Kidney Transplant Failure and RejectionNCT03759535
Study in Detection cfDNA for the Early-stage Diagnosis of Acute Rejection Post-renal Transplantation
An observational study of Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection, run by RenJi Hospital.
Trial summary
Acute rejection (AR) is still one of the major complications after kidney transplantation. The current diagnosis measure for AR is primarily pathological puncture test and hematuria biomarker detection, yet due to their inferior performance on timeliness, the allograft kidneys usually have been in severe conditions… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
- What is being tested?
- Acute rejection
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2018to 30 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Study population: 20 to-receive-kidney-transplant patients are randomized, the self-control study protocol is utilized for each patient as the following. Under the condition of signed informed consent, for 20 kidney transplant recipients For 20 patients that have been diagnosed with acute rejection on the first visits.
Who may be able to join
- Patients are suitable for kidney transplant surgeries. Or There is obvious evidence for acute rejection of the allograft kidneys. The patients have no infectious complications.
Who cannot join
- Patients have failed in the transplant surgeries. Patients have no urine 1 week after the transplant surgeries. Patients have severe infectious complications after the transplant surgeries. Or:The patients have infectious complications. The patients have tumors. The patients are pregnant.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Research on the Detection of Donor Derived Cell Free DNA (cfDNA)for the Early-stage Diagnosis of Acute Rejection Reaction Post Kidney Transplantation
Acute rejection (AR) is still one of the major complications after kidney transplantation. The current diagnosis measure for AR is primarily pathological puncture test and hematuria biomarker detection, yet due to their inferior performance on timeliness, the allograft kidneys usually have been in severe conditions when the diagnoses take place. Donor derived cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is utilized as a measure for "liquid biopsy", it can predict acute rejection at very early periods, and it is easy to operate, with fewer invasive injuries, and can reflect related conditions in a timely manner, etc.. This study plans to utilize second-generation sequencing technology to systematically evaluate the abundance variations of nuclear genome and mitocondria derived dd-cfDNA in the kidney transplant recipients' blood and urine, thus it can assist in accumulating more proof for the clinical utilization of dd-cfDNA from different sources at the early stages of AR in evidence-based medicine, and lay foundation for the development of dd-cfDNA based early-stage rejection detection tools afterkidney transplantation surgery.
Read the detailed description
With the growing development of kidney transplant technologies and immunosuppressive therapies, the number of end-stage renal disease patients receiving kidney transplant has been increasing. Acute rejection (AR) is one of the main complications for kidney transplantation, and AR is the major reason for lowering graft survival rate and for graft malfunction, thus the timely detection of AR and early interventions are crucial. The current clinical measures for the detection of AR include pathological puncture test and hematuria biomarker detection. Yet pathological tests are invasive, limited to sampling errors and the existing perception differences among observants, and with other disadvantages such as expensiveness, poor patient compliance, and related complications. Hematuria biomarker detection is slow in response and low in the sensitivity and specificity for reflecting the organs' metabolic index in the diagnosis of acute rejection injury. Though the monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs, immune molecules and cytokines in the blood circulation can both provide certain value for the evaluation of patients' immune status after organ transplant, these factors are not good indicators for the early-stage diagnosis of allograft injury. Donor derived cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is utilized as a measure for "liquid biopsy", it is easy to operate, with less invasiveness, and it can reflect related conditions in a timely manner, etc.. This measure can detect the injury degree for allograft, and the index will rise before fluctuation reflection of the syndrome and related laboratory indexes, which is crucial for the very early-stage diagnosis of allograft acute rejection, and the further prevention of allograft injury. In the mean time, dd-cfDNA assumes high utilization value for the monitoring of immunosuppressive conditions, and therefore providing instructions for the optimization of the immunosuppressive treatment.
Under the condition of signed informed consent, the study protocols were scheduled as below:
Self-control study protocol:
20 to-receive-kidney-transplant patients are randomized, the self-control study protocol is utilized for each patient as the following.
Before the kidney transplant surgery, 1ml of peripheral EDTA anticoagulant from the recipients, and 1ml of peripheral EDTA anticoagulant from the donors are collected.
In 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks' time after the kidney transplant surgeries, 8 to 10 ml of peripheral blood from the recipients using cfDNA blood collection tubes, and 10 to 15 ml of midstream urine are collected respectively.
Inclusion criteria:
*Patients are suitable for kidney transplant surgeries.
Exclusion criteria:
- Patients have failed in the transplant surgeries.
- Patients have no urine 1 week after the transplant surgeries.
