HivNCT03734393
HOPE in Action Trial of HIV+ Deceased Donor Liver Transplants for HIV+ Recipients
A study testing HIVD+/R+ in people with Hiv, run by Johns Hopkins University at 26 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to determine if an HIV-infected donor liver (HIVD+) transplant is safe with regards to major transplant-related and HIV-related complications Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hiv
- What is being tested?
- HIVD+/R+
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 26 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 Jan 2019to 4 Jul 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant meets the standard criteria for liver transplant at the local center.
- Participants being listed for a simultaneous liver kidney (SLK) are eligible if participants meet the standard criteria for both organs.
- Participant is able to understand and provide informed consent.
- Participant meets with an independent advocate per the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act Safeguards and Research Criteria.
- Documented HIV infection (by any licensed assay or documented history of detectable HIV-1 RNA).*
- Participant is ≥ 18 years old.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Opportunistic complications: prior history of certain opportunistic infections is not an exclusion if the participant has received appropriate therapy and has no evidence of active disease. Medical record documentation should be provided whenever possible.
- CD4+ T-cell count: ≥ 100/µL within 16 weeks prior to transplant if no history of AIDS-defining infection; or ≥ 200 μL if history of opportunistic infection is present.
- HIV-1 RNA is below 50 RNA/mL.* Viral blips between 50-400 copies will be allowed as long as there are not consecutive measurements > 200 copies/mL. *Organ recipients who are unable to tolerate anti-retroviral therapy (ART) due to organ.
- failure or recently started ART may be eligible despite a detectable viral load if safe and effective ART to be used by the recipient after transplantation is described.
- Participant must have or be willing to start seeing a primary medical care provider with expertise in HIV management.
- Participant is willing to comply with all medications related to participant's transplant and HIV management.
- For participants with a history of aspergillus colonization or disease, no current clinical evidence of active disease.
- Agreement to use contraception.
- Participant is not suffering from significant wasting (e.g. body mass index < 21) thought to be related to HIV disease.
Who cannot join
- Participant has a history of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), or primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma.*
- Participant is pregnant or breastfeeding. (Note: Participants who become pregnant post-transplant will continue to be followed in the study and will be managed per local site practice. Women that become pregnant should not breastfeed.)
- Past or current medical problems or findings from medical history, physical examination or laboratory testing that are not listed above, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may pose additional risks from participation in the study, may interfere with the participant's ability to comply with study requirements or that may impact the quality or interpretation of the data obtained from the study.
Trial locations and contacts
26 sites in 1 country.
26 sites in 1 country
United States26 sites
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
University of Maryland, Institute of Human Virology
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205
University of Alabama, Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
University of Tennessee Health and Science Center
Memphis, Tennessee, 38104
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Yale University School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520-8022
Ochsner Clinic Foundation
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10029
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, 10065
New York University School of Medicine
New York, New York, 11016
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
UPMC - University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, 92103
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94193
MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
About this study
Official title: HOPE in Action Prospective Multicenter, Clinical Trial of HIV+ Deceased Donor Liver Transplants for HIV+ Recipients
The primary objective of this study is to determine if an HIV-infected donor liver (HIVD+) transplant is safe with regards to major transplant-related and HIV-related complications
Read the detailed description
This study will evaluate if receiving a liver transplant from an HIV-infected deceased liver donor is safe with regards to survival and major transplant-related and HIV-related complications compared to receiving a liver from an HIV-uninfected deceased liver donor (HIVD-). Those participants who have accepted an HIVD- organ will be randomized to be followed in the full study or followed in the nested observational group
- Conditions
- Hiv
- Being tested
- HIVD+/R+
- Medical subject headings
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HIVD+/R+Other
Liver from an HIV-infected deceased donor
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HIV D+/R+ | Experimental | HIV-infected individuals that accept an organ from an HIV-infected deceased donor - enrollment 40 Receives: Other: HIVD+/R+ |
| HIVD-/R+ | No intervention | HIV-infected individuals that accept an organ from an HIV-uninfected deceased donor and are randomized to participate in the full study arm, which includes research sample collection -enrollment 40 |
| HIVD-/R+ (observational) | No intervention | HIV-infected individuals that accept an organ from an HIV-uninfected deceased donor and randomized to observational group with limited data collection - enrollment 120 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to first death or graft failure or serious adverse event (SAE) or HIV breakthrough or opportunistic infection as a composite measure
Time (in days) to first of any of the following events: death or graft failure or SAE or HIV breakthrough or opportunistic infection
Measured: From date of transplant through administrative censorship at study completion, up to 4 years
Secondary outcomes (57)
Time to Pre-transplant mortality
Time (in days) to mortality while enrolled before transplant (survival framework)
Measured: From date of enrollment to date of transplant or death of any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 4 years
Graft Failure as assessed by Time to first occurrence of mortality or re-transplant or return to maintenance dialysis
Time (in days) to mortality or re-transplant or return to maintenance dialysis (survival framework)
Measured: From date of transplant through administrative censorship at study completion, up to 4 years
1-year acute liver rejection
Proportion of recipients who experience acute rejection as measured by biopsy using Banff 2016 comprehensive Update for antibody mediated rejection and Banff 1997 criteria for acute cellular rejection, liver.
