Interstitial Lung DiseaseNCT03727568
Study Comparing Two Different Methods of Cryobiopsy in the Interstitial Lung Diseases
A study testing Cryobiopsy in people with Interstitial Lung Disease, run by University Hospital, Essen at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are a heterogeneous collection of more than 100 different pulmonary disorders. Surgical lung biopsie in combination with multidisciplinary discussion is recommend in combination to reach a consensus diagnosis when the initial clinical evaluation is inconclusive in the diagnosis of ILD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Interstitial Lung Disease
- What is being tested?
- Cryobiopsy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 140 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 11 Sep 2018to 31 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Inpatients with suspected ILD based on clinical and radiological features
- Male or female patients aged ≥18 years
- Signed the informed consent
- Clinical indication to performed a lung biopsy in radiologically proven ILD
Who cannot join
- Bleeding risk:
- Known predisposition to bleeding
- International randomised ratio (INR) >1,5,
- Elevated partial thromboplastin time (PTT)
- Platelet count < 80000/ul
- Patients who required full-dose therapeutic anticoagulation or clopidogrel or other thienopyridines
Show all 9Show fewer
- Oxygen saturation < 90% with supported Oxygen 2l/min
- Severe bullous pulmonary emphysema
- Severe cardiac disease (angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction in the last 6 month, acute hearth failure)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Randomised Study Comparing Two Different Methods of Transbronchial Cryobiopsy in the Interstitial Lung Diseases
Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are a heterogeneous collection of more than 100 different pulmonary disorders. Surgical lung biopsie in combination with multidisciplinary discussion is recommend in combination to reach a consensus diagnosis when the initial clinical evaluation is inconclusive in the diagnosis of ILD. Cryobiopsy via bronchoscopy is approved for lung biopsies and allows harvesting of large tissue samples of excellent. This technique is not jet standardized. In this prospective randomised study the investigators want to evaluate the diagnostic yield comparing two different techniques of performing transbronchial cryobiopsy. In this study would be compared a shorter freezing time and more number of biopsies vs a longer freezing time and less number of biopsies.
Read the detailed description
Design:
The investigators design a prospective randomised multicenter study to assess the diagnostic value of cryobiopsy in patients with suspected Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia by comparing two different interventional methods.
Patients with suspected ILD in which the clinical, radiological and BAL-data are insufficient to establish a definitive clinical diagnosis, requiring then tissue specimen to determine a diagnosis would be included.
Therefore this all patients will undergo transbronchial cryobiopsy. If a definitive diagnosis even after cryobiopsy and MDD cannot be made, SLB will be recommended.
For the cryobiopsies the 1.9 mm cryoprobe and ERBECRYO®2 with carbon dioxide will be used. All transbronchial cryobiopsies have to be obtained of one or two lobes of the same lung and in at least two different segments. The bronchopulmonary segment for the cryobiopsy will be selected based on the radiological features shown on a high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest. The areas with exclusively fibrotic changes should be avoided. After having touched the pleura with the cryopobe, the probe is retracted one to two centimetres and then in this position the freezing process will be initiated. The flexible bronchoscope with the inserted cryoprobe will be removed through the rigid bronchoscope after the sample was obtained.
The cryobiopsies can be performed in rigid or flexible bronchoscopy. The use of a Fogarty occlusion balloon is left to the discretion of the bronchoscopist.
Experimental Groups:
Group nº1: A total of 3 samples with a freezing time of 7 seconds at least for the first biopsy and a freezing time from ≥5 seconds for the following biopsies.
Group nº 2: A total of 8 samples with a freezing time of 3 seconds at least for the first biopsy and a freezing time from <5 seconds for the following biopsies.
Patient preselection:
Inclusion criteria
- Inpatients with suspected ILD based on clinical and radiological features
- Inpatients with probable pulmonary sarcoidosis without hilar or mediastinal lymph node enlargement
- Male or female patients aged ≥18 years
- Signed the informed consent
Exclusion criteria
- Bleeding risk:
- Known predisposition to bleeding
- International randomised ratio (INR) >1,5,
- Elevated partial thromboplastin time (PTT)
- Platelet count < 80000/ul)
- Patients who required full-dose therapeutic anticoagulation or double antiplatelet therapy which can not be stopped as recommended before the cryobiopsy
- Oxygen saturation < 90% with supported Oxygen 2l/min
- Diffusing capacity (DLCO) <35% or FVC< 50%
- Significant pulmonary emphysema
- Severe cardiac disease (angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction in the last 6 month, acute hearth failure)
- Documented pulmonary hypertension PAP sys >50mmHg
- Typical UIP-Pattern in HRCT
Patient's recruitment:
The recruited patients who present all characteristics of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and who signed the inform consent undergo cryobiopsy. All patients undergo a clinical evaluation.
