Type2 DiabetesNCT03748810
Head-to-head Comparison of Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin
An observational study of Type2 Diabetes, run by Chungbuk National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
This open-labeled, prospective, observational, 3-year, clinical study was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety between empagliflozin (25 mg once daily) and dapagliflozin (10 mg once daily) in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes despite preexisting triple OAD combination. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type2 Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2016to 30 Jun 2022
- How long will I take part?
- 3 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The targeted population consists of adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated in outpatient setting by specialists
Who may be able to join
- Inadequately controlled under triple OADs (metformin, glimepiride, dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitor) as evidenced by HbA1c 7.5-12%
Who cannot join
- Type 1 diabetes
- Gestational diabetes
- Diabetes due to secondary causes
- Receiving anticancer treatment
- Receiving glucocorticoids or immune-suppressants
- have been treated with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors for more than 7 consecutive days within 3 months before entering this study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site
Chungbuk National University Hospital
Cheonju, North Chungcheong, 28644
About this study
Official title: Head-to-head Comparison of Quadruple Combination Therapy With Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin in Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) Despite Three Existing Oral Antidiabetic Drugs (OAD)
This open-labeled, prospective, observational, 3-year, clinical study was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety between empagliflozin (25 mg once daily) and dapagliflozin (10 mg once daily) in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes despite preexisting triple OAD combination.
Read the detailed description
All participants included in this study were initially requested to initiate therapy with insulin, but they insisted on another form of OAD. When participants declined insulin injection and requested another OAD, they were not randomly assigned to each groups. It is fairly common among participants with T2D to decline insulin therapy, despite being aware of its importance and the benefits in controlling blood glucose. Their lack of willingness to use insulin is explained by their avoidance of painful injections, the potential for body weight gain and their fear of hypoglycemia. The investigators conducted a regimen consisting of four OADs, including empagliflozin or dapagliflozin, to confirm which regimen would be effective and safe.
- Conditions
- Type2 Diabetes
- Being tested
- Empagliflozin, Dapagliflozin
- Keywords
- Empagliflozin, Dapagliflozin, Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, Quadruple combination antidiabetic drugs
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EmpagliflozinDrug
Also called Metformin, Glimepiride, DPP4 inhibitor
Empagliflozin 25 mg once daily add on the background OADs for 3 years
DapagliflozinDrug
Also called Metformin, Glimepiride, DPP4 inhibitor
Dapagliflozin 25 mg once daily add on the background OADs for 3 years
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Triple OADs failure | Empagliflozin or dapagliflozin as an add-on drug for inadequately controlled T2D patients who are already receiving a regimen of three distinct OADs, including metformin, glimepiride and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors. Receives: Drug: Empagliflozin; Drug: Dapagliflozin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in HbA1c from baseline to week 156 (3-year)
Changes in HbA1c from baseline to week 156 (3-year)
Measured: Baseline, week 156 (3-year)
Changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 156 (3-year)
Changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 156 (3-year)
Measured: Baseline, week 156 (3-year)
Secondary outcomes (27)
Changes in HbA1c from baseline to week 104 (2-year)
Changes in HbA1c from baseline to week 104 (2-year)
Measured: Baseline, week 104 (2-year)
Changes in HbA1c from baseline to week 52 (1-year)
Changes in HbA1c from baseline to week 52 (1-year)
Measured: Baseline, week 52 (1-year)
Changes in HbA1c from baseline to week 24
Changes in HbA1c from baseline to week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 12
Changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 12
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 24
Changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 56 (1-year)
Changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 56 (1-year)
Measured: Baseline, Week 56 (1-year)
Changes in weight between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Changes in weight between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Measured: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Changes in weight between baseline and week 104 (2-year)
Changes in weight between baseline and week 104 (2-year)
Measured: Baseline, Week 104 (2-year)
Changes in weight between baseline and week 52
Changes in weight between baseline and week 52
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Changes in weight between baseline and week 24
Changes in weight between baseline and week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in weight between baseline and week 12
Changes in weight between baseline and week 12
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Changes in systolic blood pressure between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Changes in systolic blood pressure between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Measured: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Changes in systolic blood pressure between baseline and week 104 (2-year)
Changes in systolic blood pressure between baseline and week 104 (2-year)
Measured: Baseline, Week 104 (2-year)
Changes in systolic blood pressure between baseline and week 52
Changes in systolic blood pressure between baseline and week 52
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Changes in systolic blood pressure between baseline and week 24
Changes in systolic blood pressure between baseline and week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in systolic blood pressure between baseline and week 12
Changes in systolic blood pressure between baseline and week 12
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Changes in diastolic blood pressure between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Changes in diastolic blood pressure between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Measured: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Changes in diastolic blood pressure between baseline and week 104 (2-year)
Changes in diastolic blood pressure between baseline and week 104 (2-year)
Measured: Baseline, Week 104 (2-year)
Changes in diastolic blood pressure between baseline and week 52
Changes in diastolic blood pressure between baseline and week 52
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Changes in diastolic blood pressure between baseline and week 24
Changes in diastolic blood pressure between baseline and week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in diastolic blood pressure between baseline and week 12
Changes in diastolic blood pressure between baseline and week 12
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Changes in total cholesterol between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Changes in total cholesterol between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Measured: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Changes in triglyceride between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Changes in triglyceride between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Measured: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Changes in LDL-cholesterol between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Changes in LDL-cholesterol between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Measured: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Changes in HDL-cholesterol between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Changes in HDL-cholesterol between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Measured: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Percentage of patients with hypoglycemic episodes between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
All episodes consistent with hypoglycemic episodes with or without a confirmatory blood glucose reading were collected
Measured: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Percentage of patients with at least 1 episode of genitourinary tract infections between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Percentage of patients with at least 1 episode of genitourinary tract infections
Measured: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Nov 2018
- Study start1 Jan 2016
- Primary completion30 Jun 2022
- Study completion30 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type2 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 3 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chungbuk National University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Eu Jeong Ku, Chungbuk National University Hospital
- Investigators
- Jae Hyun Ahn, Study chair, Chungbuk National University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03748810
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SGLT2 inhibitor 2018
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Ku EJ, Lee DH, Jeon HJ, Oh TK. Long-term effectiveness and safety of quadruple combination therapy with empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes: 3-year prospective observational study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;182:109123. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109123. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
PubMed 34740742Ku EJ, Lee DH, Jeon HJ, Oh TK. Empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin, glimepiride and dipeptidyl peptide 4 inhibitors: A 52-week prospective observational study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 May;151:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
PubMed 30954510
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Head-to-head Comparison of Quadruple Combination Therapy With Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin in Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) Despite Three Existing Oral Antidiabetic Drugs (OAD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03748810
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SGLT2 inhibitor 2018
- Conditions
- Type2 Diabetes
- Keywords
- Empagliflozin, Dapagliflozin, Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, Quadruple combination antidiabetic drugs
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chungbuk National University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This open-labeled, prospective, observational, 3-year, clinical study was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety between empagliflozin (25 mg once daily) and dapagliflozin (10 mg once daily) in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes despite preexisting triple OAD combination.
