Virus DiseasesPhase 3NCT03739112
Efficacy of a Plant-derived Quadrivalent Virus-like Particle (VLP) Vaccine in the Elderly
A Phase 3 study testing Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine and Fluarix Quadrivalent® Comparator Vaccine in people with Virus Diseases and RNA Virus Infections, run by Medicago at 104 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
This Phase 3 study was intended to assess the relative efficacy of the Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine during the 2018-2019 influenza season compared to a licensed vaccine in elderly adults 65 years of age and older. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Virus Diseases, RNA Virus Infections, Respiratory Tract Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine and Fluarix Quadrivalent® Comparator Vaccine
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12,794 participants
- Where
- 104 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- 18 Sep 2018to 16 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants must have read, understood, and signed the informed consent form (ICF) prior to participating in the study; participants must also complete study-related procedures and communicate with the study staff at visits and by phone during the study;
- Participants must have a body mass index (BMI) ≤35 kg/m^2;
- Participants are considered by the Investigator to be reliable and likely to cooperate with the assessment procedures and be available for the duration of the study;
- Male and female participants must be 65 years of age and older at the Screening/Vaccination visit (Visit 1);
- Participants must be non-institutionalized (e.g. not living in rehabilitation centres or old-age homes; living in an elderly community is acceptable) and have no acute or evolving medical problems prior to study participation and no clinically relevant abnormalities that could jeopardize participant safety or interfere with study assessments, as assessed by the Principal Investigator or sub-Investigator (thereafter referred as Investigator) and determined by medical history, physical examination, and vital signs;
- Note: Participants with a pre-existing chronic disease are allowed to participate if the disease is stable and, according to the Investigator's judgment, the condition is unlikely to confound the results of the study or pose additional risk to the participant by participating in the study. Stable disease is generally defined as no new onset or exacerbation of pre-existing chronic disease three months prior to vaccination. Based on the Investigator's judgment, a participant with more recent stabilization of a disease could also be eligible.
Who cannot join
- According to the Investigator's opinion, history of an ongoing acute or evolving medical or neuropsychiatric illness. 'Evolving' was defined as:
- Requiring a new medical or surgical treatment during the three months prior to study vaccine administration unless the criteria outlined in inclusion criterion no. 5 can be met (i.e. the Investigator can justify inclusion based upon the innocuous nature of medical/surgical events and/or treatments);
- Requiring any significant change in a chronic medication (i.e. drug, dose, frequency) during the three months prior to study vaccine administration due to uncontrolled symptoms or drug toxicity unless the innocuous nature of the medication change meets the criteria outlined in inclusion criterion no. 5 and is appropriately justified by the Investigator.
- Any medical or neuropsychiatric condition or any history of excessive alcohol use or drug abuse that would render the participant unable to provide informed consent or unable to provide valid safety observations and reporting, including methadone (methadone as treatment for opioid dependence may be acceptable if the participant has been otherwise opioid-free for at least three years);
- Any autoimmune disease other than hypothyroidism on stable replacement therapy (including, but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Crohn's disease, type 1 diabetes, and inflammatory bowel disease) or any confirmed or suspected immunosuppressive condition or immunodeficiency including known or suspected human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B or C infection, the presence of lymphoproliferative disease;
- Any history of status asthmaticus or ongoing serious problems with asthma, hospitalization for asthma control, or recurrent asthma episodes requiring medical attention in the last three years (one or more episodes per year);
Show all 25Show fewer
- Administration or planned administration of any non-influenza vaccine within 30 days prior to randomization up to blood sampling on Day 21. Immunization on an emergency basis was evaluated case-by-case by the Investigator;
- Administration of any adjuvanted or investigational influenza vaccine within one year prior to randomization or planned administration prior to the completion of the study;
- Administration of any 'standard', non-adjuvanted influenza vaccine (e.g. live attenuated trivalent/quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine or split trivalent/quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine administered by intranasal, intradermal, or IM route) within six months prior to randomization and up to completion of the study;
- Use of any investigational or non-registered product within 30 days or five half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to randomization or planned use during the study period. Participants may not participate in any other investigational or marketed drug study while participating in this study until after the study;
