Regional AnesthesiaESP-MRINCT03751358
ESP Volunteer LA Spread Controlled by MRI
A study testing Unilateral Erector spinae plane block in people with Regional Anesthesia, run by Vinmec Healthcare System at 1 site in Vietnam.
Trial summary
Background and Objectives: The Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Blockade (ESPB) is a regional anesthesia technique recently described by Forero M in November 2016 , whereby local anesthetic (LA) is injected in the inter Fascial space between posteriorly the fascia of Erector Spinae Muscles (IFS-ESP) (the iliocostalis… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Regional Anesthesia
- What is being tested?
- Unilateral Erector spinae plane block
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 8 participants
- Where
- 1 siteVietnam
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2019to 30 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 45 year old
Who cannot join
- Refusal of the volunteer
- Anatomical abnormalities of the thoracic spine identified by physical examination.
- Body mass index ≥30 kg/m2
- Medical contra-indication for Conscious MRI
- Claustrophobia
- Metal implants (pacemaker and others)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity against Ropivacaine or other amino-amide LAs
- Participation in another clinical study within the last 4 weeks prior to study
- Coagulopathies in the medical history
- Abnormalities in electrocardiography that are considered clinically relevant such as atrio-ventricular block or bradycardia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of the Spread of Local Anesthetic Solution After Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Blockade
Background and Objectives: The Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Blockade (ESPB) is a regional anesthesia technique recently described by Forero M in November 2016 , whereby local anesthetic (LA) is injected in the inter Fascial space between posteriorly the fascia of Erector Spinae Muscles (IFS-ESP) (the iliocostalis, longissimus, and spinalis muscles ) and anteriorly the inter-transverse ligament to achieve multi-metameric analgesia for thoracic or upper abdominal surgery.
Recent studies published showed controversies on the spread of the local anesthetic and also the clinical efficiency .
Read more
The clarification of mechanism of the paravertebral block is one example for the effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) in this context We therefore designed a prospective study in volunteers to examine the spread of LA via MRI investigation in correlation with the extent of somatic block after a standardized ultrasound (US) guided ESPB. Our study will study the spread at T4 or T5 level which is the level used for most of thoracic, cardiac and breast surgeries to determine if dye would spread anteriorly to the involve or igins of the ventral and dorsal branches of the spinal nerves.
Methods:
After ethical committee approval we will select 10 Healthy volunteers to perform Unilateral ESP single shot block with a very low dose of Local anesthetic (LA) (Ropivacaine 0.5% 1 mg/kg (Maximal dose recommended = 3 mg/kg ) mixed with 0,1ml gadolinium After injection an ultrasound image of the spread of the LA with an easy 3 Dimension will be acquired. 10 and 30 minutes after injection a MRI will be performed to analyze the ultrasound spread. An Evaluation of the extension of Sensory Blockade.
Patient will be kept under monitoring for 1,5 hours to assess any complication Sensory block will be assessed. At 1 week after the study day, all volunteers will undergo an investigation of the puncture sites to exclude puncture- related infection or hematoma.
Statistical analysis will be done The cranio-caudal spread of LA will be recorded (US + MRI) and described for each of the volunteers.
Read the detailed description
Screening Visit Ten healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 45 year olds Will be enrolled in the study. Prior to inclusion in the study, we informed them about the nature, scope, and the procedures of the study and about the particular study-related risks.
Exclusion criteria were defined as follows:
- Anatomical abnormalities of the thoracic spine identified by physical examination.
- Body mass index ≥30 kg/m2
- Medical contra-indication for Conscious MRI
- Claustrophobia
- Metal implants (pacemaker and others)
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity against Ropivacaine or other amino-amide LAs
- Participation in another clinical study within the last 4 weeks prior to study
- Coagulopathies in the medical history
- Abnormalities in electrocardiography that are considered clinically relevant such as atrio-ventricular block or bradycardia After signing the informed consent, each volunteer will go under a general physical examination, including patient history and drawing of blood for the laboratory (red and white blood count, and standard blood coagulation parameters).
