Atopic DermatitisPhase 3BREEZE-AD7NCT03733301
A Study of Baricitinib (LY3009104) in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
A Phase 3 study testing Baricitinib and Topical corticosteroid in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 68 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atopic Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- Baricitinib and Topical corticosteroid
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 329 participants
- Where
- 68 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- 16 Nov 2018to 22 Aug 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Have been diagnosed with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis for at least 12 months.
- Have had inadequate response to existing topical (applied to the skin) medications within 6 months preceding screening.
- Are willing to discontinue certain treatments for eczema (such as systemic and topical treatments during a washout period).
- Agree to use emollients daily.
Who cannot join
- Are currently experiencing or have a history of other concomitant skin conditions (e.g., psoriasis or lupus erythematosus), or a history of erythrodermic, refractory, or unstable skin disease that requires frequent hospitalizations and/or intravenous treatment for skin infections.
- A history of eczema herpeticum within 12 months, and/or a history of 2 or more episodes of eczema herpeticum in the past.
- Participants who are currently experiencing a skin infection that requires treatment, or is currently being treated, with topical or systemic antibiotics.
- Have any serious illness that is anticipated to require the use of systemic corticosteroids or otherwise interfere with study participation or require active frequent monitoring (e.g., unstable chronic asthma).
- Have been treated with the following therapies:
- Monoclonal antibody for less than 5 half-lives prior to randomization.
Show all 18Show fewer
- Received prior treatment with any oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor less than 4 weeks prior to randomization.
- Received any parenteral corticosteroids administered by intramuscular or intravenous (IV) injection within 6 weeks prior to planned randomization or are anticipated to require parenteral injection of corticosteroids during the study.
- Have had an intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 6 weeks prior to planned randomization.
- Have high blood pressure characterized by a repeated systolic blood pressure >160 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or diastolic blood pressure >100 mm Hg.
- Have had major surgery within the past eight weeks or are planning major surgery during the study.
- Have experienced any of the following within 12 weeks of screening: venous thromboembolic event (VTE), myocardial infarction (MI), unstable ischemic heart disease, stroke, or New York Heart Association Stage III/IV heart failure.
- Have a history of recurrent (≥2) VTE or are considered at high risk of VTE as deemed by the investigator.
- Have a history or presence of cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, chronic liver disease gastrointestinal, endocrine, hematological, neurological, lymphoproliferative disease or neuropsychiatric disorders or any other serious and/or unstable illness.
- Have a current or recent clinically serious viral, bacterial, fungal, or parasitic infection including herpes zoster, tuberculosis.
- Have specific laboratory abnormalities.
- Have received certain treatments that are contraindicated.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
Trial locations and contacts
68 sites in 10 countries.
68 sites in 10 countries
Japan17 sites
Iidabashi Clinic
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0072
Tokyo Teishin Hospital
Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 102-8798
Hosono Clinic
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0031
Yamano Dermatological Clinic
Dazaifu, Fukuoka, 818-0104
JA Shizuoka Kohseiren Enshu Hospital
Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 430-0929
Kawashima Dermatology Clinic
Ichikawa-shi, Chiba, 272-0033
Tashiro Dermatological Clinic
Iizuka, Fukuoka, 820-0040
Medical Corporation Soleil Miyata Dermatology Clinic
Matsudo-shi, Chiba, 271-0092
Oizumi Hanawa Clinic
Nerima-ku, Tokyo, 178-0063
Yoshioka Dermatology Clinic
Neyagawa, Osaka, 572-0838
Queen's Square Dermatology and Allergology
Nishi-ku, Yokohama-city, Kanagawa, 220-6208
Shibaki Dermatology Clinic
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006 0022
Sapporo Skin Clinic
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0063
Yamate Dermatological Clinic
Shinjuku, Tokyo, 169-0075
Tachikawa Dermatology Clinic
Tachikawa-shi, Tokyo, 190-0023
Shirasaki Clinic
Takaoka-shi, Toyama, 9330871
Senri-Chuo Hanafusa Dermatology Clinic
Toyonaka-shi, Osaka, 560-0085
Germany10 sites
Universitätsklinikum Aachen - UKA
Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52074
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 10117
Dermatologisches Zentrum Osnabrück Nord
Bramsche, Lower Saxony, 49565
Rosenpark Research Geschäftsbereich der Rosenparkklinik GmbH
Darmstadt, Hesse, 64283
Universitaetsklinikum Essen
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45147
TFS Trial Form Support GmbH
Hamburg, 20537
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69120
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23538
Klinikum der Universität München
München, Bavaria, 80337
Universitätsklinikum Münster
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149
South Korea8 sites
Korea University Ansan Hospital
Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, 15355
Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 10326
Gachon University Gil Medical Center
Incheon, Korea, 21565
Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, 03722
Konkuk University Hospital
Seoul, 05030
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Seoul, 06591
Chungang University Hospital
Seoul, 06973
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
Seoul, 07441
Australia7 sites
Clinical Trials SA Pty Ltd
Adelaide, South Australia, 5073
The Skin Centre
Benowa, Queensland, 4217
Skin and Cancer Foundation Inc.
