Pulmonary Nodule, SolitaryIDEALNCT03753724
IDEAL: Artificial Intelligence and Big Data for Early Lung Cancer Diagnosis Study
An observational study of Pulmonary Nodule, Solitary and Pulmonary Nodule, Multiple, run by University of Oxford at 4 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This study aims to test the use of novel CT image analysis techniques to enable a better characterisation of small pulmonary nodules. The study will incorporate solid and predominantly solid nodules of 5-15 mm scanned using a variety of scanner types, imaging protocols and patient populations. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Nodule, Solitary, Pulmonary Nodule, Multiple, Lung Cancer
- How many people
- 1,293 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 29 Aug 2018to 31 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients aged 18 years old or older with CT scans reported as having pulmonary nodule(s) of 5-15mm who meet the inclusion criteria and who can be placed into groups 1, 2 or 3.
Who may be able to join
- Male or Female, aged 18 years or above
- CT scans identified as having pulmonary nodule(s) of 5-15mm
- Patients with solid or predominantly solid nodules referred to the pulmonary nodule clinic or for CT scan review by a specialist
- CT scan section thickness of 3mm and less
Who cannot join
- The CT scans are technically inadequate
- Having received treatment for cancer in the last 5 years
- Patient has more than five reported qualifying nodules
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom4 sites
Leeds Teaching Hospitals Nhs Trust
Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS9 7TF
Nottingham University Hospitals Nhs Trust
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7LE
Royal Berkshire Nhs Foundation Trust
Reading, Berkshire, RG1 5AN
About this study
Official title: IDEAL: Artificial Intelligence and Big Data for Early Lung Cancer Diagnosis Prospective Study (Phase 2)
This study aims to test the use of novel CT image analysis techniques to enable a better characterisation of small pulmonary nodules. The study will incorporate solid and predominantly solid nodules of 5-15 mm scanned using a variety of scanner types, imaging protocols and patient populations. The investigators hope that the new image processing techniques will improve the accuracy of lung nodule analysis which will in turn reduce the number of unnecessary investigations for benign nodules and may increase the accuracy of the early diagnosis of lung cancer in malignant nodules. This study aims to test this novel analysis software to subsequently allow validation.
Read the detailed description
As the commonest cancer with 1.8 million cases diagnosed each year worldwide, early diagnosis of lung cancer is important to reduce mortality. The early diagnosis of lung cancer is contingent on both the detection of a small lung nodule and determining whether it is malignant. Whilst computed tomography (CT) has proven to be a robust way of detecting lung nodules, they are often discovered on routine scanning as an incidental finding or as part of a lung cancer screening program. Hence, determining whether they are benign or malignant is challenging.
Up to 75% of smokers scanned either as part of their clinical care or in lung cancer screening trials have subcentimetre pulmonary nodules detected. This places a substantial burden on scanning facilities, staff and patients. Current methods of determining if lung nodules are benign or malignant are not standardised and unproven. The US National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) showed that up to 95% of lung nodules detected on CT scans of the chest were false positives i.e. they were not malignant. Detection of non-malignant nodules have the unwanted consequences of unnecessary cost as they require follow-up scanning or alternative methods of investigation, cause patient anxiety, may result in increased morbidity potentially by biopsy or resection, and result in increased patient radiation exposure due to follow-up CT scans or from PET-CT scans.
As part of standard care at present, patients with lung nodules greater than 4mm and sub-centimetre are followed up with CT scan(s), up to 5 scans, for up to 24 months, according to the internationally accepted Fleischner guidelines. Additional investigations, such as a positron-emission tomography (PET-CT) scan and biopsy or resection may also be performed based on the size and clinical risk profile of the patient.
Recent studies have shown that incorporating lung nodule characteristics such as size, texture, growth rate, contrast enhancement can improve the accuracy of predicting the risk of malignancy. This allows the stratification of lung nodules into different investigations and/or follow-up pathways based on the predicted risk of malignancy.
This study aims to test the use of novel CT image analysis techniques incorporated into a clinical risk model to characterise small pulmonary nodules. The study will incorporate solid and predominantly solid nodules of 5-15mm scanned using a variety of scanner types, imaging protocols and patient populations.