- Treatment with systemic glucocorticoids at a dose exceeding 10 mg of prednisone (or equivalent) per day for more than seven consecutive days or for ten or more days in total, within one month of study vaccine administration; any other cytotoxic or immunosuppressant drug, or any immunoglobulin preparation within three months of vaccination and until the completion of the study. Low doses of nasal or inhaled glucocorticoids are allowed. Topical steroids are permitted;
- Any significant disorder of coagulation including, but not limited to, treatment with warfarin derivatives or heparin. Persons receiving prophylactic anti-platelet medications (e.g. low-dose aspirin [no more than 100 mg/day]), and without a clinically apparent bleeding tendency are eligible. Participants treated with new generation drugs that do not increase the risk of IM bleeding (e.g. clopidogrel) are also eligible;
- History of allergy to any of the constituents of the Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine, any components of the active comparator quadrivalent vaccine, or tobacco;
- History of anaphylactic allergic reactions to plants or plants components (including fruits and nuts);
- Use of antihistamines within 48 hours prior to study vaccination;
- Daily use of large doses of medication for pain control or inflammation (e.g. opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]). Use of a singular regular dose either in the morning or at bedtime would not be exclusionary;
- Use of prophylactic medications (e.g. acetaminophen/paracetamol, aspirin, naproxen, or ibuprofen) within 24 hours of randomization to prevent or pre-empt symptoms due to vaccination;
- Planned use of influenza antiviral treatment medication before the collection of nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs (e.g. oseltamivir, zanamivir, rapivab);
- Have a rash, dermatological condition, tattoos, muscle mass, or any other abnormalities at the injection site that may interfere with injection site reaction rating;
- Participants who have received a blood transfusion within 90 days prior to study vaccination;
- Participants with abnormal vital signs (systolic blood pressure [BP] ≥ 150 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 95 mmHg for individuals taking antihypertensive medication and ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg for individuals not taking antihypertensive medication; heart rate [HR] ≤ 45 beats/min and ≥ 100 beats/min) evaluated by an Investigator to be clinically significant. A participant with abnormal vital signs results may be included in the study based on Investigator's judgment (e.g. a resting HR ≤ 45 in highly trained athletes);
- Presence of any febrile illness (including an oral temperature [OT] ≥ 38.0 ˚C within 24 hours prior to vaccination;
- Cancer or treatment for cancer within three years prior to study vaccine administration. Persons with a history of cancer who are disease-free without treatment for three years or more are eligible. However, individuals with conditions such as treated and uncomplicated basal cell carcinoma of the skin or non-treated, non-disseminated local prostate cancer may be eligible;
- Participants identified as an Investigator or employee of the Investigator or clinical site with direct involvement in the proposed study, or identified as an immediate family member (i.e. parent, spouse) of the Investigator or any employee of Medicago (or their family members);
- Participants with a history of Guillain-Barré Syndrome.
Trial locations and contacts
104 sites in 5 countries.
104 sites in 5 countries
United States50 sites
(Site 219) Heartland Research Associates LLC
Augusta, Kansas, 67010
(Site 206) Benchmark Research
Austin, Texas, 78705
(Site 218) Tekton Research Inc
Austin, Texas, 78745
(Site 213) Advanced Clinical Research
Banning, California, 92220
(Site 209) United Medical Associates
Binghamton, New York, 13901
(Site 237) PMG Research of Cary LLC
Cary, North Carolina, 27518
(Site 230) PMG Research of Charlotte LLC
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209
(Site 233) Sterling Research Group
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
(Site 208) Sterling Research Group
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45246
(Site 245) Rapid Medical Research
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122
(Site 202) Aventiv Research Inc
Columbus, Ohio, 43213
(Site 239) Alliance for Multispeciality Research
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134
(Site 201) Meridian Clinical Research
Dakota Dunes, South Dakota, 57049
(Site 217) Regional Clinical Research inc
Endwell, New York, 13760
(Site 214) Ventavia Research Group LLC
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
(Site 224) Benchmark Research
Fort Worth, Texas, 76135
(Site 222) Research Centers of America
Hollywood, Florida, 33024
(Site 247) New orleans Center for Clinical Research
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920
(Site 241) Central Kentucky Reserach Associates
Lexington, Kentucky, 40509
(Site 249) Advanced Clinical Research
Meridian, Idaho, 83642
(Site 203) Benchmark Research
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
(Site 225) Coastal Clinical Research
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
(Site 216) PMG Research of Charleston LLC
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464
(Site 248) Coastal Carolina Research Center
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464
(Site 234) Heartland Research Associates LLC
Newton, Kansas, 67114
(Site 226) Meridian Clinical Research LLC
Norfolk, Nebraska, 68701
(Site 229) Clinical Research Associates of Tidewater
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
(Site 207) Lynn Institute of Norman
Norman, Oklahoma, 73069
