Psychological DistressNCT03730155
Compassion Cultivation Training (CCT): An Intervention for Caregivers
A study testing CCT intervention. in people with Psychological Distress, run by University of Aarhus at 2 sites in Denmark.
Trial summary
This study will begin a novel line of research on CCT in Denmark as a preventive intervention for caregivers of people suffering from a mental illness. The primary aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of a Compassion Cultivation Training (CCT) course on psychological distress of informal caregivers. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Psychological Distress
- What is being tested?
- CCT intervention.
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesDenmark
- Study dates
- 15 May 2018to 29 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- caregiver male and female (fx. parent /spouse/other family member) of a person with a mental illness,
- 18 - 75 years of age
- Danish speaking
- not pregnant.
Who cannot join
- having an untreated mental illness,
- addictions, or substance abuse
- meditation practice (studies have shown that people who are long-term meditation practitioners are more resilient and have greater psychological well-being (Lykins \& Baer, 2009). Therefore, people with 1 year or more of prior formal meditation practice, will not be eligible for the study as we cannot rule out whether their scores are due to their long-term practice or to the CCT intervention),
- or current psychotherapeutic treatment.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Denmark2 sites
Aarhus Universitet
Copenhagen, 2400
Aarhus University
Kolding, 6000
About this study
Official title: Compassion Cultivation Training (CCT): A Preventive Intervention for Caregivers of People Who Suffer From a Mental Illness
This study will begin a novel line of research on CCT in Denmark as a preventive intervention for caregivers of people suffering from a mental illness. The primary aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of a Compassion Cultivation Training (CCT) course on psychological distress of informal caregivers.
Read the detailed description
Hypothesis 1: It is hypothesized that caregivers in CCT will reduce psychological distress, relative to control participants, as measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) at baseline (T0), post intervention (T1), 3-month (T2) and 6-month (T3).
Hypothesis 2: It is hypothesized that caregivers in CCT, relative to control participants, will increase compassion for self and others, show greater acceptance of difficult emotions and decrease emotion suppression as measured by Self-Compassion Scale Short Form (SCS-12), Multidimensional Compassion Scale (MCS), Perceived Stress Scale, (PSS), The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)), The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-15), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) and WHO-5 measured at T0, T1, T2, and T3.
Hypothesis of Mechanisms: Improvements on these skills will mediate the effects of treatment and outcome. Specifically: a) increase in compassion for self and others (SCS-12 and MCS) will mediate the effects of emotion regulation skills (i.e. greater acceptance of difficult emotions and therefore less suppression of difficult emotions) and b) increase in emotion regulation skills (ERQ) (i.e. greater acceptance of difficult emotions and therefore less suppression of difficult emotions) will mediate the effects of psychological distress (DASS) in informal caregivers.
Methods Research design The effect of CCT will be evaluated in a parallel randomised controlled trial including 77 participants in the intervention group and 77 in a wait-list group.
Participants will be recruited through primary care physicians. The Danish Center for Mindfulness, Aarhus University has a good history of recruiting participants for their trials, due to well established relationships primary care physicians. Recruitment will also be carried out in collaboration with the national association for caregivers; Bedre Psykiatri, Landsforeningen for pårørende (Better Psychiatry, national association for caregivers), through Psykiatrifonden (The Danish Mental Health Fund), who acknowledge and support this research as they are keenly aware of the great need for interventions for informal caregivers. Lastly, we will recruit through social media such as Facebook, Twitter, and the Danish Center for Mindfulness website. Randomization After informed consent and T (0) measures, participants will be randomized to either CCT (N=77) or waitlist control group (N=77) using a computer algorithm with predefined, concealed random numbers. An independent statistician will manage the randomization by giving all registered participants either a number of "1" or "2" in sequence. The participants with "1" will be assigned to the immediate intervention group and those with "2" to a waitlist control group. We will not use "treatment" or "control" group to mention the allocation. All subjects will be told that they will be arranged into two groups to attend the CCT session separately due to resource limitations. The independent clinical assistant will call participants to let them know the group they belong to, either the immediate group or the waitlist group.
Procedure Eligible participants, meeting all study criteria, are asked to participate in the Randomized Controlled Trail (RCT). All participants will be given psychological, and demographic measurements at baseline (T0), and psychological measures at post intervention (T1), 3-month follow-up (T2) and 6-month follow-up (T3), The study will be registered in ClinicalTrails.gov before commencement. The investigators will specifically ask that the participants in the waitlist control group do not start any other intervention during the study period.
