whether they receive conventional DBS or adaptive DBS and will then cross-over to the second type of stimulation. All procedures will be repeated in matched form in the two treatment periods. The patient's usual medication will be started once each screening test is completed and the medication continued through-out the day.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients will be randomised as to whether they receive conventional DBS or adaptive DBS first. Thereafter they will cross-over to the second type of stimulation.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adaptive DBS | Experimental | Device: Adaptive DBSWe will use our custom-built externalized research system (ERS) to deliver adaptive stimulation to the subthalamic nuclei. |
| Conventional DBS | Active comparator | Device: Conventional DBSWe will use our custom-built externalized research system (ERS) to deliver continuous stimulation to the subthalamic nuclei. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Study participants will be patients undergoing DBS of the subthalamic nucleus for the treatment of severe Parkinson's disease. Severe Parkinson's disease is defined as marked motor fluctuations (off periods and dyskinesias) despite optimal medical management. This is determined by the patient's clinical team.
- Able to give consent.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Cognitive impairment (judged by the clinician taking consent as not having sufficient mental capacity to understand the study and its requirements). This includes anyone who, in the opinion of the clinician taking consent, is unlikely to retain sufficient mental capacity for the duration of their involvement in the study.
- Intracranial bleeding, confusion, cerebrospinal fluid leak or any other complication after the first stage of surgery.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Adaptive DBSWe will use our custom-built externalized research system (ERS) to allow recordings and stimulation. The device is small and lightweight and communicates wirelessly with a personal computer. The electrical connections to the DBS leads will be through temporary extensions with appropriate mechanical slack. To allow for stimulation return, a conductive clip to the ERS case will be connected to a conducting (ECG) pad placed over chest. Periodic impedance checks will ensure this connection is robust through the course of the experiment. The patient can be ambulant whilst wearing the device. | Device | Adaptive DBS |
| Conventional DBSWe will use our custom-built externalized research system (ERS) to deliver continuous conventional stimulation. | Device | Conventional DBS |
Primary outcome
Daytime Assessment
Time frame: 1 day
Average of blinded videoed United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score repeated every 3 hours through the day. Score range 0-108. Higher score is worse outcome.
Night time assessment
Time frame: 1 night
Average blinded videoed assessment scores of mobility during sleep arousals and awakenings. Score range 0-10. Higher score is worse outcome.
7 secondary outcomes
Energy delivered
Time frame: 1 day/night cycle
Tremor severity
Time frame: 1 day/night cycle
Objective motor impairment
Time frame: 1 day
Speech impairment
Time frame: 1 day
Dyskinesia severity
Time frame: 1 day
Sleep quality: score
Time frame: 1 night
Power efficiency
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Apr 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Parkinson Disease
Recruiting
Automated Language Analysis in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Application of Artificial Intelligence Models
Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD)
Recruiting
Investigating Basal Ganglia-Cortical Physiology During Sleep and Its Modulation by Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease
Parkinson's Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Hydroxychloroquine in Subjects With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson&Amp;#39;s Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Cognitive-Motor Training for Gait Adaptability in Parkinson Disease
Parkinson Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Erlick Pereira, DM FRCS principal investigator
St George's University Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Adaptive DBS and Conventional DBS in people with Parkinson Disease, run by St. George's Hospital, London.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Erlick AC Pereira, DM FRCS (02087252375 ext. 02087254173, epereira@sgul.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Daytime Assessment (time frame: 1 day). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2019.