Carcinoma, HepatocellularNCT03756051
Harms of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance
An observational study of Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study leverage a multi-center randomized controlled trial assessing screening-related benefits (i.e. early tumor detection, treatment eligibility, and overall survival) among a racially and socioeconomically diverse population of patients with cirrhosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- What is being tested?
- Prospective Longitudinal Data and Surveys and Semi-structured Interviews
- How many people
- 2,871 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2018to 30 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients from the parent randomized controlled trial will be included in this study.
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients (≥ 21 years old)
- Cirrhosis
- Outpatient visit in year prior to randomization
- English or Spanish speaking
Who cannot join
- History of hepatocellular carcinoma
- History of liver transplantation
- Child Pugh C cirrhosis
- Significant comorbid conditions with life expectancy < 1 year, (e.g., extrahepatic malignancy)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390
About this study
Official title: Harms of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Patients With Cirrhosis
This study leverage a multi-center randomized controlled trial assessing screening-related benefits (i.e. early tumor detection, treatment eligibility, and overall survival) among a racially and socioeconomically diverse population of patients with cirrhosis. However, the randomized controlled trial was not budgeted to assess hepatocellular carcinoma screening-related harms. The goal of this study is to quantify physical, financial, and psychosocial harms across three healthcare settings.
Read the detailed description
Leveraging a multi-center randomized controlled trial assessing screening benefits in a socioeconomically and racially diverse population of patients with cirrhosis followed in 3 healthcare settings over a 4-year period, this study aims to:
Aim 1: Assess the effect of hepatocellular carcinoma screening on a) physical harms due to follow-up tests, b) financial harms, and c) overdiagnosis in patients with severe liver dysfunction or comorbid illness, through electronic medical record data, manual chart review, and validated survey measures.
Aim 2: Assess the effect of hepatocellular carcinoma screening on screening-related psychosocial harms, e.g. cancer-specific worry, situational anxiety, mood disturbances, and decisional regret, through longitudinal validated measures and qualitative interviews.
Aim 3: Create and disseminate a balance sheet of benefits and harms to inform patients, providers, healthcare organizations, payers, and policymakers about the value of hepatocellular carcinoma screening in patients with cirrhosis.
Over a 4-year period, electronic medical record data will be used to compare screening-related physical and financial harms between patients undergoing and those not undergoing hepatocellular carcinoma screening. Psychosocial harms, as ascertained through longitudinal measurement of validated survey instruments and qualitative interviews, will be compared between patients with positive or indeterminate screening results and those with negative results or without any screening. Mixed-effect regression analysis will be used to determine if screening harms differed by factors at multiple levels including patient (e.g. degree of liver dysfunction), provider (e.g. subspecialty training), and healthcare organization (e.g. access to liver transplantation). This study will seamlessly complement data from the parent randomized controlled trial. By immediately translating these high quality data about hepatocellular carcinoma screening benefits and harms into a balance sheet, the investigators will facilitate patient-provider discussions, inform payer decisions about reimbursement, and guide policy decisions. These data are also crucial to identify modifiable and high-yield intervention targets and strategies to reduce hepatocellular carcinoma screening harms in the future.
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- Being tested
- Prospective Longitudinal Data, Surveys and Semi-structured Interviews
- Keywords
- Physical Harms, Financial Harms, Overdiagnosis, Psychosocial Harms
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prospective Longitudinal DataOther
We will prospectively follow the cohort using electronic medical record to document the hepatocellular carcinoma screening process and characterize physical and financial harms related to positive or indeterminate screening results and burden of inappropriate screening. Patients are anticipated to undergo hepatocellular carcinoma screening every 6-12 months, so each patient will have ~4-8 screening encounters over the study duration. We will use manual chart review to determine intent of ultrasound exams (screening vs. diagnostic) and test results. Receipt of follow-up tests after positive or indeterminate screening results will be identified through electronic medical record extraction using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for CT, MRI, and biopsy.