Data Collection Eligible participants will receive an email with a link to the measurements that must be filled out online from their homes at baseline and is a requirement to be able to participate in the study. At post intervention, and the three and six-month follow up participants will again receive an email asking them to fill out the questionnaires packet online using the link in the email. The data will be collected in a secure university approved system, RedCap. Follow-up emails, phone calls, and text message reminders will be sent out encouraging participants to fill out the surveys if they have not already done so.
Intervention:
CCT is an eight-week group based two-hour course and incorporates practices of compassion, mindfulness, and meditation, with scientific research on compassion and related topics in the fields of psychology and neurology along with contemplative thinking.
CCT is a psycho-educational course and each week participants engage with material on the cultivation of compassion and other related topics, class discussions, formal meditations, and dyadic exercises. Participants are asked to meditate daily at home for 20-25 minutes on guided compassion meditations accessed through the website www.centerforcompassion.dk and engage in informal compassion practices. The CCT course is curriculum-based and consists of 6 steps. Step 1 involves learning to focus and settle the mind. Step 2 involves cultivating the psychosomatic experiences of warmth and caring for a loved one. Step 3 involves training compassion and loving kindness for oneself. Step 4 involves cultivating compassion towards others through embracing our shared common humanity and appreciating the interconnectedness of self and others. Step 5 involves training compassion towards all beings, and step 6 involves an ''active compassion'' practice where participants imagine taking away others' pain and sorrow and offering them one's own joy and happiness (Jinpa, 2010).
Compliance and attrition Treatment compliance will be assessed by recording the number of completed CCT sessions, and by having participants fill out a daily practice log as research has shown that positive outcomes are dose dependent (Jazaieri et al., 2015). When applicable, participants will be asked for their reasons for poor compliance/drop-out and asked to continue participation in the assessments until six-months follow-up. Any adverse effects, reported by participants or observed by investigators, will be recorded and reported to the Research Ethics Committee (Duggan et al., 2014). An intention to treat (ITT) analysis will be used to circumvent noncompliance and missing outcomes, and to provide an unbiased estimate of treatment effects. When applicable, participants will be asked for their reasons for poor compliance/drop-out and asked to continue participation in the assessments until six-months follow-up.
Measures
Statistical Analysis:
We will compare the outcome variables (DASS, PSS, SCS-12, MCS, ERQ, BRS, FFMQ-15, and WHO-5) correcting for multiple comparisons where appropriate using the Student t or Wilcoxon tests. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) will be conducted to assess whether CCT is related to changes between baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention in relation to psychological distress.
The four measurement points allow to test whether changes in the proposed mediators are associated with changes in the proposed outcomes. This is a crucial condition in order to investigate mediators and possible mechanisms (Kazdin A.E., 2007). We will use structural equation modelling to examine the proposed mechanisms of CCT by testing the following action theories and conceptual theories simultaneously (Chen, H-T., 1994; Goldsmith et al., 2018).
The current project assumes two conceptual theories, which will be tested: 1) changes in compassion for self and others will affect psychological distress (DASS) and 2) changes in emotion regulation skills of reappraisal and suppression (ERQ) will affect psychological distress (DASS). The action theories, that CCT changes 1) compassion for self (SCS-12) and others (MCS) and 2) emotion regulation skills of reappraisal and suppression (ERQ), will be tested. The indirect, direct and total effects will be estimated with 95% CI inspired by a framework suggested by Goldsmith et al., (2018). The statistical package M-Plus will be applied.
We will also use a random-effects repeated measures analysis to examine the impact of the CCT intervention on psychological distress, adjusting for confounding variables (age, gender, ethnicity, socio-economic status, and years as informal caretaker). The repeated measure analysis approach accounts for the same individual's different outcome measures across different points in time without assuming either linear or curvilinear growth pattern. Cronbach alpha's will be computed to determine the internal consistency of our outcome measures.
Power:
The sample size was calculated using effect sizes from related publications (Jazaieri et al., 2013, 2014, 2015, Kuhlmann et al., 2015, Galante, et al., 2014, \& Brito-Pons, 2014), respective η-square-values, and Cohen's d) with G*Power. The power analysis gave an approximate value of a minimum of 77 participants in both groups where we expect a medium effect size of .5 Cohen's d (alpha .05, power 80%). A minimum of 77 participants per group allows for an attrition rate of 20%, which will give us a minimum sample size of 64 participants per group. Four groups of approximately 20 participants per group will be given the CCT intervention.
