Early Childhood Professional DevelopmentSCOPENCT03743337
Study of Coaching Practices in Early Care and Education Settings
An observational study of Early Childhood Professional Development, run by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Mathematica Policy Research, funded by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will collect descriptive information for the Study of Coaching Practices in Early Care and Education Settings (SCOPE) project. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Early Childhood Professional Development
- How many people
- 310 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2019to 30 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Early care and education (ECE) center directors, professional development coaches and coach supervisors, center-based teachers, and family child care (FCC) providers.
Who may be able to join
- Currently operating licensed or license exempt child care setting
- Receiving funding from a Head Start grant and/or serve children who receive CCDF subsidies
- Currently receiving classroom-based coaching for teachers of preschoolers/FCC providers caring for preschoolers.
Who cannot join
- Does not meet the inclusion criteria
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Mathematica
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20002
Tim Bruursema, 202-484-3097, tbruursema@mathamtica-mpr.com
About this study
Mathematica Policy Research, funded by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will collect descriptive information for the Study of Coaching Practices in Early Care and Education Settings (SCOPE) project. The goal of this information collection is to learn how the prevalence, implementation, combination, and tailoring of core features of professional development coaching for early care and education (ECE) providers vary across ECE classrooms and family child care (FCC) homes serving children supported by Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) subsidies or in settings that receive Head Start grants. The investigators will conduct three data collection activities. First, the investigators will collect information on coaching taking place in different states in winter 2018 from state-level entities. Second, the investigators will conduct one round of survey data collection with ECE center directors, coaches, teachers, and FCC providers in winter 2019 through spring 2019. Third, the investigators will conduct case studies to better understand factors that influence the coaching approaches identified through the survey data collection. The case studies will include semi-structured interviews, a coaching session observation, and collection of coaching logs. The case studies will occur in spring 2020.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to advance understanding of implementation of core features of coaching in ECE classrooms, and how features may vary by key contextual factors and implementation drivers. This study will focus on coaching used for delivering professional development services to ECE teachers and FCC providers to improve knowledge and practice in center-based classrooms and FCC homes serving preschool-age children. At the classroom/teacher level, the approach to coaching can vary by dosage, content, activities (e.g., assessment, observation, goal-setting, modeling, reflection), materials (e.g., video, written plans, resource documents) and other features. However, there is no consensus as to which of these features are core to the practice of coaching. Additionally, little is known about how these features of coaching are implemented, combined, and tailored to the needs of teachers or how contextual factors or implementation drivers may mediate or moderate the effects of coaching. Ultimately, SCOPE findings will improve coaching practice in the ECE field and determine which coaching features are ripe for more rigorous evaluation.
Descriptive Study: The investigators will carry out a descriptive study in a sample of seven states. Sampled states will have one or more classroom-based coaching models offered to centers and FCC homes that are serving preschool-age children and that receive Head Start grants or serve children who receive CCDF subsidies. All of the data that will be collected are listed below.
- State coaching informant interviews: To obtain information about coaching approaches and about the available administrative data on coaching, including the range of coaching providers and approaches occurring in states and what ECE settings may be receiving classroom coaching. As part of this process, we will also seek existing administrative data on coaching processes and participants.
- ECE setting eligibility screening: To obtain information on the characteristics of the ECE setting, the coaching taking place in that setting, and characteristics of participants in coaching; and to determine if a setting is eligible for survey data collection and if personnel are willing to participate in the study
- Surveys for the descriptive study:
- A center director survey - To collect information on the center context, supports for and challenges to coaching and professional development, and structural and process features of coaching
- A coach survey - To collect information on coach characteristics, supports for and challenges to coaching, and process and structural features of coaching
- A teacher/FCC provider survey- To collect information on teacher and FCC provider characteristics, supports for coaching, structural and process features of coaching, coaching outputs (such as attitudes and beliefs), and the FCC context
Case Studies: The investigators will also conduct case studies in twelve ECE settings (centers and FCC homes) selected from the seven states; some of the settings may have participated in the descriptive study and others may not have. Site visit data collection for the case studies will consist of the following activities:
- Semi-structured interviews with center directors, teachers/FCC providers, coaches, and coach supervisors. To collect information on how decisions are made about coaching and what features are included; supports for coaching; organizational context and climate for coaching (e.g., organizational culture, philosophies, staffing and turnover, languages and cultures of families served); individual experiences as part of the coaching process; barriers/supports for coaching
- Teacher/FCC provider survey: The teachers and FCC providers in the case studies will be asked to complete the descriptive study teacher/FCC provider survey.