Measured: From date of transplant to end of year 1
2-year acute liver rejection
Proportion of recipients who experience acute rejection as measured by biopsy using Banff 2016 comprehensive Update for antibody mediated rejection and Banff 1997 criteria for acute cellular rejection, liver.
Measured: From date of transplant to end of year 2
3-year acute liver rejection
Proportion of recipients who experience acute rejection as measured by biopsy using Banff 2016 comprehensive Update for antibody mediated rejection and Banff 1997 criteria for acute cellular rejection, liver.
Measured: From date of transplant to end of year 3
Number of graft rejections in liver transplant
Cumulative incidence of acute rejection (survival framework) as measured by biopsy using Banff 2016 comprehensive Update for antibody mediated rejection and Banff 1997 criteria for acute cellular rejection, liver.
Measured: From date of transplant to end of year 3
6-month acute kidney rejection in simultaneous liver/kidney transplant recipients
Proportion of recipients who experience acute rejection as measured by biopsy using Banff 2015 criteria: Borderline changes: 'Suspicious' for acute T-cell mediated rejection.This category is used when no intimal arteritis is present, but there are foci of mild tubulitis (t1, t2, or t3) with minor interstitial infiltration (i0 or i1) or interstitial infiltration (i2, i3) with mild (t1) tubulitis. Acute T-cell mediated rejection:Grade from IA defined as cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected, i2 or i3) and foci of moderate tubulitis (t2) to III defined as cases with 'transmural' arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation (v3)
Measured: From date of transplant to 6 months post transplant
1-year acute kidney rejection in simultaneous liver/kidney transplant recipients only
Proportion of recipients who experience acute rejection as measured by biopsy using Banff 2015 criteria: Borderline changes: 'Suspicious' for acute T-cell mediated rejection.This category is used when no intimal arteritis is present, but there are foci of mild tubulitis (t1, t2, or t3) with minor interstitial infiltration (i0 or i1) or interstitial infiltration (i2, i3) with mild (t1) tubulitis. Acute T-cell mediated rejection:Grade from IA defined as cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected, i2 or i3) and foci of moderate tubulitis (t2) to III defined as cases with 'transmural' arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation (v3)
Measured: From date of transplant to end of year 1
Number of Non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL)
Cumulative incidence of NAFL as measured by biopsy and transient elastography with controlled attenuation parameter for steatosis
Measured: From date of transplant through end of follow-up, up to 3 years
Number of steatohepatitis (NASH)
Cumulative incidence of NASH as measured by biopsy and transient elastography with controlled attenuation parameter for steatosis
Measured: From date of transplant through end of follow-up, up to 3 years
Trajectory of recipient Cluster of Differentiation (CD4) count over time
Analysis of repeated measures of CD4 (cells/mm3) count (longitudinal model)
Measured: From date of transplant through end of follow up, up to 4 years
Trajectory of recipient plasma HIV RNA over time
Analysis of repeated measures of plasma HIV RNA (copies/mL) longitudinal model
Measured: From date of transplant through end of follow-up, up to 4 years
Graft function as assessed by Fibrosis-4 index
Mean calculated fibrosis-4 index (Age (years) + AST/platelet count (109/L) x √ALT) Fibrosis 4 index estimates the amount of scar or fibrosis in the liver without requiring a biopsy. Using a lower cutoff value of 1.45, a Fibrosis-4 score <1.45 had a negative predictive value of 90% for advanced fibrosis. In contrast, a Fibrosis-4 >3.25 would have a 97% specificity and a positive predictive value of 65% for advanced fibrosis. In the patient cohort in which this formula was first validated, at least 70% patients had values <1.45 or >3.25.
