Gastric CancerPhase 4NCT03733639
Tisseel® as a Reinforcement of Esophagojejunal Anastomoses
A Phase 4 study testing Tisseel and No Tisseel in people with Gastric Cancer and Anastomotic Leak, run by Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Background: The dehiscence of esophagojejunal anastomoses is one of the most serious complications after total gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. Any method of avoiding this problem will affect not only the postoperative course but also the prognostic of disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastric Cancer, Anastomotic Leak
- What is being tested?
- Tisseel and No Tisseel
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 146 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 21 Jul 2020to 1 Jul 2022
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients over 18 years diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma and scheduled for a total gastrectomy with curative intent in EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Group who agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients with non-epithelial neoplasms, with metastases, not resected or undergoing palliative resections. Patients who do not sign informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Elisenda Garsot Savall
Badalona, Barcelona, 08016
Yolanda Soler, CRD, +34 629 760 411, soler.y@recercaclinica.es
Sara Sentí, MD
About this study
Official title: The Use of Fibrin Glue Sealant (Tisseel®) as a Reinforcement of Esophagojejunal Anastomoses Will Decrease the Rate of Anastomotic Leak.
Background:
The dehiscence of esophagojejunal anastomoses is one of the most serious complications after total gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. Any method of avoiding this problem will affect not only the postoperative course but also the prognostic of disease.
Read more
Methods:
This is a prospective, randomized and multicenter trial, within the Spanish EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Group, to investigate the efficacy of Tisseel® in reducing the rate of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage in patients with gastric cancer. The rate of anastomosis leak will be measured with clinical, radiological and analytic parameters.
Objective:
Analyze the efficacy of Tisseel® as a reinforcement in reducing the rate of anastomotic esophagojejunal anastomoses.
Read the detailed description
Introduction The dehiscence of the esophagojejunal anastomosis is one of the most serious complications after a total gastrectomy not only in the short term but it has been shown to be an independent risk factor for survival. The rate of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage after cancer gastrectomies is described to be between 1-12.3%.
Any method to prevent this complication would be of vital importance to improve the evolution of these patients. Likewise, when the dehiscence has been established, early detection could contribute to an early intervention, avoiding more serious consequences and, therefore, improving the short and long term prognosis.
Little progress has been made during recent decades in the prevention of anastomotic leakage in high-risk digestive tract anastomosis. Some authors have tried the use of new methods of suture, reinforcements or patches in the anastomosis. Fibrin adhesives were introduced more than 30 years ago, in order to favor hemostasis and tissue adhesion. Numerous studies have demonstrated their effectiveness in reducing surgical bleeding in cardiovascular surgery but its role as a sealant in gastrointestinal anastomosis is more debated. There have been some experimental studies that have shown a possible protective effect of this material in enteric anastomoses. With the evolution of bariatric surgery and with the high volume of surgeries handled, several studies have been published that assess the effect of fibrin sealants on gastrojejunal anastomoses. In esophagogastric surgery, the number of published studies is reduced and there are only 2 studies that assess the effect of fibrin sealants on esophagojejunal anastomosis. The results of these studies seem to indicate that the application of fibrin sealants in this anastomosis could have a favorable effect in reducing the number of anastomotic dehiscences.
There are different definitions for the concept of "anastomotic dehiscence". The dehiscence of the esophago-jejunal anastomotic can be defined as any clinical and / or radiological evidence of dehiscence of the anastomosis. Although early diagnosis is key to avoiding major consequences, in clinical practice, the diagnosis of anastomotic dehiscence is often delayed. Direct observation of the debit of surgical drainage, fever or persistent ileus or clear symptoms of peritonitis are indirect signs that make us suspect a possible anastomotic dehiscence. The possibility of having a parameter that allows us to diagnose early a problem in the suture would allow us to act earlier and, therefore, improve the prognosis of these patients in the short and long term.
In colorectal surgery, serological parameters such as procalcitonin or C-reactive protein have been studied as early predictors of anastomotic dehiscence. In esophagogastric surgery, publications are scarce and all of them analyze results in esophagogastric anastomoses.
