Acute AppendicitisMERESNCT03754777
Modified Enhanced Recovery Program in Emergency Surgery (MERES)
A study testing Laparoscopic appendectomy in people with Acute Appendicitis and Acute Appendicitis With Rupture, run by Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University at 1 site in Russia.
Trial summary
Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a widespread surgical procedure. Patients may develop considerable postoperative pain and dyspepsia resulting in prolong in-hospital stay. Almost 10% of patients develop postoperative complications. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Appendicitis, Acute Appendicitis With Rupture, Acute Appendicitis With Peritonitis
- What is being tested?
- Laparoscopic appendectomy
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 122 participants
- Where
- 1 siteRussia
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2017to 1 Feb 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with any stage of acute appendicitis except 3B according to Gomes classification;
- Class I-II surgical patients according to the classification of The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA).
Who cannot join
- Patient refusal to participate in the study or to sign the informed consent form;
- Language barrier;
- Transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery;
- ASA class ≥ III;
- Conversion to open procedure;
- Appendicular mass found during laparoscopy;
- Gomes 3B appendicitis requiring immersion of the appendicular stump;
- Pregnancy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Modified Enhanced Recovery Program in Emergency Surgery
Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a widespread surgical procedure. Patients may develop considerable postoperative pain and dyspepsia resulting in prolong in-hospital stay. Almost 10% of patients develop postoperative complications. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has proven its effectiveness in elective surgery and can theoretically improve outcomes of LA. To date there is no ERAS program for LA. The aim of the study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a modified ERAS protocol in LA.
Read the detailed description
A modified ERAS (mERAS) protocol was investigated. The study is a prospective, randomized nonblinded. All patients underwent LA. Modified ERAS protocol included patient informing, limitation of drainage use; intraperitoneal anesthesia with long-acting anesthetics; low-pressure pneumoperitoneum; early mobilization and oral nutrition. Pain level was assessed in rest using visual analogue scale (VAS). The primary endpoint was postoperative length of stay (pLOS).
- Conditions
- Acute Appendicitis, Acute Appendicitis With Rupture, Acute Appendicitis With Peritonitis, Acute Appendicitis Without Peritonitis
- Being tested
- Laparoscopic appendectomy
- Keywords
- enhanced recovery, fast-track, appendectomy, intraperitoneal anesthesia, low pressure pneumoperitoneum
- Medical subject headings
- Appendicitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Laparoscopic appendectomyProcedure or surgery
Preoperative care in both arms. Crystalloid isotonic solutions and antibiotic prophylaxis 30 min prior to surgery.
Surgery. General anesthesia with strict control of fluid therapy and hemodynamic changes during surgery. Appendectomy with the use of monopolar coagulation by experienced surgeons following appendix stump ligation by two Roeder knots.
Postoperative care. Antibiotics for 3-5 days for patients with complicated appendicitis (Gomez ≥ 3A). The postoperative pain level evaluation in rest by VAS in 0 h (immediately after awakening), 2, 6, 12 and 24 h postop. The postoperative analgesic modality "on demand": Ketorolac 30 mg for patients with VAS pain level ≥ 5 cm. Antiemetics in dyspepsia. No iv infusions postoperatively. Intestinal peristalsis evaluation by auscultation every 2 h after surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Modified ERAS protocol group | Experimental | Laparoscopic appendectomy with modified ERAS protocol group Preadmission. Not available due to the emergency setting. Preoperative care.
1) Patient brochure with a detailed description of the type of pathology, surgery procedure, rehabilitation process, possible complications, and other.
Surgery.
1. Low pressure (8-9 mmHg) pneumoperitoneum.
2. Routinely remove of appendix mesentery in presence of any signs of its inflammation.
3. Additional local anesthesia with 0.25% ropivacaine.
4. Abdominal cavity draining only in patients with perforated appendicitis and diffuse peritonitis (Gomes 5).
Postoperative care.
1. Early mobilization (2 h after surgery)
2. Early fluid intake (2 h after surgery)
3. Early liquid food (6 h after surgery) Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic appendectomy |
| Standard care group | Placebo comparator | Standard care laparoscopic appendectomy. Preadmission. Not available due to emergency setting. Preoperative care. 1) Patient oral informing about the type of pathology, surgery procedure and possible complications. No brochure.