Measured: 1 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by Fibrosis-4 index
Mean calculated fibrosis-4 index (Age (years) + AST/platelet count (109/L) x √ALT) Fibrosis 4 index estimates the amount of scar or fibrosis in the liver without requiring a biopsy. Using a lower cutoff value of 1.45, a Fibrosis-4 score <1.45 had a negative predictive value of 90% for advanced fibrosis. In contrast, a Fibrosis-4 >3.25 would have a 97% specificity and a positive predictive value of 65% for advanced fibrosis. In the patient cohort in which this formula was first validated, at least 70% patients had values <1.45 or >3.25.
Measured: 2 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by Fibrosis-4 index
Mean calculated fibrosis-4 index (Age (years) + AST/platelet count (109/L) x √ALT) Fibrosis 4 index estimates the amount of scar or fibrosis in the liver without requiring a biopsy. Using a lower cutoff value of 1.45, a Fibrosis-4 score <1.45 had a negative predictive value of 90% for advanced fibrosis. In contrast, a Fibrosis-4 >3.25 would have a 97% specificity and a positive predictive value of 65% for advanced fibrosis. In the patient cohort in which this formula was first validated, at least 70% patients had values <1.45 or >3.25.
Measured: 3 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by Fibrosis-4 index
Mean calculated fibrosis-4 index (Age (years) + AST/platelet count (109/L) x √ALT) Fibrosis 4 index estimates the amount of scar or fibrosis in the liver without requiring a biopsy. Using a lower cutoff value of 1.45, a Fibrosis-4 score <1.45 had a negative predictive value of 90% for advanced fibrosis. In contrast, a Fibrosis-4 >3.25 would have a 97% specificity and a positive predictive value of 65% for advanced fibrosis. In the patient cohort in which this formula was first validated, at least 70% patients had values <1.45 or >3.25.
Measured: 4 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by incidence of fibrosis
Cumulative incidence of advanced fibrosis (stage F3 or greater as defined by metavir fibrosis score) as measured on biopsy. The fibrosis score is assessed on a five point scale (F0 = no fibrosis, F1 = portal fibrosis without septa, F2 = few septa, F3 = numerous septa without cirrhosis, F4 = cirrhosis).
