Palliative CareNCT03758703
Music Intervention on Palliative Patients
A study testing Pre-recorded music intervention group and Pre-recorded soothing poetry group in people with Palliative Care, run by McMaster University at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Palliative/hospice care patients experience many negative symptoms during their time in such facilities. These symptoms include, but are usually not limited to, pain, anxiety, depression, and so on. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Palliative Care
- What is being tested?
- Pre-recorded music intervention group and Pre-recorded soothing poetry group
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Dec 2019to May 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- English-speaking;
- A score of 3 or higher on ESAS scale for pain and anxiety
- Cognitively alert and competent to provide informed consent
- A Palliative Performance Scale of at least 40/100.
Who cannot join
- Participants with a prognosis of fewer than 2 weeks or an expectation of leaving the inpatient setting within a 2 week period.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Canada2 sites
Emmanuel House Good Shepherd Residential Hospice
Hamilton, Ontario, L8R 2X5
Maria Maria Bau-Coote, (905) 308-8401, MBau-Coote@gsch.ca
Arbaaz A Patel
Dr Bob Kemp Hospice
Hamilton, Ontario, L9B 1B1
Sara Klinck, (905) 387-2448, saraklinck@gmail.com
Arbaaz A Patel
About this study
Official title: Investigating Music Care Intervention On Palliative Care Patients
Palliative/hospice care patients experience many negative symptoms during their time in such facilities. These symptoms include, but are usually not limited to, pain, anxiety, depression, and so on. This study is interested in exploring how a music intervention can be used to reduce these symptoms in order to improve the quality of life for these patients. Specifically, because music interventions can be costly (e.g., employing music therapists and the likes of) and there is a lack of knowledge about how to properly implement music interventions, we believe that it would be most cost-effective as well as effective in reducing the described symptoms by introducing pre-recorded music as an intervention. Patients will be given pre-recorded music which requires less training and less money but may be just as effective as music interventions that do not use pre-recorded music. Patients will be evaluated by administering surveys at predetermined times to measure their symptoms, and interview-like questions will be administered at the end of the study to collect information that will be used to inform a larger study in the future. This study will, therefore, be collecting data on both how effective the intervention is and how feasible it is to use the same methods for a similar larger study in the future.
Read the detailed description
This study will employ a pragmatic randomized control trial design as a mixed-methods study in which approximately half of the participants will be randomized into a control and the other remaining half in the experimental group. Randomization sequences will be generated externally and allocation concealment will be employed. Group allocation will be revealed to subjects following informed consent, which is characterized by participants understanding the full details of this study and any risks that may present themselves. Because of the nature of the intervention, it is not possible to perform blinding and further stratification is restricted due to the small sample size. Confounding variables, like those of age, gender, education, and cancer-type, will be collected and controlled for during the statistical analyses. In addition, palliative performance status (PPS) at baseline, and daily pain medication usage during the intervention will be recorded to control for potential confounders. PPS is regularly measured by hospital staff. The research team will not access the resident's health records. Instead, the in-house care staff will perform this screening and refer eligible participants to the research team. Participants randomized into the experimental group will receive and self-select a pre-recorded music care playlist, whereas those randomized into the control group will receive and self-select a pre-recorded soothing poetry playlist, daily, over the course of seven days, but are free to select different playlists within their intervention arm each day. The music and poetry will be delivered using the same system with the same sound quality through a portable Bluetooth speaker system. The speaker system will allow others to listen with the participant. Pre-recorded poetry was chosen as a control intervention because it stimulates the same biological auditory system as music. This is an appropriate comparison for the pre-recorded music intervention because although it is delivered through the same fundamental biological pathway, poetry sound waves are interpreted as non-patterned and non-musical. In contrast, music sound waves are interpreted as patterned and organized. It is important to recognize that, especially in the context of hospice care, it would be unethical to prevent participants from using music outside of the study. This is controlled for by performing pre- and post-evaluations exclusively for the session. In other words, this data will be collected concurrently rather than longitudinally. Further, an additional daily involvement questionnaire will be used to determine whether music has been used outside of the context of this study. This will allow the research team to later control for this (e.g., when it is used as a distraction