(Site 238) Tekton Research
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73114
(Site 211) Meridian Clinical Research
Omaha, Nebraska, 68134
(Site 221) St-Johns Center for Clinical Research
Ponte Vedra, Florida, 32081
(Site 246) Paradigm Clinical Research / Pharmaseek
Redding, California, 96001
(Site 251) Meridian Clinical Research
Richmond Hill, Georgia, 31324
(Site 205) PMG Research of Rocky Mount LLC
Rocky Mount, North Carolina, 27804
(Site 212) Benckmark Research
Sacramento, California, 95864
(Site 204) Jean Brown Research
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84124
(Site 232) Benchmark Research
San Angelo, Texas, 76904
(Site 250) Clinical Trials of Texas Inc
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
(Site 244) Paradigm Clinical Research Center Inc
San Diego, California, 92117
(Site 240) Meridian Clinical Research LLC
Savannah, Georgia, 31406
(Site 231) QPS-MRA LLC
South Miami, Florida, 33143
(Site 227) Sundande Clinical Research
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
(Site 236) PMG Research
Statesville, North Carolina, 28625
(Site 223) Clinical Research Atlanta
Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281
(Site 201) Clinical Research Consortium
Tempe, Arizona, 85003
(Site 220) Advanced Clinical Research
West Jordan, Utah, 84088
(Site 242) Paradigm Clinical Research Centers Inc
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033
(Site 215) Heartland Research Associates LLC
Wichita, Kansas, 67205
(Site 235) Heartland Research Associates LLC
Wichita, Kansas, 67207
(Site 228) Research of Winston-Salem
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Germany24 sites
(Site 410) Emovis GmbH
Berlin, 10629
(Site 418) Klinische Forschung Berlin GbR
Berlin, 10787
(Site 422) Synexus Clinical Research GmbH
Berlin, 12627
(Site 402) Synexus Clinical research GmbH
Bochum, 44787
(Site 409) Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. med Kleinecke-Pohl
Cologne, 51069
(Site 401) Cardiologicum Dresden & Pirna
Dresden, 01277
(Site 406) Diabetologische Germeinschafts praxis Faulman
Dresden, 1279
(Site 405) Doktor Markus Faghih
Essen, 45355
(Site 407) Klinisches Forschungszentrum Dr. Hagemann am Hausarztzer
Essen, 45355
(Site 417) Medizentrum Essen-Borbeck
Essen, 45355
(Site 414) Unterfrintroper Hausarztzentrum Klinische Forschung
Essen, 45359
(SIte 404) Synexus Clinical Reserach GmbH
Frankfurt, 60313
(Site 411) MedicoKIT GmbH
Goch, 47574
(Site 425) Clinical Research Hamburg
Hamburg, 22143
(Site 403) Praxis Dr. Med Cornelia Brauer
Hamburg, 22415
(Site 408) Germeinsschaftspraxis Dr. med Christiane Klein/Minnich
Künzing, 94550
(Site 421) SIBAmed Studienzentrum GmbH
Leipzig, 01403
(Site 420) Synexus Clinical Research GmbH
Leipzig, 04103
(Site 423) centrum fuer Diagnostik und Gesundheit
Munich, 80809
(Site 413) Dr. Ingomar F.K. Naudts MD Office
Rodgau, 63110
(Site 415) Praxisgemeinschaft Stuhr-Brinkum
Stuhr, 28816
(Site 416) Praxis Dr. med Joachim Sauter
Wangen, 88239
(Site 412) MALU-Medizinische Studien GmbH
Wardenburg, 26203
(Site 424) Medislim GmbH
Weinheim, 69469
Canada13 sites
(Site 103) Q & T Recherche Chicoutimi
Chicoutimi, Quebec, G7H 7Y8
(Site 105) Q & T Outaouais
Gatineau, Quebec, J8Y 6S8
(Site 113) Dawson Road Family Medical Clinic
Guelph, Ontario, N1H 1B1
(Site 107) Manna Research Inc.
Lévis, Quebec, G6W 0M6
(Site 109) Manna Research Inc. (Mirabel)
Mirabel, Quebec, J7J 2K8
(Site 108) Manna Research
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, H9R 4S3
(Site 102) CHU de Québec - Université Laval
Québec, Quebec, G1E 7G9
(site 101) Centre de Recherche St-Louis
Québec, Quebec, G1W 4R4
(Site 110) Alpha Recherche Clinique
Québec, Quebec, G3K 2P8
(Site 104) Q & T Recherche Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1J 2G2
(Site 110) Manna Research Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, M9W 4L6
(Site 106) Colchester Research Group
Truro, Nova Scotia, B2N 1L2
(Site 112) Medexa Recherche
Victoriaville, Quebec, G6P 6P6
Finland10 sites
(Site 309) Espoo Vaccine Research Clinic
Espoo, 02230
(Site 303) Helsinki South Vaccine Research Clinic
Helsinki, 00100
(Site 308) Helsinki East Vaccine Research Center
Helsinki, 00930
(Site 301) Jarvenpaa Vaccine Research Clinic
Jarvenpaa, 04400
(Site 306) Kokkola Vaccine Research Clinic
Kokkola, 67100
(Site 304) Oulu Vaccine Research Clinic
Oulu, 90220
(Site 302) Tampere University Vaccine Research Center
Pori, 28100
(Site 305) Seinaejoki Vaccine Research Clinic
Seinäjoki, 60100
(Site 310) Tampere Vaccine Research Clinic
Tampere, 33100
(Site 307) Turku Vaccine Research Center
Turku, 20520
Thailand7 sites
(Site 603) Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahid - Division of Infectious Disease
Bangkok, 10160
(Site 606) Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University
Bangkok, 10400
(Site 608) Phramongkutklao Hospital
Bangkok, 10400
(Site 609) Division of Tropical Pediatrics
Bangkok, 10400
(Site 601) Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
Chiang Mai, 50200
(Site 607) Srinagarind Hospital Khon Kaen University
Khon Kaen, 40002
(Site 605) Golden Jubilee Medical Center
Nakhon Pathom
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Observer-blind, Active Comparator-controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of a Plant-derived Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine in Adults 65 Years of Age and Older
This Phase 3 study was intended to assess the relative efficacy of the Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine during the 2018-2019 influenza season compared to a licensed vaccine in elderly adults 65 years of age and older. One dose of VLP Influenza Vaccine (30 μg/strain) or of Comparator (15 μg/strain) was to be administered to 12,738 participants.