Furthermore, the determination of amylases in drainage has also been used for the detection of postoperative fistula. It is a simple and low cost method and is a parameter widely used in pancreatic surgery for the detection and evolutionary control of pancreatic fistulas. It has also been shown to be useful in esophageal surgery and in bariatric surgery. However, in gastric cancer it has only been used for the diagnosis of pancreatic fistula as a complication in total gastrectomies with associated splenectomy.
Finally, the use of radiology with oral contrast routinely in the postoperative period of esophagogastric surgery has been shown to have a low sensitivity for the early detection of anastomotic dehiscence. CT with oral contrast seems to have greater sensitivity and positive predictive value in esophageal surgery for this purpose, but the need to perform a postoperative test to evaluate the anastomosis without clinical evidence of dehiscence is unclear.
For all these reasons, we believe that a multicenter randomized study will contribute to improve the clinical results of esophagogastric surgery and the knowledge of the diagnosis of complications, by studying the efficacy of Tisseel® in reducing the rate of anastomotic leakage, but also analyzing the role of drain amylases, serum CRP (C-reactive protein), procalcitonin and white blood cell levels in the early detection and prediction of anastomotic leak, and the role of CT with oral contrast as a routine assessment of anastomotic integrity.
Objective Analyze the efficacy of Tisseel® in reducing the rate of anastomotic leakage diagnosed in the postoperative period using clinical and / or radiological parameters.
Methods This is a prospective, randomized and multicenter trial, within the Spanish EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Project, to investigate the efficacy of Tisseel® in reducing the rate of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage in patients with gastric cancer.
Participation study will be offered to all centers that are currently part of the Spanish EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Group. Those hospitals that show their desire to participate must sign the Letter of Commitment. In the same way, the study must sign off by European Medicine Agency and Spanish Agency of Medicines.
Once the patient is included in the study the surgeon performs a total gastrectomy as usual procedure. Once the esophagojejunal anastomosis is done the patient is randomized (Tisseel® vs no product). Surgeon dispenses Tisseel® all over the anastomosis following data sheet if applicable. The rest of the surgical procedure is as usual. In the postoperative period the investigator collects the data commented in following sections.
The evidence of an anastomotic leak will be tested with analytical and radiological parameters:
- Blood samples will be taken from patients at:
- Immediate preoperative (blood count, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein)
- Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 postoperative (blood count, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein).
- A sample of surgical drainage will be collected for the determination of amylases on days: 1,3,5, and 7 postoperative or until drainage is withdrawn.
- An abdominal CT with oral contrast will be performed within the first 5 postoperative days. The date and the result will be collected.
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer, Anastomotic Leak
- Being tested
- Tisseel, No Tisseel
- Medical subject headings
- Stomach Neoplasms, Anastomotic Leak
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TisseelDrug
Reinforcement of esophagojejunal anastomoses after total gastrectomy with the product.
No TisseelDevice
No reinforcement of esophagojejunal anastomoses after total gastrectomy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tisseel® | Active comparator | Once the esophagojejunal anastomosis is done the patient is randomized (Tisseel® vs no product). In the arm "Tisseel®" surgeon dispenses the product all over the anastomosis. The rest of the surgical procedure is as usual. Receives: Drug: Tisseel |
| no Tisseel® | Other | Once the esophagojejunal anastomosis is done the patient is randomized (Tisseel® vs no product). In the arm " noTisseel®" surgeon performs the surgical procedure as usual. Receives: Device: No Tisseel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of esophagojejunal anastomotic leak in immediate postoperative period
Clinical or radiological (see anex 1: Score Goense) evidence of esophagojejunal anastomotic leak.
Measured: 7 days
Secondary outcomes (11)
Amylases level in drainage
Amylase level (mg/L) in drainage
Measured: days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively
CRP (C-reactive protein) in blood
C-reactive protein in blood (mg/L)
Measured: days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively
Procalcitonin in blood
Procalcitonin in blood (mg/L)
Measured: days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively
White cell levels in blood
White cell levels in blood (x109/L)
Measured: days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively
Results of Computed Tomography with oral contrast.
