AzTrials
AzTrials

Atopic DermatitisPhase 2NCT03738423

Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of REGN3500 Administered to Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

A Phase 2 study testing REGN3500 in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 89 sites in 11 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of REGN3500 monotherapy in Atopic dermatitis (AD), as well as understand the dose-response relationship, compared with placebo treatment, in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Atopic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
REGN3500
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
129 participants
Where
89 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
13 Nov 2018to 24 Jul 2020
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Chronic AD, according to American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria (Eichenfield, 2014), that has been present for at least 3 years before the screening visit
  • Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥16 at the screening and baseline visits
  • IGA score ≥3 (on the 0 to 4 IGA scale, in which 3 is moderate and 4 is severe) at screening and baseline visits
  • ≥10% Body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement at the screening and baseline visits
  • Documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to topical AD medication(s) or for whom topical treatments are medically inadvisable

Who cannot join

  • Participation in a prior anti-Interleukin (IL)-33 medication clinical study
  • Treatment with an investigational drug within 8 weeks or within 5 half-lives (if known), whichever is longer, before the baseline visit
  • Having used any of the following treatments within 4 weeks before the baseline visit or any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to require such treatment(s) during the first 4 weeks of study treatment:
  • Immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drugs (eg, systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate-mofetil, Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), Janus kinase inhibitors, azathioprine, methotrexate, etc)
  • Phototherapy for AD
  • Regular use (more than 2 visits per week) of a tanning booth/parlor within 4 weeks of the baseline visit
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 12 weeks before the baseline visit
  • Active chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antiprotozoals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before the baseline visit
  • Known or suspected history of immunosuppression
  • History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive HIV serology at screening
  • Positive with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb), or hepatitis C virus antibody (HCV Ab) at the screening visit
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study
  • Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria apply

Trial locations and contacts

89 sites in 11 countries.

89 sites in 11 countries

United States31 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35209

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45231

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Evansville, Indiana, 47714

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Fremont, California, 94538

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32256

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40202

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40217

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40241

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Macon, Georgia, 31217

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402

  • Regeneron Study Site

    New York, New York, 10022

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23502

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Norman, Oklahoma, 73071

  • Regeneron Study Site

    North Charleston, South Carolina, 29420

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Oceanside, California, 92056

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66215

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85006

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Sacramento, California, 95815

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Saint Joseph, Michigan, 49085

  • Regeneron Study Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78218

  • Regeneron Study Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Regeneron Study Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78258

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Santa Monica, California, 90404

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Skokie, Illinois, 60077

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85718

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Wilmington, North Carolina, 28405

Other trials in United States

Germany13 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Bad Bentheim, 48455

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Berlin, 10117

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Berlin, 12459

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Frankfurt, 60590

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Hamburg, 20537

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Hanau, 63450

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Ibbenbueren, 49477

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Lübeck, 23538

  • Regeneron Study Site

    München, 80337

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Münster, 48149

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Tübingen, 72076

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Witten, 58453

Other trials in Germany

Japan9 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Chūō, 409-3898

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Hiroshima, 734-8551

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Kanagawa, 252-0392

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Kyoto, 602-8566

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Kyoto, 606-8507

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Shizuoka, 420-8630

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Shizuoka, 430-0929

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Wakayama, 641-8510

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Yamanashi, 400-8506

Other trials in Japan

South Korea9 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Bucheon-si, 14584

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Busan, 49241

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Gyeonggi-do, 16499

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Incheon, 21431

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Incheon, 21565

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Seoul, 02841

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Seoul, 06591

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Seoul, 06973

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Seoul, 07441

Other trials in South Korea

Poland7 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Krakow, 30-033

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Lodz, 90-436

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Szczecin, 71-434

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Warsaw, 01-817

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Warsaw, 02-953

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Wroclaw, 51-318

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Wroclaw, 51-685

Other trials in Poland

Canada6 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Calgary, Alberta, T2G 1B1