Measured: From date of transplant through end of follow-up, up to 3 years
Graft function as assessed by liver stiffness
Mean calculated liver stiffness by transient elastography (kPA)
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by liver stiffness
Mean calculated liver stiffness by transient elastography (kPA)
Measured: 2 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by liver stiffness
Mean calculated liver stiffness by transient elastography (kPA)
Measured: 3 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by aspartate aminotransferase (AST)
Mean calculated AST (U/L)
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by AST
Mean calculated AST (U/L)
Measured: 2 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by AST
Mean calculated AST (U/L)
Measured: 3 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by AST
Mean calculated AST (U/L)
Measured: 4 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
Mean calculated ALT (U/L)
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by ALT
Mean calculated ALT (U/L)
Measured: 2 years post-transplant
Average Graft function as assessed by ALT
Mean calculated ALT (U/L)
Measured: 3 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by ALT
Mean calculated ALT (U/L)
Measured: 4 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by bilirubin
Mean calculated bilirubin (mg/dL)
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by bilirubin
Mean calculated bilirubin (mg/dL)
Measured: 2 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by bilirubin
Mean calculated bilirubin (mg/dL)
Measured: 3 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by Bilirubin
Mean calculated bilirubin (mg/dL)
Measured: 4 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by Mean calculated Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score
Mean calculated MELD score. MELD score indicates the severity of liver disease, with scores ranging from 0-40. The higher the score the more severe the disease
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by Mean calculated MELD score
Mean calculated MELD score. MELD score indicates the severity of liver disease, with scores ranging from 0-40. The higher the score the more severe the disease
Measured: 2 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by Mean calculated MELD score
Mean calculated MELD score. MELD score indicates the severity of liver disease, with scores ranging from 0-40. The higher the score the more severe the disease
Measured: 3 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by Mean calculated MELD score
Mean calculated MELD score. MELD score indicates the severity of liver disease, with scores ranging from 0-40. The higher the score the more severe the disease
Measured: 4 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by AST to Platelet Ratio (APRI) index
Mean calculated APRI index [( AST / upper limits of normal (ULN) AST ) x 100] / Platelets (109/L)] An APRI score greater than 1.0 has a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 72% for predicting cirrhosis. In addition, APRI score greater than 0.7 has a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 72% for predicting significant hepatic fibrosis.For detection of cirrhosis, using an APRI cutoff score of 2.0 is more specific (91%) but less sensitive (46%). The lower the APRI score (less than 0.5), the greater the negative predictive value (and ability to rule out cirrhosis) and the higher the value (greater than 1.5) the greater the positive predictive value (and ability to rule in cirrhosis); midrange values are less helpful.
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by AST to Platelet Ratio (APRI) index
Mean calculated APRI index [( AST / ULN AST ) x 100] / Platelets (109/L)] An APRI score greater than 1.0 has a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 72% for predicting cirrhosis. In addition, APRI score greater than 0.7 has a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 72% for predicting significant hepatic fibrosis.For detection of cirrhosis, using an APRI cutoff score of 2.0 is more specific (91%) but less sensitive (46%). The lower the APRI score (less than 0.5), the greater the negative predictive value (and ability to rule out cirrhosis) and the higher the value (greater than 1.5) the greater the positive predictive value (and ability to rule in cirrhosis); midrange values are less helpful.
Measured: 2 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by AST to Platelet Ratio (APRI) index
Mean calculated APRI index [( AST / ULN AST ) x 100] / Platelets (109/L)] An APRI score greater than 1.0 has a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 72% for predicting cirrhosis. In addition, APRI score greater than 0.7 has a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 72% for predicting significant hepatic fibrosis.For detection of cirrhosis, using an APRI cutoff score of 2.0 is more specific (91%) but less sensitive (46%). The lower the APRI score (less than 0.5), the greater the negative predictive value (and ability to rule out cirrhosis) and the higher the value (greater than 1.5) the greater the positive predictive value (and ability to rule in cirrhosis); midrange values are less helpful.
Measured: 3 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by AST to Platelet Ratio (APRI) index
Mean calculated APRI index [( AST / ULN AST ) x 100] / Platelets (109/L)] An APRI score greater than 1.0 has a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 72% for predicting cirrhosis. In addition, APRI score greater than 0.7 has a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 72% for predicting significant hepatic fibrosis.For detection of cirrhosis, using an APRI cutoff score of 2.0 is more specific (91%) but less sensitive (46%). The lower the APRI score (less than 0.5), the greater the negative predictive value (and ability to rule out cirrhosis) and the higher the value (greater than 1.5) the greater the positive predictive value (and ability to rule in cirrhosis); midrange values are less helpful.