Surveys and Semi-structured InterviewsOther
We will use surveys and semi-structured interviews to characterize psychological harms after positive or indeterminate screening tests. Patient surveys will include patient-reported scales to measure psychosocial factors at three times points: baseline, 1 month after screening result, and 4 months after screening result. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted via telephone to explore patient attitudes toward risk perception, test follow-up, competing demands, and "downstream harms", particularly financial issues (e.g., out-of-pocket costs, access to insurance, and juggling hepatocellular carcinoma screening process completion with competing demands-work and family).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort | This study will collect prospective longitudinal data to characterize rates and identify correlates of a) physical harms due to follow-up tests, b) financial harms, and c) inappropriate screening using electronic medical record data and manual chart review. The study will also use surveys and semi-structured interviews to characterize rates and identify correlates of screening-related psychological harms, e.g. cancer specific worry, situational anxiety, mood disturbances, and decisional regret. Lastly, investigators will create and disseminate a balance sheet of benefits and harms to inform patients, providers, healthcare organizations, payers, and policymakers about the role of hepatocellular carcinoma screening in patients with cirrhosis. Receives: Other: Prospective Longitudinal Data; Other: Surveys and Semi-structured Interviews |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Physical Harms
Physical harms (contrast injury, radiation exposure, and biopsy complications) can result from screening or follow-up testing and extends beyond medical complications to include discomfort. A binary outcome (harm vs. no harm) will be defined for each person and each type of physical harm (contrast injury, radiation exposure, biopsy, and any physical harm). We will report the point estimate and 95% confidence interval for the proportion of patients with each type of harm in each arm, stratified by health system. Using an intention-to-treat principle, we will use Chi squared test to compare the proportion of patients with physical harms between the screening and usual care arms, with a secondary analysis stratified by health system. We will also perform a sensitivity analysis based on test intent, in which we will only include tests (and corresponding harms) performed as a direct result of hepatocellular carcinoma screening.
Measured: 4 Years
Financial Harms
Financial harms may include anticipated or real costs of hepatocellular carcinoma screening and diagnostic evaluation including, indirect costs such as missed work, and opportunity costs such as distraction from other health-related activities. Financial harms will be summarized for each arm using descriptive analyses as average and range of costs per person. Degree of financial harms will be compared between the hepatocellular carcinoma screening and usual care arms using Student T test, with a secondary analysis stratified by health system. In a secondary analysis, a mixed-effect model approach will be employed to identify patient-, provider- and system-level factors associated with financial harm.
Measured: 4 Years
Overdiagnosis
Defined as hepatocellular carcinoma diagnoses that are unlikely to have an effect on mortality, specifically among patients with: 1) significant comorbid conditions or 2) severe liver dysfunction, i.e. Child Pugh C cirrhosis, who are not candidates for liver transplantation, at hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. For the primary analysis, Chi squared test will be used to compare the proportion of patients with overdiagnosis between the screening arm and usual care arm, stratified by health system.
Measured: 4 Years
Psychosocial Harms
Patients will be divided into 4 categories: true positives, false positives, true negatives, and no screening. True positives will be defined as those who develop hepatocellular carcinoma within 6 months of the screening test; false positives as those who remain without hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis during 6 months of follow-up; and true negatives as those with normal screening tests and without hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis during 6 months of follow-up. Psychosocial harms (cancer-specific worry, situational anxiety, mood disturbances, and decisional regret) will be defined by change in survey scores from baseline and will be calculated at 1 month and 6 months for each patient.
Measured: 4 Years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Patient-, Provider-, and System-level Factors Associated with Physical Harms
As a secondary analysis, we will construct mixed-effect logistic regression models to identify patient-, provider-, and system-level factors associated with physical harms (contrast injury, radiation exposure, biopsy, and any physical harm). Models will include random effects for providers and health systems to account for potential correlation at different levels. Final models will include covariates identified by stepwise variable selection procedure and those considered clinically important a priori (BMI, race, liver dysfunction, and gastroenterology care). Statistical significance will be declared for p<0.05.
Measured: 4 Years
Patient-, Provider-, and System-level Factors Associated with Psychosocial Harms
We will construct a mixed regression model with the outcome being decisional regret and covariates including patient-, provider- and system-level factors. Decisional regret score, ranging from 0 to 100, will be analyzed as a continuous outcome. The mixed model will include random effects for providers and systems to account for correlation at different levels. The model will include covariates identified through stepwise variable selection and those considered clinically important a priori (age, gender, race and ethnicity, liver dysfunction).
Measured: 4 Years
Physical Harms
Physical harms (contrast injury, radiation exposure, and biopsy complications) can result from screening or follow-up testing and extends beyond medical complications to include discomfort.