CT scans from patients referred to the Lung Nodule Clinic or for review by a specialist in nodule assessment as per current clinical practice will be reviewed. Patients who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be contacted by a member of the clinical care team and study participation will be discussed.
Of the nodules detected, their management will be categorised as per standard care into the following groups:
GROUP 1. On review of the scans by an expert, no further follow up or investigation is required, as the nodule(s) has been categorised as benign. As the patient was unaware the scan was being reviewed and no further investigations are required. Patient is invited to take part in the study (by telephone).
GROUP 2. On review, the nodule is indeterminate and further scanning at a later date is required. The patient is informed of this, usually via a telephone call from either the doctor or nurse specialist working in the Lung Nodule Clinic (LNC) or site equivalent. This LNC is usually a virtual clinic - no physical interaction with the patient - and the follow up scan is reviewed and the patient contacted again via the virtual clinic. Patient is invited to take part in the study (by telephone, by post or in clinic if appropriate).
GROUP 3. On review, the nodule is regarded as potentially malignant and further scans and a clinic appointment is made for the patient. Patient is invited to take part in the study (in clinic if appropriate).
Apart from CT images routine care clinical information about the patient (e.g. age, sex, smoking status, family history of lung cancer) and data on nodule characteristics derived from the identified CT scan (and/or prior and subsequent) will be collected and used to test the new software program that will stratify pulmonary nodules in terms of their probability of being malignant or benign. All this data is routine and is collected as part of standard care therefore no study visits will need to be arranged.
As part of the health economics assessment patients will be invited to complete the EQ-5D-5L (quality of life), GAD-7 (anxiety), and productivity loss questionnaires. Patients will also be asked questions about their health utilisation. This data may also be collected from medical notes/electronic patient records.
The initial questionnaires will be completed within 2 weeks (if possible) of having the first scan and a follow-up will be carried out after 1 year for group 1 participants. Group 2 and 3 participants will also be invited to complete these questionnaires 3 months after their initial scan as they will have undergone further investigations during that time. The questionnaires will be completed over the phone for patients in groups 1 and over the phone or face to face when attending routine clinic appointments for groups 2 and 3.
- Keywords
- pulmonary nodules, lung cancer, artificial intelligence, CAP model
- Medical subject headings
- Solitary Pulmonary Nodule, Multiple Pulmonary Nodules, Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | On review of the scans by an expert, no further follow up or investigation is required, as the nodule(s) has been categorised as benign. As the patient was unaware the scan was being reviewed and no further investigations are required. Patient is invited to take part in the study (by telephone). | |
| Group 2 | On review, the nodule is indeterminate and further scanning at a later date is required. The patient is informed of this, usually via a telephone call from either the doctor or nurse specialist working in the Lung Nodule Clinic (LNC) or site equivalent. This LNC is usually a virtual clinic - no physical interaction with the patient - and the follow up scan is reviewed and the patient contacted again via the virtual clinic. Patient is invited to take part in the study (by telephone, by post or in clinic if appropriate). | |
| Group 3 | On review, the nodule is regarded as potentially malignant and further scans and a clinic appointment is made for the patient. Patient is invited to take part in the study (in clinic if appropriate). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The overall diagnostic performance of a new computer aided prediction (CAP) model for malignancy in small pulmonary nodules (% diagnostic accuracy).
Area Under the Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (AUC).
Measured: Up to 1 year.
Secondary outcomes (2)
The health economic benefits of the CAP model.
Measured reduction in health care related costs using the CAP model algorithm compared to the current standard of care.
Measured: At 2 weeks, 3 months (group 2 & 3 only) and year 1.
The diagnostic performance of the CAP model for malignancy in small pulmonary nodules at a specific operating point relevant to clinical practice.
Measure of diagnostic performance of the risk model.
