Breast CancerNCT03726619
e-CHEC-uP: Scaling up an Efficacious Cancer Screening Intervention for Women With Limited English
A study testing e-CHEC-uP and CHEC-uP in people with Breast Cancer and Cervical Cancer, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This research is being done to learn more about whether or not Korean American women will improve the screening practices for breast and cervical cancer if subjects receive education and follow-up from community health workers. The education materials may be given via online or in-person. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 65 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer, Cervical Cancer
- What is being tested?
- e-CHEC-uP and CHEC-uP
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 14 Jul 2019to 17 Aug 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 65 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 21-65 years
- Self-identified as a Korean American woman
- Overdue for a mammogram (40-65 years of age only) or a Pap test**
- Able to read and write Korean or English
- Willing to provide written consent to allow the researchers to audit medical records for mammography and Pap test use
Who cannot join
- A cancer diagnosis
- Being pregnant
- An acute and/or terminal condition (e.g., life expectancy of less than 6 months or last cancer treatment within the last 5 years)
- Psychiatric diagnosis (e.g., schizophrenia or cognitive impairment) or other conditions that preclude participation in the study activities
- Had undergone a hysterectomy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This research is being done to learn more about whether or not Korean American women will improve the screening practices for breast and cervical cancer if subjects receive education and follow-up from community health workers. The education materials may be given via online or in-person. Primary Hypothesis: e-CHEC-uP will be as efficacious as the original CHEC-uP in promoting mammogram and Pap test screening among Korean immigrant women (KIW) at 6 months.
Objectives: (1) To develop a web-based platform of the health literacy education component of the original CHEC-uP intervention; (2) To evaluate the acceptability and usability of the web version of the health literacy education in a user testing sample of 10 KIW; and (3) To conduct a pilot study to test the preliminary efficacy of the web version of CHEC-uP (e-CHEC-uP) in 40 KIW.
Read the detailed description
e-CHEC-uP stands for e-Community based breast and cervical cancer control education program.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Cervical Cancer
- Being tested
- e-CHEC-uP, CHEC-uP
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
e-CHEC-uPBehavioural
One time online-based education about breast and cervical cancer screening procedures followed by phone counseling by trained community health worker over 6 months
CHEC-uPBehavioural
One time face-to-face education about breast and cervical cancer screening procedures followed by phone counseling by trained community health worker over 6 months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| e-CHEC-uP | Experimental | Group 1 will receive the education study intervention after the first baseline questionnaire. Participants will be asked to take part in a one-time, 1 to 1.5-hour online education on breast and cervical cancer prevention followed by monthly phone calls and navigation assistance by a community health worker to help address any barriers in order to help receive a mammogram or a Pap test. Receives: Behavioral: e-CHEC-uP |
| CHEC-uP | Active comparator | Group 2 will receive a similar education intervention but the education is offered face-to-face instead. Participants will be asked to take part in a one-time, 1 to 1.5-hour face-to-face education on breast and cervical cancer prevention followed by monthly phone calls and navigation assistance by a community health worker. Receives: Behavioral: CHEC-uP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Age-appropriate mammogram screening test
Patient medical records will be reviewed to confirm the receipt of mammogram and whether the age at which it was received is "appropriate". According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), Mammograms received from ages 40 to 54 years (annual screening) and from ages 55 years onward (biennial screening) will be deemed appropriate. It is optional to continue annual screening after age 54 years based on a woman's choice.
The investigators will compare the proportion of women in each group (e-CHEC-uP intervention vs. CHEC-uP) who completed mammogram at 6 months.
Measured: 6 months
Age-appropriate Pap screening test
Patient medical records will be reviewed to confirm the receipt of Pap test and whether the age at which it was received is "appropriate". According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), Pap tests received from ages 21 to 65 years once every 3 years will be deemed appropriate.
The investigators will compare the proportion of women in each group (e-CHEC-uP intervention vs. CHEC-uP) who completed Pap test at 6 months.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Health Literacy as assessed by a 49-item instrument
Scoring of the health literacy instrument is in such a way that each correct response will be coded as 1 whereas incorrect response will be coded as 0. Total scores can range from 0 to 49 with higher scores indicating higher health literacy.