Measured: 12 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Nov 2018
- Study start1 Apr 2018
- Primary completion30 Jun 2022
- Study completion30 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Carcinoma, HepatocellularStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,871 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Parkland Health and Hospital System, Baylor College of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amit Singal, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Investigators
- Amit Singal, MD, Principal investigator, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03756051
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STU 102016-012
- Other IDs
- R01CA212008
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 26 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 30 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Singal AG, Daher D, Narasimman M, Yekkaluri S, Liu Y, Cerda V, Banala C, Khan A, Lee M, Seif El Dahan K, Murphy CC, Kramer JR, Hernaez R. Benefits and harms of hepatocellular carcinoma screening outreach in patients with cirrhosis: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Feb 1;117(2):262-269. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae228.
PubMed 39288308Singal AG, Reddy S, Radadiya Aka Patel H, Villarreal D, Khan A, Liu Y, Cerda V, Rich NE, Murphy CC, Tiro JA, Kramer JR, Hernaez R. Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of a Mailed Outreach Strategy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Dec;20(12):2818-2825.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.014. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
PubMed 34902568
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Harms of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Patients With Cirrhosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03756051
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STU 102016-012
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- Keywords
- Physical Harms, Financial Harms, Overdiagnosis, Psychosocial Harms
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,871 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Parkland Health and Hospital System, Baylor College of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study leverage a multi-center randomized controlled trial assessing screening-related benefits (i.e. early tumor detection, treatment eligibility, and overall survival) among a racially and socioeconomically diverse population of patients with cirrhosis. However, the randomized controlled trial was not budgeted to assess hepatocellular carcinoma screening-related harms. The goal of this study is to quantify physical, financial, and psychosocial harms across three healthcare settings.
Detailed description
Leveraging a multi-center randomized controlled trial assessing screening benefits in a socioeconomically and racially diverse population of patients with cirrhosis followed in 3 healthcare settings over a 4-year period, this study aims to:
Aim 1: Assess the effect of hepatocellular carcinoma screening on a) physical harms due to follow-up tests, b) financial harms, and c) overdiagnosis in patients with severe liver dysfunction or comorbid illness, through electronic medical record data, manual chart review, and validated survey measures.
Aim 2: Assess the effect of hepatocellular carcinoma screening on screening-related psychosocial harms, e.g. cancer-specific worry, situational anxiety, mood disturbances, and decisional regret, through longitudinal validated measures and qualitative interviews.
Aim 3: Create and disseminate a balance sheet of benefits and harms to inform patients, providers, healthcare organizations, payers, and policymakers about the value of hepatocellular carcinoma screening in patients with cirrhosis.
Over a 4-year period, electronic medical record data will be used to compare screening-related physical and financial harms between patients undergoing and those not undergoing hepatocellular carcinoma screening. Psychosocial harms, as ascertained through longitudinal measurement of validated survey instruments and qualitative interviews, will be compared between patients with positive or indeterminate screening results and those with negative results or without any screening. Mixed-effect regression analysis will be used to determine if screening harms differed by factors at multiple levels including patient (e.g. degree of liver dysfunction), provider (e.g. subspecialty training), and healthcare organization (e.g. access to liver transplantation). This study will seamlessly complement data from the parent randomized controlled trial. By immediately translating these high quality data about hepatocellular carcinoma screening benefits and harms into a balance sheet, the investigators will facilitate patient-provider discussions, inform payer decisions about reimbursement, and guide policy decisions. These data are also crucial to identify modifiable and high-yield intervention targets and strategies to reduce hepatocellular carcinoma screening harms in the future.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort | – | Other: Prospective Longitudinal Data, Other: Surveys and Semi-structured InterviewsThis study will collect prospective longitudinal data to characterize rates and identify correlates of a) physical harms due to follow-up tests, b) financial harms, and c) inappropriate screening using electronic medical record data and manual chart review. The study will also use surveys and semi-structured interviews to characterize rates and identify correlates of screening-related psychological harms, e.g. cancer specific worry, situational anxiety, mood disturbances, and decisional regret. Lastly, investigators will create and disseminate a balance sheet of benefits and harms to inform patients, providers, healthcare organizations, payers, and policymakers about the role of hepatocellular carcinoma screening in patients with cirrhosis. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients from the parent randomized controlled trial will be included in this study.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adult patients (≥ 21 years old)
- Cirrhosis
- Outpatient visit in year prior to randomization
- English or Spanish speaking
