Khat AbuseKhatAssistNCT03730805
The Adaptation and Evaluation of the WHO's ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention to Khat-Using Ethiopian University Students
A study testing ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention, Induction of Deliberative Mindset and Induction of Implemental Mindset in people with Khat Abuse, run by University of Konstanz at 1 site in Ethiopia.
Trial summary
The leaves of the khat tree (catha edulis) are traditionally chewed in the countries around the Horn of Africa. They contain the amphetamine-like alkaloid cathinone and their use can produce a Substance Use Disorder. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Khat Abuse
- What is being tested?
- ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention, Induction of Deliberative Mindset and Induction of Implemental Mindset
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 307 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEthiopia
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2018to 31 Jan 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- second year student or higher year student at Jimma University
- khat use in the month prior to baseline
- participant's wish to reduce or stop khat use
Who cannot join
- severe substance use, except khat
- inability to read and write Amharic or Oromo languages
- ongoing acute episode of severe mental disorder
- current suicidal ideation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The leaves of the khat tree (catha edulis) are traditionally chewed in the countries around the Horn of Africa. They contain the amphetamine-like alkaloid cathinone and their use can produce a Substance Use Disorder. The researchers intent to validate an Amharic and an Oromo version of the WHO's ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention among khat-using Ethiopian university students. In an RCT, khat using students of Jimma University with initial motivation to stop or cut down khat use will be randomised to either an intervention or a control group. In the intervention group, the WHO's ASSIST-linked BI will be delivered in a single session by trained local counsellors. In the control group, participants will receive a neuropsychological assessment (Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices, SPM; Raven, 1972). Khat use, the neuropsychological variables and psychiatric symptoms will be assessed before the intervention and two weeks after it. Additionally, the researchers will measure the participants resistance during the session. The control group will receive the intervention after the post test. In order to study state variables that influence brief intervention effectivity, e.g. by increasing or reducing resistance, the researchers randomise subjects in each study arm to several short pre-interventions that are based on Gollwitzer's empirically well established Mindset Theory of Action Phases (for summary: Gollwitzer \& Keller, 2016). This means, before delivering the ASSIST-linked BI (intervention group) or before the SPM assessment (controlgroup) a specific psychological state will be induced by a brief writing task that theoretically should affect the openness to the intervention: (1) implemental mindset, (2) deliberative mindset, (3) no mindset induction. The researchers expect that khat use will be reduced more in the intervention condition compared to the control condition and that induced states influence the effectiveness of the intervention.
- Conditions
- Khat Abuse
- Being tested
- ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention, Induction of Deliberative Mindset, Induction of Implemental Mindset
- Keywords
- Catha Edulis, Khat, Qat, Khat Use Disorder, Screening and Brief Intervention, ASSIST
- Medical subject headings
- Helping Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ASSIST-linked Brief InterventionBehavioural
Also called Screening and Brief Intervention
The intervention follows the WHO's ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention (Humenik et al., 2012; Humeniuk et al., 2010), a manualized one-session intervention that can be categorised as belonging to the Screening and Brief Intervention approach. It follows the FRAMES model (Bien et al., 1993) and contains techniques from Motivational Interviewing (Miller \& Rollnick, 1991).
Induction of Deliberative MindsetBehavioural
Also called Induction of Open Mindset
Based on the Mindset Theory of Action Phases (Gollwitzer \& Keller, 2016), a brief writing task (writing down pros and cons for an unresolved personal problem of the participant's own choice) is used to induce a specific psychological state in which the individual is cognitively open to process new information.
Induction of Implemental MindsetBehavioural
Also called Induction of Closed Mindset
Based on the Mindset Theory of Action Phases (Gollwitzer \& Keller, 2016), a brief writing task (writing down steps necessary to implement a personal decision of the participant's choice that has not yet been put into practice) is used to induce a specific psychological state in which the individual is cognitively not open to process new information.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention + open mindset | Experimental | ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention plus prior induction of deliberative mindset Receives: Behavioral: ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention; Behavioral: Induction of Deliberative Mindset |
| Intervention + closed mindset | Experimental | ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention plus prior induction of closed mindset Receives: Behavioral: ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention; Behavioral: Induction of Implemental Mindset |
| Intervention alone | Experimental | ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention without prior induction of any mindset Receives: Behavioral: ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention |
| Control + open mindset | Experimental | In stead of intervention, a neuropsychological assessment (Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices; SPM; Raven, 1940) with prior induction of an open mindset is conduced. Receives: Behavioral: Induction of Deliberative Mindset |
| Control + closed mindset | Experimental | In stead of intervention, a neuropsychological assessment (Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices; SPM; Raven, 1940) with prior induction of a closed mindset is conduced. Receives: Behavioral: Induction of Implemental Mindset |
| Control alone | No intervention | In stead of intervention, a neuropsychological assessment (Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices; SPM; Raven, 1940) without prior induction of any mindset is conduced. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
khat use quantity (standard units)
The researchers assess the khat units consumed in the two weeks prior to the assessment with Sobell \& Sobell's (1995) calender-based method, Timeline Follow Back.
