AzTrials
AzTrials

Atopic DermatitisPhase 3BREEZE-AD7NCT03733301

A Study of Baricitinib (LY3009104) in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

A Phase 3 study testing Baricitinib and Topical corticosteroid in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 68 sites in 10 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atopic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
Baricitinib and Topical corticosteroid
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
329 participants
Where
68 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
16 Nov 2018to 22 Aug 2019
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have been diagnosed with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis for at least 12 months.
  • Have had inadequate response to existing topical (applied to the skin) medications within 6 months preceding screening.
  • Are willing to discontinue certain treatments for eczema (such as systemic and topical treatments during a washout period).
  • Agree to use emollients daily.

Who cannot join

  • Are currently experiencing or have a history of other concomitant skin conditions (e.g., psoriasis or lupus erythematosus), or a history of erythrodermic, refractory, or unstable skin disease that requires frequent hospitalizations and/or intravenous treatment for skin infections.
  • A history of eczema herpeticum within 12 months, and/or a history of 2 or more episodes of eczema herpeticum in the past.
  • Participants who are currently experiencing a skin infection that requires treatment, or is currently being treated, with topical or systemic antibiotics.
  • Have any serious illness that is anticipated to require the use of systemic corticosteroids or otherwise interfere with study participation or require active frequent monitoring (e.g., unstable chronic asthma).
  • Have been treated with the following therapies:
  • Monoclonal antibody for less than 5 half-lives prior to randomization.
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Received prior treatment with any oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor less than 4 weeks prior to randomization.
  • Received any parenteral corticosteroids administered by intramuscular or intravenous (IV) injection within 6 weeks prior to planned randomization or are anticipated to require parenteral injection of corticosteroids during the study.
  • Have had an intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 6 weeks prior to planned randomization.
  • Have high blood pressure characterized by a repeated systolic blood pressure >160 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or diastolic blood pressure >100 mm Hg.
  • Have had major surgery within the past eight weeks or are planning major surgery during the study.
  • Have experienced any of the following within 12 weeks of screening: venous thromboembolic event (VTE), myocardial infarction (MI), unstable ischemic heart disease, stroke, or New York Heart Association Stage III/IV heart failure.
  • Have a history of recurrent (≥2) VTE or are considered at high risk of VTE as deemed by the investigator.
  • Have a history or presence of cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, chronic liver disease gastrointestinal, endocrine, hematological, neurological, lymphoproliferative disease or neuropsychiatric disorders or any other serious and/or unstable illness.
  • Have a current or recent clinically serious viral, bacterial, fungal, or parasitic infection including herpes zoster, tuberculosis.
  • Have specific laboratory abnormalities.
  • Have received certain treatments that are contraindicated.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding.

Trial locations and contacts

68 sites in 10 countries.

