AzTrials
AzTrials

Venous Leg UlcerINVICTUSNCT03736941

Impact of Venotrain UlcerteC Venous Compression Device in the Treatment of Venous Ulcers in Daily Practice

A study testing Patients with venous leg in people with Venous Leg Ulcer, run by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph at 2 sites in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The cornerstone of the management of venous leg or predominantly venous leg ulcers with IPS> 0.8 is venous compression as recommended by the HAS in June 2006. There is ample clinical evidence to support its importance to improve the chances of closure of this chronic lesion and shorten the healing time compared to the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Venous Leg Ulcer
What is being tested?
Patients with venous leg
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
129 participants
Where
2 sitesFrance
Study dates
16 Apr 2019to 31 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient whose age is ≥ 18 years
  • Patient with venous or predominantly venous leg ulcer as defined by HAS
  • Patient with at least one supracleolar ulcer at stage C6 of CEAP
  • Surface of the ulcer of the largest size ≤ 10 cm2
  • IPS less than 6 months> 0.8 for both limbs or toe pressure ≥ 60 mmHg if mediacalcosis (SPI> 1.2)
  • Patient with a maximum of three supraballeolar ulcers (one or two sided)
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patient followed by a hospital outpatient clinic in the departments of vascular medicine, angiology, internal medicine, dermatology or geriatric medicine (First consultation or not)
  • Patient with walking ability over 50 m (with or without help)
  • Patient with a prescription indication of Venetrain® Ulcertec Low Venous Compression System (Bauerfeind)
  • Patient giving free, informed and written consent

Who cannot join

  • Any other non-venous etiology of the ulcer in the opinion of the clinician
  • Infections of lesions requiring the introduction of systemic antibiotic therapy
  • Contraindication to treatment including venous compression by stockings
  • Patient with cognitive impairment
  • Patient to be hospitalized within 20 weeks after inclusion
  • Patient with another wound than the leg ulcer (s) (especially foot ulcers, pressure ulcers)
  • Patient with at least one very exudative ulcer, requiring the placement of a thick absorbent primary dressing incompatible with the use of compression stockings

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

France2 sites
  • Centre hospitalier universitaire d'Angers

    Angers, 49100

  • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph

    Paris, 75014

Other trials in France

About this study

The cornerstone of the management of venous leg or predominantly venous leg ulcers with IPS> 0.8 is venous compression as recommended by the HAS in June 2006. There is ample clinical evidence to support its importance to improve the chances of closure of this chronic lesion and shorten the healing time compared to the absence of compression.

In 2016, a system of re-usable compression stockings (Venotrain® Ulcertec, BAUERFEIND, France), and bringing an interface pressure of 30 to 45 mmHg to the ankle according to the prescription, was taken over by the Health Insurance in France. 'Indication' Ulcer of venous origin or predominantly venous component, stage C6 CEAP classification with a systolic pressure index greater than 0.9 '.

The investigators propose to study the efficiency of Venotrain® Ulcertec in a diverse population in which it is prescribed according to the usual practices of venous leg ulceration of venous or predominantly venous origin.

Read the detailed description

The supra-malleolar leg ulcers of venous origin, in the C6 stage of the CEAP (unhealed venous ulcer), are characterized by the presence of two pulses (pedis and posterior tibial) or a Systolic Pressure Index (SPI) ≥ 0, 7 or a pressure of the big toe ≥ 60 mmHg or an arterial echo-doppler of the lower limbs revealing neither hemodynamic stenosis nor arterial occlusion.

The HAS working group defines a pure venous ulcer as a leg wound that has not healed for more than 1 month, related to an ambulatory venous hyperpressure. This hyperpressure may be secondary to superficial vein reflux and / or deep vein reflux or obstruction and / or calf pump deficiency. In the pure venous ulcer, there is no arterial involvement. The predominantly venous mixed ulcer is an ulcer with a preferentially venous mechanism but accompanied by a moderate arterial occlusion of the lower limbs which does not explain the symptomatology alone.

The fundamental element in the management of venous or predominantly venous leg ulcers with an SPI> 0.8 is venous compression as recommended by the June 2006 HAS.

Numerous clinical evidence confirms its importance for improving the chances of closure of this chronic lesion and shortening the healing time compared to the absence of compression.

It is a long treatment that can last several months, very restrictive for the patient and all the more so, that the perception of an improvement is far from immediate. In addition, the affected population is usually elderly, and the ulcer is a source of permanent discomfort, affecting the quality of life of the subjects and explaining frequent social isolation and depressed mood. Moreover, the cost of this treatment is sometimes dissuasive with a dependent burden for the patient who, sometimes, is unacceptable.

