Medical EducationNCT03758391
Comparison of Learning in Traditional Versus "Flipped" Classrooms
A study testing Flipped Classroom education in people with Medical Education, run by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is an educational research study to compare knowledge retention of neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellowship trainees instructed on a subsection of the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) NPM Content Outline using traditional didactic lectures (control group) versus a flipped classroom methodology (intervention… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Medical Education
- What is being tested?
- Flipped Classroom education
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 538 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2018to 30 Sep 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Fellow or educator in an ACGME-accredited Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Fellowship program in the US.
Who cannot join
- Not a fellow or educator in an ACGME-accredited Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Fellowship program in the US.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
About this study
Official title: Comparison of a "Flipped" Classroom Methodology to Traditional Instructional Techniques for Neonatal-perinatal Medicine Fellows: A National Prospective Study
This is an educational research study to compare knowledge retention of neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellowship trainees instructed on a subsection of the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) NPM Content Outline using traditional didactic lectures (control group) versus a flipped classroom methodology (intervention group). The primary objectives are to assess whether the flipped classroom provides equivalent or superior outcomes for knowledge acquisition and retention compared to traditional lecture-based formats, based upon baseline and serial knowledge assessments (after the educational session, and at 3- and 6- month intervals). The secondary outcomes are learner and educator preference.
Read the detailed description
Sixty-three ACGME-accredited NPM fellowship training programs in the United States have enrolled to participate in this study. Programs have been randomized to teach a subsection of neonatal physiology using the traditional didactic approach or using the "flipped" classroom methodology.
The ACGME requires that NPM fellowship programs provide formal instruction to teach trainees about key concepts in the care of neonates and infants, and most programs have traditionally utilized didactic presentations to relay this information. These sessions are typically instructor-centered, with little requirement for involvement or engagement on the part of the learner, and are not felt to optimize long-term knowledge acquisition and retention. A newer educational model, the "flipped" classroom, increases the opportunities for learner engagement and requires investment and preparation. Using this educational structure, fellows receive learning materials that need to be reviewed prior to the in-person educational session. The participants will then spend the in-person session actively engaged in applying the knowledge to answer questions, participate in discussions, and solve problems. Adult learning theory supports this active involvement as a way to increase learner engagement, improve recognition of meaning of the material, and improve knowledge acquisition and long-term retention.
Fellowship Program Directors involved in the Organization of Neonatal Training Program Directors (ONTPD) have been contacted about the opportunity to participate in this prospective multi-center study. After enrollment, program directors will complete a brief survey of their program's baseline educational methods and demographics. Fellows will be contacted directly by local site PIs for individual consent to data collection. Fellows will be asked to provide demographic information, assessment of learning style/ practices, time devoted to educational pursuits, and perceptions of current physiology education. The fellows will be asked to complete 4 knowledge assessments (baseline, at the end of the educational block, 3 months, 6 months) in REDCap over the course of 6 months. All data will be de-identified, and individual and programmatic data will be anonymous. The assigned ABP content will be taught within the same 3-month period any time between September 2018 and March 2019 via the assigned method (traditional didactic or flipped classroom). All educational materials will be provided to both arms of the study. Learning objectives will be based on the ABP NPM Content Outline and materials with be authored by experts in neonatal physiology. Materials will undergo rigorous peer-review by an editorial board. Traditional/control fellows will be instructed using the provided educational materials in an instructor-led didactic slide presentation. Intervention group fellows will be required to view the same educational materials in online videos prior to their assigned classroom session. During the "flipped" classroom session, the fellows will work through a series of questions based on the assigned educational materials with a local facilitator using a facilitation guide who has been trained in flipped classroom facilitation. This facilitator guide will present discussion points based upon the pre-learning materials and requires learners to apply acquired knowledge. The facilitator guides are also peer-reviewed for content and quality.
In the present study, only the ABP Content Objectives for NPM on gastroenterology and bilirubin will be included. Educational materials will be reviewed and revised by a 4-member editorial board to ensure accuracy, completeness, and quality. For online viewing, these materials are uploaded on MedEdOnTheGo.com, an online learning management platform. Fellows will be provided with additional reading materials, such as seminal articles or textbook chapters, that will allow them to develop a deep understanding of the topic.