68 sites in 10 countries

Japan17 sites
  • Iidabashi Clinic

    Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0072

  • Tokyo Teishin Hospital

    Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 102-8798

  • Hosono Clinic

    Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0031

  • Yamano Dermatological Clinic

    Dazaifu, Fukuoka, 818-0104

  • JA Shizuoka Kohseiren Enshu Hospital

    Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 430-0929

  • Kawashima Dermatology Clinic

    Ichikawa-shi, Chiba, 272-0033

  • Tashiro Dermatological Clinic

    Iizuka, Fukuoka, 820-0040

  • Medical Corporation Soleil Miyata Dermatology Clinic

    Matsudo-shi, Chiba, 271-0092

  • Oizumi Hanawa Clinic

    Nerima-ku, Tokyo, 178-0063

  • Yoshioka Dermatology Clinic

    Neyagawa, Osaka, 572-0838

  • Queen's Square Dermatology and Allergology

    Nishi-ku, Yokohama-city, Kanagawa, 220-6208

  • Shibaki Dermatology Clinic

    Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006 0022

  • Sapporo Skin Clinic

    Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0063

  • Yamate Dermatological Clinic

    Shinjuku, Tokyo, 169-0075

  • Tachikawa Dermatology Clinic

    Tachikawa-shi, Tokyo, 190-0023

  • Shirasaki Clinic

    Takaoka-shi, Toyama, 9330871

  • Senri-Chuo Hanafusa Dermatology Clinic

    Toyonaka-shi, Osaka, 560-0085

Other trials in Japan

Germany10 sites
  • Universitätsklinikum Aachen - UKA

    Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52074

  • Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, 10117

  • Dermatologisches Zentrum Osnabrück Nord

    Bramsche, Lower Saxony, 49565

  • Rosenpark Research Geschäftsbereich der Rosenparkklinik GmbH

    Darmstadt, Hesse, 64283

  • Universitaetsklinikum Essen

    Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45147

  • TFS Trial Form Support GmbH

    Hamburg, 20537

  • Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg

    Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69120

  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein

    Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23538

  • Klinikum der Universität München

    München, Bavaria, 80337

  • Universitätsklinikum Münster

    Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149

Other trials in Germany

South Korea8 sites
  • Korea University Ansan Hospital

    Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, 15355

  • Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital

    Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 10326

  • Gachon University Gil Medical Center

    Incheon, Korea, 21565

  • Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System

    Seoul, 03722

  • Konkuk University Hospital

    Seoul, 05030

  • Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

    Seoul, 06591

  • Chungang University Hospital

    Seoul, 06973

  • Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

    Seoul, 07441

Other trials in South Korea

Australia7 sites
  • Clinical Trials SA Pty Ltd

    Adelaide, South Australia, 5073

  • The Skin Centre

    Benowa, Queensland, 4217

  • Skin and Cancer Foundation Inc.

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3053

  • Fremantle Dermatology

    Perth, Western Australia, 6160

  • Woden Dermatology

    Phillip, Australian Capital Territory, 2606

  • Skin & Cancer Foundation Australia

    Westmead, New South Wales, 2145

  • Veracity Clinical Research Pty Ltd

    Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102

Other trials in Australia

Taiwan6 sites
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Kaohsiung

    Kaohsiung City, 83301

  • Taipei Medical University- Shuang Ho Hospital

    New Taipei City, 23561

  • Chung Shan Medical University Hospital

    Taichung, 40201

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, 10048

  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Taipei

    Taipei, 10508

  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Linkou

    Taoyuan, (r.o.c.), 333

Other trials in Taiwan

Argentina5 sites
  • Centro de Investigaciones Metabólicas (CINME) - Comite

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1056ABJ

  • Fundacion CIDEA

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1121ABE

  • Instituto de Neumonología y Dermatología

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1425BEA

  • Psoriahue Medicina Interdisciplinaria

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1425DKG

  • Parra Dermatología

    Mendoza, 5500

Other trials in Argentina

Italy5 sites
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedale San Martino di Genova

    Genova, 16132

  • Azienda Ospedaliera - Universitaria Pisana

    Pisa, 56126

  • Policlinico Univ. Agostino Gemelli

    Rome, Lazio, 00168

  • Istituto Clinico Humanitas

    Rozzano, Milano, 20089

  • ULSS 8 UOC Dermatologia Viale Rodolfi, 37

    Vicenza, 36100

Other trials in Italy

Spain5 sites
  • Hospital del Mar

    Barcelona, 08003

  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    Barcelona, 08041

  • Hospital Reina Sofia

    Córdoba, 14004

  • Hospital De Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin

    Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35010

  • Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal

    Madrid, 28034

Other trials in Spain

Poland4 sites
  • Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o.

    Lodz, 90-265

  • Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne

    Świdnik, 21-040

  • Centrum Medyczne AMED

    Warsaw, 01-518

  • Centrum Medyczne Evimed

    Warsaw, 02-625

Other trials in Poland

Austria1 site
  • Universitätsklinikum Graz

    Graz, Styria, 8036

Other trials in Austria

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis BREEZE-AD7

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

Being tested
Baricitinib, Topical corticosteroid, Placebo
Keywords
eczema, atopic eczema
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic, Eczema

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BaricitinibDrug

    Also called LY3009104

    Administered orally.

  • Topical corticosteroidDrug

    Administered as standard-of-care.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Administered orally.

Study groups in NCT03733301
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
4 Milligram (mg) BaricitinibExperimental4 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS). Placebo administered orally once daily to match 2 mg Baricitinib.
Receives: Drug: Baricitinib; Drug: Topical corticosteroid; Drug: Placebo
2 mg BaricitinibExperimental2 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily in combination with TCS. Placebo administered orally once daily to match 4 mg Baricitinib.
Receives: Drug: Baricitinib; Drug: Topical corticosteroid; Drug: Placebo
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo administered orally once daily in combination with TCS.
Receives: Drug: Topical corticosteroid; Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 With a ≥ 2 Point Improvement

    The IGA measures investigators global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their atopic dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.