In addition, an electrocardiogram as well as determination of blood pressure and heart rate will be performed. when all inclusion criteria will be met, a bilateral cross-sectional ultrasound examination of the IFS-ESP at the thoracic 4 (T4) level will be performed to confirm a clear identification of the ultrasound landmarks
- Transverse process T4
- Anterior fascia of Erector Spinae Muscle
- Inter-transverse ligament The T4 level will be determined by counting the spinous processes from the seventh cervical vertebra (vertebra prominens) in a distal direction. The screening visit took place within 3 weeks before study.
Ultrasound-guided ESPB and MRI Investigation On the morning of study, the volunteers will be admitted to the clinical ward. A venous access will be inserted into an antecubital vein and standard cardiorespiratory monitoring will be established (electrocardiogram, noninvasive blood pressure, and Spo2).
The ultrasound-guided injection of LA inside the IFS-ESP will be performed under direct ultrasound guidance using a ultrasound system (Logic S8 GE healthcare ultrasound) with a 50-mm 7-15 MHz linear ultrasound transducer in a para sagittal lateral position with the scheduled blocking area above. The IFS-ESP will be visualized as our group is performing at the level of T4 transverse process (See Bellow Performance protocole in Images) The puncture area and the ultrasound probe will be prepared in a sterile manner, and a skin wheal was performed with 1 ml lidocaine 2%. Then, the puncture will be performed with a 21-G, 80-mm Facette tip needle and an injection line (Stimuplex D Plus, 0.71 Å~ 80 mm, 22G Å~ 3 ⅛ ," BBraun Melsungen AG) realizing an "in-plane" ultrasound guided technique. Once the tip of the needle was placed inside the IFS-ESP, 2 ml dextrose will be injected checking the caudal and cranial spread and also the "breathing sign". (See protocol of puncture bellow). After these safety tests performed : local anesthetic Ropivacaine 0.5% mixed with 0,1ml gadolinium will be injected as follow:
- Patient 40 to 49 kg = 8 mL= 40 mg of ropivacaine
- Patient 50 to 59 kg = 10 mL = 50 mg of ropivacaine
- Patient 60 to 69 kg = 12 mL = 60 mg of ropivacaine
- Patient over 70 Kg = 15 mL = 75 mg of ropivacaine Maximum dose of Ropivacaine = 3 mg/kg (International recommendations and manufacturer recommendation) After the injection of LA a manual 3D acquisition will be done ( GE easy 3D Software) will do recorded to visualize the spread of LA inside the IFS-ESP, then an MRI will be performed 10 minutes and 30 minutes after injection using a 3-Tesla unit, long spine coil, covering the whole spine. T2-weighted sequences will be performed in sagittal and coronal planes. Axial T2-weighted sequences with fat suppression will be added in the region of the fluid accumulation. Axial T1-weighted sequences in this region will be performed to identify or exclude hemorrhagic components. Slice thickness will be 3 mm. During MRI investigation, the volunteers will be monitored via the MRI Bluetooth monitoring system (Spo2 , electrocardiogram). The distribution pattern of LA inside the IFS-ESP will be evaluated by analyses of the T2-weighted, fluid-sensitive images. Starting at the T4 puncture level, the axial T2-weighted sequences will be analyzed in a cranial and caudal direction to evaluate the cranio-caudal spread of LA. Any distribution of LA outside the IFS-ESP : ventral to the inter-transverse ligament, epidural, paravertebral prevertebral, and contralateral) will be analyzed. All images will be investigated by the same radiologist Evaluation of Sensory Blockade Sensory block will be assessed by pinprick testing with 22-G short bevel needles in comparison with the contralateral dermatomes. The blocked area will be tested from the T1 dermatome at the anterior axillary line and at the parasternal space in a cranial and then in a caudal direction. If required, the C2-5 dermatomes will be tested at the neck. Each individual dermatome on the blocked side will be compared with the contralateral side. All assessments will be performed by one investigator. Assessments will be quantified with the following scale
- 0 =full feeling)
- 1 = reduced
- 2 = No feeling
Sensory scores will be evaluated at the following time points:
- Prior block
- 30 min after block before second MRI investigation
- 60 min after block
- 120 min after block
- 24 h after the block to check the full recovery Successful blockade in a specific dermatome will be defined when pinprick testing will be positive value = 2. Onset and duration of ESPB will be not evaluated, as this study is designed to investigate the spread of LA within the ESPB. The expansion of the ESPB will be investigated meticulously.
