Effect of TrainingBURTSNCT03759795
Bournemouth University Resilience Training for Surgeons
A study testing ACTr (Acceptance and Commitment Training) in people with Effect of Training, run by Bournemouth University at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The challenges that characterise surgical practice may result in a myriad of stressors that impact upon the personal and professional lives of surgeons. This includes a high likelihood that surgeons will have to deal with adverse patient outcomes due to surgical complications and errors, sometime during their careers. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Effect of Training
- What is being tested?
- ACTr (Acceptance and Commitment Training)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 68 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 14 Feb 2018to 1 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Trainee surgeons and consultant surgeons
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites
Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Bournemouth, BH7 7DW
Poole Hopsital
Poole, BH15 2JB
About this study
Official title: Ameliorating the Impact of Complications and Errors on Surgeons: Resilience Training for Surgeons.
The challenges that characterise surgical practice may result in a myriad of stressors that impact upon the personal and professional lives of surgeons. This includes a high likelihood that surgeons will have to deal with adverse patient outcomes due to surgical complications and errors, sometime during their careers. Such stressors can have undesirable effects on the surgeon in terms of quality of life and psychological well-being (e.g. anxiety, feelings of regret), as well as lowered professional confidence and impaired perceptions of professional competence. Furthermore, there is evidence that these kinds of negative impacts can also lead to burnout and depression. As well as the detrimental effects on surgeons and those around them, this in turn may lead to more errors and poorer outcomes for patients. This study will examine the efficacy of an ACT based training intervention to enhance resilience and psychological flexibility.
Read the detailed description
Research in a range of occupational settings has indicated that resilience plays an important role in ameliorating the impact of adverse events in high pressure environments. This project will use a randomised controlled trial research design to assess the efficacy of brief one-to-one Acceptance and Commitment Training (ACTr), designed to enhance surgeons' psychological resilience. According to the model ACTr is based on, psychopathology is primarily the consequence of psychological inflexibility i.e. inability to persist or change behaviour according to long-term values due to language and cognition skills, which has particular significance when an individual is confronted with stress or adversity.
The main aim of this research is to assess the efficacy of a brief one-to-one Acceptance and Commitment Training course. Researchers wish to ascertain whether such a course can increase surgeons' resilience by increasing psychological flexibility, valuing and self-compassion (all of which are expected to be positively impacted by this training). This research will fill a gap in the relevant research literature; namely that no research project as far as we are aware has evaluated ACTr as a means to enhance resilience in surgeons. In fact any research conducted on resilience training with a surgical population is rare.
- Conditions
- Effect of Training
- Being tested
- ACTr (Acceptance and Commitment Training)
- Keywords
- Resilience, Psychological flexibility, Acceptance and Commitment Training
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ACTr (Acceptance and Commitment Training)Behavioural
The programme is based on Acceptance and Commitment Training (ACT), a contemporary, empirically supported approach to psychological well-being.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Acceptance and Commitment Training (ACTr) Receives: Behavioral: ACTr (Acceptance and Commitment Training) |
| Wait-list control | No intervention | No intervention during trial. Participants in this group will be offered the training once the study is complete. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Resilience - Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)
A self-report measure of psychological resilience. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Measured: 20 weeks
General Health - General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12).
A self reported measure of minor psychological symptomology in a non-clinical population.
Measured: 20 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
CBI (Copenhagen Burnout Inventory)
A self-report measure of vulnerability to burnout. Lower values represent a better outcome.
Measured: 20 weeks
DASS21 (Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale)
A self-report measure of depression, stress and anxiety. Lower values represent a better outcome.
Measured: 20 weeks
VLQ (Value Living Questionnaire)
A self-report measure of valuing. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Measured: 20 weeks
WAAQ (Work related Acceptance and Action Questionnaire)
A self-report measure of work related psychological flexibility. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Measured: 20 weeks
AAQII (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire)
A self-report measure of general psychological inflexibility. Lower values represent a better outcome.