Read the detailed description
This randomized, observer-blind, active-controlled multicenter, Phase 3 study was conducted at multiple sites. The composition of the Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine used in this study included a mix of recombinant H1, H3, and two B hemagglutinin proteins expressed as VLPs for the 2018-2019 influenza virus strains.
A total of 12,794 healthy male and female participants aged 65 years and older were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into one of two parallel treatment groups, such that 6,396 participants were randomized to receive the Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine at a dose of 30 μg/strain and 6,398 participants were randomized to receive the comparator. Within the two treatment groups, participants were stratified by site and two age groups (65-74 years of age and 75 years of age and older in a 2:1 ratio).
Participants participated in this study for approximately nine months, during which a first visit was scheduled on Day 0 for screening and vaccine administration.
- Conditions
- Virus Diseases, RNA Virus Infections, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Respiratory Tract Infections
- Being tested
- Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine, Fluarix Quadrivalent® Comparator Vaccine
- Keywords
- vaccine, safety, efficacy, plant-made, virus-like particle, hemagglutinin
- Medical subject headings
- Virus Diseases, RNA Virus Infections, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Respiratory Tract Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Quadrivalent VLP VaccineBiological
Single dose of a 30 µg/strain of Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine
Fluarix Quadrivalent® Comparator VaccineBiological
Single dose of a 15 μg/strain of Fluarix Quadrivalent® Comparator Vaccine
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine | Experimental | Participants received one intramuscular (IM) injection of 0.5 mL of 30 μg/strain of the Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine on Day 0. Receives: Biological: Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine |
| Fluarix Quadrivalent® Comparator Vaccine | Active comparator | Participants received one IM injection of 0.5 mL of 15 μg/strain of the Fluarix Quadrivalent® comparator vaccine on Day 0. Receives: Biological: Fluarix Quadrivalent® Comparator Vaccine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Occurrences of Protocol-Defined Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) Due to Any Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza Strains
Occurrences of laboratory-confirmed ILI caused by any influenza viral strains was measured by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A participant was considered to have protocol-defined ILI if the participant met at least one of the following pre-defined respiratory symptoms: sore throat, cough, sputum production, wheezing, or difficulty breathing and at least one of the following systemic symptoms: fever (defined as a temperature > 37.2 °C or > 99.0 °F), chills, tiredness, headache or myalgia. The number of laboratory-confirmed ILI cases caused by any influenza strains are reported.
Measured: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months
Secondary outcomes (26)
Number of Occurrences of Laboratory Confirmed Protocol-Defined Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) Caused by Vaccine-Matched Influenza Strains
Occurrences of protocol-defined ILI due to laboratory-confirmed influenza caused by influenza viral types/subtypes that were matched (and/or antigenically similar) to the strains covered in the vaccine formulation was measured by sequential RT-PCR \& serotyping. The vaccine-matched strains included: homologous A/Michigan/45/2015 [H1N1], homologous A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016 [H3N2], homologous B/Colorado/06/2017 and homologous B/Phuket/3073/2013) covered in the vaccine formulation. A participant was considered to have protocol-defined ILI if the participant met at least one of the following pre-defined respiratory symptoms: sore throat, cough, sputum production, wheezing, or difficulty breathing and at least one of the following systemic symptoms: fever (defined as a temperature > 37.2 °C or > 99.0 °F), chills, tiredness, headache or myalgia. The number of laboratory-confirmed ILI cases caused by vaccine-matched influenza strains (all matched strains) are reported.
Measured: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months
Number of Occurrences of Protocol-Defined Respiratory Illness Due to Any Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza Strains
Occurrences of protocol-defined respiratory illness due to laboratory-confirmed influenza strain (matched, mismatched, and un-typed) was measured by sequential RT-PCR. A protocol-defined respiratory illness was determined by the occurrence of at least 1 of the following respiratory symptoms: sneezing, stuffy nose, sore throat, cough, sputum production, wheezing, or difficulty breathing. The number of protocol-defined respiratory illness cases caused by any laboratory-confirmed influenza strain (matched, mismatched, and un-typed) are reported.
