Secondary LymphedemaNCT03760744
Imaging Biomarkers of Lymphatic Dysfunction
A study testing CDT with Negative Pressure and CDT alone in people with Secondary Lymphedema, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Persons with secondary arm and/or upper quadrant lymphedema following cancer therapies commonly are prescribed complete decongestive therapy as a course of management of their lymphedema. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 90 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Secondary Lymphedema
- What is being tested?
- CDT with Negative Pressure and CDT alone
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 23 Jan 2019to 15 Mar 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 90 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Females with a diagnosis of secondary arm and/or upper quadrant lymphedema following cancer treatments
Who cannot join
- Subjects who have any type of non-MRI compatible bioimplant activated by mechanical, electronic, or magnetic means (e.g., cochlear implants, pacemakers, neurostimulators, biostimulators, electronic infusion pumps, etc.) or are not able to comfortably be able to tolerate the limited fit of the MRI
- Subjects who have any type of ferromagnetic bioimplant that could potentially be displaced.
- Subjects who may have shrapnel embedded in their bodies (such as from war wounds), metal workers and machinists (potential for metallic fragments in or near the eyes).
- Pregnant women will be excluded from the MRI portion of the study only
- Subjects who have open wounds on either ankle or top of foot because of contraindications with placement of electrodes to obtain the L-DEX U400 readings.
- Persons with heart pacemakers.
- Persons with bilateral arm lymphedema (or bilateral risk) or pre-existing lymphedema/edema in the upper body prior to cancer treatments.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212
About this study
Persons with secondary arm and/or upper quadrant lymphedema following cancer therapies commonly are prescribed complete decongestive therapy as a course of management of their lymphedema. The investigators will perform a repeated-measures cross-over trial to test the hypothesis that mobilization of protein enriched hardened tissue using graded negative pressure therapy in conjunction with complete decongestive therapy (CDT) is more effective to standard CDT alone for secondary lymphedema management.
Read the detailed description
The goal of this work is to apply novel, noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods for visualizing lymphatic circulation dysfunction to test a fundamental hypothesis about secondary lymphedema conservative decongestive therapy. Breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL) arises secondary to surgical axillary lymph node (LN) dissection and irritation, and is a chronic and lifelong condition affecting a high 21.4% of patients receiving common breast cancer therapies. Persons with secondary lymphedema following axillary lymph node removal also include undergoing treatment for other cancers, such as melanoma involving the upper body, necessitating the need for axially lymph node removal.
Improving lymphedema management represents a major clinical need, and emerging efforts focus on improving quality of life through optimizing post-surgical complex decongestive therapy (CDT), and exploring novel pharmacological and surgical procedures. Here, the investigators will perform a repeated-measures cross-over trial to test the hypothesis that mobilization of protein enriched hardened tissue using graded negative pressure therapy in conjunction with complete decongestive therapy (CDT) is more effective to standard CDT alone for secondary lymphedema management. Both of these conservative physical therapy treatments are commonly employed for treatment of secondary lymphedema.