Melbourne, Victoria, 3053
Fremantle Dermatology
Perth, Western Australia, 6160
Woden Dermatology
Phillip, Australian Capital Territory, 2606
Skin & Cancer Foundation Australia
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145
Veracity Clinical Research Pty Ltd
Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102
Taiwan6 sites
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Kaohsiung
Kaohsiung City, 83301
Taipei Medical University- Shuang Ho Hospital
New Taipei City, 23561
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
Taichung, 40201
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 10048
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Taipei
Taipei, 10508
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Linkou
Taoyuan, (r.o.c.), 333
Argentina5 sites
Centro de Investigaciones Metabólicas (CINME) - Comite
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1056ABJ
Fundacion CIDEA
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1121ABE
Instituto de Neumonología y Dermatología
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1425BEA
Psoriahue Medicina Interdisciplinaria
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1425DKG
Parra Dermatología
Mendoza, 5500
Italy5 sites
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedale San Martino di Genova
Genova, 16132
Azienda Ospedaliera - Universitaria Pisana
Pisa, 56126
Policlinico Univ. Agostino Gemelli
Rome, Lazio, 00168
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano, Milano, 20089
ULSS 8 UOC Dermatologia Viale Rodolfi, 37
Vicenza, 36100
Spain5 sites
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, 08003
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08041
Hospital Reina Sofia
Córdoba, 14004
Hospital De Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35010
Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
Madrid, 28034
Poland4 sites
Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o.
Lodz, 90-265
Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne
Świdnik, 21-040
Centrum Medyczne AMED
Warsaw, 01-518
Centrum Medyczne Evimed
Warsaw, 02-625
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis BREEZE-AD7
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Being tested
- Baricitinib, Topical corticosteroid, Placebo
- Keywords
- eczema, atopic eczema
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic, Eczema
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BaricitinibDrug
Also called LY3009104
Administered orally.
Topical corticosteroidDrug
Administered as standard-of-care.
PlaceboDrug
Administered orally.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Milligram (mg) Baricitinib | Experimental | 4 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS). Placebo administered orally once daily to match 2 mg Baricitinib. Receives: Drug: Baricitinib; Drug: Topical corticosteroid; Drug: Placebo |
| 2 mg Baricitinib | Experimental | 2 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily in combination with TCS. Placebo administered orally once daily to match 4 mg Baricitinib. Receives: Drug: Baricitinib; Drug: Topical corticosteroid; Drug: Placebo |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo administered orally once daily in combination with TCS. Receives: Drug: Topical corticosteroid; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 With a ≥ 2 Point Improvement
The IGA measures investigators global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their atopic dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Measured: Week 16
Secondary outcomes (24)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75)
The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI75 is defined as a ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI90
The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI90 is defined as a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.
Measured: Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline on EASI Score
The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe).