The results will be expressed based on Goense Score
Based on Score Goense (Anastomotic Leakage Prediction Score). The investigator will collect the presence of:
Yes No Normal Fluid collection Air cavity Fistula Wall discontinuity Empiema
Goense L, Stassen PMC, Wessels FJ, van Rossum PSN, Ruurdal JP, van Leeuwen MS, van Hillegersberg R. Diagnostic performance of a CT-based scoring system for diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: comparison with subjective CT assessment. Eur Radiol 2017; 27:4426-34
Measured: between 3th and 5th postoperative day
Type of esophagojejunal anastomoses performed
The type of esophagojejunal anastomoses performed can be:
- mechanical (circular)
- mechanical (lineal)
- manual
Measured: day of intervention
Postoperative complications
Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo score):
Grade I Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiological interventions
Grade II Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for grade I complications.
Grade III Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention
- IIIa Intervention not under general anesthesia
- IIIb Intervention under general anesthesia
Grade IV Life-threatening complication requiring IC/ICU-management
- IVa single organ dysfunction (including dialysis)
- IVb multiorgandysfunction
Grade V Death of a patient
Measured: 30 days after surgery
90-day mortality
Mortality at 90 days after surgery
Measured: 90 days after surgery
Need for urgent surgical re-intervention
Reintervention after surgery:
Yes/Not
Measured: 30 days after surgery
Hospital stay
Number of days of hospital stay
Measured: 30 days after surgery
Readmission
Readmission within 30 days after discharge:
Yes/Not
Measured: 30 days after discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2018
- Study start21 Jul 2020
- Primary completion1 Jul 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jul 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (31)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 146 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Elisenda Garsot Savall, Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
- Investigators
- Elisenda Garsot, Principal investigator, Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03733639
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Tisseel
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 18 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 23 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Aurello P, Magistri P, D'Angelo F, Valabrega S, Sirimarco D, Tierno SM, Nava AK, Ramacciato G. Treatment of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage: a systematic review from the last two decades. Am Surg. 2015 May;81(5):450-3.
PubMed 25975326Migita K, Takayama T, Matsumoto S, Wakatsuki K, Enomoto K, Tanaka T, Ito M, Nakajima Y. Risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Sep;16(9):1659-65. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1932-4. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
PubMed 22688419De Stefano A, Bettarini F, Di Mare G, Neri A. [Enteric anastomosis and Tachosil(R)]. Minerva Chir. 2011 Jun;66(3):183-8. Italian.
PubMed 21666554Yuan Y, Zeng X, Hu Y, Xie T, Zhao Y. Omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD008446. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008446.pub2.
PubMed 23152259Borst HG, Haverich A, Walterbusch G, Maatz W. Fibrin adhesive: an important hemostatic adjunct in cardiovascular operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982 Oct;84(4):548-53.
PubMed 6981733Kjaergard HK, Fairbrother JE. Controlled clinical studies of fibrin sealant in cardiothoracic surgery--a review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10(9):727-33. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(96)80332-0.
PubMed 8905274Matthew TL, Spotnitz WD, Kron IL, Daniel TM, Tribble CG, Nolan SP. Four years' experience with fibrin sealant in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Jul;50(1):40-3; discussion 43-4. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90080-p.
PubMed 2369228Bonanomi G, Prince JM, McSteen F, Schauer PR, Hamad GG. Sealing effect of fibrin glue on the healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses: implications for the endoscopic treatment of leaks. Surg Endosc. 2004 Nov;18(11):1620-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8803-3. Epub 2004 Oct 11.
PubMed 15931477Silecchia G, Boru CE, Mouiel J, Rossi M, Anselmino M, Morino M, Toppino M, Gaspari A, Gentileschi P, Tacchino R, Basso N. The use of fibrin sealant to prevent major complications following laparoscopic gastric bypass: results of a multicenter, randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2492-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9885-0. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
PubMed 18365278Upadhyaya VD, Gopal SC, Gangopadhyaya AN, Gupta DK, Sharma S, Upadyaya A, Kumar V, Pandey A. Role of fibrin glue as a sealant to esophageal anastomosis in cases of congenital esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula. World J Surg. 2007 Dec;31(12):2412-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9244-7.