After the clinical evaluation a MDD will take place. In the first MDD a provisional clinical diagnose is proposed. If a transbronchial cryobiopsy is indicated by the MDD, patients are randomised to the groups 1 or 2 immediate before the bronchoscopy.
Once the histological result is achieved, another MDD including the pathologist for establishing the definitive clinical diagnose take place. As all local pathologists of the participating centres are experienced in ILD, the samples are evaluated by the respective pathologist. If case of uncertainty, the samples can be evaluated by a second pathologist in one of the participating centres.
- Conditions
- Interstitial Lung Disease
- Being tested
- Cryobiopsy
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Diseases, Interstitial
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CryobiopsyProcedure or surgery
In this study the investigators want to evaluate the diagnostic yield comparing 2 different techniques of performing cryobiopsy. A shorter freezing time and more number of biopsies vs a longer freezing time and less number of biopsies would be compared. Patients are randomised to the groups 1 or 2 immediate before the bronchoscopy.
Group 1: a total of 3 samples with a freezing time of 7 seconds at least for the first biopsy and freezing time for 5 seconds or more for the followings biopsies Group 2: a total of 8 samples with a freezing time of 3 seconds at least for the first biopsy and freezing time for less than 5 seconds for the followings biopsies
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cryobiopsy: longer freezing time | Experimental | Group nº1: A total of 3 samples with a freezing time of 7 seconds at least for the first biopsy and a freezing time from ≥5 seconds for the following biopsies. Receives: Procedure: Cryobiopsy |
| Cryobiopsy: shorter freezing time | Experimental | Group nº 2: A total of 8 samples with a freezing time of 3 seconds at least for the first biopsy and a freezing time from <5 seconds for the following biopsies. Receives: Procedure: Cryobiopsy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diagnostic yield
The investigator will assess the proportion of patients in which a definitive diagnosis is possible after Multi-Disciplinary Discussion
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
Complications
Number of pneumothorax, bleeding and acute exacerbation.
Measured: 2 years
Number of diagnostic samples
Measured: 2 years
Correlation between the suspected clinical diagnosis and the histological diagnosis
Measured: 2 years
Correlation between between radiological pattern and final diagnosis
The investigator want to evaluate the patient rate in which the radiological pattern could be confirmed by histological finding
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Nov 2018
- Study start11 Sep 2018
- Primary completion11 May 2022
- Study completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Interstitial Lung DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Essen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Marta Cuyás
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kaid Darwiche, University Hospital, Essen
- Investigators
- Kaid Darwiche, Principal investigator, Head of department of inteventionel pneumology, Ruhrlandklinik Essen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03727568
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RLK-Kryo-1
- Other IDs
- 18-7951-BO
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 22 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 2 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Randomised Study Comparing Two Different Methods of Transbronchial Cryobiopsy in the Interstitial Lung Diseases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03727568
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RLK-Kryo-1
- Conditions
- Interstitial Lung Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, EssenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Marta Cuyás
- Study start
- 11 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 May 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are a heterogeneous collection of more than 100 different pulmonary disorders. Surgical lung biopsie in combination with multidisciplinary discussion is recommend in combination to reach a consensus diagnosis when the initial clinical evaluation is inconclusive in the diagnosis of ILD. Cryobiopsy via bronchoscopy is approved for lung biopsies and allows harvesting of large tissue samples of excellent. This technique is not jet standardized. In this prospective randomised study the investigators want to evaluate the diagnostic yield comparing two different techniques of performing transbronchial cryobiopsy. In this study would be compared a shorter freezing time and more number of biopsies vs a longer freezing time and less number of biopsies.
Detailed description
Design:
The investigators design a prospective randomised multicenter study to assess the diagnostic value of cryobiopsy in patients with suspected Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia by comparing two different interventional methods.
Patients with suspected ILD in which the clinical, radiological and BAL-data are insufficient to establish a definitive clinical diagnosis, requiring then tissue specimen to determine a diagnosis would be included.
Therefore this all patients will undergo transbronchial cryobiopsy. If a definitive diagnosis even after cryobiopsy and MDD cannot be made, SLB will be recommended.
For the cryobiopsies the 1.9 mm cryoprobe and ERBECRYO®2 with carbon dioxide will be used. All transbronchial cryobiopsies have to be obtained of one or two lobes of the same lung and in at least two different segments. The bronchopulmonary segment for the cryobiopsy will be selected based on the radiological features shown on a high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest. The areas with exclusively fibrotic changes should be avoided. After having touched the pleura with the cryopobe, the probe is retracted one to two centimetres and then in this position the freezing process will be initiated. The flexible bronchoscope with the inserted cryoprobe will be removed through the rigid bronchoscope after the sample was obtained.
The cryobiopsies can be performed in rigid or flexible bronchoscopy. The use of a Fogarty occlusion balloon is left to the discretion of the bronchoscopist.