- Collection of coaching logs (whenever available): To provide information on the frequency of interactions between teachers/FCC providers and coaches, the focus of these interactions, and the coaching strategies employed. The coaching logs are preexisting materials used by some coaches when they provide coaching to teachers.
- Coaching session observations: To provide information on the process features of coaching (coaching activities and relationship-building activities); structural features (target of coaching and content); and outputs (teacher/FCC provider engagement, actual dosage, and perceptions of the coach-teacher/FCC provider relationship)
- Conditions
- Early Childhood Professional Development
- Keywords
- Infant-toddler care, Early child development, Professional development
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Coaching experienced by teachers/family child care providers
Study-developed teacher/FCC provider survey on coaching experiences
Measured: Up to 6 months
Coaching delivered by professional development coaches
Study developed survey of coaches' approach to coaching
Measured: Up to 6 months
Context in which coaching takes place/influences on the coaching process
Study developed survey of center directors on center characteristics
Measured: Up to 6 months
Director perspectives external factors that influence the implementation of coaching
Study developed interview of center directors on program and system level contextual factors that influence coaching
Measured: Up to 3 months
Coaching participant perspectives on external factors that influence the implementation of coaching
Study developed interview of teachers/FCC providers
Measured: Up to 3 months
Coach perspectives on external factors that influence the implementation of coaching
Study developed interview of coaches on program and system level contextual factors that influence coaching
Measured: Up to 3 months
Coach supervisor perspectives on external factors that influence the implementation of coaching
Study developed interview of coach supervisors on program and system level contextual factors that influence coaching
Measured: Up to 3 months
Content of coaching interactions
Study developed observation of coach-teacher/FCC provider professional development coaching sessions
Measured: Up to 90 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Nov 2018
- Study start1 Feb 2019
- Primary completion21 Jun 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Early Childhood Professional DevelopmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 310 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Department of Health and Human Services, Child Trends, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Emily Moiduddin, PhD, Study director, Mathematica Policy ResearchSally Atkins-Burnett, PhD, Principal investigator, Mathematica Policy Research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03743337
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 50320
- Acronym
- SCOPE
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 13 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study of Coaching Practices in Early Care and Education Settings
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03743337
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCOPE / 50320
- Conditions
- Early Childhood Professional Development
- Keywords
- Infant-toddler care, Early child development, Professional development
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 310 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Department of Health and Human Services, Child Trends, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Jun 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Mathematica Policy Research, funded by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will collect descriptive information for the Study of Coaching Practices in Early Care and Education Settings (SCOPE) project. The goal of this information collection is to learn how the prevalence, implementation, combination, and tailoring of core features of professional development coaching for early care and education (ECE) providers vary across ECE classrooms and family child care (FCC) homes serving children supported by Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) subsidies or in settings that receive Head Start grants. The investigators will conduct three data collection activities. First, the investigators will collect information on coaching taking place in different states in winter 2018 from state-level entities. Second, the investigators will conduct one round of survey data collection with ECE center directors, coaches, teachers, and FCC providers in winter 2019 through spring 2019. Third, the investigators will conduct case studies to better understand factors that influence the coaching approaches identified through the survey data collection. The case studies will include semi-structured interviews, a coaching session observation, and collection of coaching logs. The case studies will occur in spring 2020.
Detailed description
This study aims to advance understanding of implementation of core features of coaching in ECE classrooms, and how features may vary by key contextual factors and implementation drivers. This study will focus on coaching used for delivering professional development services to ECE teachers and FCC providers to improve knowledge and practice in center-based classrooms and FCC homes serving preschool-age children. At the classroom/teacher level, the approach to coaching can vary by dosage, content, activities (e.g., assessment, observation, goal-setting, modeling, reflection), materials (e.g., video, written plans, resource documents) and other features. However, there is no consensus as to which of these features are core to the practice of coaching. Additionally, little is known about how these features of coaching are implemented, combined, and tailored to the needs of teachers or how contextual factors or implementation drivers may mediate or moderate the effects of coaching. Ultimately, SCOPE findings will improve coaching practice in the ECE field and determine which coaching features are ripe for more rigorous evaluation.