- Patients have severe infectious complications after the transplant surgeries. b, Case group: For 20 patients that have been diagnosed with acute rejection on the first visits, 8 to 10 ml of EDTA anticoagulant, 10 to 15 ml of midstream urine, 5 ml of saliva are collected before the treatment, 1 week and 2 weeks after the adjustment of the anti-rejection treatment, 8 to 10 ml of blood using cfDNA blood collection tubes, 10 to 15 ml of midstream urine, 5 ml of saliva are collected respectively.
Inclusion criteria:
Control group:
- The allograft kidneys function normally.
- The rejection of allograft kidneys are excluded.
- The patients have no infectious complications.
Case group:
- There is obvious evidence for acute rejection of the allograft kidneys.
- The patients have no infectious complications.
Exclusion criteria:
- The patients have infectious complications.
- The patients have tumors.
- The patients are pregnant.
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
- Being tested
- Acute rejection
- Keywords
- DNA acute rejection kidney transplantation
- Medical subject headings
- Rejection, Psychology
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Acute rejectionDiagnostic test
Donor derived cell free DNA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control group and Case group | Control group:
The allograft kidneys function normally. The rejection of allograft kidneys are excluded. The patients have no infectious complications.
Case group:
There is obvious evidence for acute rejection of the allograft kidneys. The patients have no infectious complications. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Acute rejection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Renal allograft injury Renal allograft injury
serum creatinine level
Measured: 2 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Nov 2018
- Study start1 Dec 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Kidney Transplant Failure and RejectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- RenJi Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Zhang Ming, Doctor, Study director, RenJi Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03759535
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RenJiH-renal transplantation01
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 29 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 30 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
De Vlaminck I, Martin L, Kertesz M, Patel K, Kowarsky M, Strehl C, Cohen G, Luikart H, Neff NF, Okamoto J, Nicolls MR, Cornfield D, Weill D, Valantine H, Khush KK, Quake SR. Noninvasive monitoring of infection and rejection after lung transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 27;112(43):13336-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517494112. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
PubMed 26460048Lo YM, Tein MS, Pang CC, Yeung CK, Tong KL, Hjelm NM. Presence of donor-specific DNA in plasma of kidney and liver-transplant recipients. Lancet. 1998 May 2;351(9112):1329-30. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)79055-3. No abstract available.
PubMed 9643800
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Research on the Detection of Donor Derived Cell Free DNA (cfDNA)for the Early-stage Diagnosis of Acute Rejection Reaction Post Kidney Transplantation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03759535
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RenJiH-renal transplantation01
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
- Keywords
- DNA acute rejection kidney transplantation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- RenJi HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute rejection (AR) is still one of the major complications after kidney transplantation. The current diagnosis measure for AR is primarily pathological puncture test and hematuria biomarker detection, yet due to their inferior performance on timeliness, the allograft kidneys usually have been in severe conditions when the diagnoses take place. Donor derived cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is utilized as a measure for "liquid biopsy", it can predict acute rejection at very early periods, and it is easy to operate, with fewer invasive injuries, and can reflect related conditions in a timely manner, etc.. This study plans to utilize second-generation sequencing technology to systematically evaluate the abundance variations of nuclear genome and mitocondria derived dd-cfDNA in the kidney transplant recipients' blood and urine, thus it can assist in accumulating more proof for the clinical utilization of dd-cfDNA from different sources at the early stages of AR in evidence-based medicine, and lay foundation for the development of dd-cfDNA based early-stage rejection detection tools afterkidney transplantation surgery.
Detailed description
With the growing development of kidney transplant technologies and immunosuppressive therapies, the number of end-stage renal disease patients receiving kidney transplant has been increasing. Acute rejection (AR) is one of the main complications for kidney transplantation, and AR is the major reason for lowering graft survival rate and for graft malfunction, thus the timely detection of AR and early interventions are crucial. The current clinical measures for the detection of AR include pathological puncture test and hematuria biomarker detection. Yet pathological tests are invasive, limited to sampling errors and the existing perception differences among observants, and with other disadvantages such as expensiveness, poor patient compliance, and related complications. Hematuria biomarker detection is slow in response and low in the sensitivity and specificity for reflecting the organs' metabolic index in the diagnosis of acute rejection injury. Though the monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs, immune molecules and cytokines in the blood circulation can both provide certain value for the evaluation of patients' immune status after organ transplant, these factors are not good indicators for the early-stage diagnosis of allograft injury. Donor derived cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is utilized as a measure for "liquid biopsy", it is easy to operate, with less invasiveness, and it can reflect related conditions in a timely manner, etc.. This measure can detect the injury degree for allograft, and the index will rise before fluctuation reflection of the syndrome and related laboratory indexes, which is crucial for the very early-stage diagnosis of allograft acute rejection, and the further prevention of allograft injury. In the mean time, dd-cfDNA assumes high utilization value for the monitoring of immunosuppressive conditions, and therefore providing instructions for the optimization of the immunosuppressive treatment.