Measured: 20 weeks
SCS (Self Compassion Scale)
A self-report measure of self compassion. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Measured: 20 weeks
SPS (Sense of Preparedness Scale)
A self-report measure of preparedness for potential future events. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Measured: 20 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Nov 2018
- Study start14 Feb 2018
- Primary completion1 Jan 2022
- Study completion1 Jan 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Effect of TrainingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bournemouth University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Helen Bolderston, Principal investigator, Bournemouth University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03759795
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1819/IRASSR/1
- Acronym
- BURTS
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 13 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 2 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Finnes A, Ghaderi A, Dahl J, Nager A, Enebrink P. Randomized controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and a workplace intervention for sickness absence due to mental disorders. J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(1):198-212. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000097. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
PubMed 28956942Flaxman PE, Bond FW. A randomised worksite comparison of acceptance and commitment therapy and stress inoculation training. Behav Res Ther. 2010 Aug;48(8):816-20. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 May 8.
PubMed 20627269Pinto A, Faiz O, Davis R, Almoudaris A, Vincent C. Surgical complications and their impact on patients' psychosocial well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 16;6(2):e007224. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007224.
PubMed 26883234Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Bechamps G, Russell T, Dyrbye L, Satele D, Collicott P, Novotny PJ, Sloan J, Freischlag J. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann Surg. 2010 Jun;251(6):995-1000. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bfdab3.
PubMed 19934755Balch CM, Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye L, Sloan JA, Russell TR, Bechamps GJ, Freischlag JA. Surgeon distress as calibrated by hours worked and nights on call. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Nov;211(5):609-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.06.393. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
PubMed 20851643Flaxman P. , Bond, F., Livheim, F. (2013): The Mindful and Effective Employee: An Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Training Manual for Improving Well-Being and Performance. New Harbinger Publications; 2013
Turner, K., Johnson, C., Thomas, K., Bolderston, H., & McDougall, S. (2016). The impact of complications and errors on surgeons. The Bulletin Of The Royal College Of Surgeons Of England, 98(9), 404-407. doi: 10.1308/rcsbull.2016.404
Greville-Harris M, Wezyk A, Thomas K, Richer S, Bolderston H, Purchase N, McDougall S, Turner KJ. Acceptance and commitment therapy- based intervention to improve psychological skills and resilience in surgical trainees: a randomised waitlist-controlled trial. BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03059-5.
PubMed 40721794Kunzler AM, Helmreich I, Chmitorz A, Konig J, Binder H, Wessa M, Lieb K. Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 5;7(7):CD012527. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012527.pub2.
PubMed 32627860
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ameliorating the Impact of Complications and Errors on Surgeons: Resilience Training for Surgeons.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03759795
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BURTS / 1819/IRASSR/1
- Conditions
- Effect of Training
- Keywords
- Resilience, Psychological flexibility, Acceptance and Commitment Training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bournemouth UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Study start
- 14 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The challenges that characterise surgical practice may result in a myriad of stressors that impact upon the personal and professional lives of surgeons. This includes a high likelihood that surgeons will have to deal with adverse patient outcomes due to surgical complications and errors, sometime during their careers. Such stressors can have undesirable effects on the surgeon in terms of quality of life and psychological well-being (e.g. anxiety, feelings of regret), as well as lowered professional confidence and impaired perceptions of professional competence. Furthermore, there is evidence that these kinds of negative impacts can also lead to burnout and depression. As well as the detrimental effects on surgeons and those around them, this in turn may lead to more errors and poorer outcomes for patients. This study will examine the efficacy of an ACT based training intervention to enhance resilience and psychological flexibility.
Detailed description
Research in a range of occupational settings has indicated that resilience plays an important role in ameliorating the impact of adverse events in high pressure environments. This project will use a randomised controlled trial research design to assess the efficacy of brief one-to-one Acceptance and Commitment Training (ACTr), designed to enhance surgeons' psychological resilience. According to the model ACTr is based on, psychopathology is primarily the consequence of psychological inflexibility i.e. inability to persist or change behaviour according to long-term values due to language and cognition skills, which has particular significance when an individual is confronted with stress or adversity.