Least Squares Mean (LSM) were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline score and baseline score-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORing Atopic Dermatitis 75 (SCORAD75)
The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3)oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with a visual analogue scales (VAS) where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), \& subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. The SCORAD75 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the SCORAD score.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 4-Point Improvement in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
The Itch NRS is a patient-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no itch" and 10 representing "worst itch imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's itching is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Score of Item 2 of the Atopic Dermatitis Sleep Scale (ADSS)
The ADSS is a 3-item, participant-administered questionnaire developed to assess the impact of itch on sleep including difficulty falling asleep due to itch, frequency of waking due to itch, and difficulty getting back to sleep last night due to itch. Item 2 frequency of waking last night is reported by selecting the number of times they woke up each night, ranging from 0 to 29 times, where the higher a number indicates a worse outcome. The ADSS is designed to be completed daily, using a daily diary, with respondents thinking about sleep "last night." Each item is scored individually. LS Mean were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline score and baseline score-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS
Skin Pain NRS is a patient-administered,11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "worst pain imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's skin pain is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of skin pain in the past 24 hours. LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by- visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI50
The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI50 is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0
The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in SCORAD
The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), \& subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease.
LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by- visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD90
The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3)oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease: (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), \& subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. The SCORAD90 is defined as a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the SCORAD score.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected
The BSA affected by AD will be assessed for 4 separate body regions and is collected as part of the EASI assessment: head and neck, trunk (including genital region), upper extremities, and lower extremities (including the buttocks). Each body region will be assessed for disease extent ranging from 0% to 100% involvement. The overall total percentage will be reported based off of all 4 body regions combined, after applying specific multipliers to the different body regions to account for the percent of the total BSA represented by each of the 4 regions. Use the percentage of skin affected for each region (0 to 100%) in EASI as follows: BSA Total = 0.1*BSAhead and neck + 0.3*BSAtrunk + 0.2* BSAupper limbs + 0.4*BSAlower limbs.
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants Developing Skin Infections Requiring Antibiotic Treatment
Percentage of participants developing skin infections requiring antibiotic treatment.
Measured: Week 16
Mean Gram Quantity of Moderate Potency Background Topical Corticosteroid (TCS) Used (Tube Weights)
Average weights of full tubes were used to determine the dispensed weights for each region. Returned tubes were weighed with cap without carton to determine the amount of TCS in grams (g) used at each visit. Analysis was done via analysis of variance (ANOVA), with geographic region, baseline disease severity (IGA) and treatment as factors in the model.
Measured: Week 0 through Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Itch NRS
The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale, with 0 representing "no itch" and 10 representing "worst itch imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's itching is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity, visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM)
The POEM is a 7-item self-assessment questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) on a scale ranging from 0-4 (0 = no days, 1 = 1-2 days, 2 = 3-4 days, 3 = 5-6 days, 4 = everyday). The sum of the 7 items gives the total POEM score of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease). High scores are indicative of more severe disease and poor quality of life.
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Severity-Atopic Dermatitis (PGI-S-AD) Score
The PGI-S-AD is a single-item question asking the participant how they would rate their overall AD symptoms over the past 24 hours, using a daily diary. The 5 categories of responses are "(0) no symptoms", "(1) very mild", "(2) mild" "(3) moderate", and "(4) severe."
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline on the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS)
The HADS is a participant-rated instrument used to assess both anxiety and depression. This instrument consists of 14 item questionnaire, each item is rated on a 4-point scale, giving maximum scores of 21 for anxiety and depression. Scores of 11 or more on either subscale are considered to be a significant 'case' of psychological morbidity, while scores of 8-10 represent 'borderline' and 0-7, 'normal.'
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
The DLQI is a simple, participant-administered,10 question, validated, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. The recall period of this scale is over the last "week." Response categories include "not at all," "a lot," and "very much," with corresponding scores of 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and at unanswered ("not relevant") responses scored as "0." Scores range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment), and a 4-point change from baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold.
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline on the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Atopic Dermatitis (WPAI-AD) Questionnaire
The WPAI-AD participant questionnaire was developed to measure the effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities in the 7 days prior to the visit. The WPAI-AD consists of 6 items grouped in 4 domains: absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and activity impairment, that range from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating greater impairment.
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline on the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score United States and United Kingdom Algorithm
The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The first part is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive the health state index scores using the United Kingdom (UK) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.594 to 1, and the United States (US) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.109 to 1, with higher score indicating better health state.
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline on the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The second part is assessed using a VAS that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 is the worst health you can imagine and 100 is the best health you can imagine.
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Mean Number of Days Without Use of Background TCS
The ANCOVA model includes treatment, region, and baseline disease severity (IGA) as factors.