In 2016, a system of re-usable compression stockings (Venotrain® Ulcertec, BAUERFEIND, France), and bringing an interface pressure of 30 to 45 mmHg to the ankle according to the prescription, was taken over by the Health Insurance in France. 'indication' Ulcer of venous origin or predominantly venous component, stage C6 of the CEAP classification (ie not healed) with a systolic pressure index greater than 0,9 '. This type of device has demonstrated an efficiency of the same order as the multi-type or multi-band systems for the closure of venous ulcers.

The investigators can therefore hope for the use of this type of stockings, a simplification of the care, an improvement of the comfort of wearing and thus a reduction of the feeling of frustration on the part of the patients with main consequence a better acceptability.

Being tested
Patients with venous leg
Medical subject headings
Varicose Ulcer

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Patients with venous legOther

    The medical device Venotrain® Ulcertec will be prescribed according to the indications supported by the Health Insurance and used according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. It will be dispensed in town pharmacies. After inclusion, follow-up visits are scheduled at 4, and 16 weeks (± 1 week) as well as an end-of-study visit, not later than 20 weeks after enrollment or in case of premature termination. follow-up.

Study groups in NCT03736941
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with venous legExperimentalAfter inclusion, the medical device Venotrain® Ulcertec will be prescribed according to the indications supported by the Health Insurance and used according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. Follow-up visits are scheduled at 4, and 16 weeks (± 1 week) as well as an end-of-study visit, not later than 20 weeks after enrollment or in case of premature termination. follow-up. During the various visits, clinical data will be collected in the patient's medical file as well as the answers to the questionnaires.
Receives: Other: Patients with venous leg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Prevalence of Optimal efficiency

    The primary endpoint is the overall, center-level prevalence of optimal VENOTRAIN® Ulcertec compressive sock efficiency. Optimal efficiency is defined by the observation of an ulcer closure at the end of a maximum follow-up of 20 weeks without the need to change the type of compression system initially prescribed and without detecting local problems considered by the clinician as possibly related to the compressive device but not interfering with the patient's management.

    Measured: Week 20

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. health-related quality of life EQ5D-5L

    The patient will complete the questionnary during the 4 weeks's consultation. EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status.The number of levels of severity was increased to five in this new version; having no problems, having slight problems, having moderate problems, having severe problems and being unable to do/having extreme problems.

    Measured: Week 4

  2. health-related quality of life EQ5D-5L

    The patient will complete the questionnary during the 16 weeks's consultation. EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status.The number of levels of severity was increased to five in this new version; having no problems, having slight problems, having moderate problems, having severe problems and being unable to do/having extreme problems.

    Measured: Week 16

  3. health-related quality of life EQ5D-5L

    The patient will complete the questionnary during the 20 weeks's consultation. EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status.The number of levels of severity was increased to five in this new version; having no problems, having slight problems, having moderate problems, having severe problems and being unable to do/having extreme problems.

    Measured: Week 20

  4. Prevalence of acceptable efficiency

    The endpoint is the overall, center-level prevalence of acceptable VENOTRAIN® Ulcertec compressive sock efficiency. An acceptable efficiency will be defined according to the same criteria but at least one troublesome local event has been detected without requiring a temporary or permanent interruption of the compression system initially prescribed.

    Measured: Week 20

  5. Evaluation of the patient's adhesion of VENOTRAIN® Ulcertec compressive sock

    If stop: frequency of use before stop (never, episodic, daily), date of stop, person having decided the stop, reason for stop, prescription of another system If current use: time of use, membership (daily wear, every other day or more, less than every other day, from time to time or never / almost), ease of use of the compression according to the Likert scale, overall acceptability of Likert scale compression

    Measured: Week 4

  6. Evaluation of the patient's adhesion of VENOTRAIN® Ulcertec compressive sock

    If stop: frequency of use before stop (never, episodic, daily), date of stop, person having decided the stop, reason for stop, prescription of another system If current use: time of use, membership (daily wear, every other day or more, less than every other day, from time to time or never / almost), ease of use of the compression according to the Likert scale, overall acceptability of Likert scale compression

    Measured: Week 16

  7. Evaluation of the patient's adhesion of VENOTRAIN® Ulcertec compressive sock

    If stop: frequency of use before stop (never, episodic, daily), date of stop, person having decided the stop, reason for stop, prescription of another system If current use: time of use, membership (daily wear, every other day or more, less than every other day, from time to time or never / almost), ease of use of the compression according to the Likert scale, overall acceptability of Likert scale compression

    Measured: Week 20

  8. Time's estimation to obtain complete closure

    Time's estimation to obtain complete closure : Kaplan Meier Method

    Measured: Week 20

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Nov 2018
  2. Study start16 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion15 Apr 2022
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
129 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03736941
Sponsor's protocol ID
INVICTUS
Acronym
INVICTUS
Status last verified
Apr 2023
First submitted
5 Nov 2018
Last updated
27 Apr 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Patients with venous leg in people with Venous Leg Ulcer, run by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph at 2 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Prevalence of Optimal efficiency (time frame: Week 20). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in