- Conditions
- Secondary Lymphedema
- Being tested
- CDT with Negative Pressure, CDT alone
- Keywords
- lymphedema, therapy, swelling, graded negative pressure, complete decongestive therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphedema
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CDT with Negative PressureProcedure or surgery
Also called CDT with LymphaTouch
Complete decongestive therapy (physical therapy conservative intervention of compression, manual lymphatic drainage, skin care and exercises) in conjunction with manual intervention of graded negative pressure application for lymphatic stimulation/ tissue clearance
CDT aloneProcedure or surgery
Also called Complete decongestive therapy without negative pressure
Complete decongestive therapy (physical therapy conservative intervention of compression, manual lymphatic drainage, skin care and exercises) for lymphatic stimulation/ tissue clearance
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CDT Alone first, then CDT With Negative Pressure | Experimental | Participants randomized into a CDT alone without LymphaTouch for 6 weeks, total of 9 therapy visits (75minutes duration). This is followed by a 6 month washout period, then a second intervention consisting of CDT with LymphaTouch for 6 weeks, total of 9 therapy visits (75minutes duration) Receives: Procedure: CDT with Negative Pressure; Procedure: CDT alone |
| CDT With Negative Pressure first, then CDT Alone | Active comparator | Participants randomized into a CDT with LymphaTouch Negative Pressure for 6 weeks, total of 9 therapy visits (75minutes duration). This is followed by a 6 month washout period, then a second intervention consisting of CDT alone without Negative Pressure for 6 weeks, total of 9 therapy visits (75minutes duration) Receives: Procedure: CDT with Negative Pressure; Procedure: CDT alone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessing a Change in Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (BIS)
BIS is a noninvasive technology measuring the resistance and reactance of tissue across multiple electrical frequencies using the Impedimed U400 device. By distinguishing ICF from ECF, BIS allows sensitive detection of ECF accumulation, a hallmark of lymphedema. Impedimed's proprietary calculations convert impedance ratios of limbs (involved vs unaffected) into a single output known as LDEX (lymphedema index) with an output normal range of -10 to +10. In situations of overt signs of lymphedema, the LDEX value could be up to 120. This single output value (LDEX) is used in lymphedema research and clinical care to monitor lymphedema progress and response to lymphedema therapy. The LDEX outcome in this study represents the change in LDEX value of the arms from study baseline and at 6-8 weeks following the completion of therapy where a negative value shows a positive response from the therapy intervention by indicating a reduction in the LDEX value.
Measured: At baseline and at 6-8 weeks following the completion of therapy
Secondary outcomes (2)
Assessing a Change in Quality of Life Via Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
The Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) was developed as a self-report outcome measure of function that could be used in participants with varying levels of independence. Each participant chose a set of three daily activities and rated the level of ease and comfort with which they could complete them pre and post each intervention.
Rating scale starts at 0 (unable to perform activity) and goes to goes up to 10 (able to perform activity at the same level as before injury or problem). The closer to 10, the more favorable the number is.
Measured: At baseline (pre-intervention) and at 6-8 weeks following the completion of each therapy (post-intervention)
Tissue Dielectric Constant (TDC) Measurement Difference Above the Elbow
TDC measures the skin-to-fat water content in tissues. The location was chosen given the propensity of swelling and discomfort in the area for participant population.
This measurement compares the TDC value in the affected limb versus the unaffected limb, therefore the closer the TDC measurement difference is to zero, the more favorable the value is.
Measured: At baseline (pre-intervention) and at 6-8 weeks following the completion of each therapy ([post intervention )
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Nov 2018
- Study start23 Jan 2019
- Primary completion15 Mar 2025
- Study completion15 Mar 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Secondary LymphedemaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Vanderbilt University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Manus Donahue, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Investigators
- Manus M Donahue, PhD, Principal investigator, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03760744
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 3760744
- Other IDs
- 1R01NR015079
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 28 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 16 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Donahue PM, Crescenzi R, Scott AO, Braxton V, Desai A, Smith SA, Jordi J, Meszoely IM, Grau AM, Kauffmann RM, Sweeting RS, Spotanski K, Ridner SH, Donahue MJ. Bilateral Changes in Deep Tissue Environment After Manual Lymphatic Drainage in Patients with Breast Cancer Treatment-Related Lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol. 2017 Mar;15(1):45-56. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2016.0020.