Measured: Change from T1 (Baseline at study entry) to T2 (two weeks after ASSIST-linked BI (intervention group) or two weeks after baseline assessment (control group))
days with khat use
The researchers assess the days with khat use in the two weeks prior to the assessment with Sobell \& Sobell's (1995) calender-based method, Timeline Follow Back.
Measured: Change from T1 (Baseline at study entry) to T2 (two weeks after ASSIST-linked BI (intervention group) or two weeks after baseline assessment (control group))
Secondary outcomes (5)
Problem solving
The researchers use the Tower of Hanoi to assess the ability of the individual to solve a problem. Time to solve the problem in seconds sis recorded.
Measured: Change from T1 (Baseline at study entry) to T2 (two weeks after ASSIST-linked BI (intervention group) or two weeks after baseline assessment (control group))
Working memory
The researchers use the Corsi Block Tapping Task (Corsi, 1972) to assess the visio-spacial working memory performance of the respondent.
Measured: Change from T1 (Baseline at study entry) to T2 (Two weeks after ASSIST-linked BI (intervention group) or two weeks after baseline assessment (control group))
Symptoms of depression and anxiety
The researchers use the sum scale of the Self-Report Questionnaire 20 (SRQ-20; Harding et al., 1983) to measure symptoms of depression and anxiety.
Measured: Change from T1 (Baseline at study entry) to T2 (two weeks after ASSIST-linked BI (intervention group) or two weeks after baseline assessment (control group))
Symptoms of khat-induced psychosis
The researchers use four items from the WHO's Composite International Clinical Interview (CIDI) to assess khat-induced psychotic symptoms according to the procedure published by Widmann et al. (2014).
Measured: Change from T1 (Baseline at study entry) to T2 (two weeks after ASSIST-linked BI (intervention group) or two weeks after baseline assessment (control group))
Resistance during intervention session
Counsellors rate the participants degree of cooperativeness and resistance with the method developed by Haller et al. (2018).
Measured: Immediately after the intervention session (ASSIST-linked BI) or control session (SPM assessment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Nov 2018
- Study start15 Nov 2018
- Primary completion15 Jan 2019
- Study completion31 Jan 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Khat AbuseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Model description
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 307 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Konstanz
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Jimma University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael Odenwald, University of Konstanz
- Investigators
- Michael Odenwald, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Konstanz
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03730805
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KHAT ASSIST 2018
- Acronym
- KhatAssist
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Gollwitzer, P., & Keller, L. (2016). Mindset Theory. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackleford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. New York: Springer.
Corsi, P. M. (1972). Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. Dissertation Abstracts International, 34, 819B.
Harding TW, Climent CE, Diop M, Giel R, Ibrahim HH, Murthy RS, Suleiman MA, Wig NN. The WHO collaborative study on strategies for extending mental health care, II: The development of new research methods. Am J Psychiatry. 1983 Nov;140(11):1474-80. doi: 10.1176/ajp.140.11.1474.
PubMed 6624995Humeniuk R, Ali R, Babor T, Souza-Formigoni ML, de Lacerda RB, Ling W, McRee B, Newcombe D, Pal H, Poznyak V, Simon S, Vendetti J. A randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention for illicit drugs linked to the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) in clients recruited from primary health-care settings in four countries. Addiction. 2012 May;107(5):957-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03740.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
PubMed 22126102Humeniuk, R., Henry-Edwards, S., Ali, R., Poznyak, V., Monteiro, M., & World Health Organization. (2010). The ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention for Hazardous and Harmful Substance Use: Manual for Use in Primary Care. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing : preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
Widmann M, Warsame AH, Mikulica J, von Beust J, Isse MM, Ndetei D, al'Absi M, Odenwald MG. Khat Use, PTSD and Psychotic Symptoms among Somali Refugees in Nairobi - A Pilot Study. Front Public Health. 2014 Jun 30;2:71. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00071. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25072043Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1995). Alcohol Timeline Followback Users's Manual. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.
Bien TH, Miller WR, Tonigan JS. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a review. Addiction. 1993 Mar;88(3):315-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb00820.x.
PubMed 8461850Raven JC. Matrix Tests. Ment Health (Lond). 1940 Jan;1(1):10-18. No abstract available.
