Colonic NeoplasmsNCT03754075
Five Year Oncological Outcome After CME for Right-sided Colon Cancer
An observational study of Colonic Neoplasms, run by Nordsjaellands Hospital.
Trial summary
Study based on existing databases investigating the causal oncological treatment effects of complete mesocolic excision on UICC stage I-III right-sided colon cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colonic Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Complete mesocolic excision and Conventional colon resections
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 1,069 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2008to 16 Mar 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Data for all patients undergoing elective surgery for UICC stage I-III colonic adenocarcinoma in the Capital Region of Denmark. The population of this region is approximately 1⋅75 million, more than 30 per cent of the population of Denmark, and it is served by only four public university colorectal cancer centres.
Who may be able to join
- Right-sided colon cancer was defined as primary adenocarcinomas located in the cecum, ascending colon hepatic flexure, right or mid third of the transverse colon.
- UICC stage I-III - Gastroepiploic and infrapyloric lymph node metastases are not considered as distant metastases
Who cannot join
- Synchronous colorectal cancer - even in the right colon
- No residual tumor in the specimen after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- Metachronous colorectal cancer
- Appendix cancers
- Resections in Hillerød not performed according to the principles of CME
- Non-macroradical (R2) resections (peroperative assessment)
About this study
Official title: Five Year Oncological Outcome After Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right-sided Colon Cancer: a Population-based Cohort Study
Study based on existing databases investigating the causal oncological treatment effects of complete mesocolic excision on UICC stage I-III right-sided colon cancer.
Read the detailed description
Population-based cohort study, predominantly prospective based, on the same population as the investigator's previously study comparing short-term outcome after CME with conventional colon resections. The COMES database combines the prospectively registered colon cancer database in Hillerød (CME data), and data from the national database of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) covering patients undergoing conventional resection (non-CME) in the other three centers. The medical records of all the patients in the non-CME group (control group) were reviewed by colorectal surgeons from Hillerød. Data audit for all CME patients was performed by various co-authors employed at the other centers. A similar audit of data for non-CME patients having postoperative complications or recurrence was performed by the co-author representing the department treating the specific patients.
Statistical analysis plan
Continuous data are presented as median and interquartile ranges, and categorical data as frequencies and proportions. Kruskal-Wallis test and Fisher's exact test were used as appropriate. Death is a competing risk to recurrence and time-to-event analyses were performed as competing risk analyses obtaining the cumulative incidences for recurrence or death using the "cmprsk" R-package.
Unbiased estimation of marginal or population-averaged treatment effects in observational and non-randomized studies can be obtained through different propensity score methods. Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) uses the propensity score to weight each patient's data based on the inverse probability of receiving the treatment actually received. IPTW gives unbiased estimates of average treatment effects in time-to-event analyses if no differences in observed baseline covariates exist between the treatment groups. To account for baseline differences between patients in the two groups, stabilized weights truncated at the 0.99 interval were calculated using the "IPW" R-package. The following baseline covariates will be used: age, sex, ASA score, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor location, tumor morphology, perineural invasion, extramural venous invasion, tumor stage, and serosal invasion. All covariates used and UICC stage, two-way interactions, and squared terms of continuous covariates will be assessed for balance between the CME and the non-CME group after IPTW using the "cobalt" R-package. Absolute mean differences in mean (using standardized mean difference) and proportions (using raw mean difference) below 0.1, variance ratios between 0.5 and 2, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests equal or below 0.05 will be accepted. Graphical inspection of the distribution of covariates will be also performed.
The cause-specific hazards and overall survival will be analyzed using Cox regression. Binary outcomes will be analyzed using logistic regression. Lymph node yield will be analyzed using linear regression after logarithmic transformation. Number of metastatic lymph nodes will be analyzed using negative binominal regression. All analyses of primary and secondary outcomes will be performed after IPTW. The 95% confidence intervals for the estimates from the original Cox regression IPTW analyses will be constructed after 1000 bootstraps with replacement, and a robust sandwich estimator will be used for the logistic regression analyses in order to ensure correct variance estimation.
All available data will be used. Model assumptions will be checked. A p-value below or equal to 0.05 will be considered significant. All analyses will be performed using R statistical software, version 3.5.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
- Conditions
- Colonic Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Complete mesocolic excision, Conventional colon resections
- Keywords
- Colon cancer, Surgery, Oncological outcome, Survival
- Medical subject headings
- Colonic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Complete mesocolic excisionProcedure or surgery
The resection was based on the principles of CME. The superior mesenteric vein was exposed to perform central vessel ligation and lymph nodes dissection. Extended right hemicolectomies for tumors located from the ascending colon close to the hepatic flexure and distally were performed openly as standard during the study period. These resections included the prepyloric and gastroepiploic lymph nodes dissection.