Measured: 6 months
Breast Cancer knowledge as assessed by a 25-item instrument
Scoring of the breast cancer knowledge instrument is in such a way that each correct response will be coded as 1 whereas incorrect response will be coded as 0. Total scores for breast cancer knowledge will range from 0 to 25. Higher scores indicate higher breast cancer knowledge.
Measured: 6 months
Cervical Cancer knowledge as assessed by 10-item instrument
Scoring of the cervical cancer knowledge instrument is in such a way that each correct response will be coded as 1 whereas incorrect response will be coded as 0. Total scores for cervical cancer knowledge will range from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate higher cervical cancer knowledge.
Measured: 6 months
Cancer screening-related self-efficacy as assessed by 8-item scale
Scoring of the cancer screening-related self-efficacy is to assess one's belief about ability to get cancer screening. The 8-item scale (developed by the study team) scoring ranges from "not at all confident" coded as 1 to "very confident" coded as 4 for each item. Total scores will range from 8 to 32 with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Oct 2018
- Study start14 Jul 2019
- Primary completion17 Aug 2020
- Study completion17 Aug 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Johns Hopkins UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hae-Ra Han, PhD, RN, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03726619
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00180383
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Han HR, Huh B, Kim MT, Kim J, Nguyen T. Development and validation of the assessment of health literacy in breast and cervical cancer screening. J Health Commun. 2014;19 Suppl 2(0 2):267-84. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.936569.
PubMed 25315598Park S, Chang S, Chung C. Effects of a cognition-emotion focused program to increase public participation in Papanicolaou smear screening. Public Health Nurs. 2005 Jul-Aug;22(4):289-98. doi: 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2005.220404.x.
PubMed 16150010McCance KL, Mooney KH, Smith KR, Field R. Validity and reliability of a breast cancer knowledge test. Am J Prev Med. 1990 Mar-Apr;6(2):93-8.
PubMed 2363955Han HR, Lee YJ, Min D, Chepkorir J, Hwang DA, Chae S. Web-Based Delivery of an Effective Church-Based Intervention Program to Promote Cancer Screening (Community-based Health litEracy-focused intervention for breast and cervical Cancer Control) Among Korean Immigrant Women in the United States: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 25;12:e66092. doi: 10.2196/66092.
PubMed 40854311Hwang DA, Lee A, Song JM, Han HR. Recruitment and Retention Strategies Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Web-Based Intervention Trials: Retrospective Qualitative Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 12;23(7):e23959. doi: 10.2196/23959.
PubMed 34255658
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- e-CHEC-uP: Scaling up an Efficacious Cancer Screening Intervention for Women With Limited English
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03726619
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00180383
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Cervical Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Aug 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research is being done to learn more about whether or not Korean American women will improve the screening practices for breast and cervical cancer if subjects receive education and follow-up from community health workers. The education materials may be given via online or in-person. Primary Hypothesis: e-CHEC-uP will be as efficacious as the original CHEC-uP in promoting mammogram and Pap test screening among Korean immigrant women (KIW) at 6 months.
Objectives: (1) To develop a web-based platform of the health literacy education component of the original CHEC-uP intervention; (2) To evaluate the acceptability and usability of the web version of the health literacy education in a user testing sample of 10 KIW; and (3) To conduct a pilot study to test the preliminary efficacy of the web version of CHEC-uP (e-CHEC-uP) in 40 KIW.