technique outside of this study). At the end of each intervention, which will last for 30-minutes, three validated questionnaires (hospice quality of life index-revised (HQLIR), stait-trait anxiety inventory scale (STAIS), and edmonton symptom assessment scale (ESAS)) will be administered in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. However, one of these questionnaires will only be administered on day one, three, and seven. Finally, an additional "daily involvement" questionnaire will be used as a means to ensure that the music intervention took place. This questionnaire will be completed on each of the seven days for each participant and will record their daily involvement. The individual administering the above-mentioned questionnaires will remain with the resident for the duration of the intervention and listen to the intervention together with the resident; this holds true for both the control and experimental group. At the end of the study, acceptability data measuring trial feasibility as a function of recruitment process; participation/refusal rate; study measurements completion rate; and protocol adherence including intervention delivery and data collection, will be collected via audio-recorded semi-structured interviews with residents, families, and healthcare providers/volunteers for which consent will first be collected. Resident's families will be invited by the participant for involvement in processes such as listening to the intervention with the resident or being present during the questionnaire process, and will be given the opportunity to consent prior to engaging in the semi-structured interview. All above-mentioned questionnaires will be administered by either community volunteers, study investigators, and/or hospice staff. Note that all questionnaires will be de-identified. In order to correctly code questionnaires based on each participant's unique study identifier, first and last names will be recorded for each participant upon enrolment in the study. First and last names will be recorded on the hard-copy study code sheet which will be kept in the PI's locked filing cabinet. The code sheet will be used to prepare the de-identified questionnaires which will be used to collect data in the community hospices. Upon completion of the study, the hard copy code sheet will be destroyed.
- Conditions
- Palliative Care
- Being tested
- Pre-recorded music intervention group, Pre-recorded soothing poetry group
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pre-recorded music intervention groupOther
Refer to the arm/group descriptions.
Pre-recorded soothing poetry groupOther
Refer to the arm/group descriptions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-recorded music intervention group | Experimental | The experimental group will be receiving the pre-recorded music care intervention. The intervention is to be delivered once a day for 30 minutes, over one week, on a portable Bluetooth speaker system. Participants will select their own music from the list of pre-recorded songs playlist and are free to switch to another playlist within their treatment arm should they desire. This music was specifically designed for use in palliative care. Specifically, all songs are played at 60 beats per minute to mimic resting heart rate. Instrumentation was specifically chosen to be soothing and calming Receives: Other: Pre-recorded music intervention group |
| Pre-recorded soothing poetry group | Active comparator | The control group will be provided pre-recorded soothing poetry which they will self-select. Participants are allowed to switch playlists within their treatment arm each day should they desire. This control group is designed to control time, attention, and placebo effect. Thus, the soothing poetry will be offered the identical time duration of listening to recorded soothing poetry readings and played at the same time the intervention group receives the pre-recorded music. Receives: Other: Pre-recorded soothing poetry group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessing changes in quality of life in palliative care patients
Self-report Hospice Quality of Life Index-Revised (HQLI-R) questionnaire with 29 items; each question ranges from 0 to 10 (0 indicating the lowest quality and 10 indicating the highest quality). This yields a total score between 0 and 290.
Measured: 3 days (days 1,3 and 7 of data collection)
Assessing changes in symptom severity in palliative care patients
Self-report Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale-revised (ESAS-R) questionnaire with 10 items; each item ranges from 0 to 10 (0 indicating low to no severity in symptoms or that the symptom is absent, and 10 indicating the highest symptom severity). This yields a total score between 0 and 100.
Measured: 7 days (days 1 through 7 of data collection)
Assessing changes in trait and state anxiety in palliative care patients
Self-report State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Scale (STAI-S) questionnaire with 20 items; each item ranges from 1 to 4 (1 indicating low to no anxiety and 4 indicating the highest anxiety). This yields a total score between 0 and 80.
Measured: 7 days (days 1 through 7 of data collection)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Assessing trial feasibility for a larger future RCT
Trial feasibility will be collected in the form of audio-recorded semi-structured interviews to ascertain the feasibility of the method and logistics of the intervention. This knowledge will be applied to a future RCT in order to deliver the intervention more effectively and improve the data collection process.