PubMed 28908970Haller, N., Keller, L., Treiber, J., Schrietter, F., & Odenwald, M. (2018). The effect of mindset inductions on motivational interventions to reduce alcohol use: a pilot studies among university students. Poster presentation at the German Addiction Conference, September 17 - 20, 2018, Hamburg, Germany.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Adaptation and Evaluation of the WHO's ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention to Khat-Using Ethiopian University Students
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03730805
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KhatAssist / KHAT ASSIST 2018
- Conditions
- Khat Abuse
- Keywords
- Catha Edulis, Khat, Qat, Khat Use Disorder, Screening and Brief Intervention, ASSIST
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 307 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of KonstanzUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Jimma University
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The leaves of the khat tree (catha edulis) are traditionally chewed in the countries around the Horn of Africa. They contain the amphetamine-like alkaloid cathinone and their use can produce a Substance Use Disorder. The researchers intent to validate an Amharic and an Oromo version of the WHO's ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention among khat-using Ethiopian university students. In an RCT, khat using students of Jimma University with initial motivation to stop or cut down khat use will be randomised to either an intervention or a control group. In the intervention group, the WHO's ASSIST-linked BI will be delivered in a single session by trained local counsellors. In the control group, participants will receive a neuropsychological assessment (Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices, SPM; Raven, 1972). Khat use, the neuropsychological variables and psychiatric symptoms will be assessed before the intervention and two weeks after it. Additionally, the researchers will measure the participants resistance during the session. The control group will receive the intervention after the post test. In order to study state variables that influence brief intervention effectivity, e.g. by increasing or reducing resistance, the researchers randomise subjects in each study arm to several short pre-interventions that are based on Gollwitzer's empirically well established Mindset Theory of Action Phases (for summary: Gollwitzer \& Keller, 2016). This means, before delivering the ASSIST-linked BI (intervention group) or before the SPM assessment (controlgroup) a specific psychological state will be induced by a brief writing task that theoretically should affect the openness to the intervention: (1) implemental mindset, (2) deliberative mindset, (3) no mindset induction. The researchers expect that khat use will be reduced more in the intervention condition compared to the control condition and that induced states influence the effectiveness of the intervention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Triple blind (care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 6
- Model description
- Randomized Controlled Trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention + open mindset | Experimental | Behavioral: ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention, Behavioral: Induction of Deliberative MindsetASSIST-linked Brief Intervention plus prior induction of deliberative mindset |
| Intervention + closed mindset | Experimental | Behavioral: ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention, Behavioral: Induction of Implemental MindsetASSIST-linked Brief Intervention plus prior induction of closed mindset |
| Intervention alone | Experimental | Behavioral: ASSIST-linked Brief InterventionASSIST-linked Brief Intervention without prior induction of any mindset |
| Control + open mindset | Experimental | Behavioral: Induction of Deliberative MindsetIn stead of intervention, a neuropsychological assessment (Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices; SPM; Raven, 1940) with prior induction of an open mindset is conduced. |
| Control + closed mindset | Experimental | Behavioral: Induction of Implemental MindsetIn stead of intervention, a neuropsychological assessment (Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices; SPM; Raven, 1940) with prior induction of a closed mindset is conduced. |
| Control alone | No intervention | –In stead of intervention, a neuropsychological assessment (Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices; SPM; Raven, 1940) without prior induction of any mindset is conduced. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- second year student or higher year student at Jimma University
- khat use in the month prior to baseline
- participant's wish to reduce or stop khat use
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- severe substance use, except khat
- inability to read and write Amharic or Oromo languages
- ongoing acute episode of severe mental disorder
- current suicidal ideation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIST-linked Brief InterventionAlso: Screening and Brief InterventionThe intervention follows the WHO's ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention (Humenik et al., 2012; Humeniuk et al., 2010), a manualized one-session intervention that can be categorised as belonging to the Screening and Brief Intervention approach. It follows the FRAMES model (Bien et al., 1993) and contains techniques from Motivational Interviewing (Miller \& Rollnick, 1991). | Behavioural | Intervention + closed mindset, Intervention + open mindset, Intervention alone |
| Induction of Deliberative MindsetAlso: Induction of Open MindsetBased on the Mindset Theory of Action Phases (Gollwitzer \& Keller, 2016), a brief writing task (writing down pros and cons for an unresolved personal problem of the participant's own choice) is used to induce a specific psychological state in which the individual is cognitively open to process new information. | Behavioural | Control + open mindset, Intervention + open mindset |
| Induction of Implemental MindsetAlso: Induction of Closed MindsetBased on the Mindset Theory of Action Phases (Gollwitzer \& Keller, 2016), a brief writing task (writing down steps necessary to implement a personal decision of the participant's choice that has not yet been put into practice) is used to induce a specific psychological state in which the individual is cognitively not open to process new information. | Behavioural | Control + closed mindset, Intervention + closed mindset |
Primary outcome
khat use quantity (standard units)
Time frame: Change from T1 (Baseline at study entry) to T2 (two weeks after ASSIST-linked BI (intervention group) or two weeks after baseline assessment (control group))
The researchers assess the khat units consumed in the two weeks prior to the assessment with Sobell \& Sobell's (1995) calender-based method, Timeline Follow Back.