Measured: Up to 1 year.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2018
- Study start29 Aug 2018
- Primary completion31 Mar 2022
- Study completion31 Mar 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Nodule, SolitaryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of OxfordThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,293 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oxford
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Optellum Ltd.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Fergus Gleeson, Prof, Principal investigator, University of Oxford/Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03753724
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 13489
- Acronym
- IDEAL
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 15 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 29 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: To be confirmed.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- IDEAL: Artificial Intelligence and Big Data for Early Lung Cancer Diagnosis Prospective Study (Phase 2)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03753724
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IDEAL / 13489
- Keywords
- pulmonary nodules, lung cancer, artificial intelligence, CAP model
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,293 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OxfordUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Optellum Ltd.
- Study start
- 29 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to test the use of novel CT image analysis techniques to enable a better characterisation of small pulmonary nodules. The study will incorporate solid and predominantly solid nodules of 5-15 mm scanned using a variety of scanner types, imaging protocols and patient populations. The investigators hope that the new image processing techniques will improve the accuracy of lung nodule analysis which will in turn reduce the number of unnecessary investigations for benign nodules and may increase the accuracy of the early diagnosis of lung cancer in malignant nodules. This study aims to test this novel analysis software to subsequently allow validation.
Detailed description
As the commonest cancer with 1.8 million cases diagnosed each year worldwide, early diagnosis of lung cancer is important to reduce mortality. The early diagnosis of lung cancer is contingent on both the detection of a small lung nodule and determining whether it is malignant. Whilst computed tomography (CT) has proven to be a robust way of detecting lung nodules, they are often discovered on routine scanning as an incidental finding or as part of a lung cancer screening program. Hence, determining whether they are benign or malignant is challenging.
Up to 75% of smokers scanned either as part of their clinical care or in lung cancer screening trials have subcentimetre pulmonary nodules detected. This places a substantial burden on scanning facilities, staff and patients. Current methods of determining if lung nodules are benign or malignant are not standardised and unproven. The US National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) showed that up to 95% of lung nodules detected on CT scans of the chest were false positives i.e. they were not malignant. Detection of non-malignant nodules have the unwanted consequences of unnecessary cost as they require follow-up scanning or alternative methods of investigation, cause patient anxiety, may result in increased morbidity potentially by biopsy or resection, and result in increased patient radiation exposure due to follow-up CT scans or from PET-CT scans.
As part of standard care at present, patients with lung nodules greater than 4mm and sub-centimetre are followed up with CT scan(s), up to 5 scans, for up to 24 months, according to the internationally accepted Fleischner guidelines. Additional investigations, such as a positron-emission tomography (PET-CT) scan and biopsy or resection may also be performed based on the size and clinical risk profile of the patient.
Recent studies have shown that incorporating lung nodule characteristics such as size, texture, growth rate, contrast enhancement can improve the accuracy of predicting the risk of malignancy. This allows the stratification of lung nodules into different investigations and/or follow-up pathways based on the predicted risk of malignancy.
This study aims to test the use of novel CT image analysis techniques incorporated into a clinical risk model to characterise small pulmonary nodules. The study will incorporate solid and predominantly solid nodules of 5-15mm scanned using a variety of scanner types, imaging protocols and patient populations.
CT scans from patients referred to the Lung Nodule Clinic or for review by a specialist in nodule assessment as per current clinical practice will be reviewed. Patients who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be contacted by a member of the clinical care team and study participation will be discussed.
Of the nodules detected, their management will be categorised as per standard care into the following groups:
GROUP 1. On review of the scans by an expert, no further follow up or investigation is required, as the nodule(s) has been categorised as benign. As the patient was unaware the scan was being reviewed and no further investigations are required. Patient is invited to take part in the study (by telephone).
GROUP 2. On review, the nodule is indeterminate and further scanning at a later date is required. The patient is informed of this, usually via a telephone call from either the doctor or nurse specialist working in the Lung Nodule Clinic (LNC) or site equivalent. This LNC is usually a virtual clinic - no physical interaction with the patient - and the follow up scan is reviewed and the patient contacted again via the virtual clinic. Patient is invited to take part in the study (by telephone, by post or in clinic if appropriate).
GROUP 3. On review, the nodule is regarded as potentially malignant and further scans and a clinic appointment is made for the patient. Patient is invited to take part in the study (in clinic if appropriate).