Measured: 1 day (day 7 of data collection)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Nov 2018
- Study startDec 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Palliative CareStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by McMaster UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study will employ a pragmatic parallel randomized-control trial design as a mixed-methods study in which approximately half of the participants will be randomized into a control and the other remaining half in the experimental group.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Arbaaz Patel, McMaster University
- Investigators
- Chelsea Mackinnon, MA, MMIE, Principal investigator, McMaster University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03758703
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 5316
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 23 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 8 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Only anonymized grouped data will be shared for publication once data analysis is complete.
Publications
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Care at the End of Life; Field MJ, Cassel CK, editors. Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1997. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK233605/
PubMed 25121204Morrison RS, Meier DE. Clinical practice. Palliative care. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 17;350(25):2582-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp035232. No abstract available.
PubMed 15201415O'Callaghan CC. Pain, music creativity and music therapy in palliative care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1996 Mar-Apr;13(2):43-9. doi: 10.1177/104990919601300211.
PubMed 8716327Archie P, Bruera E, Cohen L. Music-based interventions in palliative cancer care: a review of quantitative studies and neurobiological literature. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Sep;21(9):2609-24. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1841-4. Epub 2013 May 30.
PubMed 23715815Clements-Cortes A. The use of music in facilitating emotional expression in the terminally ill. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2004 Jul-Aug;21(4):255-60. doi: 10.1177/104990910402100406.
PubMed 15315187Olofsson A, Fossum B. Perspectives on music therapy in adult cancer care: a hermeneutic study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Jul;36(4):E223-31. doi: 10.1188/09.ONF.E223-E231.
PubMed 19581226Bradt J, Dileo C, Magill L, Teague A. Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 15;(8):CD006911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub3.
PubMed 27524661McMillan SC, Weitzner M. Quality of life in cancer patients: use of a revised Hospice Index. Cancer Pract. 1998 Sep-Oct;6(5):282-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.1998.00023.x.
PubMed 9767348Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. 1991 Summer;7(2):6-9.
PubMed 1714502Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psychologists Press). Inc. 1983.
Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, Robson R, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Goldsmith CH. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jan 6;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.
PubMed 20053272Abbott JH. The distinction between randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and preliminary feasibility and pilot studies: what they are and are not. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Aug;44(8):555-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.0110. No abstract available.
PubMed 25082389
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigating Music Care Intervention On Palliative Care Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03758703
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 5316
- Conditions
- Palliative Care
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Palliative/hospice care patients experience many negative symptoms during their time in such facilities. These symptoms include, but are usually not limited to, pain, anxiety, depression, and so on. This study is interested in exploring how a music intervention can be used to reduce these symptoms in order to improve the quality of life for these patients. Specifically, because music interventions can be costly (e.g., employing music therapists and the likes of) and there is a lack of knowledge about how to properly implement music interventions, we believe that it would be most cost-effective as well as effective in reducing the described symptoms by introducing pre-recorded music as an intervention. Patients will be given pre-recorded music which requires less training and less money but may be just as effective as music interventions that do not use pre-recorded music. Patients will be evaluated by administering surveys at predetermined times to measure their symptoms, and interview-like questions will be administered at the end of the study to collect information that will be used to inform a larger study in the future. This study will, therefore, be collecting data on both how effective the intervention is and how feasible it is to use the same methods for a similar larger study in the future.