Timeline 2018: Address the key points highlighted by the CCT participants who have taken the course (1-2 months). Ethics application has been approved (1 month). Recruitment of participants has begun (1 month -ongoing). A systematic review article: Mental health interventions for caregivers of people with mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis has been accepted by Prospero. (approved in July and will conclude in December 2018). Teach the first CCT course (20 participants) as part of the RCT in Southern Jutland (November -December 2018).
2019: Continue to deliver the main RCT (CCT versus wait list) intervention. Three CCT courses will be taught with approximately 20 participants in each class (January - April 2019). Begin collecting and interpreting data from participants (April - December 2019) and prepare second article: 'CCT for Caregivers: A randomized controlled trial' (November - December 2019).
2020: Collect and interpret final data from participants (January 2019), write dissertation and article on the main study. The article 'Compassion for Caregivers: Can compassion be utilized as an emotion regulation strategy in decreasing psychological distress?' (February - September 2020).
Research group:
Lone Fjorback (LF), Ph.D., MD is director of the Danish Mindfulness Centre, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University with extensive expertise in clinical psychiatry and in constructing, advising and conducting high-quality research in the mindfulness field. Lone Fjorback is the main supervisor and principle investigator on this project.
Nanja Holland Hansen (NHH), cand.psych.aut and Ph.D.-student with Danish Center for Mindfulness, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, will carry out the intervention as she is a senior level CCT instructor. Nanja has extensive knowledge on compassion and compassion training. She was trained at Stanford University with some of the world's top experts in compassion and compassion training. She is also an experienced clinical psychologist and has worked nationally and internationally with a wide range of diverse populations and clinical issues.
Christine Parsons (CP), Ph.D. is an Associate Professor, with expertise in psychological science and neuroscience, from Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University and Oxford University. Christine has extensive knowledge regarding psychometric properties, statistical analysis and is a formidable researcher.
Lise Juul (LJ), Ph.D., is an Associate professor at Danish Center for Mindfulness, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University. She has expertise in evaluating public health interventions and has conducted RCTs in real life settings and is highly competent within mediation analysis.
Karen-Johanne Pallesen (KJP) Ph.D., is an Associate Professor at the Danish Center for Mindfulness, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University. Her expertise lies within the field of neuropsychology, cognitive science, and cognitive psychology.
On an advisory level, Leah Weiss (LW), PhD, a member of the founding faculty of the CCT program with the Compassion Institute, USA and Stanford University will collaborate on any CCT related issues, such as teaching concerns and CCT material.
Plan for dissemination Both positive and negative research results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at international and national conferences and disseminated via media such as facebook, twitter, and the Danish Center for Mindfulness website. Knowledge about how to help informal caregivers and how to increase compassion will be shared with relevant organizations. The Danish Center for Mindfulness will continue to share the results that come out of the research. We already know, based on the pilot data, that the CCT course is feasible within a Danish context and for professional caregivers (i.e. doctors, psychologists, nurses etc.). These results have already been disseminated at two international conferences: The International Conference on Mindfulness, Amsterdam, Holland, Summer 2018, and Mind and Life Summer Research Institute, Germany, 2018.
Perspective The knowledge gained from this research will lead to a greater understanding of whether an 8-week compassion training course for informal caregivers is feasible but also the effect of the CCT course and possibility to ease the burden of being a caregiver. This is extremely important knowledge for implementation and improving current practice for informal caregivers.
- Conditions
- Psychological Distress
- Being tested
- CCT intervention.
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CCT intervention.Other
8-week course with 2 hours sessions weekly. Participants should meditate 25 min. pr. day during the 8 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CCT intervention | Experimental | CCT intervention. 8 weeks with 2 hours session every week. Homework approx. 25 min. of meditation daily. Receives: Other: CCT intervention. |
| Control waitlist | No intervention | No treatment given. Participants only answer questionnaire packages. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change is being assessed: Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS: Lovibond, S.H. & Lovibond, P.F., 1995)
The DASS is a 42-item self report instrument designed to measure the three related negative emotional states of depression, anxiety and tension/stress.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
Secondary outcomes (8)
Change is being assessed: Perceived Stress Scale, (PSS: Cohen et al., 1983)
The PSS assesses the perceived stress within the last month. It is a 14 item self-report questionnaire using a 5 point-likest scale.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
Change is being assessed: The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ: Gross & John, 2003).