PubMed 28323572Crescenzi R, Donahue PMC, Hartley KG, Desai AA, Scott AO, Braxton V, Mahany H, Lants SK, Donahue MJ. Lymphedema evaluation using noninvasive 3T MR lymphangiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Nov;46(5):1349-1360. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25670. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
PubMed 28245075Donahue MJ, Donahue PMC, Jones RS, Garza M, Lee C, Patel NJ, Cooper A, De Vis JB, Meszoely I, Crescenzi R. In vivo lymph node CEST-Dixon MRI in breast cancer patients with metastatic lymph node involvement. Magn Reson Med. 2024 Feb;91(2):670-680. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29858. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
PubMed 37684712
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Imaging Biomarkers of Lymphatic Dysfunction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03760744
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 3760744
- Conditions
- Secondary Lymphedema
- Keywords
- lymphedema, therapy, swelling, graded negative pressure, complete decongestive therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
- Study start
- 23 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Mar 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 16 Oct 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Persons with secondary arm and/or upper quadrant lymphedema following cancer therapies commonly are prescribed complete decongestive therapy as a course of management of their lymphedema. The investigators will perform a repeated-measures cross-over trial to test the hypothesis that mobilization of protein enriched hardened tissue using graded negative pressure therapy in conjunction with complete decongestive therapy (CDT) is more effective to standard CDT alone for secondary lymphedema management.
Detailed description
The goal of this work is to apply novel, noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods for visualizing lymphatic circulation dysfunction to test a fundamental hypothesis about secondary lymphedema conservative decongestive therapy. Breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL) arises secondary to surgical axillary lymph node (LN) dissection and irritation, and is a chronic and lifelong condition affecting a high 21.4% of patients receiving common breast cancer therapies. Persons with secondary lymphedema following axillary lymph node removal also include undergoing treatment for other cancers, such as melanoma involving the upper body, necessitating the need for axially lymph node removal.
Improving lymphedema management represents a major clinical need, and emerging efforts focus on improving quality of life through optimizing post-surgical complex decongestive therapy (CDT), and exploring novel pharmacological and surgical procedures. Here, the investigators will perform a repeated-measures cross-over trial to test the hypothesis that mobilization of protein enriched hardened tissue using graded negative pressure therapy in conjunction with complete decongestive therapy (CDT) is more effective to standard CDT alone for secondary lymphedema management. Both of these conservative physical therapy treatments are commonly employed for treatment of secondary lymphedema.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CDT Alone first, then CDT With Negative Pressure | Experimental | Procedure: CDT with Negative Pressure, Procedure: CDT aloneParticipants randomized into a CDT alone without LymphaTouch for 6 weeks, total of 9 therapy visits (75minutes duration). This is followed by a 6 month washout period, then a second intervention consisting of CDT with LymphaTouch for 6 weeks, total of 9 therapy visits (75minutes duration) |
| CDT With Negative Pressure first, then CDT Alone | Active comparator | Procedure: CDT with Negative Pressure, Procedure: CDT aloneParticipants randomized into a CDT with LymphaTouch Negative Pressure for 6 weeks, total of 9 therapy visits (75minutes duration). This is followed by a 6 month washout period, then a second intervention consisting of CDT alone without Negative Pressure for 6 weeks, total of 9 therapy visits (75minutes duration) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 90 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Females with a diagnosis of secondary arm and/or upper quadrant lymphedema following cancer treatments
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subjects who have any type of non-MRI compatible bioimplant activated by mechanical, electronic, or magnetic means (e.g., cochlear implants, pacemakers, neurostimulators, biostimulators, electronic infusion pumps, etc.) or are not able to comfortably be able to tolerate the limited fit of the MRI
- Subjects who have any type of ferromagnetic bioimplant that could potentially be displaced.
- Subjects who may have shrapnel embedded in their bodies (such as from war wounds), metal workers and machinists (potential for metallic fragments in or near the eyes).