Surgery.
1. Standard pressure (12-14 mmHg) pneumoperitoneum
2. Abdominal draining for patients with perforated and not perforated appendicitis complicated by abscess, local or diffuse peritonitis (Gomez ≥ 3A).
3. Appendix mesentery removing in the appearance of its necrotic changes.
4. No intraabdominal anesthesia. Postoperative care.
1) Mobilization in 4-6 h after surgery 2) Fluid intake in 6 hours 3) Liquid food intake in 12 hours Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic appendectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative length of stay (pLOS)
Time interval measured from the end of the surgery until the moment of discharge from the hospital, measured in days
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (5)
Complication rate
Number of patients who develop postoperative complications (surgical site infections, intraabdominal organ-specific infection, postoperative ileus) in relation to the total number of patients, measured in percentage
Measured: 30 days
Readmission rate
Number of patients with readmission to the hospital after discharge in relation to the total number of patients, measured as a percentage
Measured: 30 days
Postoperative pain
Level of postoperative pain syndrome measured with a visual analog scale in centimeters
Measured: 24 hours
Shoulder pain incidence
Quantity of patients who developed shoulder pain after surgery in relation to the total number of patients, measured as a percentage
Measured: 24 hours
Shoulder pain level
Level of shoulder pain syndrome measured with visual analog scale in centimeters
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2018
- Study start1 Jul 2017
- Primary completion1 Dec 2017
- Study completion1 Feb 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute AppendicitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alexander V Sazhin, Prof., Study chair, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03754777
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MERES
- Acronym
- MERES
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 27 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Sazhin AV, Nechay TV, Titkova SM, Petukhov VA, Tyagunov AE, Stradymov EA, Ermakov IV, Mishakina NY. [Appendectomy technique: paradigm shift or a well-forgotten old one? The role of mesoappendectomy in prevention of infectious intra-abdominal complications (announcement of RCT)]. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2020;(10):49-59. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202010149. Russian.
PubMed 33047586Nechay T, Sazhin A, Titkova S, Tyagunov A, Anurov M, Melnikov-Makarchuk K, Tyagunov A. Evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery program components implemented in laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective randomized clinical study. Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 1;10(1):10749. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67591-5.
PubMed 32612104
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Modified Enhanced Recovery Program in Emergency Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03754777
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MERES / MERES
- Conditions
- Acute Appendicitis, Acute Appendicitis With Rupture, Acute Appendicitis With Peritonitis, Acute Appendicitis Without Peritonitis
- Keywords
- enhanced recovery, fast-track, appendectomy, intraperitoneal anesthesia, low pressure pneumoperitoneum
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a widespread surgical procedure. Patients may develop considerable postoperative pain and dyspepsia resulting in prolong in-hospital stay. Almost 10% of patients develop postoperative complications. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has proven its effectiveness in elective surgery and can theoretically improve outcomes of LA. To date there is no ERAS program for LA. The aim of the study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a modified ERAS protocol in LA.