The ERQ is a 10-item scale designed to measure respondents' tendency to regulate their emotions in two ways: 1. Cognitive Reappraisal and 2. Expressive Suppression. Respondents answer each item on a 7-point Likert-type scale.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
Change is being assessed: Self-compassion Scale -12 (SCS-12: Raes et al., 2011).
The SCS is a 12-item scale is designed to measure respondents level of self-compassion. Respondents answer on a 5-point Likert scale.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
Change is being assessed: Multidimensional Compassion Scale (MCS: Jazaieri et al., 2018)
The MCS scale is a general measure of compassion with four components: Cognitive, affective, intentional, and motivational. The scale is comprised of 16 questions and respondents answer on a 7-point Likert scale.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
Change is being assessed: Five Facet Mindfulness Scale (FFMQ-15: Baer et al., 2006).
The FFMQ is a 15-item scale measuring mindfulness. Respondents answer on a 5-point Likert Scale.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
Change is being assessed: Brief Resilience Scale (BRS: Smith B. W. et al., 2008)
The brief resilience scale (BRS) is a 6-item scale assessing the ability to bounce back or recover from stress.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
Change is being assessed: Working Alliance Inventory Short Form Revised (WAI-SR: Horvath, A. O. et al (1989) & Tracey, T. J., & Kokotovic, A. M. (1989)).
The WAI-SR is a 12-item scale measuring three domains of the therapeutic alliance: (a) agreement between patient and therapist on the goals of the treatment (Goal); (b) agreement between patient and therapist about the tasks to achieve these goals (Task); and (c) the quality of the bond between the patient and therapist (Bond). The WAI-SR is a patient-rated questionnaire. Patients rate items on a 5-point Likert scale
Measured: week 2 and week 8 of the 8 week CCT program
Change is being assessed: The World Health Organisation- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5: Topp C.W. et al, 2015; Bech, P., 2012)
The World Health Organisation- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is a short self-reported measure of current mental wellbeing. The WHO-5 consists of five statements, which respondents rate according to the scale.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Nov 2018
- Study start15 May 2018
- Primary completion20 Dec 2019
- Study completion29 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (25)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Psychological DistressStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AarhusThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Aarhus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lone Fjorback, MD, Study director, Aarhus University, Danish Center for mindfulness
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03730155
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Compassion2018
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 24 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 26 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Jinpa, T. (2010). Compassion cultivation training program (CCT program): An eight-week course on cultivation a compassionate heart and mindset. Instructor's Manual. The Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education (CCARE). Stanford Institute for Neuro-Innovation and Translational Neuroscience, Stanford University (Unpublished).
Jazaieri, H., Lee, I.A., McGonigal, K., Jinpa, T., Doty, J.R., Gross, J.J., & Goldin, P.R.,(2015). A wandering mind is a less caring mind: Daily experience sampling during compassion meditation training. The Journal of Positive Psychology, Routledge
Duggan C, Parry G, McMurran M, Davidson K, Dennis J. The recording of adverse events from psychological treatments in clinical trials: evidence from a review of NIHR-funded trials. Trials. 2014 Aug 27;15:335. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-335.
PubMed 25158932Kazdin AE. Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:1-27. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091432.
PubMed 17716046Chen, H-T., (1994). Theory-driven evaluations: Need, difficulties, and option. American Journal of Evaluations, 15, pp. 79-82.
Goldsmith KA, MacKinnon DP, Chalder T, White PD, Sharpe M, Pickles A. Tutorial: The practical application of longitudinal structural equation mediation models in clinical trials. Psychol Methods. 2018 Jun;23(2):191-207. doi: 10.1037/met0000154. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
PubMed 29283590Jazaieri, H., Jinpa, T., McGonigal, K., Rosenberg, E., Finkelstein, J., Simon-Thomas, E., & Goldin, P.R. (2013). Enhancing compassion: randomized controlled trial of a compassion cultivation training program. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, pp. 1113-1126.
Kuhlmann SM, Burger A, Esser G, Hammerle F. A mindfulness-based stress prevention training for medical students (MediMind): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Feb 8;16:40. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0533-9.
PubMed 25887430Galante J, Galante I, Bekkers MJ, Gallacher J. Effect of kindness-based meditation on health and well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Dec;82(6):1101-14. doi: 10.1037/a0037249. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
PubMed 24979314Brito, G.P. (2014). Cultivating healthy minds and open hearts. A mixed method controlled study on the psychological effects of compassion cultivation training in Chile. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in transpersonal psychology, Sofia University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
PubMed 6668417Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):348-62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.
