AzTrials
AzTrials

Early Childhood Professional DevelopmentSCOPENCT03743337

Study of Coaching Practices in Early Care and Education Settings

An observational study of Early Childhood Professional Development, run by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Mathematica Policy Research, funded by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will collect descriptive information for the Study of Coaching Practices in Early Care and Education Settings (SCOPE) project. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Early Childhood Professional Development
How many people
310 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Feb 2019to 30 Sep 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Early care and education (ECE) center directors, professional development coaches and coach supervisors, center-based teachers, and family child care (FCC) providers.

Who may be able to join

  • Currently operating licensed or license exempt child care setting
  • Receiving funding from a Head Start grant and/or serve children who receive CCDF subsidies
  • Currently receiving classroom-based coaching for teachers of preschoolers/FCC providers caring for preschoolers.

Who cannot join

  • Does not meet the inclusion criteria

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Mathematica

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20002

    Tim Bruursema, 202-484-3097, tbruursema@mathamtica-mpr.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Mathematica Policy Research, funded by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will collect descriptive information for the Study of Coaching Practices in Early Care and Education Settings (SCOPE) project. The goal of this information collection is to learn how the prevalence, implementation, combination, and tailoring of core features of professional development coaching for early care and education (ECE) providers vary across ECE classrooms and family child care (FCC) homes serving children supported by Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) subsidies or in settings that receive Head Start grants. The investigators will conduct three data collection activities. First, the investigators will collect information on coaching taking place in different states in winter 2018 from state-level entities. Second, the investigators will conduct one round of survey data collection with ECE center directors, coaches, teachers, and FCC providers in winter 2019 through spring 2019. Third, the investigators will conduct case studies to better understand factors that influence the coaching approaches identified through the survey data collection. The case studies will include semi-structured interviews, a coaching session observation, and collection of coaching logs. The case studies will occur in spring 2020.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to advance understanding of implementation of core features of coaching in ECE classrooms, and how features may vary by key contextual factors and implementation drivers. This study will focus on coaching used for delivering professional development services to ECE teachers and FCC providers to improve knowledge and practice in center-based classrooms and FCC homes serving preschool-age children. At the classroom/teacher level, the approach to coaching can vary by dosage, content, activities (e.g., assessment, observation, goal-setting, modeling, reflection), materials (e.g., video, written plans, resource documents) and other features. However, there is no consensus as to which of these features are core to the practice of coaching. Additionally, little is known about how these features of coaching are implemented, combined, and tailored to the needs of teachers or how contextual factors or implementation drivers may mediate or moderate the effects of coaching. Ultimately, SCOPE findings will improve coaching practice in the ECE field and determine which coaching features are ripe for more rigorous evaluation.

Descriptive Study: The investigators will carry out a descriptive study in a sample of seven states. Sampled states will have one or more classroom-based coaching models offered to centers and FCC homes that are serving preschool-age children and that receive Head Start grants or serve children who receive CCDF subsidies. All of the data that will be collected are listed below.

  1. State coaching informant interviews: To obtain information about coaching approaches and about the available administrative data on coaching, including the range of coaching providers and approaches occurring in states and what ECE settings may be receiving classroom coaching. As part of this process, we will also seek existing administrative data on coaching processes and participants.
  2. ECE setting eligibility screening: To obtain information on the characteristics of the ECE setting, the coaching taking place in that setting, and characteristics of participants in coaching; and to determine if a setting is eligible for survey data collection and if personnel are willing to participate in the study
  3. Surveys for the descriptive study:
  • A center director survey - To collect information on the center context, supports for and challenges to coaching and professional development, and structural and process features of coaching
  • A coach survey - To collect information on coach characteristics, supports for and challenges to coaching, and process and structural features of coaching
  • A teacher/FCC provider survey- To collect information on teacher and FCC provider characteristics, supports for coaching, structural and process features of coaching, coaching outputs (such as attitudes and beliefs), and the FCC context

Case Studies: The investigators will also conduct case studies in twelve ECE settings (centers and FCC homes) selected from the seven states; some of the settings may have participated in the descriptive study and others may not have. Site visit data collection for the case studies will consist of the following activities:

  1. Semi-structured interviews with center directors, teachers/FCC providers, coaches, and coach supervisors. To collect information on how decisions are made about coaching and what features are included; supports for coaching; organizational context and climate for coaching (e.g., organizational culture, philosophies, staffing and turnover, languages and cultures of families served); individual experiences as part of the coaching process; barriers/supports for coaching
  2. Teacher/FCC provider survey: The teachers and FCC providers in the case studies will be asked to complete the descriptive study teacher/FCC provider survey.
  3. Collection of coaching logs (whenever available): To provide information on the frequency of interactions between teachers/FCC providers and coaches, the focus of these interactions, and the coaching strategies employed. The coaching logs are preexisting materials used by some coaches when they provide coaching to teachers.
  4. Coaching session observations: To provide information on the process features of coaching (coaching activities and relationship-building activities); structural features (target of coaching and content); and outputs (teacher/FCC provider engagement, actual dosage, and perceptions of the coach-teacher/FCC provider relationship)
Keywords
Infant-toddler care, Early child development, Professional development

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Coaching experienced by teachers/family child care providers

    Study-developed teacher/FCC provider survey on coaching experiences

    Measured: Up to 6 months

  2. Coaching delivered by professional development coaches

    Study developed survey of coaches' approach to coaching

    Measured: Up to 6 months

  3. Context in which coaching takes place/influences on the coaching process

    Study developed survey of center directors on center characteristics

    Measured: Up to 6 months

  4. Director perspectives external factors that influence the implementation of coaching

    Study developed interview of center directors on program and system level contextual factors that influence coaching

    Measured: Up to 3 months

  5. Coaching participant perspectives on external factors that influence the implementation of coaching

    Study developed interview of teachers/FCC providers

    Measured: Up to 3 months

  6. Coach perspectives on external factors that influence the implementation of coaching

    Study developed interview of coaches on program and system level contextual factors that influence coaching

    Measured: Up to 3 months

  7. Coach supervisor perspectives on external factors that influence the implementation of coaching

    Study developed interview of coach supervisors on program and system level contextual factors that influence coaching

    Measured: Up to 3 months

  8. Content of coaching interactions

    Study developed observation of coach-teacher/FCC provider professional development coaching sessions

    Measured: Up to 90 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Nov 2018
  2. Study start1 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completion21 Jun 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
310 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03743337
Sponsor's protocol ID
50320
Acronym
SCOPE
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
14 Nov 2018
Last updated
13 Mar 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Early Childhood Professional Development, run by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Emily Moiduddin, PhD ((202) 484-4223, EMoiduddin@mathematica-mpr.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Coaching experienced by teachers/family child care providers (time frame: Up to 6 months). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in