Detailed description
A modified ERAS (mERAS) protocol was investigated. The study is a prospective, randomized nonblinded. All patients underwent LA. Modified ERAS protocol included patient informing, limitation of drainage use; intraperitoneal anesthesia with long-acting anesthetics; low-pressure pneumoperitoneum; early mobilization and oral nutrition. Pain level was assessed in rest using visual analogue scale (VAS). The primary endpoint was postoperative length of stay (pLOS).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Modified ERAS protocol group | Experimental | Procedure: Laparoscopic appendectomyLaparoscopic appendectomy with modified ERAS protocol group Preadmission. Not available due to the emergency setting. Preoperative care. 1) Patient brochure with a detailed description of the type of pathology, surgery procedure, rehabilitation process, possible complications, and other. Surgery. 1. Low pressure (8-9 mmHg) pneumoperitoneum. 2. Routinely remove of appendix mesentery in presence of any signs of its inflammation. 3. Additional local anesthesia with 0.25% ropivacaine. 4. Abdominal cavity draining only in patients with perforated appendicitis and diffuse peritonitis (Gomes 5). Postoperative care. 1. Early mobilization (2 h after surgery) 2. Early fluid intake (2 h after surgery) 3. Early liquid food (6 h after surgery) |
| Standard care group | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Laparoscopic appendectomyStandard care laparoscopic appendectomy. Preadmission. Not available due to emergency setting. Preoperative care. 1) Patient oral informing about the type of pathology, surgery procedure and possible complications. No brochure. Surgery. 1. Standard pressure (12-14 mmHg) pneumoperitoneum 2. Abdominal draining for patients with perforated and not perforated appendicitis complicated by abscess, local or diffuse peritonitis (Gomez ≥ 3A). 3. Appendix mesentery removing in the appearance of its necrotic changes. 4. No intraabdominal anesthesia. Postoperative care. 1) Mobilization in 4-6 h after surgery 2) Fluid intake in 6 hours 3) Liquid food intake in 12 hours |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with any stage of acute appendicitis except 3B according to Gomes classification;
- Class I-II surgical patients according to the classification of The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA).
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patient refusal to participate in the study or to sign the informed consent form;
- Language barrier;
- Transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery;
- ASA class ≥ III;
- Conversion to open procedure;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Laparoscopic appendectomyPreoperative care in both arms. Crystalloid isotonic solutions and antibiotic prophylaxis 30 min prior to surgery. Surgery. General anesthesia with strict control of fluid therapy and hemodynamic changes during surgery. Appendectomy with the use of monopolar coagulation by experienced surgeons following appendix stump ligation by two Roeder knots. Postoperative care. Antibiotics for 3-5 days for patients with complicated appendicitis (Gomez ≥ 3A). The postoperative pain level evaluation in rest by VAS in 0 h (immediately after awakening), 2, 6, 12 and 24 h postop. The postoperative analgesic modality "on demand": Ketorolac 30 mg for patients with VAS pain level ≥ 5 cm. Antiemetics in dyspepsia. No iv infusions postoperatively. Intestinal peristalsis evaluation by auscultation every 2 h after surgery. | Procedure or surgery | Modified ERAS protocol group, Standard care group |
Primary outcome
Postoperative length of stay (pLOS)
Time frame: 30 days
Time interval measured from the end of the surgery until the moment of discharge from the hospital, measured in days
5 secondary outcomes
Complication rate
Time frame: 30 days
Readmission rate
Time frame: 30 days
Postoperative pain
Time frame: 24 hours
Shoulder pain incidence
Time frame: 24 hours
Shoulder pain level
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Nov 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33047586Sazhin AV, Nechay TV, Titkova SM, Petukhov VA, Tyagunov AE, Stradymov EA, Ermakov IV, Mishakina NY. [Appendectomy technique: paradigm shift or a well-forgotten old one? The role of mesoappendectomy in prevention of infectious intra-abdominal complications (announcement of RCT)]. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2020;(10):49-59. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202010149. Russian.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32612104Nechay T, Sazhin A, Titkova S, Tyagunov A, Anurov M, Melnikov-Makarchuk K, Tyagunov A. Evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery program components implemented in laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective randomized clinical study. Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 1;10(1):10749. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67591-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Acute Appendicitis
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Comparison of Pro-Adrenomedullin, C-Reactive Protein, and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis
Acute Appendicitis
Active, not recruiting
PAINED: Project Addressing INequities in the Emergency Department
Pain, Appendicitis
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy of Complicated Appendicitis
Appendicitis, Perforated Appendicitis
Recruiting
Feasibility and Safety of a Pediatric ERAS Protocol for Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Acute Appendicitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Laparoscopic Antibiotic Lavage to Prevent Intra-abdominal Abscess Formation in Complicated Appendicitis
Complicated Appendicitis, Intra-Abdominal Abscess
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alexander V Sazhin, Prof. study chair
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Laparoscopic appendectomy in people with Acute Appendicitis and Acute Appendicitis With Rupture, run by Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University at 1 site in Russia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative length of stay (pLOS) (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03754777, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2018.