Measured: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months
Number of Occurrences of Protocol-Defined Respiratory Illness Vaccine Caused by Vaccine-Matched Influenza Strains
Occurrences of protocol-defined respiratory illness vaccine caused by vaccine-matched influenza strains was measured by sequential RT-PCR \& serotyping. The vaccine-matched strains included: homologous A/Michigan/45/2015 [H1N1], homologous A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016 [H3N2], homologous B/Colorado/06/2017 and homologous B/Phuket/3073/2013. The protocol-defined respiratory illness was determined by the occurrence of at least 1 of the following respiratory symptoms: sneezing, stuffy nose, sore throat, cough, sputum production, wheezing, or difficulty breathing. The number of protocol-defined respiratory illness cases caused by one or more vaccine-matched strains are reported.
Measured: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months
Number of Occurrences of Protocol-Defined ILI
Occurrences of protocol-defined ILI that were confirmed or not by laboratory testing were assessed. A participant was considered to have protocol-defined ILI if the participant met at least one of the following pre-defined respiratory symptoms: sore throat, cough, sputum production, wheezing, or difficulty breathing and at least one of the following systemic symptoms: fever (defined as a temperature > 37.2 °C or > 99.0 °F), chills, tiredness, headache or myalgia. The number of protocol-defined ILI cases (confirmed or not) are reported.
Measured: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months
Number of Participants With at Least One Immediate Complaints
Immediate complaints were defined as any solicited local or systemic reactions. Solicited local reactions included: erythema, swelling, and pain at the injection site) and solicited systemic reactions included: fever, headache, fatigue, muscle aches, joint aches, chills, a feeling of general discomfort, swelling in the axilla, and swelling in the neck.
Measured: 15 minutes post vaccination
Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Local and Systemic Reactions
Participants were monitored for both solicited local reactions (erythema, swelling, and pain at the injection site) and solicited systemic reactions (fever, headache, fatigue, muscle aches, joint aches, chills, a feeling of general discomfort, swelling in the axilla, and swelling in the neck) from the time of vaccination through Day 7. Any solicited local or systemic immediate complaint was also included.
Measured: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 7
Number of Participants With ≥ Severe Solicited Local and Systemic Reaction
Participants were monitored for both solicited local reactions (erythema, swelling, and pain at the injection site) and solicited systemic reactions (fever, headache, fatigue, muscle aches, joint aches, chills, a feeling of general discomfort, swelling in the axilla, and swelling in the neck). The intensity of the solicited reactions was graded as mild (1)-easily tolerated and does not interfere with usual activity; moderate (2)-interferes with daily activity, but the participant is still able to function; severe (3)-incapacitating and the participant is unable to work or complete usual activity or potentially life threatening; (4)-likely to be life-threatening if not treated in a timely manner, according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance for Industry. ≥ Severe events included severe and potentially life-threatening events. Any ≥severe solicited reactions are reported.
Measured: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 7
Number of Participants With ≥ Severe Related Solicited Reactions
Participants were monitored for both solicited local reactions (erythema, swelling, \& pain at the injection site) \& solicited systemic reactions (fever, headache, fatigue, muscle aches, joint aches, chills, a feeling of general discomfort, swelling in axilla, \& swelling in neck). The intensity of solicited reactions was graded as mild (1)-easily tolerated and does not interfere with usual activity; moderate (2)-interferes with daily activity, but the participant is still able to function; severe (3)-incapacitating and the participant is unable to work or complete usual activity or potentially life threatening; (4)-likely to be life-threatening if not treated in a timely manner, according to the FDA Guidance for Industry. ≥ Severe events included severe and potentially life-threatening events. Any ≥severe related (possibly related, probably related, and definitely related to the study treatments [as defined by investigator]) solicited events are reported.
Measured: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 7
Number of Participants With Unsolicited Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Participants were monitored for unsolicited TEAEs (e.g., nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and pain). An adverse event (AE) or adverse experience was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant who received study drug, with or without a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE was considered treatment-emergent if it began on or after the date and time of Study Day 0 vaccination.
Measured: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 21
Number of Participants With ≥ Severe Unsolicited TEAEs
Participants were monitored for unsolicited TEAEs (e.g., nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and pain). AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant who received study drug, with or without a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE was considered treatment-emergent if it began on or after the date and time of Study Day 0 vaccination. The intensity of the solicited reactions was graded as mild (1)-easily tolerated and does not interfere with usual activity; moderate (2)-interferes with daily activity, but the participant is still able to function; severe (3)-incapacitating and the participant is unable to work or complete usual activity or potentially life threatening; (4)-likely to be life-threatening if not treated in a timely manner, according to the FDA Guidance for Industry. ≥ severe events included severe and potentially life-threatening events. Any ≥ severe unsolicited reactions are reported.