Under the condition of signed informed consent, the study protocols were scheduled as below:
Self-control study protocol:
20 to-receive-kidney-transplant patients are randomized, the self-control study protocol is utilized for each patient as the following.
Before the kidney transplant surgery, 1ml of peripheral EDTA anticoagulant from the recipients, and 1ml of peripheral EDTA anticoagulant from the donors are collected.
In 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks' time after the kidney transplant surgeries, 8 to 10 ml of peripheral blood from the recipients using cfDNA blood collection tubes, and 10 to 15 ml of midstream urine are collected respectively.
Inclusion criteria:
*Patients are suitable for kidney transplant surgeries.
Exclusion criteria:
- Patients have failed in the transplant surgeries.
- Patients have no urine 1 week after the transplant surgeries.
- Patients have severe infectious complications after the transplant surgeries. b, Case group: For 20 patients that have been diagnosed with acute rejection on the first visits, 8 to 10 ml of EDTA anticoagulant, 10 to 15 ml of midstream urine, 5 ml of saliva are collected before the treatment, 1 week and 2 weeks after the adjustment of the anti-rejection treatment, 8 to 10 ml of blood using cfDNA blood collection tubes, 10 to 15 ml of midstream urine, 5 ml of saliva are collected respectively.
Inclusion criteria:
Control group:
- The allograft kidneys function normally.
- The rejection of allograft kidneys are excluded.
- The patients have no infectious complications.
Case group:
- There is obvious evidence for acute rejection of the allograft kidneys.
- The patients have no infectious complications.
Exclusion criteria:
- The patients have infectious complications.
- The patients have tumors.
- The patients are pregnant.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control group and Case group | – | Diagnostic Test: Acute rejectionControl group: The allograft kidneys function normally. The rejection of allograft kidneys are excluded. The patients have no infectious complications. Case group: There is obvious evidence for acute rejection of the allograft kidneys. The patients have no infectious complications. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- 20 to-receive-kidney-transplant patients are randomized, the self-control study protocol is utilized for each patient as the following. Under the condition of signed informed consent, for 20 kidney transplant recipients For 20 patients that have been diagnosed with acute rejection on the first visits.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients are suitable for kidney transplant surgeries. Or There is obvious evidence for acute rejection of the allograft kidneys. The patients have no infectious complications.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients have failed in the transplant surgeries. Patients have no urine 1 week after the transplant surgeries. Patients have severe infectious complications after the transplant surgeries. Or:The patients have infectious complications. The patients have tumors. The patients are pregnant.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Acute rejectionDonor derived cell free DNA | Diagnostic test | Control group and Case group |
Primary outcome
Renal allograft injury Renal allograft injury
Time frame: 2 months
serum creatinine level
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Nov 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 26460048De Vlaminck I, Martin L, Kertesz M, Patel K, Kowarsky M, Strehl C, Cohen G, Luikart H, Neff NF, Okamoto J, Nicolls MR, Cornfield D, Weill D, Valantine H, Khush KK, Quake SR. Noninvasive monitoring of infection and rejection after lung transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 27;112(43):13336-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517494112. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 9643800Lo YM, Tein MS, Pang CC, Yeung CK, Tong KL, Hjelm NM. Presence of donor-specific DNA in plasma of kidney and liver-transplant recipients. Lancet. 1998 May 2;351(9112):1329-30. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)79055-3. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
Recruiting
Efficiency of Everolimus for the Treatment of Kidney Transplanted Patients Presenting a Missing Self-induced NK-mediated Rejection
Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study Comparing Siplizumab With Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin to Help the Body Accept a Kidney Transplant
Renal Transplant Failure and Rejection
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Study of Tegoprubart Efficacy and Safety Compared With Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation
Kidney Transplant Rejection
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Treatment of Early Borderline Lesions in Low Immunological Risk Kidney Transplant Patients (TRAINING)
Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
RecruitingObservational study
Dd-cfDNA and Treg in Prediction of Kidney Transplant Acute Rejection
Acute Rejection of Renal Transplant, Graft Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Zhang Ming, Doctor study director
RenJi Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection, run by RenJi Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Zhang Ming, Doctor (13817817827, drmingzhang@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Renal allograft injury Renal allograft injury (time frame: 2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03759535, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Nov 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.