Healthcare-Associated InfectionsNCT03749434
Understanding and Addressing Variations in HAIs After Durable Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
An observational study of Healthcare-Associated Infections, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Substantial center variability exists in healthcare-associated infection (HAI) rates following durable ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation for patients with advanced heart failure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthcare-Associated Infections
- How many people
- 34,958 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 Feb 2019to 30 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients who have received a FDA-approved, durable ventricular assist device implant.
Who may be able to join
- Female and Male adult patients 18 and over who have received a FDA-approved, durable ventricular assist device implant from 2008 onwards
Who cannot join
- Children
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Understanding and Addressing Variations in Healthcare-associated Infections (HAIs) After Durable Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
Substantial center variability exists in healthcare-associated infection (HAI) rates following durable ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation for patients with advanced heart failure. Preliminary evidence suggests that this variability may be related to process (e.g., pre-operative intranasal mupirocin), provider (e.g., surgeon technique, physician teamwork), device, (e.g., centrifugal vs. axial flow), and center specific (e.g., infection prevention strategies and resources) factors. The investigators will undertake a mixed methods study to: (1) identify determinants of center-level variability in HAI rates, (2) develop a comprehensive understanding of barriers and facilitators for achieving low center HAI rates, and (3) develop, iteratively enhance, and disseminate a best practices toolkit for preventing HAIs that accommodates various center contexts.
Read the detailed description
Durable ventricular assist devices (VADs) provide long-term mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to cardiac transplantation or as permanent therapy, and have the potential to benefit more than 250K patients with advanced heart failure (HF) refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy. Upwards of six out of every 10 VAD patients develop a healthcare-associated infection (HAI) following implant. Broader adoption of durable VAD therapy is hindered by HAIs given their association with mortality (5.6-fold increased risk of 1-year mortality) and healthcare expenditures ($264K - $869K per patient).
Most studies evaluating HAIs in the setting of VAD therapy have been limited to post-hoc analyses of small trials, or single center experiences. While some argue that centers with lower HAI rates select healthier patients, others counter that improved practices (e.g., standardizing empirical and targeted antimicrobial therapy) or enhanced provider teamwork are more predictive of improved outcomes. While evidence-based HAI prevention guidelines and implementation tools (e.g., checklists) exist, these approaches are not comprehensive (e.g., neglecting device-specific determinants) or customizable to local context, thus limiting usability, adoption, and likelihood of significant effectiveness for preventing HAIs. Understanding the barriers and facilitators within individual centers for maximizing adoption of prevention measures would serve as the foundation for targeted strategies. Without this knowledge, evidence-based, action-oriented recommendations will have limited local adoption and ultimately effectiveness in preventing HAIs after VAD implantation. The investigators' long-term goal is to develop and subsequently promote wide-scale adoption of evidence-based HAI prevention practices following durable VAD implantation. The objective of this proposal is to identify prevention recommendations for the most significant HAIs after VAD implantation. To achieve this objective, the investigators will undertake a mixed methods study of adult patients receiving VADs in the U.S. from 2009 - 2017 and develop a modular toolkit of evidence-based recommendations. To determine best practices for preventing HAIs, the investigators will examine center-level differences in HAI rates to identify strategies used by centers with low rates, and barriers to lowering HAI rates among centers with high rates. The investigators will use a novel dataset including administrative claims and detailed clinical data, along with in-depth center surveys, to address the following aims: (i) identify determinants of center-level variability in HAI rates, (ii) develop a comprehensive understanding of barriers and facilitators for achieving low center HAI rates, and (iii) develop, iteratively enhance, and disseminate a best practices toolkit for preventing HAIs that accommodates various center contexts.
These studies will have a positive impact on clinical practice by identifying targets for an interventional study. Moreover, the mixed methods approach will serve as a model for evaluating and improving clinical care more broadly - especially in the setting of complex surgical procedures.
- Conditions
- Healthcare-Associated Infections
- Keywords
- Infections, Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Cross Infection, Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adults with HAIs after VAD therapy | Adult patients who have received a ventricular assist device implant. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients who have developed a healthcare-associated infection within 90 days following a ventricular assist device (VAD) implant
Any healthcare-associated infection within 90 days following a VAD implant
Measured: 90 days following a VAD implant
Secondary outcomes (1)
Type of healthcare-associated infection
Healthcare-associated infection subtype
Measured: 90 days following a VAD implant
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Nov 2018
- Study start4 Feb 2019
- Primary completion30 Jun 2024
- Study completion30 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Healthcare-Associated InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 34,958 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Donald Likosky, University of Michigan
- Investigators
- Donald Likosky, PhD., Principal investigator, University of Michigan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03749434
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HUM00155687
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 23 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Understanding and Addressing Variations in Healthcare-associated Infections (HAIs) After Durable Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03749434
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HUM00155687
- Conditions
- Healthcare-Associated Infections
- Keywords
- Infections, Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 34,958 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MichiganUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
- Study start
- 4 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Substantial center variability exists in healthcare-associated infection (HAI) rates following durable ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation for patients with advanced heart failure. Preliminary evidence suggests that this variability may be related to process (e.g., pre-operative intranasal mupirocin), provider (e.g., surgeon technique, physician teamwork), device, (e.g., centrifugal vs. axial flow), and center specific (e.g., infection prevention strategies and resources) factors. The investigators will undertake a mixed methods study to: (1) identify determinants of center-level variability in HAI rates, (2) develop a comprehensive understanding of barriers and facilitators for achieving low center HAI rates, and (3) develop, iteratively enhance, and disseminate a best practices toolkit for preventing HAIs that accommodates various center contexts.