Measured: Week 0 through Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0 or 1 With a ≥ 2 Point Improvement
The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Measured: Week 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2018
- Study start16 Nov 2018
- Primary completion29 Jul 2019
- Study completion22 Aug 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atopic DermatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Eli Lilly and CompanyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 329 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Incyte Corporation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), Study director, Eli Lilly and Company
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03733301
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17100
- Other IDs
- I4V-MC-JAIY, 2018-001726-26, 2018
- Acronym
- BREEZE-AD7
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 11 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.
Publications
Wollenberg A, Kircik L, Simpson E, Brinker D, Katoh N, Rueda MJ, Issa M, Yang F, Feely M, Alexis A. Pooled Analysis of Baricitinib Tolerability in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis in Relation to Acne, Headache, and Gastrointestinal Events From 8 Clinical Trials. Dermatitis. 2023 Jul-Aug;34(4):308-314. doi: 10.1089/derm.2022.0027. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
PubMed 36749121Katoh N, Takita Y, Isaka Y, Nishikawa A, Torisu-Itakura H, Saeki H. Pooled Safety Analysis of Baricitinib in Adult Participants with Atopic Dermatitis in the Japanese Subpopulation from Six Randomized Clinical Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Dec;12(12):2765-2779. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00828-5. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
PubMed 36255569Thyssen JP, Buhl T, Fernandez-Penas P, Kabashima K, Chen S, Lu N, DeLozier AM, Casillas M, Stander S. Baricitinib Rapidly Improves Skin Pain Resulting in Improved Quality of Life for Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: Analyses from BREEZE-AD1, 2, and 7. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Oct;11(5):1599-1611. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00577-x. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
PubMed 34275122Buhl T, Rosmarin D, Serra-Baldrich E, Fernandez-Penas P, Igarashi A, Konstantinou MP, Chen S, Lu N, Pierce E, Casillas M. Itch and Sleep Improvements with Baricitinib in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of 3 Phase 3 Studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Jun;11(3):971-982. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00534-8. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
PubMed 33899152King B, Maari C, Lain E, Silverberg JI, Issa M, Holzwarth K, Brinker D, Cardillo T, Nunes FP, Simpson EL. Extended Safety Analysis of Baricitinib 2 mg in Adult Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: An Integrated Analysis from Eight Randomized Clinical Trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 May;22(3):395-405. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00602-x. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
PubMed 33826132Reich K, Kabashima K, Peris K, Silverberg JI, Eichenfield LF, Bieber T, Kaszuba A, Kolodsick J, Yang FE, Gamalo M, Brinker DR, DeLozier AM, Janes JM, Nunes FP, Thyssen JP, Simpson EL. Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib Combined With Topical Corticosteroids for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Dec 1;156(12):1333-1343. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.3260.
PubMed 33001140
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis BREEZE-AD7
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03733301
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BREEZE-AD7 / 17100
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Keywords
- eczema, atopic eczema
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 329 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Eli Lilly and CompanyIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Incyte Corporation
- Study start
- 16 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Aug 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 11 Aug 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Milligram (mg) Baricitinib | Experimental | Drug: Baricitinib, Drug: Topical corticosteroid, Drug: Placebo4 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS). Placebo administered orally once daily to match 2 mg Baricitinib. |
| 2 mg Baricitinib | Experimental | Drug: Baricitinib, Drug: Topical corticosteroid, Drug: Placebo2 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily in combination with TCS. Placebo administered orally once daily to match 4 mg Baricitinib. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Topical corticosteroid, Drug: PlaceboPlacebo administered orally once daily in combination with TCS. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Have been diagnosed with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis for at least 12 months.
- Have had inadequate response to existing topical (applied to the skin) medications within 6 months preceding screening.
- Are willing to discontinue certain treatments for eczema (such as systemic and topical treatments during a washout period).
- Agree to use emollients daily.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Are currently experiencing or have a history of other concomitant skin conditions (e.g., psoriasis or lupus erythematosus), or a history of erythrodermic, refractory, or unstable skin disease that requires frequent hospitalizations and/or intravenous treatment for skin infections.
- A history of eczema herpeticum within 12 months, and/or a history of 2 or more episodes of eczema herpeticum in the past.
- Participants who are currently experiencing a skin infection that requires treatment, or is currently being treated, with topical or systemic antibiotics.