PubMed 12916575Raes F, Pommier E, Neff KD, Van Gucht D. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):250-5. doi: 10.1002/cpp.702. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
PubMed 21584907Jazaieri, H., McGonigal, K., Jinpa, T., Doty, J.R., Gross, J.J., & Goldin, P.R. (2014). A randomized controlled trial of compassion cultivation training: Effects on mindfulness, affect, and emotion regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 38, pp. 23-35
Jazaieri, H., Lee, I.A., McGonigal, K., Jinpa, T., Doty, J.R., Gross, J.J., & Goldin, P.R.,(2015). A wandering mind is a less caring mind: Daily experience sampling during compassion meditation training. The Journal of Positive Psychology, Routledge.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Compassion Cultivation Training (CCT): A Preventive Intervention for Caregivers of People Who Suffer From a Mental Illness
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03730155
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Compassion2018
- Conditions
- Psychological Distress
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AarhusUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 May 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will begin a novel line of research on CCT in Denmark as a preventive intervention for caregivers of people suffering from a mental illness. The primary aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of a Compassion Cultivation Training (CCT) course on psychological distress of informal caregivers.
Detailed description
Hypothesis 1: It is hypothesized that caregivers in CCT will reduce psychological distress, relative to control participants, as measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) at baseline (T0), post intervention (T1), 3-month (T2) and 6-month (T3).
Hypothesis 2: It is hypothesized that caregivers in CCT, relative to control participants, will increase compassion for self and others, show greater acceptance of difficult emotions and decrease emotion suppression as measured by Self-Compassion Scale Short Form (SCS-12), Multidimensional Compassion Scale (MCS), Perceived Stress Scale, (PSS), The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)), The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-15), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) and WHO-5 measured at T0, T1, T2, and T3.
Hypothesis of Mechanisms: Improvements on these skills will mediate the effects of treatment and outcome. Specifically: a) increase in compassion for self and others (SCS-12 and MCS) will mediate the effects of emotion regulation skills (i.e. greater acceptance of difficult emotions and therefore less suppression of difficult emotions) and b) increase in emotion regulation skills (ERQ) (i.e. greater acceptance of difficult emotions and therefore less suppression of difficult emotions) will mediate the effects of psychological distress (DASS) in informal caregivers.
Methods Research design The effect of CCT will be evaluated in a parallel randomised controlled trial including 77 participants in the intervention group and 77 in a wait-list group.
Participants will be recruited through primary care physicians. The Danish Center for Mindfulness, Aarhus University has a good history of recruiting participants for their trials, due to well established relationships primary care physicians. Recruitment will also be carried out in collaboration with the national association for caregivers; Bedre Psykiatri, Landsforeningen for pårørende (Better Psychiatry, national association for caregivers), through Psykiatrifonden (The Danish Mental Health Fund), who acknowledge and support this research as they are keenly aware of the great need for interventions for informal caregivers. Lastly, we will recruit through social media such as Facebook, Twitter, and the Danish Center for Mindfulness website. Randomization After informed consent and T (0) measures, participants will be randomized to either CCT (N=77) or waitlist control group (N=77) using a computer algorithm with predefined, concealed random numbers. An independent statistician will manage the randomization by giving all registered participants either a number of "1" or "2" in sequence. The participants with "1" will be assigned to the immediate intervention group and those with "2" to a waitlist control group. We will not use "treatment" or "control" group to mention the allocation. All subjects will be told that they will be arranged into two groups to attend the CCT session separately due to resource limitations. The independent clinical assistant will call participants to let them know the group they belong to, either the immediate group or the waitlist group.
Procedure Eligible participants, meeting all study criteria, are asked to participate in the Randomized Controlled Trail (RCT). All participants will be given psychological, and demographic measurements at baseline (T0), and psychological measures at post intervention (T1), 3-month follow-up (T2) and 6-month follow-up (T3), The study will be registered in ClinicalTrails.gov before commencement. The investigators will specifically ask that the participants in the waitlist control group do not start any other intervention during the study period.