Measured: 4 years post-transplant
Metabolic Outcome as assessed by Body mass index (BMI)
Mean calculated BMI (weight in kilograms/height in meters squared)
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
Metabolic Outcome as assessed by Body mass index (BMI)
Mean calculated BMI(weight in kilograms/height in meters squared)
Measured: 2 years post-transplant
Metabolic Outcome as assessed by Body mass index (BMI)
Mean calculated BMI(weight in kilograms/height in meters squared)
Measured: 3 years post-transplant
Metabolic Outcome as assessed by Body mass index (BMI)
Mean calculated BMI(weight in kilograms/height in meters squared)
Measured: 4 years post-transplant
Average hemoglobin a1c among participants at 1 year
Mean calculated hemoglobin a1c (mg/dL)
Measured: 1 years post-transplant
Average hemoglobin a1c among participants at 2 years
Mean calculated hemoglobin a1c (mg/dL)
Measured: 2 years post-transplant
Average hemoglobin a1c among participants at 3 years
Mean calculated hemoglobin a1c (mg/dL)
Measured: 3 years post-transplant
Average hemoglobin a1c among participants at 4 years
Mean calculated hemoglobin a1c (mg/dL)
Measured: 4 years post-transplant
Number of HIV breakthroughs
Measured by local sites' Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certified lab with episode of HIV breakthrough defined as 2 consecutive plasma HIV viral loads >200 copies/mL or one HIV viral load >1000 copies/mL after a period of virologic control post-transplant
Measured: From date of transplant through end of follow-up, up to 4 years
Number of opportunistic infections
Cumulative incidence of opportunistic infections
Measured: From date of transplant through end of follow-up, up to 4 years
Number of X4 tropic virus breakthroughs
Measured by sending virus at time of breakthrough for HIV co-receptor assay
Measured: From date of transplant through end of follow-up, up to 4 years
Number of vascular complications
Number of vascular complications within 1 year of transplant, e.g. thrombosis, aneurysm
Measured: From date of transplant through year 1
Number of surgical complications
Number of surgical complications within 1 year of transplant, e.g. delayed closure, wound dehiscence
Measured: From date of transplant through year 1
Number of viral-related malignancies
Number of malignancies as determined by local pathology
Measured: From date of transplant through end of follow-up, up to 4 years
Hepatitis C (HCV) sustained viral response post-transplant
Proportion of HCV RNA positive recipients that achieve a sustained virologic response week 12 post-treatment (<15 IU/mL) with direct acting antivirals
Measured: 12 weeks HCV treatment
Number of the formation of de novo donor-specific human leukocyte antigen(HLA) antibodies
Proportion of participants with a de novo donor-specific HLA antibody as measured and reported by local sites' lab
Measured: From date of transplant through end of year 1
Time to first occurrence of all-cause-mortality or graft failure or renal allograft rejection or HIV breakthrough or HIV virologic failure or AIDS defining illness as a composite measure
Time to first of any of these events: all-cause-mortality or graft failure or renal allograft rejection or HIV breakthrough or HIV virologic failure or AIDS defining illness
Measured: From date of transplant through end of follow-up, up to 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Nov 2018
- Study start4 Jan 2019
- Primary completion4 Jul 2025
- Study completion4 Jul 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HivStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Johns Hopkins UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christine Durand, MD, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03734393
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00194582
- Other IDs
- U01AI138897
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Benner SE, Zhu X, Hussain S, Florman S, Eby Y, Fernandez RE, Ostrander D, Rana M, Ottmann S, Hand J, Price JC, Pereira MR, Wojciechowski D, Simkins J, Stosor V, Mehta SA, Aslam S, Malinis M, Haidar G, Massie A, Smith ML, Odim J, Morsheimer M, Quinn TC, Laird GM, Siliciano R, Balagopal A, Segev DL, Durand CM, Redd AD, Tobian AAR. HIV-Positive Liver Transplant Does not Alter the Latent Viral Reservoir in Recipients With Antiretroviral Therapy-Suppressed HIV. J Infect Dis. 2023 Nov 2;228(9):1274-1279. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad241.