Detailed description
e-CHEC-uP stands for e-Community based breast and cervical cancer control education program.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| e-CHEC-uP | Experimental | Behavioral: e-CHEC-uPGroup 1 will receive the education study intervention after the first baseline questionnaire. Participants will be asked to take part in a one-time, 1 to 1.5-hour online education on breast and cervical cancer prevention followed by monthly phone calls and navigation assistance by a community health worker to help address any barriers in order to help receive a mammogram or a Pap test. |
| CHEC-uP | Active comparator | Behavioral: CHEC-uPGroup 2 will receive a similar education intervention but the education is offered face-to-face instead. Participants will be asked to take part in a one-time, 1 to 1.5-hour face-to-face education on breast and cervical cancer prevention followed by monthly phone calls and navigation assistance by a community health worker. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 21-65 years
- Self-identified as a Korean American woman
- Overdue for a mammogram (40-65 years of age only) or a Pap test**
- Able to read and write Korean or English
- Willing to provide written consent to allow the researchers to audit medical records for mammography and Pap test use
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- A cancer diagnosis
- Being pregnant
- An acute and/or terminal condition (e.g., life expectancy of less than 6 months or last cancer treatment within the last 5 years)
- Psychiatric diagnosis (e.g., schizophrenia or cognitive impairment) or other conditions that preclude participation in the study activities
- Had undergone a hysterectomy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| e-CHEC-uPOne time online-based education about breast and cervical cancer screening procedures followed by phone counseling by trained community health worker over 6 months | Behavioural | e-CHEC-uP |
| CHEC-uPOne time face-to-face education about breast and cervical cancer screening procedures followed by phone counseling by trained community health worker over 6 months | Behavioural | CHEC-uP |
Primary outcome
Age-appropriate mammogram screening test
Time frame: 6 months
Patient medical records will be reviewed to confirm the receipt of mammogram and whether the age at which it was received is "appropriate". According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), Mammograms received from ages 40 to 54 years (annual screening) and from ages 55 years onward (biennial screening) will be deemed appropriate. It is optional to continue annual screening after age 54 years based on a woman's choice. The investigators will compare the proportion of women in each group (e-CHEC-uP intervention vs. CHEC-uP) who completed mammogram at 6 months.
Age-appropriate Pap screening test
Time frame: 6 months
Patient medical records will be reviewed to confirm the receipt of Pap test and whether the age at which it was received is "appropriate". According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), Pap tests received from ages 21 to 65 years once every 3 years will be deemed appropriate. The investigators will compare the proportion of women in each group (e-CHEC-uP intervention vs. CHEC-uP) who completed Pap test at 6 months.
4 secondary outcomes
Health Literacy as assessed by a 49-item instrument
Time frame: 6 months
Breast Cancer knowledge as assessed by a 25-item instrument
Time frame: 6 months
Cervical Cancer knowledge as assessed by 10-item instrument
Time frame: 6 months
Cancer screening-related self-efficacy as assessed by 8-item scale
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2020.
- Background: PubMed 25315598Han HR, Huh B, Kim MT, Kim J, Nguyen T. Development and validation of the assessment of health literacy in breast and cervical cancer screening. J Health Commun. 2014;19 Suppl 2(0 2):267-84. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.936569.
- Background: PubMed 16150010Park S, Chang S, Chung C. Effects of a cognition-emotion focused program to increase public participation in Papanicolaou smear screening. Public Health Nurs. 2005 Jul-Aug;22(4):289-98. doi: 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2005.220404.x.
- Background: PubMed 2363955McCance KL, Mooney KH, Smith KR, Field R. Validity and reliability of a breast cancer knowledge test. Am J Prev Med. 1990 Mar-Apr;6(2):93-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40854311Han HR, Lee YJ, Min D, Chepkorir J, Hwang DA, Chae S. Web-Based Delivery of an Effective Church-Based Intervention Program to Promote Cancer Screening (Community-based Health litEracy-focused intervention for breast and cervical Cancer Control) Among Korean Immigrant Women in the United States: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 25;12:e66092. doi: 10.2196/66092.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34255658Hwang DA, Lee A, Song JM, Han HR. Recruitment and Retention Strategies Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Web-Based Intervention Trials: Retrospective Qualitative Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 12;23(7):e23959. doi: 10.2196/23959.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Effect of a Health Belief Model Based Digital Nudge Intervention on Breast Cancer Screening
Breast Cancer Screening, Breast Cancer Awareness
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Low-Dose Apatinib Plus Chemotherapy in ADC-Pretreated HER2-Positive and HER2-Low Advanced Breast Cancer
Breast Neoplasms, Advanced Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
ROSETTA Breast-01: The Effects and Safety of Pumitamig in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Breast Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Phase II Study of Dato-DXd in Triple-negative Breast Cancer Patients With Newly Diagnosed or Progressing Brain Metastases
Breast Cancer Stage IV
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hae-Ra Han, PhD, RN principal investigator
Johns Hopkins University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing e-CHEC-uP and CHEC-uP in people with Breast Cancer and Cervical Cancer, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Age-appropriate mammogram screening test (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03726619, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2020.