Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyNCT03742999
Effectiveness of Visual and Auditory Feedback on Eye-hand Coordination in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
A study testing physical therapy program, E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser and physical therapy program and ELink Upper Limb Exerciser in people with Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy, run by Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
Trial summary
The aim of this study was to investigate potential benefits of adding augmented biofeedback training to standard therapy in improving eye-hand coordination in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy .Participants were divided randomly into three equal groups. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 8 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
- What is being tested?
- physical therapy program, E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser and physical therapy program and ELink Upper Limb Exerciser
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 45 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSaudi Arabia
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2018to 1 Jan 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 8 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Grade of spasticity between 1 to 1+ according to Modified ashworth Scale,
- The ability to handle objects independently was between level (I) and (II)
- According to Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)
- No history of epilepsy
- No botulinum toxin A treatment for the upper extremities in the previous 6 months
- Able to understand and follow verbal commands and instructions
Who cannot join
- Presence of visual or auditory impairments
- Significant tightness or fixed deformities in the upper limbs
- Severe spasticity
- Autism
- Severe cognitive impairment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Saudi Arabia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Disabled Children's Association
Riyadh, 25058
Reem M Alwhaibi, +966599112273 ext. +966599112273, rmalwhaibi@pnu.edu.sa
Reham M Alsakhawi, phd, +966504182628, RSMahmoud@pnu.edu.sa
About this study
The aim of this study was to investigate potential benefits of adding augmented biofeedback training to standard therapy in improving eye-hand coordination in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy .Participants were divided randomly into three equal groups. Group (A) received specially designed program of physical therapy intervention strategies to facilitate visual motor integration and visual perception over a period of three months. Group (B) received augmented biofeedback training only, and group (C) received augmented biofeedback training and same physical therapy program as group (A).
Read the detailed description
Children were assigned randomly into three groups of equal number (A, B and C). Children were selected randomly by collecting all names of children that matched the inclusion criteria of the study then upload the names and gender using an electronic program (SPSS) which divided the sample into three equal groups (A), (B) \& (C). Group A: this group included fifteen children with spastic hemiplegic CP. Children of this group received specially designed program of physical therapy exercises to facilitate eye-hand coordination to improve visual-motor coordination and grasping skills, which included: unbutton buttons, and button in all again; put the pellets in the bottle as fast as he/she can; place the shapes on its form board; build steps, wall, pyramid and a tower from cubes; cut out a line, square, triangle, and rectangular shapes on a paper by scissor; string squared cubes and lace the holes of strip. The tools used in training program were: button strip, lacing strip and its lace, mottle with screw- on cap, markers with different colors, beads and its lacing, square cubes, pellets, papers, blunt scissors, colored cubes, different types of form board and its shapes. Adjusted chair and table were used to accommodate differences in children's body built. Children were trained for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months.
Group B: this group included fifteen children with spastic hemiplegic CP. Children of this group received training using the E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months. Group C: this group included fifteen children with spastic hemiplegic CP. Children of this group received the same physical therapy program as conducted for group A, and training with E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser as conducted for group B. The training was for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months.
The participated children were assessed by the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale (2nd edition) (PDMS-2) Test before and after the three months of the treatment program. The average time required for evaluating each child was 40 min. The assessment and training methods were applied according to the instructions provided in the test and equipment manuals, no modifications were necessary.
- Conditions
- Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
- Being tested
- physical therapy program, E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser, physical therapy program and ELink Upper Limb Exerciser
- Keywords
- Biofeedback, eye-hand coordination, Peabody
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
physical therapy programProcedure or surgery
this group received specially designed physical therapy program to facilitate eye-hand coordination and fine motor to improve VMI, VP and MC, which included: unbutton buttons, and button in all again; put the pellets in the bottle as fast as he/she can; place the shapes on its form board; build steps, wall, pyramid and a tower from cubes; cut out a line, square, triangle, and rectangular shapes on a paper by scissor; string squared cubes and lace the holes of strip. Children were trained for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months.
E-Link Upper Limb ExerciserDevice
The exercises in the E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser System are in the form of simple and exciting games such as soccer, hitting walls, space shooting, driving, arnd throwing balls into a bucket.Children were trained for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months
physical therapy program and ELink Upper Limb ExerciserCombination product
physical therapy program and E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser. Children were trained for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| group A | Active comparator | Group (A) physical therapy program for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months Receives: Procedure: physical therapy program |
| group B | Active comparator | Group (B) E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser (augmented biofeedback training)for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months Receives: Device: E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser |
| group C | Experimental | group (C) physical therapy program and E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser Receives: Combination Product: physical therapy program and ELink Upper Limb Exerciser |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Baseline Peabody Developmental Motor Scale at 3 months (2nd edition) (PDMS-2)
Peabody Developmental Motor Scale provides assessment and training or remediation of gross and fine motor skills for children. It composed of two scores (Gross Motor and Fine Motor) divided into six subtests (Reflexes, Stationary, Locomotion, Object Manipulation, Grasping, Visual-Motor Integration).
scale ranges from 2, 1, or 0 ( 2 is the better outcome, 0 is the worse outcome)
Measured: 10-15 minutes total, it is taken at base line and after 3 months of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Nov 2018
- Study start1 Jul 2018
- Primary completion20 Dec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Reem M Alwhaibi, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
- Investigators
- Reem M Alwhaibi, PhD, Principal investigator, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03742999
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 205-w-37
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 10 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 15 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: data from participants will be made available
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Visual and Auditory Feedback on Eye-hand Coordination in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03742999
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 205-w-37
- Conditions
- Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
- Keywords
- Biofeedback, eye-hand coordination, Peabody
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Dec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study was to investigate potential benefits of adding augmented biofeedback training to standard therapy in improving eye-hand coordination in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy .Participants were divided randomly into three equal groups. Group (A) received specially designed program of physical therapy intervention strategies to facilitate visual motor integration and visual perception over a period of three months. Group (B) received augmented biofeedback training only, and group (C) received augmented biofeedback training and same physical therapy program as group (A).