Fellows will be surveyed regarding their learning experiences at 3 different time points; before the educational intervention begins, at the completion of the educational intervention, and 3 months after completion of the intervention. Fellows will complete anonymous surveys in REDCap regarding their learning experiences, class preparation, the quality of teaching, perceived effectiveness of teaching efforts, and preferences for learning. Fellows will also participate in short 15-item multiple choice quizzes to measure knowledge retention. There will be 4 quizzes in total; prior to the intervention (baseline), at the completion of the intervention, 3 months post, and 6 months post-intervention. These quizzes will be proctored and closed book. Fellows in either randomization arm will answer the same questions. The quiz questions will cover the specific content addressed in the educational sessions, be created by the study team, and piloted by attending neonatologists for clarity, accuracy, and relevance.
Data will be tabulated on baseline information for both program level and fellow level with testing to determine if pre-intervention testing data is different between groups (equivalence variance 2-tailed T-tests for continuous data and likert scores, and chi square for categorical data). Knowledge retention curves will be developed by performing T-tests of mean scores for each time point. Post-education surveys for program directors and fellows will be evaluated to assess effect of interventions using equal variance 2-tailed T-tests for continuous data and likert scores.
- Conditions
- Medical Education
- Being tested
- Flipped Classroom education
- Keywords
- Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Andragogy, Flipped Classroom
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Flipped Classroom educationOther
Fellows will receive GI/Bilirubin education in a flipped classroom format.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional Didactic Education | No intervention | Education will be provided to fellows using the traditional didactic approach (lecture-based). |
| Flipped Classroom Education | Experimental | Education will be provided to fellows using the flipped classroom approach. Receives: Other: Flipped Classroom education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Knowledge retention
Knowledge retention will be tested using multiple choice examinations.
Measured: 9 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Learner Preferences
Learner preferences for how to receive education will be assessed through qualitative survey
Measured: 6 months
Educator Preferences
Educator preferences for how to provide education will be assessed through qualitative survey
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Nov 2018
- Study start1 Sep 2018
- Primary completion30 Sep 2019
- Study completion30 Sep 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Medical EducationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective cohort study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 538 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Organization of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Training Program Directors
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03758391
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18-015235
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 28 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of a "Flipped" Classroom Methodology to Traditional Instructional Techniques for Neonatal-perinatal Medicine Fellows: A National Prospective Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03758391
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18-015235
- Conditions
- Medical Education
- Keywords
- Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Andragogy, Flipped Classroom
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 538 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Organization of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Training Program Directors
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an educational research study to compare knowledge retention of neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellowship trainees instructed on a subsection of the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) NPM Content Outline using traditional didactic lectures (control group) versus a flipped classroom methodology (intervention group). The primary objectives are to assess whether the flipped classroom provides equivalent or superior outcomes for knowledge acquisition and retention compared to traditional lecture-based formats, based upon baseline and serial knowledge assessments (after the educational session, and at 3- and 6- month intervals). The secondary outcomes are learner and educator preference.
Detailed description
Sixty-three ACGME-accredited NPM fellowship training programs in the United States have enrolled to participate in this study. Programs have been randomized to teach a subsection of neonatal physiology using the traditional didactic approach or using the "flipped" classroom methodology.
The ACGME requires that NPM fellowship programs provide formal instruction to teach trainees about key concepts in the care of neonates and infants, and most programs have traditionally utilized didactic presentations to relay this information. These sessions are typically instructor-centered, with little requirement for involvement or engagement on the part of the learner, and are not felt to optimize long-term knowledge acquisition and retention. A newer educational model, the "flipped" classroom, increases the opportunities for learner engagement and requires investment and preparation. Using this educational structure, fellows receive learning materials that need to be reviewed prior to the in-person educational session. The participants will then spend the in-person session actively engaged in applying the knowledge to answer questions, participate in discussions, and solve problems. Adult learning theory supports this active involvement as a way to increase learner engagement, improve recognition of meaning of the material, and improve knowledge acquisition and long-term retention.