Data Collection Eligible participants will receive an email with a link to the measurements that must be filled out online from their homes at baseline and is a requirement to be able to participate in the study. At post intervention, and the three and six-month follow up participants will again receive an email asking them to fill out the questionnaires packet online using the link in the email. The data will be collected in a secure university approved system, RedCap. Follow-up emails, phone calls, and text message reminders will be sent out encouraging participants to fill out the surveys if they have not already done so.
Intervention:
CCT is an eight-week group based two-hour course and incorporates practices of compassion, mindfulness, and meditation, with scientific research on compassion and related topics in the fields of psychology and neurology along with contemplative thinking.
CCT is a psycho-educational course and each week participants engage with material on the cultivation of compassion and other related topics, class discussions, formal meditations, and dyadic exercises. Participants are asked to meditate daily at home for 20-25 minutes on guided compassion meditations accessed through the website www.centerforcompassion.dk and engage in informal compassion practices. The CCT course is curriculum-based and consists of 6 steps. Step 1 involves learning to focus and settle the mind. Step 2 involves cultivating the psychosomatic experiences of warmth and caring for a loved one. Step 3 involves training compassion and loving kindness for oneself. Step 4 involves cultivating compassion towards others through embracing our shared common humanity and appreciating the interconnectedness of self and others. Step 5 involves training compassion towards all beings, and step 6 involves an ''active compassion'' practice where participants imagine taking away others' pain and sorrow and offering them one's own joy and happiness (Jinpa, 2010).
Compliance and attrition Treatment compliance will be assessed by recording the number of completed CCT sessions, and by having participants fill out a daily practice log as research has shown that positive outcomes are dose dependent (Jazaieri et al., 2015). When applicable, participants will be asked for their reasons for poor compliance/drop-out and asked to continue participation in the assessments until six-months follow-up. Any adverse effects, reported by participants or observed by investigators, will be recorded and reported to the Research Ethics Committee (Duggan et al., 2014). An intention to treat (ITT) analysis will be used to circumvent noncompliance and missing outcomes, and to provide an unbiased estimate of treatment effects. When applicable, participants will be asked for their reasons for poor compliance/drop-out and asked to continue participation in the assessments until six-months follow-up.
Measures
Statistical Analysis:
We will compare the outcome variables (DASS, PSS, SCS-12, MCS, ERQ, BRS, FFMQ-15, and WHO-5) correcting for multiple comparisons where appropriate using the Student t or Wilcoxon tests. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) will be conducted to assess whether CCT is related to changes between baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention in relation to psychological distress.
The four measurement points allow to test whether changes in the proposed mediators are associated with changes in the proposed outcomes. This is a crucial condition in order to investigate mediators and possible mechanisms (Kazdin A.E., 2007). We will use structural equation modelling to examine the proposed mechanisms of CCT by testing the following action theories and conceptual theories simultaneously (Chen, H-T., 1994; Goldsmith et al., 2018).
The current project assumes two conceptual theories, which will be tested: 1) changes in compassion for self and others will affect psychological distress (DASS) and 2) changes in emotion regulation skills of reappraisal and suppression (ERQ) will affect psychological distress (DASS). The action theories, that CCT changes 1) compassion for self (SCS-12) and others (MCS) and 2) emotion regulation skills of reappraisal and suppression (ERQ), will be tested. The indirect, direct and total effects will be estimated with 95% CI inspired by a framework suggested by Goldsmith et al., (2018). The statistical package M-Plus will be applied.
We will also use a random-effects repeated measures analysis to examine the impact of the CCT intervention on psychological distress, adjusting for confounding variables (age, gender, ethnicity, socio-economic status, and years as informal caretaker). The repeated measure analysis approach accounts for the same individual's different outcome measures across different points in time without assuming either linear or curvilinear growth pattern. Cronbach alpha's will be computed to determine the internal consistency of our outcome measures.
Power:
The sample size was calculated using effect sizes from related publications (Jazaieri et al., 2013, 2014, 2015, Kuhlmann et al., 2015, Galante, et al., 2014, \& Brito-Pons, 2014), respective η-square-values, and Cohen's d) with G*Power. The power analysis gave an approximate value of a minimum of 77 participants in both groups where we expect a medium effect size of .5 Cohen's d (alpha .05, power 80%). A minimum of 77 participants per group allows for an attrition rate of 20%, which will give us a minimum sample size of 64 participants per group. Four groups of approximately 20 participants per group will be given the CCT intervention.