Detailed description
Durable ventricular assist devices (VADs) provide long-term mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to cardiac transplantation or as permanent therapy, and have the potential to benefit more than 250K patients with advanced heart failure (HF) refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy. Upwards of six out of every 10 VAD patients develop a healthcare-associated infection (HAI) following implant. Broader adoption of durable VAD therapy is hindered by HAIs given their association with mortality (5.6-fold increased risk of 1-year mortality) and healthcare expenditures ($264K - $869K per patient).
Most studies evaluating HAIs in the setting of VAD therapy have been limited to post-hoc analyses of small trials, or single center experiences. While some argue that centers with lower HAI rates select healthier patients, others counter that improved practices (e.g., standardizing empirical and targeted antimicrobial therapy) or enhanced provider teamwork are more predictive of improved outcomes. While evidence-based HAI prevention guidelines and implementation tools (e.g., checklists) exist, these approaches are not comprehensive (e.g., neglecting device-specific determinants) or customizable to local context, thus limiting usability, adoption, and likelihood of significant effectiveness for preventing HAIs. Understanding the barriers and facilitators within individual centers for maximizing adoption of prevention measures would serve as the foundation for targeted strategies. Without this knowledge, evidence-based, action-oriented recommendations will have limited local adoption and ultimately effectiveness in preventing HAIs after VAD implantation. The investigators' long-term goal is to develop and subsequently promote wide-scale adoption of evidence-based HAI prevention practices following durable VAD implantation. The objective of this proposal is to identify prevention recommendations for the most significant HAIs after VAD implantation. To achieve this objective, the investigators will undertake a mixed methods study of adult patients receiving VADs in the U.S. from 2009 - 2017 and develop a modular toolkit of evidence-based recommendations. To determine best practices for preventing HAIs, the investigators will examine center-level differences in HAI rates to identify strategies used by centers with low rates, and barriers to lowering HAI rates among centers with high rates. The investigators will use a novel dataset including administrative claims and detailed clinical data, along with in-depth center surveys, to address the following aims: (i) identify determinants of center-level variability in HAI rates, (ii) develop a comprehensive understanding of barriers and facilitators for achieving low center HAI rates, and (iii) develop, iteratively enhance, and disseminate a best practices toolkit for preventing HAIs that accommodates various center contexts.
These studies will have a positive impact on clinical practice by identifying targets for an interventional study. Moreover, the mixed methods approach will serve as a model for evaluating and improving clinical care more broadly - especially in the setting of complex surgical procedures.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adults with HAIs after VAD therapy | – | –Adult patients who have received a ventricular assist device implant. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients who have received a FDA-approved, durable ventricular assist device implant.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Female and Male adult patients 18 and over who have received a FDA-approved, durable ventricular assist device implant from 2008 onwards
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Children
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Number of patients who have developed a healthcare-associated infection within 90 days following a ventricular assist device (VAD) implant
Time frame: 90 days following a VAD implant
Any healthcare-associated infection within 90 days following a VAD implant
1 secondary outcome
Type of healthcare-associated infection
Time frame: 90 days following a VAD implant
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jul 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Healthcare-Associated Infections
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of an AI-Assisted Tool for CLABSI Surveillance at VA Medical Centers
Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI), Bacteremia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Initial and Subsequent Healthcare-Associated Infections in Intensive Care Patients
Cross Infection, Intensive Care Units
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Prospective Healthcare-Associated Links in Transmission of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria
Cystic Fibrosis, Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Traditional Chinese Medicine in Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Pneumonia
Multi Drug Resistant Infections, Pneumnia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Early Identification of Pathogens in Children With Respiratory Tract Infection by Mechanical Ventilation Using mNGS
VAP - Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Donald Likosky, PhD. principal investigator
University of Michigan
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Healthcare-Associated Infections, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients who have developed a healthcare-associated infection within 90 days following a ventricular assist device (VAD) implant (time frame: 90 days following a VAD implant). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2024.