Observation after Injection of LA Inside the IFS-ESP The volunteers will be observed and monitored (Spo2, electrocardiogram, and noninvasive blood pressure) 3 h after performance of ESPB and discharged after that time. A dedicated study emergency telephone number will be provided in cases of any medical problems.
Management of Side Effects Decrease in heart rate and blood pressure ≥30% from initial values will be treated with 0.01 mg/kg glycorpyrrolate and repetitive doses of 2 mg etilefrine, respectively.
Any sign of toxicity by IV injection = LAST protocol with intra-lipid 20% and keep in closed observation for 12 hours (ASRA recommendation) Follow-up Investigation At 1 week after the study day, all volunteers will undergo an investigation of the puncture sites to exclude puncture- related infection or hematoma.
Statistical Analysis The cranio-caudal spread of LA will be recorded and described for each of the volunteers. Due to not-normally distributed nature of the data, we will use a one-tailed Wilcoxon test to compare the cranial versus the caudal spread of LA at the same side. Pearson correlation coefficient will be used to correlate the spread of LA with the sensory distribution of ESPB Data will be presented as median (interquartile range). A P < 0.05 will be considered as statistically significant. SPSS 17.0.1 will be used as statistical software (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY).
- Conditions
- Regional Anesthesia
- Being tested
- Unilateral Erector spinae plane block
- Keywords
- ESP Thoracic, Spread Local anesthetic, Volunteer, Magnetic résonance imaging
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Unilateral Erector spinae plane blockProcedure or surgery
Also called Injection of Low volume of local anesthetic
Magnetic résonance imaging
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Unilateral Erector spinae plane block | Experimental | Thoracic unilateral Erector spinae plane block performed on the volunteer and analyse of the spread of local anesthetic by magnetic resonance imaging Receives: Procedure: Unilateral Erector spinae plane block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Magnetic resonnance Imaging spread
spread of the local anesthetic
Measured: 40 minutes after injection
Sensory blockade evaluation
Pinprick testing from cervical dermatomes to T12 dermatome
Measured: 4 hours after local anesthetic injection
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Nov 2018
- Study start1 Feb 2019
- Primary completion30 Apr 2019
- Study completion30 Jun 2019
Why it stopped: Problem with MRI interpretation
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Regional AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Healthy volunteers accepting to have a Unilateral ESP block with an MRI after injection of Low volume of local anesthetic
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vinmec Healthcare System
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Huyen Vu Xuan, MD, Study chair, Vinmec Healthcare System
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03751358
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VINMECTC
- Acronym
- ESP-MRI
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 20 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
PubMed 27501016Ivanusic J, Konishi Y, Barrington MJ. A Cadaveric Study Investigating the Mechanism of Action of Erector Spinae Blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;43(6):567-571. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000789.
PubMed 29746445Taketa Y, Irisawa Y, Fujitani T. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block elicits sensory loss around the lateral, but not the parasternal, portion of the thorax. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Jun;47:84-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 Apr 6. No abstract available.
PubMed 29631112Schwartzmann A, Peng P, Maciel MA, Forero M. Mechanism of the erector spinae plane block: insights from a magnetic resonance imaging study. Can J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;65(10):1165-1166. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1187-y. Epub 2018 Aug 3. No abstract available.
PubMed 30076575Marhofer D, Marhofer P, Kettner SC, Fleischmann E, Prayer D, Schernthaner M, Lackner E, Willschke H, Schwetz P, Zeitlinger M. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the spread of local anesthetic solution after ultrasound-guided lateral thoracic paravertebral blockade: a volunteer study. Anesthesiology. 2013 May;118(5):1106-12. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289465f.
PubMed 23442752Andreae MH, Andreae DA. Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):711-20. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet213. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
PubMed 23811426Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology. 2000 Oct;93(4):1123-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200010000-00038. No abstract available.
PubMed 11020770Fletcher D, Martinez V. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in patients after surgery: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;112(6):991-1004. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu137.