Detailed description
Children were assigned randomly into three groups of equal number (A, B and C). Children were selected randomly by collecting all names of children that matched the inclusion criteria of the study then upload the names and gender using an electronic program (SPSS) which divided the sample into three equal groups (A), (B) \& (C). Group A: this group included fifteen children with spastic hemiplegic CP. Children of this group received specially designed program of physical therapy exercises to facilitate eye-hand coordination to improve visual-motor coordination and grasping skills, which included: unbutton buttons, and button in all again; put the pellets in the bottle as fast as he/she can; place the shapes on its form board; build steps, wall, pyramid and a tower from cubes; cut out a line, square, triangle, and rectangular shapes on a paper by scissor; string squared cubes and lace the holes of strip. The tools used in training program were: button strip, lacing strip and its lace, mottle with screw- on cap, markers with different colors, beads and its lacing, square cubes, pellets, papers, blunt scissors, colored cubes, different types of form board and its shapes. Adjusted chair and table were used to accommodate differences in children's body built. Children were trained for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months.
Group B: this group included fifteen children with spastic hemiplegic CP. Children of this group received training using the E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months. Group C: this group included fifteen children with spastic hemiplegic CP. Children of this group received the same physical therapy program as conducted for group A, and training with E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser as conducted for group B. The training was for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months.
The participated children were assessed by the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale (2nd edition) (PDMS-2) Test before and after the three months of the treatment program. The average time required for evaluating each child was 40 min. The assessment and training methods were applied according to the instructions provided in the test and equipment manuals, no modifications were necessary.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| group A | Active comparator | Procedure: physical therapy programGroup (A) physical therapy program for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months |
| group B | Active comparator | Device: E-Link Upper Limb ExerciserGroup (B) E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser (augmented biofeedback training)for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months |
| group C | Experimental | Combination Product: physical therapy program and ELink Upper Limb Exercisergroup (C) physical therapy program and E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 8 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Grade of spasticity between 1 to 1+ according to Modified ashworth Scale,
- The ability to handle objects independently was between level (I) and (II)
- According to Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)
- No history of epilepsy
- No botulinum toxin A treatment for the upper extremities in the previous 6 months
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Presence of visual or auditory impairments
- Significant tightness or fixed deformities in the upper limbs
- Severe spasticity
- Autism
- Severe cognitive impairment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| physical therapy programthis group received specially designed physical therapy program to facilitate eye-hand coordination and fine motor to improve VMI, VP and MC, which included: unbutton buttons, and button in all again; put the pellets in the bottle as fast as he/she can; place the shapes on its form board; build steps, wall, pyramid and a tower from cubes; cut out a line, square, triangle, and rectangular shapes on a paper by scissor; string squared cubes and lace the holes of strip. Children were trained for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months. | Procedure or surgery | group A |
| E-Link Upper Limb ExerciserThe exercises in the E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser System are in the form of simple and exciting games such as soccer, hitting walls, space shooting, driving, arnd throwing balls into a bucket.Children were trained for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months | Device | group B |
| physical therapy program and ELink Upper Limb Exerciserphysical therapy program and E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser. Children were trained for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three months | Combination product | group C |
Primary outcome
Change from Baseline Peabody Developmental Motor Scale at 3 months (2nd edition) (PDMS-2)
Time frame: 10-15 minutes total, it is taken at base line and after 3 months of treatment
Peabody Developmental Motor Scale provides assessment and training or remediation of gross and fine motor skills for children. It composed of two scores (Gross Motor and Fine Motor) divided into six subtests (Reflexes, Stationary, Locomotion, Object Manipulation, Grasping, Visual-Motor Integration). scale ranges from 2, 1, or 0 ( 2 is the better outcome, 0 is the worse outcome)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Nov 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. data from participants will be made available
Related trials for Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
Not yet recruiting
EFFECT OF ROBOTIC GLOVES TRAINING ON UPPER LIMB COORDINATION, SELECTIVE MOTOR CONTROL AND ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING IN CHILDREN WITH HEMIPARETIC CEREBRAL PALSY.
Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Short-Term Effects of Manual Therapy Prior to Neuromotor Therapy in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy (CP), Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Active, not recruiting
Virtual Reality Vs Postural Control Training in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Children With Hemiplegic cp
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality-Augmented Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Versus Conventional Constraint-Induced Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy.
Cerebral Palsy Spastic Hemiplegic, Functionnal Neurological Disorder
Recruiting
Implementation of Therapy Together
Cerebral Palsy, Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Reem M Alwhaibi, PhD principal investigator
Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing physical therapy program, E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser and physical therapy program and ELink Upper Limb Exerciser in people with Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy, run by Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Reem M Alwhaibi, PhD (+966599112273 ext. +966599112273, rmalwhaibi@pnu.edu.sa), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Baseline Peabody Developmental Motor Scale at 3 months (2nd edition) (PDMS-2) (time frame: 10-15 minutes total, it is taken at base line and after 3 months of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.