Apart from CT images routine care clinical information about the patient (e.g. age, sex, smoking status, family history of lung cancer) and data on nodule characteristics derived from the identified CT scan (and/or prior and subsequent) will be collected and used to test the new software program that will stratify pulmonary nodules in terms of their probability of being malignant or benign. All this data is routine and is collected as part of standard care therefore no study visits will need to be arranged.
As part of the health economics assessment patients will be invited to complete the EQ-5D-5L (quality of life), GAD-7 (anxiety), and productivity loss questionnaires. Patients will also be asked questions about their health utilisation. This data may also be collected from medical notes/electronic patient records.
The initial questionnaires will be completed within 2 weeks (if possible) of having the first scan and a follow-up will be carried out after 1 year for group 1 participants. Group 2 and 3 participants will also be invited to complete these questionnaires 3 months after their initial scan as they will have undergone further investigations during that time. The questionnaires will be completed over the phone for patients in groups 1 and over the phone or face to face when attending routine clinic appointments for groups 2 and 3.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | – | –On review of the scans by an expert, no further follow up or investigation is required, as the nodule(s) has been categorised as benign. As the patient was unaware the scan was being reviewed and no further investigations are required. Patient is invited to take part in the study (by telephone). |
| Group 2 | – | –On review, the nodule is indeterminate and further scanning at a later date is required. The patient is informed of this, usually via a telephone call from either the doctor or nurse specialist working in the Lung Nodule Clinic (LNC) or site equivalent. This LNC is usually a virtual clinic - no physical interaction with the patient - and the follow up scan is reviewed and the patient contacted again via the virtual clinic. Patient is invited to take part in the study (by telephone, by post or in clinic if appropriate). |
| Group 3 | – | –On review, the nodule is regarded as potentially malignant and further scans and a clinic appointment is made for the patient. Patient is invited to take part in the study (in clinic if appropriate). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients aged 18 years old or older with CT scans reported as having pulmonary nodule(s) of 5-15mm who meet the inclusion criteria and who can be placed into groups 1, 2 or 3.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male or Female, aged 18 years or above
- CT scans identified as having pulmonary nodule(s) of 5-15mm
- Patients with solid or predominantly solid nodules referred to the pulmonary nodule clinic or for CT scan review by a specialist
- CT scan section thickness of 3mm and less
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- The CT scans are technically inadequate
- Having received treatment for cancer in the last 5 years
- Patient has more than five reported qualifying nodules
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
The overall diagnostic performance of a new computer aided prediction (CAP) model for malignancy in small pulmonary nodules (% diagnostic accuracy).
Time frame: Up to 1 year.
Area Under the Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (AUC).
2 secondary outcomes
The health economic benefits of the CAP model.
Time frame: At 2 weeks, 3 months (group 2 & 3 only) and year 1.
The diagnostic performance of the CAP model for malignancy in small pulmonary nodules at a specific operating point relevant to clinical practice.
Time frame: Up to 1 year.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jul 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. To be confirmed.
Related trials for Pulmonary Nodule, Solitary
RecruitingObservational study
Biomarkers for Risk Stratification in Lung Cancer
Nodule Solitary Pulmonary, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Intraoperative Longitude-Latitude-Depth Localization Versus Preoperative CT-Guided Percutaneous Lung Puncture Localization for 0.8-2 cm Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules
Pulmonary Nodule, Solitary, Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Radiomics for Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Lung Nodules
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule, Lung Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Teachable Moment to Opt-out of Tobacco: Interactive Voice Response Quit Line for Veteran Active Smokers With Lung Nodules
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule, Multiple Pulmonary Nodules
Not yet recruiting
Iriscope for the Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
Lung Nodule, Solitary, Lung Nodule
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fergus Gleeson, Prof principal investigator
University of Oxford/Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pulmonary Nodule, Solitary and Pulmonary Nodule, Multiple, run by University of Oxford at 4 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The overall diagnostic performance of a new computer aided prediction (CAP) model for malignancy in small pulmonary nodules (% diagnostic accuracy). (time frame: Up to 1 year.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.