The main aim of this research is to assess the efficacy of a brief one-to-one Acceptance and Commitment Training course. Researchers wish to ascertain whether such a course can increase surgeons' resilience by increasing psychological flexibility, valuing and self-compassion (all of which are expected to be positively impacted by this training). This research will fill a gap in the relevant research literature; namely that no research project as far as we are aware has evaluated ACTr as a means to enhance resilience in surgeons. In fact any research conducted on resilience training with a surgical population is rare.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Behavioral: ACTr (Acceptance and Commitment Training)Acceptance and Commitment Training (ACTr) |
| Wait-list control | No intervention | –No intervention during trial. Participants in this group will be offered the training once the study is complete. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Trainee surgeons and consultant surgeons
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ACTr (Acceptance and Commitment Training)The programme is based on Acceptance and Commitment Training (ACT), a contemporary, empirically supported approach to psychological well-being. | Behavioural | Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
Resilience - Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)
Time frame: 20 weeks
A self-report measure of psychological resilience. Higher values represent a better outcome.
General Health - General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12).
Time frame: 20 weeks
A self reported measure of minor psychological symptomology in a non-clinical population.
7 secondary outcomes
CBI (Copenhagen Burnout Inventory)
Time frame: 20 weeks
DASS21 (Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale)
Time frame: 20 weeks
VLQ (Value Living Questionnaire)
Time frame: 20 weeks
WAAQ (Work related Acceptance and Action Questionnaire)
Time frame: 20 weeks
AAQII (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire)
Time frame: 20 weeks
SCS (Self Compassion Scale)
Time frame: 20 weeks
SPS (Sense of Preparedness Scale)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Mar 2022.
- Background: PubMed 28956942Finnes A, Ghaderi A, Dahl J, Nager A, Enebrink P. Randomized controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and a workplace intervention for sickness absence due to mental disorders. J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(1):198-212. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000097. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
- Background: PubMed 20627269Flaxman PE, Bond FW. A randomised worksite comparison of acceptance and commitment therapy and stress inoculation training. Behav Res Ther. 2010 Aug;48(8):816-20. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 May 8.
- Background: PubMed 26883234Pinto A, Faiz O, Davis R, Almoudaris A, Vincent C. Surgical complications and their impact on patients' psychosocial well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 16;6(2):e007224. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007224.
- Background: PubMed 19934755Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Bechamps G, Russell T, Dyrbye L, Satele D, Collicott P, Novotny PJ, Sloan J, Freischlag J. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann Surg. 2010 Jun;251(6):995-1000. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bfdab3.
- Background: PubMed 20851643Balch CM, Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye L, Sloan JA, Russell TR, Bechamps GJ, Freischlag JA. Surgeon distress as calibrated by hours worked and nights on call. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Nov;211(5):609-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.06.393. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
- BackgroundFlaxman P. , Bond, F., Livheim, F. (2013): The Mindful and Effective Employee: An Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Training Manual for Improving Well-Being and Performance. New Harbinger Publications; 2013
- BackgroundTurner, K., Johnson, C., Thomas, K., Bolderston, H., & McDougall, S. (2016). The impact of complications and errors on surgeons. The Bulletin Of The Royal College Of Surgeons Of England, 98(9), 404-407. doi: 10.1308/rcsbull.2016.404
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40721794Greville-Harris M, Wezyk A, Thomas K, Richer S, Bolderston H, Purchase N, McDougall S, Turner KJ. Acceptance and commitment therapy- based intervention to improve psychological skills and resilience in surgical trainees: a randomised waitlist-controlled trial. BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03059-5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32627860Kunzler AM, Helmreich I, Chmitorz A, Konig J, Binder H, Wessa M, Lieb K. Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 5;7(7):CD012527. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012527.pub2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Effect of Training
Recruiting
Feasibility and Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training Combined With Blood Flow Restriction for Frail Older Adults
Frailty Syndrome, Older Adults
Enrolling by invitation
Controlled Evaluation of an Exercise Program for Overweight Adolescents
Adolescent, Pediatric Obesity
Not yet recruiting
Does Estrogen Blunt the Effects of Exercise Training on Glycemic Control
To Determine Whether Estrogen Influences the Effects of Training on Glycemic Control and Insulin Sensitivity
Recruiting
Eccentric Muscle Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation
Strength Training Effects, HFrEF - Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Recruiting
Pain in Aging Former Athletes, Master's Athletes, and Nonathletes
Pain, Pain Management
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Helen Bolderston principal investigator
Bournemouth University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ACTr (Acceptance and Commitment Training) in people with Effect of Training, run by Bournemouth University at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Resilience - Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) (time frame: 20 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03759795, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Mar 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.