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 1G5

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5N 1E3

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Verdun, Quebec, H4G 3E7

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Windsor, Ontario, N8X 2G1

Other trials in Canada

Czechia4 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Brno, 602 00

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Náchod, 547 01

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Ostrava, 702 00

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Prague, 130 00

Other trials in Czechia

Spain4 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Barakaldo, 48903

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Córdoba, 14004

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Madrid, 28041

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Santiago de Compostela, 15706

Other trials in Spain

Hungary3 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Budapest, 84-88

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Debrecen, Hajdú-Bihar, 4032

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Orosháza, Bekes County, 5900

Other trials in Hungary

Australia2 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Kogarah, 2217

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Melbourne, 3002

Other trials in Australia

United Kingdom1 site
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Sheffield, S10 2JF

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Dose-Ranging Study Investigating the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of REGN3500 Administered to Adult Patients With Moderate-to- Severe Atopic Dermatitis

The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of REGN3500 monotherapy in Atopic dermatitis (AD), as well as understand the dose-response relationship, compared with placebo treatment, in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

Secondary objectives are to:

  • Assess the safety and tolerability of subcutaneous (SC) doses of REGN3500 monotherapy in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD
  • Assess the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of REGN3500 in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD
  • Assess the immunogenicity of REGN3500 in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD
Being tested
REGN3500, REGN3500-Matching Placebo
Keywords
Moderate, Severe
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic, Lymphoma, Follicular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • REGN3500Drug

    Administered subcutaneous (SC)

  • REGN3500-Matching PlaceboDrug

    Administered subcutaneous (SC)

Study groups in NCT03738423
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment 1ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: REGN3500; Drug: REGN3500-Matching Placebo
Treatment 2ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: REGN3500; Drug: REGN3500-Matching Placebo
Treatment 3ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: REGN3500; Drug: REGN3500-Matching Placebo
Treatment 4ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: REGN3500; Drug: REGN3500-Matching Placebo
Treatment 5ExperimentalMatching placebo
Receives: Drug: REGN3500-Matching Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percent change from baseline in EASI score at Week 16 was reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percent change from baseline in EASI score at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment was reported.

    Measured: Week 16

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (Greater Than or Equal to [≥] 50 Percent [%] Improvement From Baseline) Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of participants who achieved EASI-50 (≥50% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 were reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing EASI score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (Greater Than or Equal to [≥] 50% Improvement From Baseline) Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of participants who achieved EASI-50 (≥50% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 were based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment were reported.

    Measured: Week 16

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of participants who achieved EASI-75 (≥75% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment were reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing EASI score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.

    Measured: Week 16

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of participants who achieved EASI-75 (≥75% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment were reported.

    Measured: Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-90 (EASI-90) (≥90% Improvement From Baseline) Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of participants who achieved EASI-90 (≥90% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment were reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing EASI score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.

    Measured: Week 16

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-90 (EASI-90) (≥90% Improvement From Baseline) Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of participants who achieved EASI-90 (≥90% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment were reported.

    Measured: Week 16

  7. Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Absolute change from baseline in EASI score at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment was reported.

    Measured: Week 16

  8. Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Absolute change from baseline in EASI score at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment was reported.

    Measured: Week 16

  9. Percentage of Participants With Both Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score 0 or 1 (on 0 to 5 IGA Scale) and a Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    IGA was an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5 point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response was an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with both IGA score of "0" or "1" and a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment were reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing IGA score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.

    Measured: Week 16

  10. Percentage of Participants With Both IGA Score 0 or 1 (on the 0 to 5 IGA Scale) and a Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    IGA was an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5 point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response was an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with both IGA score of "0" or "1" and a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment were reported.

    Measured: Week 16

  11. Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Participants were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Absolute change from baseline in weekly average of daily Peak Pruritus NRS score at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment was reported.

    Measured: Week 16

  12. Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Participants were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    Measured: Week 16

  13. Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Participants were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Percent change from baseline in weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS score at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment was reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing NRS score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.

    Measured: Week 16

  14. Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Participants were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Percent change from baseline in weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS score at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment was reported.

