AzTrials
AzTrials

Septic ShockPhase 2ATESSNCT03756220

Ascorbic Acid and Thiamine Effect in Septic Shock

A Phase 2 study testing Combination therapy of vitamin C and thiamine and Normal saline solution in people with Septic Shock and Sepsis, run by Tae Gun Shin at 6 sites in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of early metabolic resuscitation with combination therapy using vitamin C and thiamine in improving organ function and survival in patients with septic shock. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 89 years
Conditions the study is for
Septic Shock, Sepsis
What is being tested?
Combination therapy of vitamin C and thiamine and Normal saline solution
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
116 participants
Where
6 sitesSouth Korea
Study dates
1 Dec 2018to 14 Apr 2020
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 89 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients (> 18 years)
  • Septic shock: sepsis with persisting hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg and a serum lactate level >2 mmol/L despite adequate volume resuscitation. Sepsis is defined as clinically suspected or confirmed infection with acute organ failure identified as an acute change in total SOFA score with 2 points or more.

Who cannot join

  • Transferred patients from other hospitals after application of vasopressors or mechanical ventilation
  • Patients who signed a "Do not attempt resuscitation" order or who had set limitations on invasive care
  • Patients who have a terminal, unresponsive illness and survival discharge is not expected (metastatic terminal cancer, etc.)
  • Patients who experienced cardiac arrest before enrollment or when death is anticipated within 24 hours despite maximal treatment
  • Patients who take more than 1g of Vitamin C per day before enrollment or who take supplemental thiamine
  • Pregnant woman
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Known Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
  • Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to vitamin C or thiamine
  • Known Mediterranean anemia
  • Known hyperoxaluria
  • Known cystinuria
  • Acute gout attack
  • Known oxalate renal stone
  • Patients who meet the inclusion criteria 24 hours after emergency department arrival or when enrollment is delayed more than 24 hours after diagnosis of septic shock
  • Inability or refusal of a subject or legal surrogate to give informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

6 sites in 1 country

South Korea6 sites
  • Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital,

    Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do

  • Department of Emergency Medicine, Borame Medical Center, Seoul National University, College of Medicine

    Seoul

  • Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine,

    Seoul

  • Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine,

    Seoul

  • Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center,

    Seoul

  • Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Combination Therapy of Vitamin C and Thiamine for Septic Shock: Multi-center, Double-blinded, Randomized, Controlled Study

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of early metabolic resuscitation with combination therapy using vitamin C and thiamine in improving organ function and survival in patients with septic shock.

Read the detailed description

Sepsis is a complex disease involving life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection and is still associated with unacceptably high mortality. Sepsis management should be undertaken as a medical emergency and focused on timely intervention, including early identification and treatment of infection through appropriate antimicrobial therapy and source control when applicable as well as reversing hemodynamic instability through fluid resuscitation and vasopressor use if necessary. Despite these supportive therapies, morbidity and mortality have remained high, suggesting the need for adjuvant therapies for inflammatory and oxidative stress in patients with sepsis; however, no agents have been proven to definitely improve survival.

Vitamin C plays a role in mediating inflammation through antioxidant activities and is also important as a cofactor/co-substrate for the synthesis of endogenous adrenaline, cortisol, and vasopressin. Recently, several clinical trials have reported the positive effects of vitamin C on outcomes in sepsis or septic shock. During sepsis, vitamin C prevents neutrophil-induced lipid oxidation and protects against the loss of the endothelial barrier. Early intravenous supplementation is therefore needed to limit loss of microcirculation and oxidation of lipids. Thiamine is also a key cofactor for glucose metabolism, the generation of ATP (adenosine triphosphate), and the production of NADPH. Considering acute consumption in the hypermetabolic state, thiamine supplementation might be a reasonable therapeutic adjunct for patients with sepsis and was added to reduce the risk of renal oxalate crystallization. These findings led to a recent before-and-after study showing that treatment of sepsis with a combination of vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine prevented organ dysfunction and reduced the mortality rate.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of early metabolic resuscitation with combination therapy using vitamin C and thiamine in improving organ function and survival in patients with septic shock.