Timeline 2018: Address the key points highlighted by the CCT participants who have taken the course (1-2 months). Ethics application has been approved (1 month). Recruitment of participants has begun (1 month -ongoing). A systematic review article: Mental health interventions for caregivers of people with mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis has been accepted by Prospero. (approved in July and will conclude in December 2018). Teach the first CCT course (20 participants) as part of the RCT in Southern Jutland (November -December 2018).
2019: Continue to deliver the main RCT (CCT versus wait list) intervention. Three CCT courses will be taught with approximately 20 participants in each class (January - April 2019). Begin collecting and interpreting data from participants (April - December 2019) and prepare second article: 'CCT for Caregivers: A randomized controlled trial' (November - December 2019).
2020: Collect and interpret final data from participants (January 2019), write dissertation and article on the main study. The article 'Compassion for Caregivers: Can compassion be utilized as an emotion regulation strategy in decreasing psychological distress?' (February - September 2020).
Research group:
Lone Fjorback (LF), Ph.D., MD is director of the Danish Mindfulness Centre, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University with extensive expertise in clinical psychiatry and in constructing, advising and conducting high-quality research in the mindfulness field. Lone Fjorback is the main supervisor and principle investigator on this project.
Nanja Holland Hansen (NHH), cand.psych.aut and Ph.D.-student with Danish Center for Mindfulness, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, will carry out the intervention as she is a senior level CCT instructor. Nanja has extensive knowledge on compassion and compassion training. She was trained at Stanford University with some of the world's top experts in compassion and compassion training. She is also an experienced clinical psychologist and has worked nationally and internationally with a wide range of diverse populations and clinical issues.
Christine Parsons (CP), Ph.D. is an Associate Professor, with expertise in psychological science and neuroscience, from Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University and Oxford University. Christine has extensive knowledge regarding psychometric properties, statistical analysis and is a formidable researcher.
Lise Juul (LJ), Ph.D., is an Associate professor at Danish Center for Mindfulness, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University. She has expertise in evaluating public health interventions and has conducted RCTs in real life settings and is highly competent within mediation analysis.
Karen-Johanne Pallesen (KJP) Ph.D., is an Associate Professor at the Danish Center for Mindfulness, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University. Her expertise lies within the field of neuropsychology, cognitive science, and cognitive psychology.
On an advisory level, Leah Weiss (LW), PhD, a member of the founding faculty of the CCT program with the Compassion Institute, USA and Stanford University will collaborate on any CCT related issues, such as teaching concerns and CCT material.
Plan for dissemination Both positive and negative research results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at international and national conferences and disseminated via media such as facebook, twitter, and the Danish Center for Mindfulness website. Knowledge about how to help informal caregivers and how to increase compassion will be shared with relevant organizations. The Danish Center for Mindfulness will continue to share the results that come out of the research. We already know, based on the pilot data, that the CCT course is feasible within a Danish context and for professional caregivers (i.e. doctors, psychologists, nurses etc.). These results have already been disseminated at two international conferences: The International Conference on Mindfulness, Amsterdam, Holland, Summer 2018, and Mind and Life Summer Research Institute, Germany, 2018.
Perspective The knowledge gained from this research will lead to a greater understanding of whether an 8-week compassion training course for informal caregivers is feasible but also the effect of the CCT course and possibility to ease the burden of being a caregiver. This is extremely important knowledge for implementation and improving current practice for informal caregivers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CCT intervention | Experimental | Other: CCT intervention.CCT intervention. 8 weeks with 2 hours session every week. Homework approx. 25 min. of meditation daily. |
| Control waitlist | No intervention | –No treatment given. Participants only answer questionnaire packages. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- caregiver male and female (fx. parent /spouse/other family member) of a person with a mental illness,
- 18 - 75 years of age
- Danish speaking
- not pregnant.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- having an untreated mental illness,
- addictions, or substance abuse
- meditation practice (studies have shown that people who are long-term meditation practitioners are more resilient and have greater psychological well-being (Lykins \& Baer, 2009). Therefore, people with 1 year or more of prior formal meditation practice, will not be eligible for the study as we cannot rule out whether their scores are due to their long-term practice or to the CCT intervention),
- or current psychotherapeutic treatment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CCT intervention.8-week course with 2 hours sessions weekly. Participants should meditate 25 min. pr. day during the 8 weeks. | Other | CCT intervention |
Primary outcome
Change is being assessed: Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS: Lovibond, S.H. & Lovibond, P.F., 1995)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
The DASS is a 42-item self report instrument designed to measure the three related negative emotional states of depression, anxiety and tension/stress.