days with khat use
Time frame: Change from T1 (Baseline at study entry) to T2 (two weeks after ASSIST-linked BI (intervention group) or two weeks after baseline assessment (control group))
The researchers assess the days with khat use in the two weeks prior to the assessment with Sobell \& Sobell's (1995) calender-based method, Timeline Follow Back.
5 secondary outcomes
Problem solving
Time frame: Change from T1 (Baseline at study entry) to T2 (two weeks after ASSIST-linked BI (intervention group) or two weeks after baseline assessment (control group))
Working memory
Time frame: Change from T1 (Baseline at study entry) to T2 (Two weeks after ASSIST-linked BI (intervention group) or two weeks after baseline assessment (control group))
Symptoms of depression and anxiety
Time frame: Change from T1 (Baseline at study entry) to T2 (two weeks after ASSIST-linked BI (intervention group) or two weeks after baseline assessment (control group))
Symptoms of khat-induced psychosis
Time frame: Change from T1 (Baseline at study entry) to T2 (two weeks after ASSIST-linked BI (intervention group) or two weeks after baseline assessment (control group))
Resistance during intervention session
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention session (ASSIST-linked BI) or control session (SPM assessment)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2020.
- BackgroundGollwitzer, P., & Keller, L. (2016). Mindset Theory. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackleford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. New York: Springer.
- BackgroundCorsi, P. M. (1972). Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. Dissertation Abstracts International, 34, 819B.
- Background: PubMed 6624995Harding TW, Climent CE, Diop M, Giel R, Ibrahim HH, Murthy RS, Suleiman MA, Wig NN. The WHO collaborative study on strategies for extending mental health care, II: The development of new research methods. Am J Psychiatry. 1983 Nov;140(11):1474-80. doi: 10.1176/ajp.140.11.1474.
- Background: PubMed 22126102Humeniuk R, Ali R, Babor T, Souza-Formigoni ML, de Lacerda RB, Ling W, McRee B, Newcombe D, Pal H, Poznyak V, Simon S, Vendetti J. A randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention for illicit drugs linked to the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) in clients recruited from primary health-care settings in four countries. Addiction. 2012 May;107(5):957-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03740.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
- BackgroundHumeniuk, R., Henry-Edwards, S., Ali, R., Poznyak, V., Monteiro, M., & World Health Organization. (2010). The ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention for Hazardous and Harmful Substance Use: Manual for Use in Primary Care. Geneva: World Health Organization.
- BackgroundMiller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing : preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
- Background: PubMed 25072043Widmann M, Warsame AH, Mikulica J, von Beust J, Isse MM, Ndetei D, al'Absi M, Odenwald MG. Khat Use, PTSD and Psychotic Symptoms among Somali Refugees in Nairobi - A Pilot Study. Front Public Health. 2014 Jun 30;2:71. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00071. eCollection 2014.
- BackgroundSobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1995). Alcohol Timeline Followback Users's Manual. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.
- Background: PubMed 8461850Bien TH, Miller WR, Tonigan JS. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a review. Addiction. 1993 Mar;88(3):315-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb00820.x.
- Background: PubMed 28908970Raven JC. Matrix Tests. Ment Health (Lond). 1940 Jan;1(1):10-18. No abstract available.
- BackgroundHaller, N., Keller, L., Treiber, J., Schrietter, F., & Odenwald, M. (2018). The effect of mindset inductions on motivational interventions to reduce alcohol use: a pilot studies among university students. Poster presentation at the German Addiction Conference, September 17 - 20, 2018, Hamburg, Germany.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Khat Abuse
Recruiting
Troubled-Desire & Therapeutic Chat for Reduction of CSAM Use (TD-CHAT)
Prevention, Well Being
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Odenwald, PhD principal investigator
University of Konstanz
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ASSIST-linked Brief Intervention, Induction of Deliberative Mindset and Induction of Implemental Mindset in people with Khat Abuse, run by University of Konstanz at 1 site in Ethiopia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ethiopia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
khat use quantity (standard units) (time frame: Change from T1 (Baseline at study entry) to T2 (two weeks after ASSIST-linked BI (intervention group) or two weeks after baseline assessment (control group))). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03730805, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2020.