Measured: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 21
Number of Participants With ≥ Severe Related Unsolicited Reactions
Participants were monitored for unsolicited TEAEs (e.g., nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, \& pain). AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug, with or without a causal relationship with treatment. An AE was considered treatment-emergent if it began on or after date \& time of Study Day 0 vaccination. Intensity of solicited reactions was graded as mild (1) easily tolerated \& not interfere with usual activity; moderate (2) interferes with daily activity, but participant still able to function; severe (3) incapacitating \& participant unable to work/complete usual activity/ potentially life threatening; (4) likely to be life-threatening if not treated in a timely manner, according to FDA Guidance for Industry. ≥ severe events included severe \& potentially life-threatening events. Any ≥severe related (possibly, probably, \& definitely related to study treatments [as defined by investigator]) unsolicited events are reported.
Measured: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 21
Number of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug, with or without a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE was an AE that resulted in death, was life threatening, resulted in a persistent or significant disability or incapacity, resulted in or prolonged an existing hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or was another important medical event.
Measured: Day 0 to ~9 months
Number of Occurrences of Death
The number of participants who died during the study was assessed.
Measured: Day 0 up to ~9 months
Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an AE
An AE or adverse experience was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant who received study drug, with or without a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can be any favorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to a medicinal product.
Measured: Day 0 up to ~9 months
Number of Participants With at Least One New Onset Chronic Diseases (NOCDs)
All NOCDs that may plausibly have an allergic, autoimmune or inflammatory component were reported. Plausibility should be interpreted broadly however; the only clear exceptions were degenerative conditions such as osteoarthritis, age-related physiologic changes and life-style diseases. In this context, most cancers, cardiac conditions and kidney diseases should be reported. NOCDs were collected from vaccination on Day 0 to the end of the surveillance period.
Measured: Day 0 up to ~9 months
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) of Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Response for Each Homologous and Heterologous Influenza Strain
GMTs were measured using a HI assay for the homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013, and the heterologous strains: H1N1 = A/Brisbane/59/2007; H3N2 = A/Uruguay/716/2007; B/Malaysia = B/Malaysia/2506/2004; B/Florida = B/Florida/4/2006.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion Measured by HI Antibody Response for Each Homologous and Heterologous Strain
The percentage of participants in a given treatment group with either a ≥ 4-fold increase in reciprocal HI titers between Day 0 and Day 21 or a rise of undetectable HI titer (i.e. < 10) pre-vaccination (Day 0) to an HI titer of ≥ 40 on Day 21 was measured using an HI assay for the homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013, and the heterologous strains: H1N1 = A/Brisbane/59/2007; H3N2 = A/Uruguay/716/2007; B/Malaysia = B/Malaysia/2506/2004; B/Florida = B/Florida/4/2006.
Measured: Day 0 (pre-vaccination) to Day 21
Percentage of Participants With Seroprotection Measured by HI Antibody Response for Each Homologous and Heterologous Strain
The percentage of participants in a given treatment group attaining a reciprocal HI titer of ≥ 40 on Day 21 (the percentage of vaccine recipients with a serum HI titer of at least 1:40 following vaccination) was measured using an HI assay for homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013, and the heterologous strains: H1N1 = A/Brisbane/59/2007; H3N2 = A/Uruguay/716/2007; B/Malaysia = B/Malaysia/2506/2004; B/Florida = B/Florida/4/2006.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
Geometric Mean Fold Rise (GMFR) of HI Antibody Response for Each Homologous and Heterologous Strain
GMFR, the geometric mean of the ratio of GMTs (Day 21/Day 0), was measured using an HI assay homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013, and the heterologous strains: H1N1 = A/Brisbane/59/2007; H3N2 = A/Uruguay/716/2007; B/Malaysia = B/Malaysia/2506/2004; B/Florida = B/Florida/4/2006.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
GMTs of Microneutralization (MN) Antibody Response for Each Homologous Strain
GMTs were measured using an MN assay for homologous strains:H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion Measured by MN Antibody Response for Each Homologous Strain
The percentage of participants in a given treatment group with either a ≥ 4-fold increase in reciprocal MN titers between Day 0 and Day 21 or a rise of undetectable MN titer (i.e. 7.1) pre-vaccination (Day 0) to an MN titer of ≥ 28.3 at Day 21 post-vaccination were measured using an MN assay for homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013.
Measured: Day 0 (pre-vaccination) to Day 21
GMFR of MN Antibody Response for Each Homologous Strain
GMFR, the geometric mean of the ratio of GMTs (Day 21/Day 0), was measured using an MN assay for H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
Geometric Mean Areas (GMA) of Single Radial Hemolysis (SRH) Antibody Response for Each Homologous Strain
GMA was measured using an SRH assay for homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion Measured by SRH Antibody Response for Each Homologous Strain
The percentage of participants in a given treatment group showing at least 50 % increase in GMA between Days 0 and 21 were measured using an SRH assay for homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013.