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- History of hepatocellular carcinoma
- History of liver transplantation
- Child Pugh C cirrhosis
- Significant comorbid conditions with life expectancy < 1 year, (e.g., extrahepatic malignancy)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Prospective Longitudinal DataWe will prospectively follow the cohort using electronic medical record to document the hepatocellular carcinoma screening process and characterize physical and financial harms related to positive or indeterminate screening results and burden of inappropriate screening. Patients are anticipated to undergo hepatocellular carcinoma screening every 6-12 months, so each patient will have ~4-8 screening encounters over the study duration. We will use manual chart review to determine intent of ultrasound exams (screening vs. diagnostic) and test results. Receipt of follow-up tests after positive or indeterminate screening results will be identified through electronic medical record extraction using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for CT, MRI, and biopsy. | Other | Cohort |
| Surveys and Semi-structured InterviewsWe will use surveys and semi-structured interviews to characterize psychological harms after positive or indeterminate screening tests. Patient surveys will include patient-reported scales to measure psychosocial factors at three times points: baseline, 1 month after screening result, and 4 months after screening result. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted via telephone to explore patient attitudes toward risk perception, test follow-up, competing demands, and "downstream harms", particularly financial issues (e.g., out-of-pocket costs, access to insurance, and juggling hepatocellular carcinoma screening process completion with competing demands-work and family). | Other | Cohort |
Primary outcome
Physical Harms
Time frame: 4 Years
Physical harms (contrast injury, radiation exposure, and biopsy complications) can result from screening or follow-up testing and extends beyond medical complications to include discomfort. A binary outcome (harm vs. no harm) will be defined for each person and each type of physical harm (contrast injury, radiation exposure, biopsy, and any physical harm). We will report the point estimate and 95% confidence interval for the proportion of patients with each type of harm in each arm, stratified by health system. Using an intention-to-treat principle, we will use Chi squared test to compare the proportion of patients with physical harms between the screening and usual care arms, with a secondary analysis stratified by health system. We will also perform a sensitivity analysis based on test intent, in which we will only include tests (and corresponding harms) performed as a direct result of hepatocellular carcinoma screening.
Financial Harms
Time frame: 4 Years
Financial harms may include anticipated or real costs of hepatocellular carcinoma screening and diagnostic evaluation including, indirect costs such as missed work, and opportunity costs such as distraction from other health-related activities. Financial harms will be summarized for each arm using descriptive analyses as average and range of costs per person. Degree of financial harms will be compared between the hepatocellular carcinoma screening and usual care arms using Student T test, with a secondary analysis stratified by health system. In a secondary analysis, a mixed-effect model approach will be employed to identify patient-, provider- and system-level factors associated with financial harm.
Overdiagnosis
Time frame: 4 Years
Defined as hepatocellular carcinoma diagnoses that are unlikely to have an effect on mortality, specifically among patients with: 1) significant comorbid conditions or 2) severe liver dysfunction, i.e. Child Pugh C cirrhosis, who are not candidates for liver transplantation, at hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. For the primary analysis, Chi squared test will be used to compare the proportion of patients with overdiagnosis between the screening arm and usual care arm, stratified by health system.
Psychosocial Harms
Time frame: 4 Years
Patients will be divided into 4 categories: true positives, false positives, true negatives, and no screening. True positives will be defined as those who develop hepatocellular carcinoma within 6 months of the screening test; false positives as those who remain without hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis during 6 months of follow-up; and true negatives as those with normal screening tests and without hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis during 6 months of follow-up. Psychosocial harms (cancer-specific worry, situational anxiety, mood disturbances, and decisional regret) will be defined by change in survey scores from baseline and will be calculated at 1 month and 6 months for each patient.
3 secondary outcomes
Patient-, Provider-, and System-level Factors Associated with Physical Harms
Time frame: 4 Years
Patient-, Provider-, and System-level Factors Associated with Psychosocial Harms
Time frame: 4 Years
Physical Harms
Time frame: 12 Months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Dec 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39288308Singal AG, Daher D, Narasimman M, Yekkaluri S, Liu Y, Cerda V, Banala C, Khan A, Lee M, Seif El Dahan K, Murphy CC, Kramer JR, Hernaez R. Benefits and harms of hepatocellular carcinoma screening outreach in patients with cirrhosis: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Feb 1;117(2):262-269. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae228.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34902568Singal AG, Reddy S, Radadiya Aka Patel H, Villarreal D, Khan A, Liu Y, Cerda V, Rich NE, Murphy CC, Tiro JA, Kramer JR, Hernaez R. Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of a Mailed Outreach Strategy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Dec;20(12):2818-2825.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.014. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amit Singal, MD principal investigator
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Physical Harms (time frame: 4 Years). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03756051, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Dec 2024.