PubMed 17917772Saldana-Cortes JA, Larios-Arceo F, Prieto-Diaz-Chavez E, De Buen EP, Gonzalez-Mercado S, Alvarez-Villasenor AS, Prieto-Aldape MR, Fuentes-Orozco C, Gonzalez-Ojeda A. Role of fibrin glue in the prevention of cervical leakage and strictures after esophageal reconstruction of caustic injury. World J Surg. 2009 May;33(5):986-93. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-9949-x.
PubMed 19234736Fernandez Fernandez L, Tejero E, Tieso A. Randomized trial of fibrin glue to seal mechanical oesophagojejunal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1996 Jan;83(1):40-1. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830111. No abstract available.
PubMed 8653358Lago Oliver J, Arjona Medina I, Martin Garcia-Almenta E, Martin Gil J, Sanz Sanchez M, Perez Diaz MD, Alonso Poza A, Turegano Fuentes F, Torres Garcia A. [Use of fibrin based biological adhesives in the prevention of anastomotic leaks in the high risk digestive tract: preliminary results of the multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, and simple blind phase IV clinical trial: Protissucol001]. Cir Esp. 2012 Dec;90(10):647-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 Jun 27. Spanish.
PubMed 22748849Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001 Sep;88(9):1157-68. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01829.x.
PubMed 11531861Yoo HM, Lee HH, Shim JH, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY. Negative impact of leakage on survival of patients undergoing curative resection for advanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;104(7):734-40. doi: 10.1002/jso.22045. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
PubMed 21792945
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Use of Fibrin Glue Sealant (Tisseel®) as a Reinforcement of Esophagojejunal Anastomoses Will Decrease the Rate of Anastomotic Leak.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03733639
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Tisseel
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer, Anastomotic Leak
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 146 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Germans Trias i Pujol HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background:
The dehiscence of esophagojejunal anastomoses is one of the most serious complications after total gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. Any method of avoiding this problem will affect not only the postoperative course but also the prognostic of disease.
Methods:
This is a prospective, randomized and multicenter trial, within the Spanish EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Group, to investigate the efficacy of Tisseel® in reducing the rate of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage in patients with gastric cancer. The rate of anastomosis leak will be measured with clinical, radiological and analytic parameters.
Objective:
Analyze the efficacy of Tisseel® as a reinforcement in reducing the rate of anastomotic esophagojejunal anastomoses.
Detailed description
Introduction The dehiscence of the esophagojejunal anastomosis is one of the most serious complications after a total gastrectomy not only in the short term but it has been shown to be an independent risk factor for survival. The rate of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage after cancer gastrectomies is described to be between 1-12.3%.
Any method to prevent this complication would be of vital importance to improve the evolution of these patients. Likewise, when the dehiscence has been established, early detection could contribute to an early intervention, avoiding more serious consequences and, therefore, improving the short and long term prognosis.
Little progress has been made during recent decades in the prevention of anastomotic leakage in high-risk digestive tract anastomosis. Some authors have tried the use of new methods of suture, reinforcements or patches in the anastomosis. Fibrin adhesives were introduced more than 30 years ago, in order to favor hemostasis and tissue adhesion. Numerous studies have demonstrated their effectiveness in reducing surgical bleeding in cardiovascular surgery but its role as a sealant in gastrointestinal anastomosis is more debated. There have been some experimental studies that have shown a possible protective effect of this material in enteric anastomoses. With the evolution of bariatric surgery and with the high volume of surgeries handled, several studies have been published that assess the effect of fibrin sealants on gastrojejunal anastomoses. In esophagogastric surgery, the number of published studies is reduced and there are only 2 studies that assess the effect of fibrin sealants on esophagojejunal anastomosis. The results of these studies seem to indicate that the application of fibrin sealants in this anastomosis could have a favorable effect in reducing the number of anastomotic dehiscences.
There are different definitions for the concept of "anastomotic dehiscence". The dehiscence of the esophago-jejunal anastomotic can be defined as any clinical and / or radiological evidence of dehiscence of the anastomosis. Although early diagnosis is key to avoiding major consequences, in clinical practice, the diagnosis of anastomotic dehiscence is often delayed. Direct observation of the debit of surgical drainage, fever or persistent ileus or clear symptoms of peritonitis are indirect signs that make us suspect a possible anastomotic dehiscence. The possibility of having a parameter that allows us to diagnose early a problem in the suture would allow us to act earlier and, therefore, improve the prognosis of these patients in the short and long term.
