AzTrials
AzTrials

DysphagiaNCT03753841

FEES to Determine Neurological Intensive Care Patients' Oral Diet

A study testing Adjustment of oral diet in people with Dysphagia and Aspiration Pneumonia, run by University of Giessen at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Dysphagia is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Adjusting the oral diet of ICU-patients based on flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) findings might reduce pneumonia rate, mortality and need for intubation/tracheotomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
Adjustment of oral diet
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
125 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
14 Jan 2014to 16 Sep 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Treatment on neurological ICU
  • Clinical suspicion of Dysphagia

Who cannot join

  • none

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Universitätsklinikum Gießen

    Giessen, Hesse, 35392

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) to Determine Neurological Patients' Oral Diet

Dysphagia is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Adjusting the oral diet of ICU-patients based on flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) findings might reduce pneumonia rate, mortality and need for intubation/tracheotomy.

Read the detailed description

Dysphagia, a common complication in neurological disorders, leads to high rates of mortality and morbidity. It is prevalent in critically ill patients, especially those who need mechanical ventilation. The investigators therefore investigate the effect of adjusting the oral diet of our intensive care unit (ICU) patients based on flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) findings, thereby assessing the impact of FEES on a neurological ICU. All patients treated on the investigators neurological ICU will be eligible for this study.

The investigators will correlate findings with baseline data, disability status, pneumonia and duration of hospitalisation, as well as a need for mechanical ventilation or a tracheotomy.

Being tested
Adjustment of oral diet
Keywords
Dysphagia, Aspiration, Management of Dysphagia, Deglutition Disorders, Deglutition, FEES, Intensive Care Neurological Disorder
Medical subject headings
Deglutition Disorders, Pneumonia, Aspiration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Adjustment of oral dietOther

    Adjustment of oral diet based on findings in fiberendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES)

Study groups in NCT03753841
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Adjustment of oral dietActive comparatorPatients who need a change in their diet regime, in whom FEES shows that they have not the adequat diet.
Receives: Other: Adjustment of oral diet
No adjustment of oral dietNo interventionPatients who have the adequat diet based on FEES findings.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pneumonia Rate

    self-explanatory

    Measured: Up to 130 days

  2. Mortality

    self-explanatory

    Measured: Up to 130 days

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Length of stay in hospital

    self-explanatory

    Measured: Up to 130 days

  2. Intubation/Tracheotomy

    Rate of Intubation/Tracheotomy

    Measured: Up to 130 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Nov 2018
  2. Study start14 Jan 2014
  3. Primary completion3 Sep 2016
  4. Study completion16 Sep 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
125 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03753841
Sponsor's protocol ID
GI 208/16-1
Status last verified
Nov 2018
First submitted
16 Nov 2018
Last updated
27 Nov 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study will be available within the published article(s). The data that support the findings of this study will not be publically available due to local medical data protection policies.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Adjustment of oral diet in people with Dysphagia and Aspiration Pneumonia, run by University of Giessen at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pneumonia Rate (time frame: Up to 130 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in