Descriptive Study: The investigators will carry out a descriptive study in a sample of seven states. Sampled states will have one or more classroom-based coaching models offered to centers and FCC homes that are serving preschool-age children and that receive Head Start grants or serve children who receive CCDF subsidies. All of the data that will be collected are listed below.
- State coaching informant interviews: To obtain information about coaching approaches and about the available administrative data on coaching, including the range of coaching providers and approaches occurring in states and what ECE settings may be receiving classroom coaching. As part of this process, we will also seek existing administrative data on coaching processes and participants.
- ECE setting eligibility screening: To obtain information on the characteristics of the ECE setting, the coaching taking place in that setting, and characteristics of participants in coaching; and to determine if a setting is eligible for survey data collection and if personnel are willing to participate in the study
- Surveys for the descriptive study:
- A center director survey - To collect information on the center context, supports for and challenges to coaching and professional development, and structural and process features of coaching
- A coach survey - To collect information on coach characteristics, supports for and challenges to coaching, and process and structural features of coaching
- A teacher/FCC provider survey- To collect information on teacher and FCC provider characteristics, supports for coaching, structural and process features of coaching, coaching outputs (such as attitudes and beliefs), and the FCC context
Case Studies: The investigators will also conduct case studies in twelve ECE settings (centers and FCC homes) selected from the seven states; some of the settings may have participated in the descriptive study and others may not have. Site visit data collection for the case studies will consist of the following activities:
- Semi-structured interviews with center directors, teachers/FCC providers, coaches, and coach supervisors. To collect information on how decisions are made about coaching and what features are included; supports for coaching; organizational context and climate for coaching (e.g., organizational culture, philosophies, staffing and turnover, languages and cultures of families served); individual experiences as part of the coaching process; barriers/supports for coaching
- Teacher/FCC provider survey: The teachers and FCC providers in the case studies will be asked to complete the descriptive study teacher/FCC provider survey.
- Collection of coaching logs (whenever available): To provide information on the frequency of interactions between teachers/FCC providers and coaches, the focus of these interactions, and the coaching strategies employed. The coaching logs are preexisting materials used by some coaches when they provide coaching to teachers.
- Coaching session observations: To provide information on the process features of coaching (coaching activities and relationship-building activities); structural features (target of coaching and content); and outputs (teacher/FCC provider engagement, actual dosage, and perceptions of the coach-teacher/FCC provider relationship)
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Early care and education (ECE) center directors, professional development coaches and coach supervisors, center-based teachers, and family child care (FCC) providers.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Currently operating licensed or license exempt child care setting
- Receiving funding from a Head Start grant and/or serve children who receive CCDF subsidies
- Currently receiving classroom-based coaching for teachers of preschoolers/FCC providers caring for preschoolers.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Does not meet the inclusion criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Coaching experienced by teachers/family child care providers
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Study-developed teacher/FCC provider survey on coaching experiences
Coaching delivered by professional development coaches
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Study developed survey of coaches' approach to coaching
Context in which coaching takes place/influences on the coaching process
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Study developed survey of center directors on center characteristics
Director perspectives external factors that influence the implementation of coaching
Time frame: Up to 3 months
Study developed interview of center directors on program and system level contextual factors that influence coaching
Coaching participant perspectives on external factors that influence the implementation of coaching
Time frame: Up to 3 months
Study developed interview of teachers/FCC providers
Coach perspectives on external factors that influence the implementation of coaching
Time frame: Up to 3 months
Study developed interview of coaches on program and system level contextual factors that influence coaching
Coach supervisor perspectives on external factors that influence the implementation of coaching
Time frame: Up to 3 months
Study developed interview of coach supervisors on program and system level contextual factors that influence coaching
Content of coaching interactions
Time frame: Up to 90 minutes
Study developed observation of coach-teacher/FCC provider professional development coaching sessions
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Mar 2019.
Related trials for Early Childhood Professional Development
Not yet recruiting
Promoting Physical Activity Among Young Children With Autism
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emily Moiduddin, PhD study director
Mathematica Policy Research
Sally Atkins-Burnett, PhD principal investigator
Mathematica Policy Research
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Early Childhood Professional Development, run by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Emily Moiduddin, PhD ((202) 484-4223, EMoiduddin@mathematica-mpr.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Coaching experienced by teachers/family child care providers (time frame: Up to 6 months). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2019.