Detailed description
This study will employ a pragmatic randomized control trial design as a mixed-methods study in which approximately half of the participants will be randomized into a control and the other remaining half in the experimental group. Randomization sequences will be generated externally and allocation concealment will be employed. Group allocation will be revealed to subjects following informed consent, which is characterized by participants understanding the full details of this study and any risks that may present themselves. Because of the nature of the intervention, it is not possible to perform blinding and further stratification is restricted due to the small sample size. Confounding variables, like those of age, gender, education, and cancer-type, will be collected and controlled for during the statistical analyses. In addition, palliative performance status (PPS) at baseline, and daily pain medication usage during the intervention will be recorded to control for potential confounders. PPS is regularly measured by hospital staff. The research team will not access the resident's health records. Instead, the in-house care staff will perform this screening and refer eligible participants to the research team. Participants randomized into the experimental group will receive and self-select a pre-recorded music care playlist, whereas those randomized into the control group will receive and self-select a pre-recorded soothing poetry playlist, daily, over the course of seven days, but are free to select different playlists within their intervention arm each day. The music and poetry will be delivered using the same system with the same sound quality through a portable Bluetooth speaker system. The speaker system will allow others to listen with the participant. Pre-recorded poetry was chosen as a control intervention because it stimulates the same biological auditory system as music. This is an appropriate comparison for the pre-recorded music intervention because although it is delivered through the same fundamental biological pathway, poetry sound waves are interpreted as non-patterned and non-musical. In contrast, music sound waves are interpreted as patterned and organized. It is important to recognize that, especially in the context of hospice care, it would be unethical to prevent participants from using music outside of the study. This is controlled for by performing pre- and post-evaluations exclusively for the session. In other words, this data will be collected concurrently rather than longitudinally. Further, an additional daily involvement questionnaire will be used to determine whether music has been used outside of the context of this study. This will allow the research team to later control for this (e.g., when it is used as a distraction technique outside of this study). At the end of each intervention, which will last for 30-minutes, three validated questionnaires (hospice quality of life index-revised (HQLIR), stait-trait anxiety inventory scale (STAIS), and edmonton symptom assessment scale (ESAS)) will be administered in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. However, one of these questionnaires will only be administered on day one, three, and seven. Finally, an additional "daily involvement" questionnaire will be used as a means to ensure that the music intervention took place. This questionnaire will be completed on each of the seven days for each participant and will record their daily involvement. The individual administering the above-mentioned questionnaires will remain with the resident for the duration of the intervention and listen to the intervention together with the resident; this holds true for both the control and experimental group. At the end of the study, acceptability data measuring trial feasibility as a function of recruitment process; participation/refusal rate; study measurements completion rate; and protocol adherence including intervention delivery and data collection, will be collected via audio-recorded semi-structured interviews with residents, families, and healthcare providers/volunteers for which consent will first be collected. Resident's families will be invited by the participant for involvement in processes such as listening to the intervention with the resident or being present during the questionnaire process, and will be given the opportunity to consent prior to engaging in the semi-structured interview. All above-mentioned questionnaires will be administered by either community volunteers, study investigators, and/or hospice staff. Note that all questionnaires will be de-identified. In order to correctly code questionnaires based on each participant's unique study identifier, first and last names will be recorded for each participant upon enrolment in the study. First and last names will be recorded on the hard-copy study code sheet which will be kept in the PI's locked filing cabinet. The code sheet will be used to prepare the de-identified questionnaires which will be used to collect data in the community hospices. Upon completion of the study, the hard copy code sheet will be destroyed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study will employ a pragmatic parallel randomized-control trial design as a mixed-methods study in which approximately half of the participants will be randomized into a control and the other remaining half in the experimental group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-recorded music intervention group | Experimental | Other: Pre-recorded music intervention groupThe experimental group will be receiving the pre-recorded music care intervention. The intervention is to be delivered once a day for 30 minutes, over one week, on a portable Bluetooth speaker system. Participants will select their own music from the list of pre-recorded songs playlist and are free to switch to another playlist within their treatment arm should they desire. This music was specifically designed for use in palliative care. Specifically, all songs are played at 60 beats per minute to mimic resting heart rate. Instrumentation was specifically chosen to be soothing and calming |
| Pre-recorded soothing poetry group | Active comparator | Other: Pre-recorded soothing poetry groupThe control group will be provided pre-recorded soothing poetry which they will self-select. Participants are allowed to switch playlists within their treatment arm each day should they desire. This control group is designed to control time, attention, and placebo effect. Thus, the soothing poetry will be offered the identical time duration of listening to recorded soothing poetry readings and played at the same time the intervention group receives the pre-recorded music. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- English-speaking;
- A score of 3 or higher on ESAS scale for pain and anxiety
- Cognitively alert and competent to provide informed consent
- A Palliative Performance Scale of at least 40/100.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participants with a prognosis of fewer than 2 weeks or an expectation of leaving the inpatient setting within a 2 week period.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-recorded music intervention groupRefer to the arm/group descriptions. | Other | Pre-recorded music intervention group |
| Pre-recorded soothing poetry groupRefer to the arm/group descriptions. | Other | Pre-recorded soothing poetry group |
Primary outcome
Assessing changes in quality of life in palliative care patients
Time frame: 3 days (days 1,3 and 7 of data collection)
Self-report Hospice Quality of Life Index-Revised (HQLI-R) questionnaire with 29 items; each question ranges from 0 to 10 (0 indicating the lowest quality and 10 indicating the highest quality). This yields a total score between 0 and 290.