- Have any serious illness that is anticipated to require the use of systemic corticosteroids or otherwise interfere with study participation or require active frequent monitoring (e.g., unstable chronic asthma).
- Have been treated with the following therapies:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BaricitinibAlso: LY3009104Administered orally. | Drug | 2 mg Baricitinib, 4 Milligram (mg) Baricitinib |
| Topical corticosteroidAdministered as standard-of-care. | Drug | 2 mg Baricitinib, 4 Milligram (mg) Baricitinib, Placebo |
| PlaceboAdministered orally. | Drug | 2 mg Baricitinib, 4 Milligram (mg) Baricitinib, Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 With a ≥ 2 Point Improvement
Time frame: Week 16
The IGA measures investigators global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their atopic dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
24 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75)
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI90
Time frame: Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline on EASI Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORing Atopic Dermatitis 75 (SCORAD75)
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 4-Point Improvement in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Score of Item 2 of the Atopic Dermatitis Sleep Scale (ADSS)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI50
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in SCORAD
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD90
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants Developing Skin Infections Requiring Antibiotic Treatment
Time frame: Week 16
Mean Gram Quantity of Moderate Potency Background Topical Corticosteroid (TCS) Used (Tube Weights)
Time frame: Week 0 through Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Itch NRS
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Severity-Atopic Dermatitis (PGI-S-AD) Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline on the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline on the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Atopic Dermatitis (WPAI-AD) Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline on the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score United States and United Kingdom Algorithm
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline on the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Mean Number of Days Without Use of Background TCS
Time frame: Week 0 through Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0 or 1 With a ≥ 2 Point Improvement
Time frame: Week 4
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Aug 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36749121Wollenberg A, Kircik L, Simpson E, Brinker D, Katoh N, Rueda MJ, Issa M, Yang F, Feely M, Alexis A. Pooled Analysis of Baricitinib Tolerability in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis in Relation to Acne, Headache, and Gastrointestinal Events From 8 Clinical Trials. Dermatitis. 2023 Jul-Aug;34(4):308-314. doi: 10.1089/derm.2022.0027. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36255569Katoh N, Takita Y, Isaka Y, Nishikawa A, Torisu-Itakura H, Saeki H. Pooled Safety Analysis of Baricitinib in Adult Participants with Atopic Dermatitis in the Japanese Subpopulation from Six Randomized Clinical Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Dec;12(12):2765-2779. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00828-5. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34275122Thyssen JP, Buhl T, Fernandez-Penas P, Kabashima K, Chen S, Lu N, DeLozier AM, Casillas M, Stander S. Baricitinib Rapidly Improves Skin Pain Resulting in Improved Quality of Life for Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: Analyses from BREEZE-AD1, 2, and 7. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Oct;11(5):1599-1611. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00577-x. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33899152Buhl T, Rosmarin D, Serra-Baldrich E, Fernandez-Penas P, Igarashi A, Konstantinou MP, Chen S, Lu N, Pierce E, Casillas M. Itch and Sleep Improvements with Baricitinib in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of 3 Phase 3 Studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Jun;11(3):971-982. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00534-8. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33826132King B, Maari C, Lain E, Silverberg JI, Issa M, Holzwarth K, Brinker D, Cardillo T, Nunes FP, Simpson EL. Extended Safety Analysis of Baricitinib 2 mg in Adult Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: An Integrated Analysis from Eight Randomized Clinical Trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 May;22(3):395-405. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00602-x. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33001140Reich K, Kabashima K, Peris K, Silverberg JI, Eichenfield LF, Bieber T, Kaszuba A, Kolodsick J, Yang FE, Gamalo M, Brinker DR, DeLozier AM, Janes JM, Nunes FP, Thyssen JP, Simpson EL. Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib Combined With Topical Corticosteroids for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Dec 1;156(12):1333-1343. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.3260.
- A Study of Baricitinib (LY3009104) in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic DermatitisLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.
Related trials for Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of HSK60002 Tablets in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Dermatitis Atopic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Moderate-to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST) study director
Eli Lilly and Company
68 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Baricitinib and Topical corticosteroid in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 68 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 68 sites in Japan, Germany, South Korea, Australia, Taiwan and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Aug 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 With a ≥ 2 Point Improvement (time frame: Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03733301, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2020.