8 secondary outcomes
Change is being assessed: Perceived Stress Scale, (PSS: Cohen et al., 1983)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
Change is being assessed: The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ: Gross & John, 2003).
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
Change is being assessed: Self-compassion Scale -12 (SCS-12: Raes et al., 2011).
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
Change is being assessed: Multidimensional Compassion Scale (MCS: Jazaieri et al., 2018)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
Change is being assessed: Five Facet Mindfulness Scale (FFMQ-15: Baer et al., 2006).
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
Change is being assessed: Brief Resilience Scale (BRS: Smith B. W. et al., 2008)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
Change is being assessed: Working Alliance Inventory Short Form Revised (WAI-SR: Horvath, A. O. et al (1989) & Tracey, T. J., & Kokotovic, A. M. (1989)).
Time frame: week 2 and week 8 of the 8 week CCT program
Change is being assessed: The World Health Organisation- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5: Topp C.W. et al, 2015; Bech, P., 2012)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Mar 2020.
- BackgroundJinpa, T. (2010). Compassion cultivation training program (CCT program): An eight-week course on cultivation a compassionate heart and mindset. Instructor's Manual. The Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education (CCARE). Stanford Institute for Neuro-Innovation and Translational Neuroscience, Stanford University (Unpublished).
- BackgroundJazaieri, H., Lee, I.A., McGonigal, K., Jinpa, T., Doty, J.R., Gross, J.J., & Goldin, P.R.,(2015). A wandering mind is a less caring mind: Daily experience sampling during compassion meditation training. The Journal of Positive Psychology, Routledge
- Background: PubMed 25158932Duggan C, Parry G, McMurran M, Davidson K, Dennis J. The recording of adverse events from psychological treatments in clinical trials: evidence from a review of NIHR-funded trials. Trials. 2014 Aug 27;15:335. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-335.
- Background: PubMed 17716046Kazdin AE. Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:1-27. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091432.
- BackgroundChen, H-T., (1994). Theory-driven evaluations: Need, difficulties, and option. American Journal of Evaluations, 15, pp. 79-82.
- Background: PubMed 29283590Goldsmith KA, MacKinnon DP, Chalder T, White PD, Sharpe M, Pickles A. Tutorial: The practical application of longitudinal structural equation mediation models in clinical trials. Psychol Methods. 2018 Jun;23(2):191-207. doi: 10.1037/met0000154. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
- BackgroundJazaieri, H., Jinpa, T., McGonigal, K., Rosenberg, E., Finkelstein, J., Simon-Thomas, E., & Goldin, P.R. (2013). Enhancing compassion: randomized controlled trial of a compassion cultivation training program. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, pp. 1113-1126.
- Background: PubMed 25887430Kuhlmann SM, Burger A, Esser G, Hammerle F. A mindfulness-based stress prevention training for medical students (MediMind): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Feb 8;16:40. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0533-9.
- Background: PubMed 24979314Galante J, Galante I, Bekkers MJ, Gallacher J. Effect of kindness-based meditation on health and well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Dec;82(6):1101-14. doi: 10.1037/a0037249. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
- BackgroundBrito, G.P. (2014). Cultivating healthy minds and open hearts. A mixed method controlled study on the psychological effects of compassion cultivation training in Chile. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in transpersonal psychology, Sofia University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
- Background: PubMed 6668417Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 12916575Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):348-62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Psychological Distress
Recruiting
The Trans-Led Care Study
Substance Abuse, Substance Addiction
Not yet recruiting
Hand in Hand: Feasibility of a Compassion-Focused App to Support Parents of Children With Mental Health Problems
Physiological Conditions, Distress, Emotional
Recruiting
Effects of a Mindful Self-Compassion Intervention on Psychological Adjustment in Breast Cancer Survivors
Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
HRVB for Stress and Anxiety During Dentistry Students' Clinical Transition
Stress (Psychology), Anxiety
Active, not recruiting
Self-Help Plus (SH+) for Stress Reduction in Social Service Workers: A Pilot RCT
Stress, Psychological, Occupational, Stress, Psychological
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lone Fjorback, MD study director
Aarhus University, Danish Center for mindfulness
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CCT intervention. in people with Psychological Distress, run by University of Aarhus at 2 sites in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change is being assessed: Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS: Lovibond, S.H. & Lovibond, P.F., 1995) (time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-months and 6-months follow up.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03730155, which also lists 25 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2020.