Assessing changes in symptom severity in palliative care patients
Time frame: 7 days (days 1 through 7 of data collection)
Self-report Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale-revised (ESAS-R) questionnaire with 10 items; each item ranges from 0 to 10 (0 indicating low to no severity in symptoms or that the symptom is absent, and 10 indicating the highest symptom severity). This yields a total score between 0 and 100.
Assessing changes in trait and state anxiety in palliative care patients
Time frame: 7 days (days 1 through 7 of data collection)
Self-report State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Scale (STAI-S) questionnaire with 20 items; each item ranges from 1 to 4 (1 indicating low to no anxiety and 4 indicating the highest anxiety). This yields a total score between 0 and 80.
1 secondary outcome
Assessing trial feasibility for a larger future RCT
Time frame: 1 day (day 7 of data collection)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Oct 2019.
- Background: PubMed 25121204Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Care at the End of Life; Field MJ, Cassel CK, editors. Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1997. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK233605/
- Background: PubMed 15201415Morrison RS, Meier DE. Clinical practice. Palliative care. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 17;350(25):2582-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp035232. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 8716327O'Callaghan CC. Pain, music creativity and music therapy in palliative care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1996 Mar-Apr;13(2):43-9. doi: 10.1177/104990919601300211.
- Background: PubMed 23715815Archie P, Bruera E, Cohen L. Music-based interventions in palliative cancer care: a review of quantitative studies and neurobiological literature. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Sep;21(9):2609-24. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1841-4. Epub 2013 May 30.
- Background: PubMed 15315187Clements-Cortes A. The use of music in facilitating emotional expression in the terminally ill. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2004 Jul-Aug;21(4):255-60. doi: 10.1177/104990910402100406.
- Background: PubMed 19581226Olofsson A, Fossum B. Perspectives on music therapy in adult cancer care: a hermeneutic study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Jul;36(4):E223-31. doi: 10.1188/09.ONF.E223-E231.
- Background: PubMed 27524661Bradt J, Dileo C, Magill L, Teague A. Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 15;(8):CD006911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub3.
- Background: PubMed 9767348McMillan SC, Weitzner M. Quality of life in cancer patients: use of a revised Hospice Index. Cancer Pract. 1998 Sep-Oct;6(5):282-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.1998.00023.x.
- Background: PubMed 1714502Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. 1991 Summer;7(2):6-9.
- BackgroundSpielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psychologists Press). Inc. 1983.
- Background: PubMed 20053272Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, Robson R, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Goldsmith CH. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jan 6;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.
- Background: PubMed 25082389Abbott JH. The distinction between randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and preliminary feasibility and pilot studies: what they are and are not. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Aug;44(8):555-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.0110. No abstract available.
- The State of Seniors Health Care in CanadaLink provided by the sponsor.
- What Canadians Say: The Way Forward Survey ReportLink provided by the sponsor.
- Episodes of Relationship Completion Through Song in Palliative CareLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Only anonymized grouped data will be shared for publication once data analysis is complete.
Related trials for Palliative Care
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Radiotherapy Dose Strategies for Symptom Relief in Large Solid Tumors
Solid Tumor
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Nudging Effective and Equitable Delivery of Specialty Palliative Care
Serious Illness, Palliative
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Single Fraction or Multi-fraction Palliative Radiation Therapy for the Improvement of Quality of Life in Patients With Metastatic Gynecologic Cancers
Metastatic Malignant Female Reproductive System Neoplasm
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Periganglionic Resiniferatoxin for the Treatment of Intractable Pain Due to Cancer-induced Bone Pain
Intractable Pain, Palliative Care
Not yet recruiting
Integrating Rhythmical Massage in Palliative Care
Palliative Care, Health Services, Palliative Care
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chelsea Mackinnon, MA, MMIE principal investigator
McMaster University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pre-recorded music intervention group and Pre-recorded soothing poetry group in people with Palliative Care, run by McMaster University at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Arbaaz A Patel (9055368221, patela11@mcmaster.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessing changes in quality of life in palliative care patients (time frame: 3 days (days 1,3 and 7 of data collection)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03758703, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2019.