PubMed 37379584Werbel WA, Brown DM, Kusemiju OT, Doby BL, Seaman SM, Redd AD, Eby Y, Fernandez RE, Desai NM, Miller J, Bismut GA, Kirby CS, Schmidt HA, Clarke WA, Seisa M, Petropoulos CJ, Quinn TC, Florman SS, Huprikar S, Rana MM, Friedman-Moraco RJ, Mehta AK, Stock PG, Price JC, Stosor V, Mehta SG, Gilbert AJ, Elias N, Morris MI, Mehta SA, Small CB, Haidar G, Malinis M, Husson JS, Pereira MR, Gupta G, Hand J, Kirchner VA, Agarwal A, Aslam S, Blumberg EA, Wolfe CR, Myer K, Wood RP, Neidlinger N, Strell S, Shuck M, Wilkins H, Wadsworth M, Motter JD, Odim J, Segev DL, Durand CM, Tobian AAR; HOPE in Action Investigators. National Landscape of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Deceased Organ Donors in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 10;74(11):2010-2019. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab743.
PubMed 34453519
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- HOPE in Action Prospective Multicenter, Clinical Trial of HIV+ Deceased Donor Liver Transplants for HIV+ Recipients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03734393
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00194582
- Conditions
- Hiv
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
- Study start
- 4 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Jul 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to determine if an HIV-infected donor liver (HIVD+) transplant is safe with regards to major transplant-related and HIV-related complications
Detailed description
This study will evaluate if receiving a liver transplant from an HIV-infected deceased liver donor is safe with regards to survival and major transplant-related and HIV-related complications compared to receiving a liver from an HIV-uninfected deceased liver donor (HIVD-). Those participants who have accepted an HIVD- organ will be randomized to be followed in the full study or followed in the nested observational group
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HIV D+/R+ | Experimental | Other: HIVD+/R+HIV-infected individuals that accept an organ from an HIV-infected deceased donor - enrollment 40 |
| HIVD-/R+ | No intervention | –HIV-infected individuals that accept an organ from an HIV-uninfected deceased donor and are randomized to participate in the full study arm, which includes research sample collection -enrollment 40 |
| HIVD-/R+ (observational) | No intervention | –HIV-infected individuals that accept an organ from an HIV-uninfected deceased donor and randomized to observational group with limited data collection - enrollment 120 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Participant meets the standard criteria for liver transplant at the local center.
- Participants being listed for a simultaneous liver kidney (SLK) are eligible if participants meet the standard criteria for both organs.
- Participant is able to understand and provide informed consent.
- Participant meets with an independent advocate per the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act Safeguards and Research Criteria.
- Documented HIV infection (by any licensed assay or documented history of detectable HIV-1 RNA).*
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Participant has a history of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), or primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma.*
- Participant is pregnant or breastfeeding. (Note: Participants who become pregnant post-transplant will continue to be followed in the study and will be managed per local site practice. Women that become pregnant should not breastfeed.)
- Past or current medical problems or findings from medical history, physical examination or laboratory testing that are not listed above, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may pose additional risks from participation in the study, may interfere with the participant's ability to comply with study requirements or that may impact the quality or interpretation of the data obtained from the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HIVD+/R+Liver from an HIV-infected deceased donor | Other | HIV D+/R+ |
Primary outcome
Time to first death or graft failure or serious adverse event (SAE) or HIV breakthrough or opportunistic infection as a composite measure
Time frame: From date of transplant through administrative censorship at study completion, up to 4 years
Time (in days) to first of any of the following events: death or graft failure or SAE or HIV breakthrough or opportunistic infection
57 secondary outcomes
Time to Pre-transplant mortality
Time frame: From date of enrollment to date of transplant or death of any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 4 years
Graft Failure as assessed by Time to first occurrence of mortality or re-transplant or return to maintenance dialysis
Time frame: From date of transplant through administrative censorship at study completion, up to 4 years
1-year acute liver rejection
Time frame: From date of transplant to end of year 1
2-year acute liver rejection
Time frame: From date of transplant to end of year 2
3-year acute liver rejection
Time frame: From date of transplant to end of year 3
Number of graft rejections in liver transplant
Time frame: From date of transplant to end of year 3
6-month acute kidney rejection in simultaneous liver/kidney transplant recipients
Time frame: From date of transplant to 6 months post transplant
1-year acute kidney rejection in simultaneous liver/kidney transplant recipients only
