Intubation ComplicationNCT03735160
Pressure Over Nasotracheal Intubation Related Nasal Alar Injury
An observational study of Intubation Complication and Pressure Injury, run by Mackay Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Nasotracheal intubation can cause injury and hemorrhage of nasal mucosa and nasal alar. The investigators measure the actual pressure at the angle between nasotracheal tube and nasal alar, analyze the relationship of clinical signs and symptoms to build up optimal clinical routines. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Intubation Complication, Pressure Injury
- What is being tested?
- pressure sensor
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 1 May 2020to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients undergo general anesthesia and receive intratracheal intubation through nose
Who may be able to join
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical classification I \& II
- patients undergo general anesthesia and receive intratracheal intubation through nose
- elective surgery
Who cannot join
- with known nasal injury
- already intubation before induction
- surgery on the nose
- emergent operation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Monitoring the Pressure Over Nasotracheal Intubation and Related Nasal Alar Injury
Nasotracheal intubation can cause injury and hemorrhage of nasal mucosa and nasal alar. The investigators measure the actual pressure at the angle between nasotracheal tube and nasal alar, analyze the relationship of clinical signs and symptoms to build up optimal clinical routines.
Read the detailed description
While assisting ventilation during general anesthesia or other reasons, patients are often intubated with endotracheal tube to secure airway. Endotracheal tube can be placed trans-orally or trans-nasally according to surgical conditions, anatomical considerations and nursing needs. Except inadequate cuff pressure related complication, nasotracheal intubation can cause dysfunction of nasal mucosal cilia, injury and hemorrhage of nasal mucosa, turbinate avulsion, obstruction of nasal airway, sinusitis and compression and injury of nasal alar, resulting in local erythema, ischemia, pressure sore, necrosis, tissue damage and may affect appearance.
Previous studies focus on the process of nasal tracheal intubation, aim to reduce mucosal injury and hemorrhage via specific intubation tool, special endotracheal tube design, lubricant and so on. However, evidences in preventing nasal alar injury are limited, in which injuries are mostly prevented by self-made special endotracheal tube and artificial leather. In general, the etiology of tissue damage is compression pressure exceeding local capillary perfusion pressure, resulting in reduced perfusion, ischemia and necrosis. Clinically, health providers prevent the injury by standardized endotracheal tube fixation and/or artificial leather at sites with potential compression. But the extend of the effect of endotracheal tube to trachea mucosa varies, range of pressure affecting capillary perfusion pressure are not yet defined, and no routine monitoring for dermis compression. Thus, endotracheal tube related skin damage is an important clinical issue without best standard operating procedure.
In this study, the investigators will place a pressure sensor at the angle of nasotracheal tube, measure the actual pressure, define the sites of compression and its pressure, analyze the relationship of clinical signs and symptoms, pressure, and duration of nasotracheal intubation, and build up optimal clinical routines.
- Conditions
- Intubation Complication, Pressure Injury
- Being tested
- pressure sensor
- Keywords
- Nasotracheal intubation, nasal alar injury
- Medical subject headings
- Pressure Ulcer
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
pressure sensorDevice
Pressure sensor at the angle of intratracheal tube and nasal alar
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Nasal intubation with pressure sensor | anesthetized patient with nasotracheal intubation Receives: Device: pressure sensor |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
appearance of nose
intact or redness ; if redness then, go through NPUAP classification
Measured: from induction to one day after surgery
VAS
Patient's VISUAL ANALOG SCALE (VAS) for pain of the nose after surgery: no pain (0 - 4 mm), mild pain (5- 44mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm)
Measured: from induction to one day after surgery
pressure between nose and intratracheal tube
pressure between nose and intratracheal tube detected by pressure sensors
Measured: during intubation
NPUAP classification
The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel stage
Measured: from induction to one day after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Nov 2018
- Study start1 May 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Apr 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Technical problem
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Intubation ComplicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mackay Memorial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chien-Chung,Huang, Mackay Memorial Hospital
- Investigators
- Chien-Chung Huang, MD, Study director, Mackay Memorial Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03735160
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18MMHIS084e
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 6 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 5 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Seegobin RD, van Hasselt GL. Endotracheal cuff pressure and tracheal mucosal blood flow: endoscopic study of effects of four large volume cuffs. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Mar 31;288(6422):965-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6422.965.
PubMed 6423162Schneider J, Mulale U, Yamout S, Pollard S, Silver P. Impact of monitoring endotracheal tube cuff leak pressure on postextubation stridor in children. J Crit Care. 2016 Dec;36:173-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.06.033. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
PubMed 27546768Al-Metwalli RR, Sadek S. Safety and reliability of the sealing cuff pressure of the Microcuff pediatric tracheal tube for prevention of post-extubation morbidity in children: A comparative study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Oct;8(4):484-8. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.140856.
