AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic RhinitisNCT03727347

Posterior Nasal Nerve (PNN) Rhinitis Study

A study testing InSeca Stylus in people with Chronic Rhinitis, run by Aerin Medical at 5 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Evaluation of the Aerin Medical Device used for the treatment of chronic rhinitis Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 22 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Rhinitis
What is being tested?
InSeca Stylus
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
5 sitesUnited States
Study dates
16 Oct 2018to 17 Sep 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 22 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 22 to 75 years (inclusively)
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Willing and able to comply with the subject-specific requirements outlined in the study protocol
  • Seeking treatment for chronic rhinitis symptoms of at least 6 months duration and willing to undergo an office-based procedure
  • Moderate to severe symptoms of rhinorrhea (rTNSS rating of 2 or 3 for rhinorrhea)
  • Mild to severe symptoms of nasal congestion (rTNSS rating of 1, 2 or 3 for congestion)
  • rTNSS score of greater than or equal to 6
  • Dissatisfaction with medical management, defined as usage of intranasal steroids for a minimum of 4 weeks without adequate symptom relief, as judged by the subject

Who cannot join

  • Anatomic obstructions that in the investigator's opinion limit access to the posterior nose
  • Altered anatomy of the posterior nose as a result of prior sinus or nasal surgery or injury
  • Active nasal or sinus infection
  • Moderate to severe ocular allergic symptoms (such as eye tearing [epiphora], itching [pruritus], or redness [erythema])
  • History of significant dry eye
  • History of any of the following: nose bleeds in the past 3 months, rhinitis medicamentosa, head or neck irradiation
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Known or suspected allergies or contraindications to the anesthetic agents and/or antibiotic medications to be used during the study procedure session
  • Known or suspected to be pregnant, or is lactating
  • Participating in another clinical research study
  • Other medical conditions which in the opinion of the investigator would predispose the subject to poor wound healing, increased surgical risk, or poor compliance with the requirements of the study

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

United States5 sites
  • Colorado ENT and Allergy

    Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909

  • Fort Worth ENT

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76109

  • ENT and Allergy Associates of Texas

    McKinney, Texas, 75070

  • Advanced ENT and Allergy

    New Albany, Indiana, 47150

  • Piedmont ENT Associates

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Clinical Evaluation of Low Power Radiofrequency Energy Applied to the Posterior Nasal Nerve Area for Symptomatic Relief of Chronic Rhinitis

Evaluation of the Aerin Medical Device used for the treatment of chronic rhinitis

Read the detailed description

This is a non-significant risk, prospective, multi-center, non-randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Aerin Medical device (InSeca Stylus) when used to deliver radiofrequency (RF) energy to the posterior nasal nerve area to improve symptoms in those diagnosed with chronic rhinitis.

Being tested
InSeca Stylus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • InSeca StylusDevice

    Low power radiofrequency energy delivery to the portion of the nasal cavity mucosa overlying the region of the posterior nasal nerve (the posterior middle meatus and posterior inferior meatus).

Study groups in NCT03727347
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InSeca Stylus Treatment GroupExperimentalSubjects treated with low power radiofrequency energy applied to the nasal cavity mucosa overlying the region of the posterior nasal nerve (the posterior middle meatus and posterior inferior meatus)
Receives: Device: InSeca Stylus

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)

    Mean change in Reflective Total Nasal Symptoms Score (rTNSS) from baseline to 12 weeks post-study procedure. Improvement (12 week score - baseline score) is signified by a negative value.

    The Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) is a patient self reported questionnaire of four nasal symptoms: rhinitis, nasal congestion, nasal itching and sneezing. Patients will report their symptoms reflected or felt over the last 12 hours. Total scores can range from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates increased symptom severity. This study will measure the mean change in the rTNSS total score from Baseline to 12 week follow up visit

    Measured: Comparison of scores at Baseline and 12 weeks post procedure

  2. Percentage of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events (Safety)

    Characterization of the type and frequency of treatment-related adverse events reported during or following the study procedure. Subjects were asked about possible side effects or adverse experiences related to the study procedure at each follow up visit. Each event was documented and identified as to its relationship and level of relatedness to the study device and/or study procedure.

    This measure includes any subject who experienced at least one event considered definitely, probably, or possibly related to the device or procedure.

    Measured: At or following the study procedure, and up to the final study visit at 1 year.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Nov 2018
  2. Study start16 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2020
  4. Study completion17 Sep 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
All enrolled subjects will be treated with the InSeca Stylus
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03727347
Sponsor's protocol ID
TP668
Status last verified
Sep 2020
First submitted
24 Oct 2018
Last updated
16 Jun 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Quillen DM, Feller DB. Diagnosing rhinitis: allergic vs. nonallergic. Am Fam Physician. 2006 May 1;73(9):1583-90.

    PubMed 16719251
  • Wallace DV, Dykewicz MS, Bernstein DI, Blessing-Moore J, Cox L, Khan DA, Lang DM, Nicklas RA, Oppenheimer J, Portnoy JM, Randolph CC, Schuller D, Spector SL, Tilles SA; Joint Task Force on Practice; American Academy of Allergy; Asthma & Immunology; American College of Allergy; Asthma and Immunology; Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. The diagnosis and management of rhinitis: an updated practice parameter. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Aug;122(2 Suppl):S1-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.06.003. No abstract available.

    PubMed 18662584
  • Behrbohm H. The Dual Character of Nasal Surgery. In: Behrbohm H, Tardy MEJ, eds. Essentials of Septorhinoplasty. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme; 2004

  • Geurkink N. Nasal anatomy, physiology, and function. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1983 Aug;72(2):123-8. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(83)90518-3.

    PubMed 6350406
  • Dahl R, Mygind N. Anatomy, physiology and function of the nasal cavities in health and disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1998 Jan 5;29(1-2):3-12. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(97)00058-6.

    PubMed 10837577
  • Rogers DF. Airway goblet cells: responsive and adaptable front-line defenders. Eur Respir J. 1994 Sep;7(9):1690-706.

    PubMed 7995400
  • Schroer B, Pien LC. Nonallergic rhinitis: common problem, chronic symptoms. Cleve Clin J Med. 2012 Apr;79(4):285-93. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.79a11099.

    PubMed 22473729
  • Greiner AN, Meltzer EO. Overview of the treatment of allergic rhinitis and nonallergic rhinopathy. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2011 Mar;8(1):121-31. doi: 10.1513/pats.201004-033RN.

    PubMed 21364230
  • Halderman A, Sindwani R. Surgical management of vasomotor rhinitis: a systematic review. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015 Mar-Apr;29(2):128-34. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4141.

    PubMed 25785754
  • Kirtane MV, Rajaram D, Merchant SN. Transnasal approach to the vidian nerve: anatomical considerations. J Postgrad Med. 1984 Oct;30(4):210-3. No abstract available.

    PubMed 6527306

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing InSeca Stylus in people with Chronic Rhinitis, run by Aerin Medical at 5 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jun 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (time frame: Comparison of scores at Baseline and 12 weeks post procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03727347, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in