PubMed 24829420Gan TJ, Robinson SB, Oderda GM, Scranton R, Pepin J, Ramamoorthy S. Impact of postsurgical opioid use and ileus on economic outcomes in gastrointestinal surgeries. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Apr;31(4):677-86. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1005833. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
PubMed 25586296
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of the Spread of Local Anesthetic Solution After Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Blockade
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03751358
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ESP-MRI / VINMECTC
- Conditions
- Regional Anesthesia
- Keywords
- ESP Thoracic, Spread Local anesthetic, Volunteer, Magnetic résonance imaging
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Problem with MRI interpretation
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vinmec Healthcare SystemUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background and Objectives: The Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Blockade (ESPB) is a regional anesthesia technique recently described by Forero M in November 2016 , whereby local anesthetic (LA) is injected in the inter Fascial space between posteriorly the fascia of Erector Spinae Muscles (IFS-ESP) (the iliocostalis, longissimus, and spinalis muscles ) and anteriorly the inter-transverse ligament to achieve multi-metameric analgesia for thoracic or upper abdominal surgery.
Recent studies published showed controversies on the spread of the local anesthetic and also the clinical efficiency .
The clarification of mechanism of the paravertebral block is one example for the effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) in this context We therefore designed a prospective study in volunteers to examine the spread of LA via MRI investigation in correlation with the extent of somatic block after a standardized ultrasound (US) guided ESPB. Our study will study the spread at T4 or T5 level which is the level used for most of thoracic, cardiac and breast surgeries to determine if dye would spread anteriorly to the involve or igins of the ventral and dorsal branches of the spinal nerves.
Methods:
After ethical committee approval we will select 10 Healthy volunteers to perform Unilateral ESP single shot block with a very low dose of Local anesthetic (LA) (Ropivacaine 0.5% 1 mg/kg (Maximal dose recommended = 3 mg/kg ) mixed with 0,1ml gadolinium After injection an ultrasound image of the spread of the LA with an easy 3 Dimension will be acquired. 10 and 30 minutes after injection a MRI will be performed to analyze the ultrasound spread. An Evaluation of the extension of Sensory Blockade.
Patient will be kept under monitoring for 1,5 hours to assess any complication Sensory block will be assessed. At 1 week after the study day, all volunteers will undergo an investigation of the puncture sites to exclude puncture- related infection or hematoma.
Statistical analysis will be done The cranio-caudal spread of LA will be recorded (US + MRI) and described for each of the volunteers.
Detailed description
Screening Visit Ten healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 45 year olds Will be enrolled in the study. Prior to inclusion in the study, we informed them about the nature, scope, and the procedures of the study and about the particular study-related risks.
Exclusion criteria were defined as follows:
- Anatomical abnormalities of the thoracic spine identified by physical examination.
- Body mass index ≥30 kg/m2
- Medical contra-indication for Conscious MRI
- Claustrophobia
- Metal implants (pacemaker and others)
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity against Ropivacaine or other amino-amide LAs
- Participation in another clinical study within the last 4 weeks prior to study
- Coagulopathies in the medical history
- Abnormalities in electrocardiography that are considered clinically relevant such as atrio-ventricular block or bradycardia After signing the informed consent, each volunteer will go under a general physical examination, including patient history and drawing of blood for the laboratory (red and white blood count, and standard blood coagulation parameters).
In addition, an electrocardiogram as well as determination of blood pressure and heart rate will be performed. when all inclusion criteria will be met, a bilateral cross-sectional ultrasound examination of the IFS-ESP at the thoracic 4 (T4) level will be performed to confirm a clear identification of the ultrasound landmarks
- Transverse process T4
- Anterior fascia of Erector Spinae Muscle
- Inter-transverse ligament The T4 level will be determined by counting the spinous processes from the seventh cervical vertebra (vertebra prominens) in a distal direction. The screening visit took place within 3 weeks before study.
Ultrasound-guided ESPB and MRI Investigation On the morning of study, the volunteers will be admitted to the clinical ward. A venous access will be inserted into an antecubital vein and standard cardiorespiratory monitoring will be established (electrocardiogram, noninvasive blood pressure, and Spo2).