Measured: Day 0 (pre-vaccination) to Day 21
Percentage of Participants With Seroprotection Measured by SRH Antibody Response for Each Homologous Strain
The percentage of participants in a given treatment group attaining an area ≥ 25 mm^2 following vaccination (Day 21) were measured using an SRH assay for homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
GMFR of SRH Antibody Response for Each Homologous Strain
GMFR, the geometric mean of the ratio of GMTs (Day 21/Day 0), was measured using an SRH assay for homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Nov 2018
- Study start18 Sep 2018
- Primary completion17 May 2019
- Study completion16 Jul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Virus DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a randomized, observer-blind, active comparator-controlled, multicenter, Phase 3 efficacy study.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 12,794 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medicago
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Medicago
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03739112
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CP-PRO-QVLP-014
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 8 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Ward BJ, Makarkov A, Seguin A, Pillet S, Trepanier S, Dhaliwall J, Libman MD, Vesikari T, Landry N. Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a plant-derived, quadrivalent, virus-like particle influenza vaccine in adults (18-64 years) and older adults (>/=65 years): two multicentre, randomised phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2020 Nov 7;396(10261):1491-1503. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32014-6. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
PubMed 33065035
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Observer-blind, Active Comparator-controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of a Plant-derived Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine in Adults 65 Years of Age and Older
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03739112
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CP-PRO-QVLP-014
- Conditions
- Virus Diseases, RNA Virus Infections, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Respiratory Tract Infections
- Keywords
- vaccine, safety, efficacy, plant-made, virus-like particle, hemagglutinin
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12,794 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- MedicagoIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 18 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 May 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 23 Jun 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This Phase 3 study was intended to assess the relative efficacy of the Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine during the 2018-2019 influenza season compared to a licensed vaccine in elderly adults 65 years of age and older. One dose of VLP Influenza Vaccine (30 μg/strain) or of Comparator (15 μg/strain) was to be administered to 12,738 participants.
Detailed description
This randomized, observer-blind, active-controlled multicenter, Phase 3 study was conducted at multiple sites. The composition of the Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine used in this study included a mix of recombinant H1, H3, and two B hemagglutinin proteins expressed as VLPs for the 2018-2019 influenza virus strains.
A total of 12,794 healthy male and female participants aged 65 years and older were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into one of two parallel treatment groups, such that 6,396 participants were randomized to receive the Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine at a dose of 30 μg/strain and 6,398 participants were randomized to receive the comparator. Within the two treatment groups, participants were stratified by site and two age groups (65-74 years of age and 75 years of age and older in a 2:1 ratio).
Participants participated in this study for approximately nine months, during which a first visit was scheduled on Day 0 for screening and vaccine administration.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a randomized, observer-blind, active comparator-controlled, multicenter, Phase 3 efficacy study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine | Experimental | Biological: Quadrivalent VLP VaccineParticipants received one intramuscular (IM) injection of 0.5 mL of 30 μg/strain of the Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine on Day 0. |
| Fluarix Quadrivalent® Comparator Vaccine | Active comparator | Biological: Fluarix Quadrivalent® Comparator VaccineParticipants received one IM injection of 0.5 mL of 15 μg/strain of the Fluarix Quadrivalent® comparator vaccine on Day 0. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Participants must have read, understood, and signed the informed consent form (ICF) prior to participating in the study; participants must also complete study-related procedures and communicate with the study staff at visits and by phone during the study;
- Participants must have a body mass index (BMI) ≤35 kg/m^2;
- Participants are considered by the Investigator to be reliable and likely to cooperate with the assessment procedures and be available for the duration of the study;
- Male and female participants must be 65 years of age and older at the Screening/Vaccination visit (Visit 1);
- Participants must be non-institutionalized (e.g. not living in rehabilitation centres or old-age homes; living in an elderly community is acceptable) and have no acute or evolving medical problems prior to study participation and no clinically relevant abnormalities that could jeopardize participant safety or interfere with study assessments, as assessed by the Principal Investigator or sub-Investigator (thereafter referred as Investigator) and determined by medical history, physical examination, and vital signs;
Key exclusion criteria (25 listed)
- According to the Investigator's opinion, history of an ongoing acute or evolving medical or neuropsychiatric illness. 'Evolving' was defined as:
- Any medical or neuropsychiatric condition or any history of excessive alcohol use or drug abuse that would render the participant unable to provide informed consent or unable to provide valid safety observations and reporting, including methadone (methadone as treatment for opioid dependence may be acceptable if the participant has been otherwise opioid-free for at least three years);
- Any autoimmune disease other than hypothyroidism on stable replacement therapy (including, but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Crohn's disease, type 1 diabetes, and inflammatory bowel disease) or any confirmed or suspected immunosuppressive condition or immunodeficiency including known or suspected human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B or C infection, the presence of lymphoproliferative disease;
- Any history of status asthmaticus or ongoing serious problems with asthma, hospitalization for asthma control, or recurrent asthma episodes requiring medical attention in the last three years (one or more episodes per year);
- Administration or planned administration of any non-influenza vaccine within 30 days prior to randomization up to blood sampling on Day 21. Immunization on an emergency basis was evaluated case-by-case by the Investigator;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Quadrivalent VLP VaccineSingle dose of a 30 µg/strain of Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine | Biological | Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine |
| Fluarix Quadrivalent® Comparator VaccineSingle dose of a 15 μg/strain of Fluarix Quadrivalent® Comparator Vaccine | Biological | Fluarix Quadrivalent® Comparator Vaccine |
Primary outcome
Number of Occurrences of Protocol-Defined Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) Due to Any Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza Strains
Time frame: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months
Occurrences of laboratory-confirmed ILI caused by any influenza viral strains was measured by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A participant was considered to have protocol-defined ILI if the participant met at least one of the following pre-defined respiratory symptoms: sore throat, cough, sputum production, wheezing, or difficulty breathing and at least one of the following systemic symptoms: fever (defined as a temperature > 37.2 °C or > 99.0 °F), chills, tiredness, headache or myalgia. The number of laboratory-confirmed ILI cases caused by any influenza strains are reported.