PubMed 25422605Bolzan DW, Gomes WJ, Peixoto TC, Faresin SM, Carvalho AC, De Paola AA, Guizilini S. Clinical use of the volume-time curve for endotracheal tube cuff management. Respir Care. 2014 Nov;59(11):1628-35. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02683. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
PubMed 24917452Bernhard WN, Cottrell JE, Sivakumaran C, Patel K, Yost L, Turndorf H. Adjustment of intracuff pressure to prevent aspiration. Anesthesiology. 1979 Apr;50(4):363-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197904000-00018. No abstract available.
PubMed 434545Elwany S, Mekhamer A. Effect of nasotracheal intubation on nasal mucociliary clearance. Br J Anaesth. 1987 Jun;59(6):755-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/59.6.755.
PubMed 3606919Neves-Pinto RM, Carvalho A, Araujo E, Alberto C, Basilio-De-Oliveira, De Carvalho GA. Nasal septum giant pyogenic granuloma after a long lasting nasal intubation: case report. Rhinology. 2005 Mar;43(1):66-9.
PubMed 15844505Holzapfel L. Nasal vs oral intubation. Minerva Anestesiol. 2003 May;69(5):348-52.
PubMed 12768165Kuo MJ, Reid AP, Smith JE. Unilateral nasal obstruction: an unusual presentation of a complication of nasotracheal intubation. J Laryngol Otol. 1994 Nov;108(11):991-2. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100128701.
PubMed 7829957Yeom JH, Oh MK, Shin WJ, Ahn DW, Jeon WJ, Cho SY. Randomized comparison of the effectiveness of nasal intubation using a GlideScope video laryngoscope with Magill forceps versus vascular forceps in patients with a normal airway. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Dec;64(12):1176-1181. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0971-4. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
PubMed 28952139Sanuki T, Hirokane M, Matsuda Y, Sugioka S, Kotani J. The Parker Flex-Tip tube for nasotracheal intubation: the influence on nasal mucosal trauma. Anaesthesia. 2010 Jan;65(1):8-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06123.x. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
PubMed 19849677Song J. A comparison of the effects of epinephrine and xylometazoline in decreasing nasal bleeding during nasotracheal intubation. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Dec;17(4):281-287. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2017.17.4.281. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
PubMed 29349350Cherng CH, Chen YW. Using a modified nasotracheal tube to prevent nasal ala pressure sore during prolonged nasotracheal intubation. J Anesth. 2010 Dec;24(6):959-61. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-1009-z. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
PubMed 20809246Huang TT, Tseng CE, Lee TM, Yeh JY, Lai YY. Preventing pressure sores of the nasal ala after nasotracheal tube intubation: from animal model to clinical application. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Mar;67(3):543-51. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.100.
PubMed 19231778Meier R, Sporn P. [Decubitus ulcer prevention in the nasal ala using Silastic foam in nasotracheal intubated patients]. Anaesthesist. 1986 Jan;35(1):49-50. German.
PubMed 3963354
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Monitoring the Pressure Over Nasotracheal Intubation and Related Nasal Alar Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03735160
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18MMHIS084e
- Conditions
- Intubation Complication, Pressure Injury
- Keywords
- Nasotracheal intubation, nasal alar injury
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Technical problem
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mackay Memorial HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Nasotracheal intubation can cause injury and hemorrhage of nasal mucosa and nasal alar. The investigators measure the actual pressure at the angle between nasotracheal tube and nasal alar, analyze the relationship of clinical signs and symptoms to build up optimal clinical routines.
Detailed description
While assisting ventilation during general anesthesia or other reasons, patients are often intubated with endotracheal tube to secure airway. Endotracheal tube can be placed trans-orally or trans-nasally according to surgical conditions, anatomical considerations and nursing needs. Except inadequate cuff pressure related complication, nasotracheal intubation can cause dysfunction of nasal mucosal cilia, injury and hemorrhage of nasal mucosa, turbinate avulsion, obstruction of nasal airway, sinusitis and compression and injury of nasal alar, resulting in local erythema, ischemia, pressure sore, necrosis, tissue damage and may affect appearance.
Previous studies focus on the process of nasal tracheal intubation, aim to reduce mucosal injury and hemorrhage via specific intubation tool, special endotracheal tube design, lubricant and so on. However, evidences in preventing nasal alar injury are limited, in which injuries are mostly prevented by self-made special endotracheal tube and artificial leather. In general, the etiology of tissue damage is compression pressure exceeding local capillary perfusion pressure, resulting in reduced perfusion, ischemia and necrosis. Clinically, health providers prevent the injury by standardized endotracheal tube fixation and/or artificial leather at sites with potential compression. But the extend of the effect of endotracheal tube to trachea mucosa varies, range of pressure affecting capillary perfusion pressure are not yet defined, and no routine monitoring for dermis compression. Thus, endotracheal tube related skin damage is an important clinical issue without best standard operating procedure.