    Measured: Week 16

Secondary outcomes (24)
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75)

    The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI75 is defined as a ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI90

    The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI90 is defined as a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.

    Measured: Week 16

  3. Percent Change From Baseline on EASI Score

    The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe).

    Least Squares Mean (LSM) were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline score and baseline score-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous effects.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORing Atopic Dermatitis 75 (SCORAD75)

    The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3)oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with a visual analogue scales (VAS) where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), \& subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. The SCORAD75 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the SCORAD score.

    Measured: Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving a 4-Point Improvement in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The Itch NRS is a patient-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no itch" and 10 representing "worst itch imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's itching is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.

    Measured: Week 16

  6. Change From Baseline in the Score of Item 2 of the Atopic Dermatitis Sleep Scale (ADSS)

    The ADSS is a 3-item, participant-administered questionnaire developed to assess the impact of itch on sleep including difficulty falling asleep due to itch, frequency of waking due to itch, and difficulty getting back to sleep last night due to itch. Item 2 frequency of waking last night is reported by selecting the number of times they woke up each night, ranging from 0 to 29 times, where the higher a number indicates a worse outcome. The ADSS is designed to be completed daily, using a daily diary, with respondents thinking about sleep "last night." Each item is scored individually. LS Mean were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline score and baseline score-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous effects.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  7. Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS

    Skin Pain NRS is a patient-administered,11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "worst pain imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's skin pain is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of skin pain in the past 24 hours. LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by- visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI50

    The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI50 is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.

    Measured: Week 16

  9. Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0

    The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.

    Measured: Week 16

  10. Change From Baseline in SCORAD

    The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), \& subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease.

    LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by- visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  11. Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD90

    The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3)oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease: (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), \& subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. The SCORAD90 is defined as a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the SCORAD score.

    Measured: Week 16

  12. Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected

    The BSA affected by AD will be assessed for 4 separate body regions and is collected as part of the EASI assessment: head and neck, trunk (including genital region), upper extremities, and lower extremities (including the buttocks). Each body region will be assessed for disease extent ranging from 0% to 100% involvement. The overall total percentage will be reported based off of all 4 body regions combined, after applying specific multipliers to the different body regions to account for the percent of the total BSA represented by each of the 4 regions. Use the percentage of skin affected for each region (0 to 100%) in EASI as follows: BSA Total = 0.1*BSAhead and neck + 0.3*BSAtrunk + 0.2* BSAupper limbs + 0.4*BSAlower limbs.

    LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  13. Percentage of Participants Developing Skin Infections Requiring Antibiotic Treatment

    Percentage of participants developing skin infections requiring antibiotic treatment.

    Measured: Week 16

  14. Mean Gram Quantity of Moderate Potency Background Topical Corticosteroid (TCS) Used (Tube Weights)

    Average weights of full tubes were used to determine the dispensed weights for each region. Returned tubes were weighed with cap without carton to determine the amount of TCS in grams (g) used at each visit. Analysis was done via analysis of variance (ANOVA), with geographic region, baseline disease severity (IGA) and treatment as factors in the model.

    Measured: Week 0 through Week 16

  15. Percent Change From Baseline in Itch NRS

    The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale, with 0 representing "no itch" and 10 representing "worst itch imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's itching is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.

    LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity, visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-interaction as fixed continuous effects.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  16. Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM)

    The POEM is a 7-item self-assessment questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) on a scale ranging from 0-4 (0 = no days, 1 = 1-2 days, 2 = 3-4 days, 3 = 5-6 days, 4 = everyday). The sum of the 7 items gives the total POEM score of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease). High scores are indicative of more severe disease and poor quality of life.

    LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  17. Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Severity-Atopic Dermatitis (PGI-S-AD) Score

    The PGI-S-AD is a single-item question asking the participant how they would rate their overall AD symptoms over the past 24 hours, using a daily diary. The 5 categories of responses are "(0) no symptoms", "(1) very mild", "(2) mild" "(3) moderate", and "(4) severe."

    LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  18. Change From Baseline on the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS)

    The HADS is a participant-rated instrument used to assess both anxiety and depression. This instrument consists of 14 item questionnaire, each item is rated on a 4-point scale, giving maximum scores of 21 for anxiety and depression. Scores of 11 or more on either subscale are considered to be a significant 'case' of psychological morbidity, while scores of 8-10 represent 'borderline' and 0-7, 'normal.'

    LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  19. Change From Baseline on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)

    The DLQI is a simple, participant-administered,10 question, validated, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. The recall period of this scale is over the last "week." Response categories include "not at all," "a lot," and "very much," with corresponding scores of 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and at unanswered ("not relevant") responses scored as "0." Scores range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment), and a 4-point change from baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold.

    LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  20. Change From Baseline on the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Atopic Dermatitis (WPAI-AD) Questionnaire

    The WPAI-AD participant questionnaire was developed to measure the effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities in the 7 days prior to the visit. The WPAI-AD consists of 6 items grouped in 4 domains: absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and activity impairment, that range from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating greater impairment.

    LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  21. Change From Baseline on the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score United States and United Kingdom Algorithm

    The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The first part is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive the health state index scores using the United Kingdom (UK) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.594 to 1, and the United States (US) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.109 to 1, with higher score indicating better health state.

    LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  22. Change From Baseline on the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The second part is assessed using a VAS that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 is the worst health you can imagine and 100 is the best health you can imagine.

    LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  23. Mean Number of Days Without Use of Background TCS

    The ANCOVA model includes treatment, region, and baseline disease severity (IGA) as factors.

    Measured: Week 0 through Week 16

  24. Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0 or 1 With a ≥ 2 Point Improvement

    The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.

    Measured: Week 4

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Nov 2018
  2. Study start16 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion29 Jul 2019
  4. Study completion22 Aug 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
329 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03733301
Sponsor's protocol ID
17100
Other IDs
I4V-MC-JAIY, 2018-001726-26, 2018
Acronym
BREEZE-AD7
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
30 Oct 2018
Last updated
11 Aug 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.

Publications

  • Wollenberg A, Kircik L, Simpson E, Brinker D, Katoh N, Rueda MJ, Issa M, Yang F, Feely M, Alexis A. Pooled Analysis of Baricitinib Tolerability in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis in Relation to Acne, Headache, and Gastrointestinal Events From 8 Clinical Trials. Dermatitis. 2023 Jul-Aug;34(4):308-314. doi: 10.1089/derm.2022.0027. Epub 2023 Feb 6.

    PubMed 36749121
  • Katoh N, Takita Y, Isaka Y, Nishikawa A, Torisu-Itakura H, Saeki H. Pooled Safety Analysis of Baricitinib in Adult Participants with Atopic Dermatitis in the Japanese Subpopulation from Six Randomized Clinical Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Dec;12(12):2765-2779. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00828-5. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

    PubMed 36255569
  • Thyssen JP, Buhl T, Fernandez-Penas P, Kabashima K, Chen S, Lu N, DeLozier AM, Casillas M, Stander S. Baricitinib Rapidly Improves Skin Pain Resulting in Improved Quality of Life for Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: Analyses from BREEZE-AD1, 2, and 7. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Oct;11(5):1599-1611. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00577-x. Epub 2021 Jul 18.

    PubMed 34275122
  • Buhl T, Rosmarin D, Serra-Baldrich E, Fernandez-Penas P, Igarashi A, Konstantinou MP, Chen S, Lu N, Pierce E, Casillas M. Itch and Sleep Improvements with Baricitinib in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of 3 Phase 3 Studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Jun;11(3):971-982. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00534-8. Epub 2021 Apr 25.

    PubMed 33899152
  • King B, Maari C, Lain E, Silverberg JI, Issa M, Holzwarth K, Brinker D, Cardillo T, Nunes FP, Simpson EL. Extended Safety Analysis of Baricitinib 2 mg in Adult Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: An Integrated Analysis from Eight Randomized Clinical Trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 May;22(3):395-405. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00602-x. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

    PubMed 33826132
  • Reich K, Kabashima K, Peris K, Silverberg JI, Eichenfield LF, Bieber T, Kaszuba A, Kolodsick J, Yang FE, Gamalo M, Brinker DR, DeLozier AM, Janes JM, Nunes FP, Thyssen JP, Simpson EL. Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib Combined With Topical Corticosteroids for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Dec 1;156(12):1333-1343. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.3260.

    PubMed 33001140

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Baricitinib and Topical corticosteroid in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 68 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 68 sites in Japan, Germany, South Korea, Australia, Taiwan and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Aug 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 With a ≥ 2 Point Improvement (time frame: Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03733301, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in