AzTrials
AzTrials

Digestive HealthNCT03749031

Effects of Beverages Containing Orange or Apple Pomace on Digestive Health in Adults

A study testing Orange juice + Orange Pomace, Orange Juice and Apple Juice and Apple Pomace in people with Digestive Health, run by PepsiCo Global R&D at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized crossover intervention designed to evaluate effects of daily intake of beverages containing orange or apple Pomace on gastrointestinal function as measured by stool frequency. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Digestive Health
What is being tested?
Orange juice + Orange Pomace, Orange Juice and Apple Juice and Apple Pomace
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 Oct 2018to 30 Aug 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy males and females 18-60 years old
  • Willing and able to consume 16 oz. of orange or apple beverage per day for 4 week periods
  • Willing to maintain usual diet, smoking status, physical activity pattern, supplements and meds

Who cannot join

  • Food allergies or sensitivities to ingredients in study beverages
  • Presence or history of GI condition, endocrine (including diabetes), cardiovascular disease or other disease or condition that could interfere in the interpretation of the study results in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • Extreme dietary habits including vegetarian, vegan or Atkins diet
  • Females or are pregnant, planning to become pregnant or breast feeding during the study period.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • BioFortis

    Addison, Illinois, 60101

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Orange or Apple Pomace on Digestive Health in Adults: a Randomized, Double Blind, Controlled Trial

This is a randomized crossover intervention designed to evaluate effects of daily intake of beverages containing orange or apple Pomace on gastrointestinal function as measured by stool frequency. Additional outcomes will include aspects of digestive health and self-reported GI symptoms and dietary intake as well as analysis of gut microbiota.

Being tested
Orange juice + Orange Pomace, Orange Juice, Apple Juice and Apple Pomace, Apple Juice

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Orange juice + Orange PomaceOther

    16 oz. orange juice + orange Pomace per day for 4 weeks

  • Orange JuiceOther

    16 oz. orange juice per day for 4 weeks

  • Apple Juice and Apple PomaceOther

    16 oz. apple juice and apple Pomace per day for 4 weeks

  • Apple JuiceOther

    16 oz. apple juice per day for 4 weeks

Study groups in NCT03749031
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Orange juice onlyPlacebo comparator16 oz. orange juice per day for 4 weeks
Receives: Other: Orange Juice
orange juice + orange PomaceExperimental16 oz. orange juice + orange Pomace per day for 4 weeks
Receives: Other: Orange juice + Orange Pomace
Apple juice onlyPlacebo comparator16 oz. apple juice per day for 4 weeks
Receives: Other: Apple Juice
Apple Juice + Apple PomaceExperimental16 oz. apple juice + apple Pomace per day for 4 weeks
Receives: Other: Apple Juice and Apple Pomace

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. stool frequency

    Bowel habits daily diary as weekly averages. Fewer days with no stool, and higher number of stools per week would be better.

    Measured: Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Self-reported GI symptoms

    GI Tolerability questionnaire, 4 selections. The minimum value is Less than usual. The maximum value is Much more than usual. Pomace treament arms expected to have more GI symptoms than juice arms. Less symptoms are better than more.

    Measured: Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)

  2. Stool consistency

    Bristol score, 7 types of stool drawings presented in a chart from lumpy Type 1, to watery Type 7. Improved consistency would be better.

    Measured: Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)

  3. Ease of stool passage

    Rating scale 1 (Very easy) to 5 (Very difficult). Easier passage would be better.

    Measured: Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)

  4. microbiota changes

    Stool samples for possible explanations of mechanisms of pomace. Higher bacteria associated with fiber fermentation would be better. Species examined include F. Prau, lachnospiraceae, ruminoucoccaceae, bifidobacteria, and changes in alpha and beta diversity as measured by 16S RNA sequencing. Data pending, unknown units at this time.

    Measured: Changes from baseline sample to end of treatment sample (Week 4) and end of 3 week washout sample (Week 7)

  5. Dietary analysis

    3-day diet record. Expecting higher daily fiber intake for pomace arms.

    Measured: Changes from 2 week run in (baseline) to the last week of treatment (Week 4) and the last week of 3 week washout (Week 7)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Nov 2018
  2. Study start15 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Aug 2019
  4. Study completion30 Aug 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03749031
Sponsor's protocol ID
PEP-1805
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
19 Nov 2018
Last updated
20 Dec 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Orange juice + Orange Pomace, Orange Juice and Apple Juice and Apple Pomace in people with Digestive Health, run by PepsiCo Global R&D at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

stool frequency (time frame: Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in