Experimental Groups:
Group nº1: A total of 3 samples with a freezing time of 7 seconds at least for the first biopsy and a freezing time from ≥5 seconds for the following biopsies.
Group nº 2: A total of 8 samples with a freezing time of 3 seconds at least for the first biopsy and a freezing time from <5 seconds for the following biopsies.
Patient preselection:
Inclusion criteria
- Inpatients with suspected ILD based on clinical and radiological features
- Inpatients with probable pulmonary sarcoidosis without hilar or mediastinal lymph node enlargement
- Male or female patients aged ≥18 years
- Signed the informed consent
Exclusion criteria
- Bleeding risk:
- Known predisposition to bleeding
- International randomised ratio (INR) >1,5,
- Elevated partial thromboplastin time (PTT)
- Platelet count < 80000/ul)
- Patients who required full-dose therapeutic anticoagulation or double antiplatelet therapy which can not be stopped as recommended before the cryobiopsy
- Oxygen saturation < 90% with supported Oxygen 2l/min
- Diffusing capacity (DLCO) <35% or FVC< 50%
- Significant pulmonary emphysema
- Severe cardiac disease (angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction in the last 6 month, acute hearth failure)
- Documented pulmonary hypertension PAP sys >50mmHg
- Typical UIP-Pattern in HRCT
Patient's recruitment:
The recruited patients who present all characteristics of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and who signed the inform consent undergo cryobiopsy. All patients undergo a clinical evaluation.
After the clinical evaluation a MDD will take place. In the first MDD a provisional clinical diagnose is proposed. If a transbronchial cryobiopsy is indicated by the MDD, patients are randomised to the groups 1 or 2 immediate before the bronchoscopy.
Once the histological result is achieved, another MDD including the pathologist for establishing the definitive clinical diagnose take place. As all local pathologists of the participating centres are experienced in ILD, the samples are evaluated by the respective pathologist. If case of uncertainty, the samples can be evaluated by a second pathologist in one of the participating centres.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cryobiopsy: longer freezing time | Experimental | Procedure: CryobiopsyGroup nº1: A total of 3 samples with a freezing time of 7 seconds at least for the first biopsy and a freezing time from ≥5 seconds for the following biopsies. |
| Cryobiopsy: shorter freezing time | Experimental | Procedure: CryobiopsyGroup nº 2: A total of 8 samples with a freezing time of 3 seconds at least for the first biopsy and a freezing time from <5 seconds for the following biopsies. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Inpatients with suspected ILD based on clinical and radiological features
- Male or female patients aged ≥18 years
- Signed the informed consent
- Clinical indication to performed a lung biopsy in radiologically proven ILD
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Bleeding risk:
- Oxygen saturation < 90% with supported Oxygen 2l/min
- Severe bullous pulmonary emphysema
- Severe cardiac disease (angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction in the last 6 month, acute hearth failure)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CryobiopsyIn this study the investigators want to evaluate the diagnostic yield comparing 2 different techniques of performing cryobiopsy. A shorter freezing time and more number of biopsies vs a longer freezing time and less number of biopsies would be compared. Patients are randomised to the groups 1 or 2 immediate before the bronchoscopy. Group 1: a total of 3 samples with a freezing time of 7 seconds at least for the first biopsy and freezing time for 5 seconds or more for the followings biopsies Group 2: a total of 8 samples with a freezing time of 3 seconds at least for the first biopsy and freezing time for less than 5 seconds for the followings biopsies | Procedure or surgery | Cryobiopsy: longer freezing time, Cryobiopsy: shorter freezing time |
Primary outcome
Diagnostic yield
Time frame: 2 years
The investigator will assess the proportion of patients in which a definitive diagnosis is possible after Multi-Disciplinary Discussion
4 secondary outcomes
Complications
Time frame: 2 years
Number of diagnostic samples
Time frame: 2 years
Correlation between the suspected clinical diagnosis and the histological diagnosis
Time frame: 2 years
Correlation between between radiological pattern and final diagnosis
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Nov 2022.
Related trials for Interstitial Lung Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of PIPE 791 in Subjects With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Recruiting
Multi-site Study of the Clinical Impact of an AI-assisted Approach to Referring Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease for Diagnostic Evaluation of Pulmonary Hypertension
Pulmonary Hypertension, Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)
RecruitingObservational study
Registry for Patients With Erdheim-Chester Disease and Other Histiocytoses
Erdheim-Chester Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2 Study of LTI-03 in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2 Study of HB0056 in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kaid Darwiche principal investigator
Head of department of inteventionel pneumology, Ruhrlandklinik Essen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cryobiopsy in people with Interstitial Lung Disease, run by University Hospital, Essen at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diagnostic yield (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Nov 2022.