Detailed description
All participants included in this study were initially requested to initiate therapy with insulin, but they insisted on another form of OAD. When participants declined insulin injection and requested another OAD, they were not randomly assigned to each groups. It is fairly common among participants with T2D to decline insulin therapy, despite being aware of its importance and the benefits in controlling blood glucose. Their lack of willingness to use insulin is explained by their avoidance of painful injections, the potential for body weight gain and their fear of hypoglycemia. The investigators conducted a regimen consisting of four OADs, including empagliflozin or dapagliflozin, to confirm which regimen would be effective and safe.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 3 Years
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Triple OADs failure | – | Drug: Empagliflozin, Drug: DapagliflozinEmpagliflozin or dapagliflozin as an add-on drug for inadequately controlled T2D patients who are already receiving a regimen of three distinct OADs, including metformin, glimepiride and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The targeted population consists of adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated in outpatient setting by specialists
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Inadequately controlled under triple OADs (metformin, glimepiride, dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitor) as evidenced by HbA1c 7.5-12%
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Type 1 diabetes
- Gestational diabetes
- Diabetes due to secondary causes
- Receiving anticancer treatment
- Receiving glucocorticoids or immune-suppressants
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EmpagliflozinAlso: Metformin, Glimepiride, DPP4 inhibitorEmpagliflozin 25 mg once daily add on the background OADs for 3 years | Drug | Triple OADs failure |
| DapagliflozinAlso: Metformin, Glimepiride, DPP4 inhibitorDapagliflozin 25 mg once daily add on the background OADs for 3 years | Drug | Triple OADs failure |
Primary outcome
Changes in HbA1c from baseline to week 156 (3-year)
Time frame: Baseline, week 156 (3-year)
Changes in HbA1c from baseline to week 156 (3-year)
Changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 156 (3-year)
Time frame: Baseline, week 156 (3-year)
Changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 156 (3-year)
27 secondary outcomes
Changes in HbA1c from baseline to week 104 (2-year)
Time frame: Baseline, week 104 (2-year)
Changes in HbA1c from baseline to week 52 (1-year)
Time frame: Baseline, week 52 (1-year)
Changes in HbA1c from baseline to week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 56 (1-year)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 56 (1-year)
Changes in weight between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Changes in weight between baseline and week 104 (2-year)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104 (2-year)
Changes in weight between baseline and week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Changes in weight between baseline and week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in weight between baseline and week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Changes in systolic blood pressure between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Changes in systolic blood pressure between baseline and week 104 (2-year)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104 (2-year)
Changes in systolic blood pressure between baseline and week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Changes in systolic blood pressure between baseline and week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in systolic blood pressure between baseline and week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Changes in diastolic blood pressure between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Changes in diastolic blood pressure between baseline and week 104 (2-year)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104 (2-year)
Changes in diastolic blood pressure between baseline and week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Changes in diastolic blood pressure between baseline and week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in diastolic blood pressure between baseline and week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Changes in total cholesterol between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Changes in triglyceride between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Changes in LDL-cholesterol between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Changes in HDL-cholesterol between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Percentage of patients with hypoglycemic episodes between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Percentage of patients with at least 1 episode of genitourinary tract infections between baseline and week 156 (3-year)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156 (3-year)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jul 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34740742Ku EJ, Lee DH, Jeon HJ, Oh TK. Long-term effectiveness and safety of quadruple combination therapy with empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes: 3-year prospective observational study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;182:109123. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109123. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30954510Ku EJ, Lee DH, Jeon HJ, Oh TK. Empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin, glimepiride and dipeptidyl peptide 4 inhibitors: A 52-week prospective observational study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 May;151:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
Related trials for Type2 Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jae Hyun Ahn study chair
Chungbuk National University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Type2 Diabetes, run by Chungbuk National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in HbA1c from baseline to week 156 (3-year) (time frame: Baseline, week 156 (3-year)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03748810, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2022.