Time frame: From date of transplant to end of year 1
Number of Non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL)
Time frame: From date of transplant through end of follow-up, up to 3 years
Number of steatohepatitis (NASH)
Time frame: From date of transplant through end of follow-up, up to 3 years
Trajectory of recipient Cluster of Differentiation (CD4) count over time
Time frame: From date of transplant through end of follow up, up to 4 years
Trajectory of recipient plasma HIV RNA over time
Time frame: From date of transplant through end of follow-up, up to 4 years
Graft function as assessed by Fibrosis-4 index
Time frame: 1 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by Fibrosis-4 index
Time frame: 2 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by Fibrosis-4 index
Time frame: 3 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by Fibrosis-4 index
Time frame: 4 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by incidence of fibrosis
Time frame: From date of transplant through end of follow-up, up to 3 years
Graft function as assessed by liver stiffness
Time frame: 1 year post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by liver stiffness
Time frame: 2 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by liver stiffness
Time frame: 3 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by aspartate aminotransferase (AST)
Time frame: 1 year post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by AST
Time frame: 2 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by AST
Time frame: 3 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by AST
Time frame: 4 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
Time frame: 1 year post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by ALT
Time frame: 2 years post-transplant
Average Graft function as assessed by ALT
Time frame: 3 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by ALT
Time frame: 4 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by bilirubin
Time frame: 1 year post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by bilirubin
Time frame: 2 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by bilirubin
Time frame: 3 years post-transplant
Average graft function as assessed by Bilirubin
Time frame: 4 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by Mean calculated Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score
Time frame: 1 year post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by Mean calculated MELD score
Time frame: 2 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by Mean calculated MELD score
Time frame: 3 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by Mean calculated MELD score
Time frame: 4 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by AST to Platelet Ratio (APRI) index
Time frame: 1 year post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by AST to Platelet Ratio (APRI) index
Time frame: 2 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by AST to Platelet Ratio (APRI) index
Time frame: 3 years post-transplant
Graft function as assessed by AST to Platelet Ratio (APRI) index
Time frame: 4 years post-transplant
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jul 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37379584Benner SE, Zhu X, Hussain S, Florman S, Eby Y, Fernandez RE, Ostrander D, Rana M, Ottmann S, Hand J, Price JC, Pereira MR, Wojciechowski D, Simkins J, Stosor V, Mehta SA, Aslam S, Malinis M, Haidar G, Massie A, Smith ML, Odim J, Morsheimer M, Quinn TC, Laird GM, Siliciano R, Balagopal A, Segev DL, Durand CM, Redd AD, Tobian AAR. HIV-Positive Liver Transplant Does not Alter the Latent Viral Reservoir in Recipients With Antiretroviral Therapy-Suppressed HIV. J Infect Dis. 2023 Nov 2;228(9):1274-1279. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad241.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34453519Werbel WA, Brown DM, Kusemiju OT, Doby BL, Seaman SM, Redd AD, Eby Y, Fernandez RE, Desai NM, Miller J, Bismut GA, Kirby CS, Schmidt HA, Clarke WA, Seisa M, Petropoulos CJ, Quinn TC, Florman SS, Huprikar S, Rana MM, Friedman-Moraco RJ, Mehta AK, Stock PG, Price JC, Stosor V, Mehta SG, Gilbert AJ, Elias N, Morris MI, Mehta SA, Small CB, Haidar G, Malinis M, Husson JS, Pereira MR, Gupta G, Hand J, Kirchner VA, Agarwal A, Aslam S, Blumberg EA, Wolfe CR, Myer K, Wood RP, Neidlinger N, Strell S, Shuck M, Wilkins H, Wadsworth M, Motter JD, Odim J, Segev DL, Durand CM, Tobian AAR; HOPE in Action Investigators. National Landscape of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Deceased Organ Donors in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 10;74(11):2010-2019. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab743.
Related trials for Hiv
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christine Durand, MD principal investigator
Johns Hopkins University
26 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HIVD+/R+ in people with Hiv, run by Johns Hopkins University at 26 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 26 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to first death or graft failure or serious adverse event (SAE) or HIV breakthrough or opportunistic infection as a composite measure (time frame: From date of transplant through administrative censorship at study completion, up to 4 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03734393, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2026.