The ultrasound-guided injection of LA inside the IFS-ESP will be performed under direct ultrasound guidance using a ultrasound system (Logic S8 GE healthcare ultrasound) with a 50-mm 7-15 MHz linear ultrasound transducer in a para sagittal lateral position with the scheduled blocking area above. The IFS-ESP will be visualized as our group is performing at the level of T4 transverse process (See Bellow Performance protocole in Images) The puncture area and the ultrasound probe will be prepared in a sterile manner, and a skin wheal was performed with 1 ml lidocaine 2%. Then, the puncture will be performed with a 21-G, 80-mm Facette tip needle and an injection line (Stimuplex D Plus, 0.71 Å~ 80 mm, 22G Å~ 3 ⅛ ," BBraun Melsungen AG) realizing an "in-plane" ultrasound guided technique. Once the tip of the needle was placed inside the IFS-ESP, 2 ml dextrose will be injected checking the caudal and cranial spread and also the "breathing sign". (See protocol of puncture bellow). After these safety tests performed : local anesthetic Ropivacaine 0.5% mixed with 0,1ml gadolinium will be injected as follow:
- Patient 40 to 49 kg = 8 mL= 40 mg of ropivacaine
- Patient 50 to 59 kg = 10 mL = 50 mg of ropivacaine
- Patient 60 to 69 kg = 12 mL = 60 mg of ropivacaine
- Patient over 70 Kg = 15 mL = 75 mg of ropivacaine Maximum dose of Ropivacaine = 3 mg/kg (International recommendations and manufacturer recommendation) After the injection of LA a manual 3D acquisition will be done ( GE easy 3D Software) will do recorded to visualize the spread of LA inside the IFS-ESP, then an MRI will be performed 10 minutes and 30 minutes after injection using a 3-Tesla unit, long spine coil, covering the whole spine. T2-weighted sequences will be performed in sagittal and coronal planes. Axial T2-weighted sequences with fat suppression will be added in the region of the fluid accumulation. Axial T1-weighted sequences in this region will be performed to identify or exclude hemorrhagic components. Slice thickness will be 3 mm. During MRI investigation, the volunteers will be monitored via the MRI Bluetooth monitoring system (Spo2 , electrocardiogram). The distribution pattern of LA inside the IFS-ESP will be evaluated by analyses of the T2-weighted, fluid-sensitive images. Starting at the T4 puncture level, the axial T2-weighted sequences will be analyzed in a cranial and caudal direction to evaluate the cranio-caudal spread of LA. Any distribution of LA outside the IFS-ESP : ventral to the inter-transverse ligament, epidural, paravertebral prevertebral, and contralateral) will be analyzed. All images will be investigated by the same radiologist Evaluation of Sensory Blockade Sensory block will be assessed by pinprick testing with 22-G short bevel needles in comparison with the contralateral dermatomes. The blocked area will be tested from the T1 dermatome at the anterior axillary line and at the parasternal space in a cranial and then in a caudal direction. If required, the C2-5 dermatomes will be tested at the neck. Each individual dermatome on the blocked side will be compared with the contralateral side. All assessments will be performed by one investigator. Assessments will be quantified with the following scale
- 0 =full feeling)
- 1 = reduced
- 2 = No feeling
Sensory scores will be evaluated at the following time points:
- Prior block
- 30 min after block before second MRI investigation
- 60 min after block
- 120 min after block
- 24 h after the block to check the full recovery Successful blockade in a specific dermatome will be defined when pinprick testing will be positive value = 2. Onset and duration of ESPB will be not evaluated, as this study is designed to investigate the spread of LA within the ESPB. The expansion of the ESPB will be investigated meticulously.
Observation after Injection of LA Inside the IFS-ESP The volunteers will be observed and monitored (Spo2, electrocardiogram, and noninvasive blood pressure) 3 h after performance of ESPB and discharged after that time. A dedicated study emergency telephone number will be provided in cases of any medical problems.
Management of Side Effects Decrease in heart rate and blood pressure ≥30% from initial values will be treated with 0.01 mg/kg glycorpyrrolate and repetitive doses of 2 mg etilefrine, respectively.
Any sign of toxicity by IV injection = LAST protocol with intra-lipid 20% and keep in closed observation for 12 hours (ASRA recommendation) Follow-up Investigation At 1 week after the study day, all volunteers will undergo an investigation of the puncture sites to exclude puncture- related infection or hematoma.