In this study, the investigators will place a pressure sensor at the angle of nasotracheal tube, measure the actual pressure, define the sites of compression and its pressure, analyze the relationship of clinical signs and symptoms, pressure, and duration of nasotracheal intubation, and build up optimal clinical routines.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Nasal intubation with pressure sensor | – | Device: pressure sensoranesthetized patient with nasotracheal intubation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients undergo general anesthesia and receive intratracheal intubation through nose
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical classification I \& II
- patients undergo general anesthesia and receive intratracheal intubation through nose
- elective surgery
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- with known nasal injury
- already intubation before induction
- surgery on the nose
- emergent operation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| pressure sensorPressure sensor at the angle of intratracheal tube and nasal alar | Device | Nasal intubation with pressure sensor |
Primary outcome
appearance of nose
Time frame: from induction to one day after surgery
intact or redness ; if redness then, go through NPUAP classification
VAS
Time frame: from induction to one day after surgery
Patient's VISUAL ANALOG SCALE (VAS) for pain of the nose after surgery: no pain (0 - 4 mm), mild pain (5- 44mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm)
pressure between nose and intratracheal tube
Time frame: during intubation
pressure between nose and intratracheal tube detected by pressure sensors
NPUAP classification
Time frame: from induction to one day after surgery
The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel stage
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jun 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 6423162Seegobin RD, van Hasselt GL. Endotracheal cuff pressure and tracheal mucosal blood flow: endoscopic study of effects of four large volume cuffs. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Mar 31;288(6422):965-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6422.965.
- Results publication: PubMed 27546768Schneider J, Mulale U, Yamout S, Pollard S, Silver P. Impact of monitoring endotracheal tube cuff leak pressure on postextubation stridor in children. J Crit Care. 2016 Dec;36:173-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.06.033. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 25422605Al-Metwalli RR, Sadek S. Safety and reliability of the sealing cuff pressure of the Microcuff pediatric tracheal tube for prevention of post-extubation morbidity in children: A comparative study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Oct;8(4):484-8. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.140856.
- Results publication: PubMed 24917452Bolzan DW, Gomes WJ, Peixoto TC, Faresin SM, Carvalho AC, De Paola AA, Guizilini S. Clinical use of the volume-time curve for endotracheal tube cuff management. Respir Care. 2014 Nov;59(11):1628-35. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02683. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 434545Bernhard WN, Cottrell JE, Sivakumaran C, Patel K, Yost L, Turndorf H. Adjustment of intracuff pressure to prevent aspiration. Anesthesiology. 1979 Apr;50(4):363-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197904000-00018. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 3606919Elwany S, Mekhamer A. Effect of nasotracheal intubation on nasal mucociliary clearance. Br J Anaesth. 1987 Jun;59(6):755-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/59.6.755.
- Results publication: PubMed 15844505Neves-Pinto RM, Carvalho A, Araujo E, Alberto C, Basilio-De-Oliveira, De Carvalho GA. Nasal septum giant pyogenic granuloma after a long lasting nasal intubation: case report. Rhinology. 2005 Mar;43(1):66-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 12768165Holzapfel L. Nasal vs oral intubation. Minerva Anestesiol. 2003 May;69(5):348-52.
- Results publication: PubMed 7829957Kuo MJ, Reid AP, Smith JE. Unilateral nasal obstruction: an unusual presentation of a complication of nasotracheal intubation. J Laryngol Otol. 1994 Nov;108(11):991-2. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100128701.
- Results publication: PubMed 28952139Yeom JH, Oh MK, Shin WJ, Ahn DW, Jeon WJ, Cho SY. Randomized comparison of the effectiveness of nasal intubation using a GlideScope video laryngoscope with Magill forceps versus vascular forceps in patients with a normal airway. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Dec;64(12):1176-1181. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0971-4. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 19849677Sanuki T, Hirokane M, Matsuda Y, Sugioka S, Kotani J. The Parker Flex-Tip tube for nasotracheal intubation: the influence on nasal mucosal trauma. Anaesthesia. 2010 Jan;65(1):8-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06123.x. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 29349350Song J. A comparison of the effects of epinephrine and xylometazoline in decreasing nasal bleeding during nasotracheal intubation. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Dec;17(4):281-287. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2017.17.4.281. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Intubation Complication
Recruiting
Smart Checklist Implementation for Pediatric Tracheal Intubations in the ICU- Multicenter Study
Intubation Complication
Recruiting
The ED-AWARENESS-2 Trial
Awareness, Mechanical Ventilation
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiovascular History and Hemodynamic Complications After Intubation in ICU
Hemodynamic Complications
Not yet recruiting
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Use of Supraglottic Airway Devices and Neuromuscular Blockade
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
Not yet recruiting
Establish Whether Hyperangulated Videolaryngoscopy (HAVL) Can be Used to Facilitate Tracheal Intubation Effectively and Safely in Unselected Adult Patients; Describe the Population in Whom HAVL Fails to Facilitate Tracheal Intubation Successfully, Identifying Any Contributory Characteristics.
Intubation Skill, Intubation Complications
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chien-Chung Huang, MD study director
Mackay Memorial Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Intubation Complication and Pressure Injury, run by Mackay Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
appearance of nose (time frame: from induction to one day after surgery). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03735160, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2020.