Conventional colon resectionsProcedure or surgery
The patients underwent what was considered standard colon cancer resections in Denmark during the study period.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CME group | The CME group consisted of patients, who underwent elective CME for right-sided colon adenocarcinoma at Nordsjaellands Hospital Hillerød from 1 June 2008 to 31 December 2013. Receives: Procedure: Complete mesocolic excision | |
| Non-CME group | The non-CME group comprised patients having a elective conventional colon cancer resection for right-sided adenocarcinoma at the other three colorectal centers in the Capital Region of Denmark from 1 June 2008 to 31 December 2013. Receives: Procedure: Conventional colon resections |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Risk of recurrence
Recurrence diagnosed by CT or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT of thorax and abdomen, chest radiograph and contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver, or laparotomy in case of suspicion of recurrence. Histological verification of radiological findings of metastases during follow-up is not needed if the local multidisciplinary team conference deemed the finding as a recurrence. Metachronous colon tumors diagnosed during follow-up are considered as recurrences only if located in the anastomosis and with the same morphology as the primary tumor.
Measured: 5.2 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
Overall survival
Death by any cause
Measured: 5.2 years
Short-term mortality
Death from any cause within 30 and 90 days
Measured: 30 and 90 days
Rate of postoperative complications
Patients having surgical and non-surgical postoperative complications and with complications with Clavien-Dindo score of 3b or more
Measured: 60 days
Number of mesocolic lymph nodes
Median number and specimens with 22 or more lymph nodes detected
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2018
- Study start1 Jun 2008
- Primary completion31 Jan 2019
- Study completion16 Mar 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colonic NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,069 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nordsjaellands Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bispebjerg Hospital, Hvidovre University Hospital, Herlev Hospital, Zealand University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Claus Anders Bertelsen, PhD, MD, Nordsjaellands Hospital
- Investigators
- Claus A Bertelsen, PhD, MD, Principal investigator, Nordsjaellands Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03754075
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CMELoR2019
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 22 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 13 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rosenberg J, Fischer A, Haglind E; Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group. Current controversies in colorectal surgery: the way to resolve uncertainty and move forward. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Mar;14(3):266-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02896.x.
PubMed 22122825West NP, Sutton KM, Ingeholm P, Hagemann-Madsen RH, Hohenberger W, Quirke P. Improving the quality of colon cancer surgery through a surgical education program. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Dec;53(12):1594-603. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f433e3.
PubMed 21178852Lee L, Erkan A, Alhassan N, Kelly JJ, Nassif GJ, Albert MR, Rt Monson J. Lower survival after right-sided versus left-sided colon cancers: Is an extended lymphadenectomy the answer? Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;27(3):449-455. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.031. Epub 2018 May 29.
PubMed 30217301Bokey L, Chapuis PH, Chan C, Stewart P, Rickard MJ, Keshava A, Dent OF. Long-term results following an anatomically based surgical technique for resection of colon cancer: a comparison with results from complete mesocolic excision. Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jul;18(7):676-83. doi: 10.1111/codi.13159.
PubMed 26476136Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;11(4):354-64; discussion 364-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01735.x. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
PubMed 19016817Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, Wilhelmsen M, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Tenma JR, Bols B, Ingeholm P, Rasmussen LA, Jepsen LV, Iversen ER, Kristensen B, Gogenur I; Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):161-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71168-4. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
PubMed 25555421Kotake K, Mizuguchi T, Moritani K, Wada O, Ozawa H, Oki I, Sugihara K. Impact of D3 lymph node dissection on survival for patients with T3 and T4 colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jul;29(7):847-52. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1885-z. Epub 2014 May 6.
PubMed 24798631Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Tenma JR, Wilhelmsen M, Rasmussen LA, Jepsen LV, Kristensen B, Gogenur I; Copenhagen Complete Mesocolic Excision Study (COMES); Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG). Short-term outcomes after complete mesocolic excision compared with 'conventional' colonic cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2016 Apr;103(5):581-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10083. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
PubMed 26780563Austin PC. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
PubMed 21818162Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med. 2015 Dec 10;34(28):3661-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.6607. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
PubMed 26238958Wal WM van der, Geskus RB. ipw : An R Package for Inverse Probability Weighting. J Stat Softw 43(13):1-23, 2011.
Bernhoff R. Colon cancer aspects on surgical treatment and complete mesocolic excision. PhD thesis. Stockholm 2018. ISBN 978-91-7676-919-5.
Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, Tenma JR, Wilhelmsen M, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Iversen ER, Bols B, Ingeholm P, Rasmussen LA, Jepsen LV, Born PW, Kristensen B, Kleif J. 5-year outcome after complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1556-1565. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30485-1. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
PubMed 31526695
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Five Year Oncological Outcome After Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right-sided Colon Cancer: a Population-based Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03754075
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CMELoR2019
- Conditions
- Colonic Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Colon cancer, Surgery, Oncological outcome, Survival
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 1,069 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nordsjaellands HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bispebjerg Hospital, Hvidovre University Hospital, Herlev Hospital, Zealand University Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Mar 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Study based on existing databases investigating the causal oncological treatment effects of complete mesocolic excision on UICC stage I-III right-sided colon cancer.
Detailed description
Population-based cohort study, predominantly prospective based, on the same population as the investigator's previously study comparing short-term outcome after CME with conventional colon resections. The COMES database combines the prospectively registered colon cancer database in Hillerød (CME data), and data from the national database of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) covering patients undergoing conventional resection (non-CME) in the other three centers. The medical records of all the patients in the non-CME group (control group) were reviewed by colorectal surgeons from Hillerød. Data audit for all CME patients was performed by various co-authors employed at the other centers. A similar audit of data for non-CME patients having postoperative complications or recurrence was performed by the co-author representing the department treating the specific patients.
Statistical analysis plan
Continuous data are presented as median and interquartile ranges, and categorical data as frequencies and proportions. Kruskal-Wallis test and Fisher's exact test were used as appropriate. Death is a competing risk to recurrence and time-to-event analyses were performed as competing risk analyses obtaining the cumulative incidences for recurrence or death using the "cmprsk" R-package.
Unbiased estimation of marginal or population-averaged treatment effects in observational and non-randomized studies can be obtained through different propensity score methods. Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) uses the propensity score to weight each patient's data based on the inverse probability of receiving the treatment actually received. IPTW gives unbiased estimates of average treatment effects in time-to-event analyses if no differences in observed baseline covariates exist between the treatment groups. To account for baseline differences between patients in the two groups, stabilized weights truncated at the 0.99 interval were calculated using the "IPW" R-package. The following baseline covariates will be used: age, sex, ASA score, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor location, tumor morphology, perineural invasion, extramural venous invasion, tumor stage, and serosal invasion. All covariates used and UICC stage, two-way interactions, and squared terms of continuous covariates will be assessed for balance between the CME and the non-CME group after IPTW using the "cobalt" R-package. Absolute mean differences in mean (using standardized mean difference) and proportions (using raw mean difference) below 0.1, variance ratios between 0.5 and 2, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests equal or below 0.05 will be accepted. Graphical inspection of the distribution of covariates will be also performed.
The cause-specific hazards and overall survival will be analyzed using Cox regression. Binary outcomes will be analyzed using logistic regression. Lymph node yield will be analyzed using linear regression after logarithmic transformation. Number of metastatic lymph nodes will be analyzed using negative binominal regression. All analyses of primary and secondary outcomes will be performed after IPTW. The 95% confidence intervals for the estimates from the original Cox regression IPTW analyses will be constructed after 1000 bootstraps with replacement, and a robust sandwich estimator will be used for the logistic regression analyses in order to ensure correct variance estimation.
All available data will be used. Model assumptions will be checked. A p-value below or equal to 0.05 will be considered significant. All analyses will be performed using R statistical software, version 3.5.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CME group | – | Procedure: Complete mesocolic excisionThe CME group consisted of patients, who underwent elective CME for right-sided colon adenocarcinoma at Nordsjaellands Hospital Hillerød from 1 June 2008 to 31 December 2013. |
| Non-CME group | – | Procedure: Conventional colon resectionsThe non-CME group comprised patients having a elective conventional colon cancer resection for right-sided adenocarcinoma at the other three colorectal centers in the Capital Region of Denmark from 1 June 2008 to 31 December 2013. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Data for all patients undergoing elective surgery for UICC stage I-III colonic adenocarcinoma in the Capital Region of Denmark. The population of this region is approximately 1⋅75 million, more than 30 per cent of the population of Denmark, and it is served by only four public university colorectal cancer centres.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Right-sided colon cancer was defined as primary adenocarcinomas located in the cecum, ascending colon hepatic flexure, right or mid third of the transverse colon.