    Measured: Week 16

  15. Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction From Baseline) in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS Score ≥4 Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Participants were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Percentage of participants with improvement of weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS score ≥4 from baseline to Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment were reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing NRS score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.

    Measured: Week 16

  16. Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction From Baseline) in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score ≥4 Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16

    Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Participants were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Percentage of participants with improvement of weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS score ≥4 from baseline to Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment were reported.

    Measured: Week 16

  17. Time to Onset of Effect on Pruritus (≥4-point Reduction of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS From Baseline)

    Peak Pruritus NRS is an assessment tool used by participants to report intensity of pruritus (itch) during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: For maximum itch intensity: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable,' how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?"

    Measured: Week 16

  18. Percent Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 16

    The SCORAD index is a clinical tool for assessing the severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease).

    Measured: Week 16

  19. Absolute Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) Involvement at Week 16

    BSA affected by AD will be assessed for each section of the body using the rule of nines (the possible highest score for each region is: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]) and will be reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. The proportion assigned to different body regions is different in younger children as compared to older children (head and neck area is assigned a higher proportion in younger children as compared to older children).

    Measured: Week 16

  20. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) up to Week 16

    Adverse Event (AE): any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug which may/may not have a causal relationship with study drug. Serious AE (SAE): any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial/prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect/considered as medically important event. TEAE: AEs starting/worsening after first intake of study drug. TEAEs included: serious TEAEs and Non-serious TEAEs. AESI included: Anaphylactic or acute allergic reactions; Severe injection site reactions; Mycosis fungoides/other forms of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; severe infections; any clinical endoparasitosis; Conjunctivitis, keratitis, or blepharitis; significant Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation. Number of participants with TEAEs, Serious TEAES and AESIs from baseline up to Week 16 were reported.

    Measured: Up to week 16

  21. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) up to Week 36

    AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug which may/may not have a causal relationship with study drug. SAE: any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial/prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect/considered as medically important event. TEAE: AEs starting/worsening after first intake of study drug. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and Non-serious TEAEs. AESI included: Anaphylactic or acute allergic reactions; Severe injection site reactions; Mycosis fungoides/other forms of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; severe infections; any clinical endoparasitosis; Conjunctivitis, keratitis, or blepharitis; significant Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation. Number of participants with TEAEs, Serious TEAES and AESIs from baseline up to Week 36 were reported.

    Measured: Up to week 36

  22. Serum Concentration of Functional REGN3500

    Serum Concentration of Functional REGN3500 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32 and 36

  23. Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-Emergent Anti-REGN3500 Antibodies (ADA)

    Treatment-Emergent (TE) ADA was defined as any positive post baseline assay response when baseline results were negative or missing. Treatment-Emergent ADA responses were further classified as: - persistent (treatment-emergent positive ADA response detected in at least 2 consecutive post baseline samples separated by at least a 16-week post baseline period [based on nominal sampling time], with no ADA-negative samples in-between, regardless of any missing samples or a positive response at the last ADA sampling time point),- indeterminate (a positive assay response at the last collection time point only, regardless of any missing samples), - transient (not persistent/indeterminate, regardless of any missing samples). Number of participants with positive treatment-emergent anti-REGN3500 antibodies (ADA) were reported. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this endpoint.

    Measured: Up to week 36

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Nov 2018
  2. Study start13 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion13 Mar 2020
  4. Study completion24 Jul 2020

Why it stopped: Lack of efficacy

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
129 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03738423
Sponsor's protocol ID
R3500-AD-1805
Other IDs
2018-001544-64, 2018
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
8 Nov 2018
Last updated
10 Jun 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Kosloski MP, Guttman-Yassky E, Cork MJ, Worm M, Nahm DH, Zhu X, Ruddy MK, Harel S, Kamal MA, Goulaouic H, Xu CR, Avetisova E, Davis JD, Nivens MC, Shabbir A, Radin A. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of itepekimab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results from two terminated phase II trials. Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Aug;17(8):e13874. doi: 10.1111/cts.13874.

    PubMed 39077906

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing REGN3500 in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 89 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 89 sites in United States, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Poland and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jun 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03738423, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in