In colorectal surgery, serological parameters such as procalcitonin or C-reactive protein have been studied as early predictors of anastomotic dehiscence. In esophagogastric surgery, publications are scarce and all of them analyze results in esophagogastric anastomoses.
Furthermore, the determination of amylases in drainage has also been used for the detection of postoperative fistula. It is a simple and low cost method and is a parameter widely used in pancreatic surgery for the detection and evolutionary control of pancreatic fistulas. It has also been shown to be useful in esophageal surgery and in bariatric surgery. However, in gastric cancer it has only been used for the diagnosis of pancreatic fistula as a complication in total gastrectomies with associated splenectomy.
Finally, the use of radiology with oral contrast routinely in the postoperative period of esophagogastric surgery has been shown to have a low sensitivity for the early detection of anastomotic dehiscence. CT with oral contrast seems to have greater sensitivity and positive predictive value in esophageal surgery for this purpose, but the need to perform a postoperative test to evaluate the anastomosis without clinical evidence of dehiscence is unclear.
For all these reasons, we believe that a multicenter randomized study will contribute to improve the clinical results of esophagogastric surgery and the knowledge of the diagnosis of complications, by studying the efficacy of Tisseel® in reducing the rate of anastomotic leakage, but also analyzing the role of drain amylases, serum CRP (C-reactive protein), procalcitonin and white blood cell levels in the early detection and prediction of anastomotic leak, and the role of CT with oral contrast as a routine assessment of anastomotic integrity.
Objective Analyze the efficacy of Tisseel® in reducing the rate of anastomotic leakage diagnosed in the postoperative period using clinical and / or radiological parameters.
Methods This is a prospective, randomized and multicenter trial, within the Spanish EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Project, to investigate the efficacy of Tisseel® in reducing the rate of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage in patients with gastric cancer.
Participation study will be offered to all centers that are currently part of the Spanish EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Group. Those hospitals that show their desire to participate must sign the Letter of Commitment. In the same way, the study must sign off by European Medicine Agency and Spanish Agency of Medicines.
Once the patient is included in the study the surgeon performs a total gastrectomy as usual procedure. Once the esophagojejunal anastomosis is done the patient is randomized (Tisseel® vs no product). Surgeon dispenses Tisseel® all over the anastomosis following data sheet if applicable. The rest of the surgical procedure is as usual. In the postoperative period the investigator collects the data commented in following sections.
The evidence of an anastomotic leak will be tested with analytical and radiological parameters:
- Blood samples will be taken from patients at:
- Immediate preoperative (blood count, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein)
- Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 postoperative (blood count, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein).
- A sample of surgical drainage will be collected for the determination of amylases on days: 1,3,5, and 7 postoperative or until drainage is withdrawn.
- An abdominal CT with oral contrast will be performed within the first 5 postoperative days. The date and the result will be collected.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tisseel® | Active comparator | Drug: TisseelOnce the esophagojejunal anastomosis is done the patient is randomized (Tisseel® vs no product). In the arm "Tisseel®" surgeon dispenses the product all over the anastomosis. The rest of the surgical procedure is as usual. |
| no Tisseel® | Other | Device: No TisseelOnce the esophagojejunal anastomosis is done the patient is randomized (Tisseel® vs no product). In the arm " noTisseel®" surgeon performs the surgical procedure as usual. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients over 18 years diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma and scheduled for a total gastrectomy with curative intent in EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Group who agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with non-epithelial neoplasms, with metastases, not resected or undergoing palliative resections. Patients who do not sign informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TisseelReinforcement of esophagojejunal anastomoses after total gastrectomy with the product. | Drug | Tisseel® |
| No TisseelNo reinforcement of esophagojejunal anastomoses after total gastrectomy | Device | no Tisseel® |
Primary outcome
Rate of esophagojejunal anastomotic leak in immediate postoperative period
Time frame: 7 days
Clinical or radiological (see anex 1: Score Goense) evidence of esophagojejunal anastomotic leak.
11 secondary outcomes
Amylases level in drainage
Time frame: days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively
CRP (C-reactive protein) in blood
Time frame: days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively
Procalcitonin in blood
Time frame: days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively
White cell levels in blood
Time frame: days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively
Results of Computed Tomography with oral contrast.