Fellowship Program Directors involved in the Organization of Neonatal Training Program Directors (ONTPD) have been contacted about the opportunity to participate in this prospective multi-center study. After enrollment, program directors will complete a brief survey of their program's baseline educational methods and demographics. Fellows will be contacted directly by local site PIs for individual consent to data collection. Fellows will be asked to provide demographic information, assessment of learning style/ practices, time devoted to educational pursuits, and perceptions of current physiology education. The fellows will be asked to complete 4 knowledge assessments (baseline, at the end of the educational block, 3 months, 6 months) in REDCap over the course of 6 months. All data will be de-identified, and individual and programmatic data will be anonymous. The assigned ABP content will be taught within the same 3-month period any time between September 2018 and March 2019 via the assigned method (traditional didactic or flipped classroom). All educational materials will be provided to both arms of the study. Learning objectives will be based on the ABP NPM Content Outline and materials with be authored by experts in neonatal physiology. Materials will undergo rigorous peer-review by an editorial board. Traditional/control fellows will be instructed using the provided educational materials in an instructor-led didactic slide presentation. Intervention group fellows will be required to view the same educational materials in online videos prior to their assigned classroom session. During the "flipped" classroom session, the fellows will work through a series of questions based on the assigned educational materials with a local facilitator using a facilitation guide who has been trained in flipped classroom facilitation. This facilitator guide will present discussion points based upon the pre-learning materials and requires learners to apply acquired knowledge. The facilitator guides are also peer-reviewed for content and quality.
In the present study, only the ABP Content Objectives for NPM on gastroenterology and bilirubin will be included. Educational materials will be reviewed and revised by a 4-member editorial board to ensure accuracy, completeness, and quality. For online viewing, these materials are uploaded on MedEdOnTheGo.com, an online learning management platform. Fellows will be provided with additional reading materials, such as seminal articles or textbook chapters, that will allow them to develop a deep understanding of the topic.
Fellows will be surveyed regarding their learning experiences at 3 different time points; before the educational intervention begins, at the completion of the educational intervention, and 3 months after completion of the intervention. Fellows will complete anonymous surveys in REDCap regarding their learning experiences, class preparation, the quality of teaching, perceived effectiveness of teaching efforts, and preferences for learning. Fellows will also participate in short 15-item multiple choice quizzes to measure knowledge retention. There will be 4 quizzes in total; prior to the intervention (baseline), at the completion of the intervention, 3 months post, and 6 months post-intervention. These quizzes will be proctored and closed book. Fellows in either randomization arm will answer the same questions. The quiz questions will cover the specific content addressed in the educational sessions, be created by the study team, and piloted by attending neonatologists for clarity, accuracy, and relevance.
Data will be tabulated on baseline information for both program level and fellow level with testing to determine if pre-intervention testing data is different between groups (equivalence variance 2-tailed T-tests for continuous data and likert scores, and chi square for categorical data). Knowledge retention curves will be developed by performing T-tests of mean scores for each time point. Post-education surveys for program directors and fellows will be evaluated to assess effect of interventions using equal variance 2-tailed T-tests for continuous data and likert scores.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective cohort study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional Didactic Education | No intervention | –Education will be provided to fellows using the traditional didactic approach (lecture-based). |
| Flipped Classroom Education | Experimental | Other: Flipped Classroom educationEducation will be provided to fellows using the flipped classroom approach. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Fellow or educator in an ACGME-accredited Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Fellowship program in the US.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Not a fellow or educator in an ACGME-accredited Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Fellowship program in the US.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Flipped Classroom educationFellows will receive GI/Bilirubin education in a flipped classroom format. | Other | Flipped Classroom Education |
Primary outcome
Knowledge retention
Time frame: 9 months
Knowledge retention will be tested using multiple choice examinations.
2 secondary outcomes
Learner Preferences
Time frame: 6 months
Educator Preferences
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jan 2020.
Related trials for Medical Education
Recruiting
Linking Education, Produce Provision, and Community Referrals to Improve Diabetes Care (LINK)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Nutrition Poor
Not yet recruiting
Title of Study: Anesthesiologists' Learning Curves for Ultrasound Assessment of Difficult Airway
Airway Ultrasound, Difficult Airway Management
Not yet recruiting
Comparing the Efficacy of a Conversational Agent (QuitBot) Versus Standard Health Education on Smoking Cessation Among Medical Students in Cairo University
Conversational Agent, Smoking Cessation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Federated Learning in Renal Tumor Model
Renal Tumors
Not yet recruiting
Generative AI-Assisted Personalized Feedback for Laparoscopic Skill Learning in Medical Undergraduates
Medical Education
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Flipped Classroom education in people with Medical Education, run by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Knowledge retention (time frame: 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2020.