Statistical Analysis The cranio-caudal spread of LA will be recorded and described for each of the volunteers. Due to not-normally distributed nature of the data, we will use a one-tailed Wilcoxon test to compare the cranial versus the caudal spread of LA at the same side. Pearson correlation coefficient will be used to correlate the spread of LA with the sensory distribution of ESPB Data will be presented as median (interquartile range). A P < 0.05 will be considered as statistically significant. SPSS 17.0.1 will be used as statistical software (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Healthy volunteers accepting to have a Unilateral ESP block with an MRI after injection of Low volume of local anesthetic
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Unilateral Erector spinae plane block | Experimental | Procedure: Unilateral Erector spinae plane blockThoracic unilateral Erector spinae plane block performed on the volunteer and analyse of the spread of local anesthetic by magnetic resonance imaging |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 45 year old
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Refusal of the volunteer
- Anatomical abnormalities of the thoracic spine identified by physical examination.
- Body mass index ≥30 kg/m2
- Medical contra-indication for Conscious MRI
- Claustrophobia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Unilateral Erector spinae plane blockAlso: Injection of Low volume of local anestheticMagnetic résonance imaging | Procedure or surgery | Unilateral Erector spinae plane block |
Primary outcome
Magnetic resonnance Imaging spread
Time frame: 40 minutes after injection
spread of the local anesthetic
Sensory blockade evaluation
Time frame: 4 hours after local anesthetic injection
Pinprick testing from cervical dermatomes to T12 dermatome
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Problem with MRI interpretation). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 May 2020.
- Background: PubMed 27501016Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
- Background: PubMed 29746445Ivanusic J, Konishi Y, Barrington MJ. A Cadaveric Study Investigating the Mechanism of Action of Erector Spinae Blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;43(6):567-571. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000789.
- Background: PubMed 29631112Taketa Y, Irisawa Y, Fujitani T. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block elicits sensory loss around the lateral, but not the parasternal, portion of the thorax. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Jun;47:84-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 Apr 6. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30076575Schwartzmann A, Peng P, Maciel MA, Forero M. Mechanism of the erector spinae plane block: insights from a magnetic resonance imaging study. Can J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;65(10):1165-1166. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1187-y. Epub 2018 Aug 3. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23442752Marhofer D, Marhofer P, Kettner SC, Fleischmann E, Prayer D, Schernthaner M, Lackner E, Willschke H, Schwetz P, Zeitlinger M. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the spread of local anesthetic solution after ultrasound-guided lateral thoracic paravertebral blockade: a volunteer study. Anesthesiology. 2013 May;118(5):1106-12. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289465f.
- Background: PubMed 23811426Andreae MH, Andreae DA. Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):711-20. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet213. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
- Background: PubMed 11020770Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology. 2000 Oct;93(4):1123-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200010000-00038. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24829420Fletcher D, Martinez V. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in patients after surgery: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;112(6):991-1004. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu137.
- Background: PubMed 25586296Gan TJ, Robinson SB, Oderda GM, Scranton R, Pepin J, Ramamoorthy S. Impact of postsurgical opioid use and ileus on economic outcomes in gastrointestinal surgeries. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Apr;31(4):677-86. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1005833. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Regional Anesthesia
Recruiting
Impact of Communication Delays on Anesthesia Response to Medical Emergencies and Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia
Regional Anesthesia, Regional Anesthesia Morbidity
Not yet recruiting
Classic Versus Interfascial Axillary Block in Hand, Wrist, and Forearm Surgery
Nerve Block, Regional Anesthesia
RecruitingObservational study
Neurological Events and Unforeseen Risks After Locoregional-anesthesia
Regional Anesthesia, Regional Anesthesia Block
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Sulfate With Standard Combined Costoclavicular-Suprascapular Block for Pain Relief After Shoulder Arthroscopy.
Shoulder Arthroscopy, Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Intravenous Dexamethasone Added to Dexmedetomidine After Superior Trunk Block
Postoperative Pain, Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Huyen Vu Xuan, MD study chair
Vinmec Healthcare System
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Unilateral Erector spinae plane block in people with Regional Anesthesia, run by Vinmec Healthcare System at 1 site in Vietnam.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Problem with MRI interpretation). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Magnetic resonnance Imaging spread (time frame: 40 minutes after injection). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03751358, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.