Time frame: between 3th and 5th postoperative day
Type of esophagojejunal anastomoses performed
Time frame: day of intervention
Postoperative complications
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
90-day mortality
Time frame: 90 days after surgery
Need for urgent surgical re-intervention
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
Hospital stay
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
Readmission
Time frame: 30 days after discharge
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jul 2020.
- Background: PubMed 25975326Aurello P, Magistri P, D'Angelo F, Valabrega S, Sirimarco D, Tierno SM, Nava AK, Ramacciato G. Treatment of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage: a systematic review from the last two decades. Am Surg. 2015 May;81(5):450-3.
- Background: PubMed 22688419Migita K, Takayama T, Matsumoto S, Wakatsuki K, Enomoto K, Tanaka T, Ito M, Nakajima Y. Risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Sep;16(9):1659-65. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1932-4. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
- Background: PubMed 21666554De Stefano A, Bettarini F, Di Mare G, Neri A. [Enteric anastomosis and Tachosil(R)]. Minerva Chir. 2011 Jun;66(3):183-8. Italian.
- Background: PubMed 23152259Yuan Y, Zeng X, Hu Y, Xie T, Zhao Y. Omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD008446. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008446.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 6981733Borst HG, Haverich A, Walterbusch G, Maatz W. Fibrin adhesive: an important hemostatic adjunct in cardiovascular operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982 Oct;84(4):548-53.
- Background: PubMed 8905274Kjaergard HK, Fairbrother JE. Controlled clinical studies of fibrin sealant in cardiothoracic surgery--a review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10(9):727-33. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(96)80332-0.
- Background: PubMed 2369228Matthew TL, Spotnitz WD, Kron IL, Daniel TM, Tribble CG, Nolan SP. Four years' experience with fibrin sealant in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Jul;50(1):40-3; discussion 43-4. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90080-p.
- Background: PubMed 15931477Bonanomi G, Prince JM, McSteen F, Schauer PR, Hamad GG. Sealing effect of fibrin glue on the healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses: implications for the endoscopic treatment of leaks. Surg Endosc. 2004 Nov;18(11):1620-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8803-3. Epub 2004 Oct 11.
- Background: PubMed 18365278Silecchia G, Boru CE, Mouiel J, Rossi M, Anselmino M, Morino M, Toppino M, Gaspari A, Gentileschi P, Tacchino R, Basso N. The use of fibrin sealant to prevent major complications following laparoscopic gastric bypass: results of a multicenter, randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2492-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9885-0. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
- Background: PubMed 17917772Upadhyaya VD, Gopal SC, Gangopadhyaya AN, Gupta DK, Sharma S, Upadyaya A, Kumar V, Pandey A. Role of fibrin glue as a sealant to esophageal anastomosis in cases of congenital esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula. World J Surg. 2007 Dec;31(12):2412-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9244-7.
- Background: PubMed 19234736Saldana-Cortes JA, Larios-Arceo F, Prieto-Diaz-Chavez E, De Buen EP, Gonzalez-Mercado S, Alvarez-Villasenor AS, Prieto-Aldape MR, Fuentes-Orozco C, Gonzalez-Ojeda A. Role of fibrin glue in the prevention of cervical leakage and strictures after esophageal reconstruction of caustic injury. World J Surg. 2009 May;33(5):986-93. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-9949-x.
- Background: PubMed 8653358Fernandez Fernandez L, Tejero E, Tieso A. Randomized trial of fibrin glue to seal mechanical oesophagojejunal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1996 Jan;83(1):40-1. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830111. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
GK01 Cell Therapy in Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis
Gastric Cancer (GC)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Neoadjuvant-adjuvant Durvalumab and FLOT Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Durvalumab in Chinese Patients With Resectable GC/GEJC.
Gastric, Esophagogastric Junction
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elisenda Garsot principal investigator
Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Tisseel and No Tisseel in people with Gastric Cancer and Anastomotic Leak, run by Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Elisenda Garsot (0034934978803, egarsot@yahoo.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of esophagojejunal anastomotic leak in immediate postoperative period (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03733639, which also lists 31 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2020.