Conditions
Septic Shock, Sepsis
Being tested
Combination therapy of vitamin C and thiamine, Normal saline solution
Keywords
Septic shock, Sepsis, Vitamin C, Thiamine
Medical subject headings
Shock, Septic, Sepsis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Combination therapy of vitamin C and thiamineDrug

    Also called Ascorbic Acid Injection, Thiamine Injection

    Vitamin C (50 mg/kg up to 3 g, every 12 hours) and thiamine (200 mg every 12 hours) intravenously administered mixed in 50 mL solution bags of normal saline for 2 days

  • Normal saline solutionDrug

    Also called 0.9% NaCl

    Normal saline solution in a volume to match the treatment components administered mixed in 50 mL solution bags of normal saline for 2 days

Study groups in NCT03756220
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TreatmentExperimentalCombination therapy of vitamin C and thiamine for 2 days.
Receives: Drug: Combination therapy of vitamin C and thiamine
ControlPlacebo comparatorNormal Saline Solution
Receives: Drug: Normal saline solution

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score

    72-hour change in SOFA score, which reflected recovery from organ failure (delta SOFA = SOFA at enrollment - SOFA after 72 hours)

    Measured: Enrollment to 72 hours

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. 28-day mortality

    The number of participants who did not survive until Day 28 will be compared between the treatment and the control group

    Measured: Day 28

  2. 7-day mortality (early death)

    The number of participants who did not survive until Day 7 will be compared between the treatment and the control group

    Measured: Day 7

  3. 90-day mortality

    The number of participants who did not survive until Day 90 will be compared between the treatment and the control group

    Measured: Day 90

  4. Time to death

    Days until death

    Measured: Enrollment to Day 28

  5. In-hospital death

    The number of participants who did not survive at hospital discharge will be compared between the treatment and the control group

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

  6. Intensive care unit death (ICU) death

    The number of participants who did not survive at ICU discharge from the first index ICU admission will be compared between the treatment and the control group

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

  7. Time to Shock reversal

    Days from enrollment to shock reversal until Day 14. Shock reversal is defined as discontinuation of all vasopressors and mean arterial pressure is maintained at 60 mmHg or more for more than 24 hours.

    Measured: Enrollment to Day 14

  8. Vasopressor free days

    Days not receiving any vasopressor

    Measured: Enrollment to Day 14

  9. Ventilator free days

    Days not receiving mechanical ventilation

    Measured: Enrollment to Day 14

  10. Ventilator duration

    Days receiving mechanical ventilation during hospital stay

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

  11. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) free days

    Days not receiving Renal replacement therapy

    Measured: Enrollment to Day 14

  12. New use of renal replacement therapy (RRT)

    The number of participants who receive RRT during hospital stay will be compared between the treatment and the control group

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

  13. New onset or aggravation of acute kidney injury (AKI)

    The number of participants who suffer from new onset or aggravation of AKI will be compared between the treatment and the control group

    Measured: Enrollment to Day 14

  14. Length of ICU stay

    Number of days in the ICU during hospital admission

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

  15. ICU free day

    Days not being in the ICU

    Measured: Enrollment to Day 14

  16. Length of hospital stay

    Number of days in the hospital during hospital admission

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Nov 2018
  2. Study start1 Dec 2018
  3. Primary completion13 Jan 2020
  4. Study completion14 Apr 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Multi-center, Double-blinded, Randomized, Controlled Study
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
116 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03756220
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018R1C1B6006821
Acronym
ATESS
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
30 Oct 2018
Last updated
28 Oct 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

    PubMed 26903338
  • Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, Kumar A, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Rubenfeld GD, Angus DC, Annane D, Beale RJ, Bellinghan GJ, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith C, De Backer DP, French CJ, Fujishima S, Gerlach H, Hidalgo JL, Hollenberg SM, Jones AE, Karnad DR, Kleinpell RM, Koh Y, Lisboa TC, Machado FR, Marini JJ, Marshall JC, Mazuski JE, McIntyre LA, McLean AS, Mehta S, Moreno RP, Myburgh J, Navalesi P, Nishida O, Osborn TM, Perner A, Plunkett CM, Ranieri M, Schorr CA, Seckel MA, Seymour CW, Shieh L, Shukri KA, Simpson SQ, Singer M, Thompson BT, Townsend SR, Van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Wiersinga WJ, Zimmerman JL, Dellinger RP. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):486-552. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255.