26 secondary outcomes
Number of Occurrences of Laboratory Confirmed Protocol-Defined Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) Caused by Vaccine-Matched Influenza Strains
Time frame: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months
Number of Occurrences of Protocol-Defined Respiratory Illness Due to Any Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza Strains
Time frame: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months
Number of Occurrences of Protocol-Defined Respiratory Illness Vaccine Caused by Vaccine-Matched Influenza Strains
Time frame: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months
Number of Occurrences of Protocol-Defined ILI
Time frame: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months
Number of Participants With at Least One Immediate Complaints
Time frame: 15 minutes post vaccination
Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Local and Systemic Reactions
Time frame: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 7
Number of Participants With ≥ Severe Solicited Local and Systemic Reaction
Time frame: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 7
Number of Participants With ≥ Severe Related Solicited Reactions
Time frame: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 7
Number of Participants With Unsolicited Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 21
Number of Participants With ≥ Severe Unsolicited TEAEs
Time frame: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 21
Number of Participants With ≥ Severe Related Unsolicited Reactions
Time frame: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 21
Number of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Time frame: Day 0 to ~9 months
Number of Occurrences of Death
Time frame: Day 0 up to ~9 months
Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an AE
Time frame: Day 0 up to ~9 months
Number of Participants With at Least One New Onset Chronic Diseases (NOCDs)
Time frame: Day 0 up to ~9 months
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) of Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Response for Each Homologous and Heterologous Influenza Strain
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion Measured by HI Antibody Response for Each Homologous and Heterologous Strain
Time frame: Day 0 (pre-vaccination) to Day 21
Percentage of Participants With Seroprotection Measured by HI Antibody Response for Each Homologous and Heterologous Strain
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
Geometric Mean Fold Rise (GMFR) of HI Antibody Response for Each Homologous and Heterologous Strain
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
GMTs of Microneutralization (MN) Antibody Response for Each Homologous Strain
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion Measured by MN Antibody Response for Each Homologous Strain
Time frame: Day 0 (pre-vaccination) to Day 21
GMFR of MN Antibody Response for Each Homologous Strain
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
Geometric Mean Areas (GMA) of Single Radial Hemolysis (SRH) Antibody Response for Each Homologous Strain
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion Measured by SRH Antibody Response for Each Homologous Strain
Time frame: Day 0 (pre-vaccination) to Day 21
Percentage of Participants With Seroprotection Measured by SRH Antibody Response for Each Homologous Strain
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
GMFR of SRH Antibody Response for Each Homologous Strain
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 33065035Ward BJ, Makarkov A, Seguin A, Pillet S, Trepanier S, Dhaliwall J, Libman MD, Vesikari T, Landry N. Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a plant-derived, quadrivalent, virus-like particle influenza vaccine in adults (18-64 years) and older adults (>/=65 years): two multicentre, randomised phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2020 Nov 7;396(10261):1491-1503. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32014-6. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
Related trials for Virus Diseases
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Long-term Bulevirtide Monotherapy in Patients With HDV-related Compensated Cirrhosis
Hepatitis D
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Learn About a Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine in Children at High Risk of RSV Disease
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Medicago
104 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine and Fluarix Quadrivalent® Comparator Vaccine in people with Virus Diseases and RNA Virus Infections, run by Medicago at 104 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 104 sites in United States, Germany, Canada, Finland, Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jun 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Occurrences of Protocol-Defined Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) Due to Any Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza Strains (time frame: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03739112, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2023.