- UICC stage I-III - Gastroepiploic and infrapyloric lymph node metastases are not considered as distant metastases
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Synchronous colorectal cancer - even in the right colon
- No residual tumor in the specimen after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- Metachronous colorectal cancer
- Appendix cancers
- Resections in Hillerød not performed according to the principles of CME
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Complete mesocolic excisionThe resection was based on the principles of CME. The superior mesenteric vein was exposed to perform central vessel ligation and lymph nodes dissection. Extended right hemicolectomies for tumors located from the ascending colon close to the hepatic flexure and distally were performed openly as standard during the study period. These resections included the prepyloric and gastroepiploic lymph nodes dissection. | Procedure or surgery | CME group |
| Conventional colon resectionsThe patients underwent what was considered standard colon cancer resections in Denmark during the study period. | Procedure or surgery | Non-CME group |
Primary outcome
Risk of recurrence
Time frame: 5.2 years
Recurrence diagnosed by CT or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT of thorax and abdomen, chest radiograph and contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver, or laparotomy in case of suspicion of recurrence. Histological verification of radiological findings of metastases during follow-up is not needed if the local multidisciplinary team conference deemed the finding as a recurrence. Metachronous colon tumors diagnosed during follow-up are considered as recurrences only if located in the anastomosis and with the same morphology as the primary tumor.
4 secondary outcomes
Overall survival
Time frame: 5.2 years
Short-term mortality
Time frame: 30 and 90 days
Rate of postoperative complications
Time frame: 60 days
Number of mesocolic lymph nodes
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Mar 2019.
- Background: PubMed 22122825Rosenberg J, Fischer A, Haglind E; Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group. Current controversies in colorectal surgery: the way to resolve uncertainty and move forward. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Mar;14(3):266-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02896.x.
- Background: PubMed 21178852West NP, Sutton KM, Ingeholm P, Hagemann-Madsen RH, Hohenberger W, Quirke P. Improving the quality of colon cancer surgery through a surgical education program. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Dec;53(12):1594-603. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f433e3.
- Background: PubMed 30217301Lee L, Erkan A, Alhassan N, Kelly JJ, Nassif GJ, Albert MR, Rt Monson J. Lower survival after right-sided versus left-sided colon cancers: Is an extended lymphadenectomy the answer? Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;27(3):449-455. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.031. Epub 2018 May 29.
- Background: PubMed 26476136Bokey L, Chapuis PH, Chan C, Stewart P, Rickard MJ, Keshava A, Dent OF. Long-term results following an anatomically based surgical technique for resection of colon cancer: a comparison with results from complete mesocolic excision. Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jul;18(7):676-83. doi: 10.1111/codi.13159.
- Background: PubMed 19016817Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;11(4):354-64; discussion 364-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01735.x. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
- Background: PubMed 25555421Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, Wilhelmsen M, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Tenma JR, Bols B, Ingeholm P, Rasmussen LA, Jepsen LV, Iversen ER, Kristensen B, Gogenur I; Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):161-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71168-4. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
- Background: PubMed 24798631Kotake K, Mizuguchi T, Moritani K, Wada O, Ozawa H, Oki I, Sugihara K. Impact of D3 lymph node dissection on survival for patients with T3 and T4 colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jul;29(7):847-52. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1885-z. Epub 2014 May 6.
- Background: PubMed 26780563Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Tenma JR, Wilhelmsen M, Rasmussen LA, Jepsen LV, Kristensen B, Gogenur I; Copenhagen Complete Mesocolic Excision Study (COMES); Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG). Short-term outcomes after complete mesocolic excision compared with 'conventional' colonic cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2016 Apr;103(5):581-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10083. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
- Background: PubMed 21818162Austin PC. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
- Background: PubMed 26238958Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med. 2015 Dec 10;34(28):3661-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.6607. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
- BackgroundWal WM van der, Geskus RB. ipw : An R Package for Inverse Probability Weighting. J Stat Softw 43(13):1-23, 2011.
- BackgroundBernhoff R. Colon cancer aspects on surgical treatment and complete mesocolic excision. PhD thesis. Stockholm 2018. ISBN 978-91-7676-919-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Colonic Neoplasms
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingObservational study
Obtaining Solid Tumor Tissue From People Having Biopsy or Surgery for Certain Types of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms, Gastric Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of LY4257496 in Participants With Cancer (OMNIRAY)
Breast Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About Study Medicine ALTA3263 in Adults With Advanced Solid Tumors With KRAS Mutations
Cancer, PDAC - Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Biopsy-Resection Agreement of Peritoneal Histopathological Growth Patterns in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study
Peritoneal (Metastatic) Cancer, Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Claus A Bertelsen, PhD, MD principal investigator
Nordsjaellands Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Colonic Neoplasms, run by Nordsjaellands Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Risk of recurrence (time frame: 5.2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03754075, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2019.