    PubMed 28098591
  • Teng J, Pourmand A, Mazer-Amirshahi M. Vitamin C: The next step in sepsis management? J Crit Care. 2018 Feb;43:230-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.09.031. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

    PubMed 28934705
  • Marik PE, Khangoora V, Rivera R, Hooper MH, Catravas J. Hydrocortisone, Vitamin C, and Thiamine for the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Before-After Study. Chest. 2017 Jun;151(6):1229-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.036. Epub 2016 Dec 6.

    PubMed 27940189
  • Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Spoelstra-de Man AM, de Waard MC. Vitamin C revisited. Crit Care. 2014 Aug 6;18(4):460. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0460-x.

    PubMed 25185110
  • Donnino MW, Andersen LW, Chase M, Berg KM, Tidswell M, Giberson T, Wolfe R, Moskowitz A, Smithline H, Ngo L, Cocchi MN; Center for Resuscitation Science Research Group. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Thiamine as a Metabolic Resuscitator in Septic Shock: A Pilot Study. Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):360-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001572.

    PubMed 26771781
  • Zabet MH, Mohammadi M, Ramezani M, Khalili H. Effect of high-dose Ascorbic acid on vasopressor's requirement in septic shock. J Res Pharm Pract. 2016 Apr-Jun;5(2):94-100. doi: 10.4103/2279-042X.179569.

    PubMed 27162802
  • Fowler AA 3rd, Syed AA, Knowlson S, Sculthorpe R, Farthing D, DeWilde C, Farthing CA, Larus TL, Martin E, Brophy DF, Gupta S; Medical Respiratory Intensive Care Unit Nursing; Fisher BJ, Natarajan R. Phase I safety trial of intravenous ascorbic acid in patients with severe sepsis. J Transl Med. 2014 Jan 31;12:32. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-32.

    PubMed 24484547
  • May JM, Harrison FE. Role of vitamin C in the function of the vascular endothelium. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013 Dec 10;19(17):2068-83. doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5205. Epub 2013 May 29.

    PubMed 23581713
  • Leite HP, de Lima LF. Metabolic resuscitation in sepsis: a necessary step beyond the hemodynamic? J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jul;8(7):E552-7. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.05.37.

    PubMed 27501325
  • de Grooth HJ, Geenen IL, Girbes AR, Vincent JL, Parienti JJ, Oudemans-van Straaten HM. SOFA and mortality endpoints in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Crit Care. 2017 Feb 24;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1609-1.

    PubMed 28231816
  • Park JE, Jo YH, Hwang SY, Kim WY, Ryoo SM, Jang DH, Kim T, Kim YJ, Kim S, Cho H, Lee GT, Chung SP, Choi SH, Shin TG, Suh GJ; Korean Shock Society (KoSS) Investigators. Biomarker Analysis for Combination Therapy of Vitamin C and Thiamine in Septic Shock: A Post-Hoc Study of the ATESS Trial. Shock. 2022 Jan 1;57(1):81-87. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001850.

    PubMed 34482319
  • Hwang SY, Park JE, Jo IJ, Kim S, Chung SP, Kong T, Shin J, Lee HJ, You KM, Jo YH, Kim D, Suh GJ, Kim T, Kim WY, Kim YJ, Ryoo SM, Choi SH, Shin TG; Korean Shock Society (KoSS) Investigators. Combination therapy of vitamin C and thiamine for septic shock in a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, controlled study (ATESS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Jul 11;20(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3542-x.

    PubMed 31296251

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Combination therapy of vitamin C and thiamine and Normal saline solution in people with Septic Shock and Sepsis, run by Tae Gun Shin at 6 sites in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (time frame: Enrollment to 72 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03756220, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Ascorbic Acid and Thiamine Effect in Septic Shock | AzTrials