- Pregnant women will be excluded from the MRI portion of the study only
- Subjects who have open wounds on either ankle or top of foot because of contraindications with placement of electrodes to obtain the L-DEX U400 readings.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CDT with Negative PressureAlso: CDT with LymphaTouchComplete decongestive therapy (physical therapy conservative intervention of compression, manual lymphatic drainage, skin care and exercises) in conjunction with manual intervention of graded negative pressure application for lymphatic stimulation/ tissue clearance | Procedure or surgery | CDT Alone first, then CDT With Negative Pressure, CDT With Negative Pressure first, then CDT Alone |
| CDT aloneAlso: Complete decongestive therapy without negative pressureComplete decongestive therapy (physical therapy conservative intervention of compression, manual lymphatic drainage, skin care and exercises) for lymphatic stimulation/ tissue clearance | Procedure or surgery | CDT Alone first, then CDT With Negative Pressure, CDT With Negative Pressure first, then CDT Alone |
Primary outcome
Assessing a Change in Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (BIS)
Time frame: At baseline and at 6-8 weeks following the completion of therapy
BIS is a noninvasive technology measuring the resistance and reactance of tissue across multiple electrical frequencies using the Impedimed U400 device. By distinguishing ICF from ECF, BIS allows sensitive detection of ECF accumulation, a hallmark of lymphedema. Impedimed's proprietary calculations convert impedance ratios of limbs (involved vs unaffected) into a single output known as LDEX (lymphedema index) with an output normal range of -10 to +10. In situations of overt signs of lymphedema, the LDEX value could be up to 120. This single output value (LDEX) is used in lymphedema research and clinical care to monitor lymphedema progress and response to lymphedema therapy. The LDEX outcome in this study represents the change in LDEX value of the arms from study baseline and at 6-8 weeks following the completion of therapy where a negative value shows a positive response from the therapy intervention by indicating a reduction in the LDEX value.
2 secondary outcomes
Assessing a Change in Quality of Life Via Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
Time frame: At baseline (pre-intervention) and at 6-8 weeks following the completion of each therapy (post-intervention)
Tissue Dielectric Constant (TDC) Measurement Difference Above the Elbow
Time frame: At baseline (pre-intervention) and at 6-8 weeks following the completion of each therapy ([post intervention )
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Oct 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 28323572Donahue PM, Crescenzi R, Scott AO, Braxton V, Desai A, Smith SA, Jordi J, Meszoely IM, Grau AM, Kauffmann RM, Sweeting RS, Spotanski K, Ridner SH, Donahue MJ. Bilateral Changes in Deep Tissue Environment After Manual Lymphatic Drainage in Patients with Breast Cancer Treatment-Related Lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol. 2017 Mar;15(1):45-56. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2016.0020.
- Background: PubMed 28245075Crescenzi R, Donahue PMC, Hartley KG, Desai AA, Scott AO, Braxton V, Mahany H, Lants SK, Donahue MJ. Lymphedema evaluation using noninvasive 3T MR lymphangiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Nov;46(5):1349-1360. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25670. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37684712Donahue MJ, Donahue PMC, Jones RS, Garza M, Lee C, Patel NJ, Cooper A, De Vis JB, Meszoely I, Crescenzi R. In vivo lymph node CEST-Dixon MRI in breast cancer patients with metastatic lymph node involvement. Magn Reson Med. 2024 Feb;91(2):670-680. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29858. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Secondary Lymphedema
Recruiting
Lymphovenous Bypass Procedure for Secondary Prevention of Lymphedema in Breast Cancer
Lymphedema Arm
RecruitingObservational study
Use of Reconstructive Microsurgery for the Treatment of Lymphedema
Lymphedema
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
mRNA Therapy to Restore Lymphatic Flow in Secondary Lymphedema
Secondary Lymphedema
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Biological Profile of Primary and Secondary Lymphedema: Inflammatory, Endothelial, Metabolic, Lymphatic, and Fibrotic Markers
Primary Lymphedema, Secondary Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 2
IIT2023-09-Chung-UpfrontTAD: Upfront TAD/SNB in Patients With Breast Cancer With Nodal Metastases
Breast Cancer, Axillary Nodal Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Manus M Donahue, PhD principal investigator
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CDT with Negative Pressure and CDT alone in people with Secondary Lymphedema, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Oct 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessing a Change in Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (BIS) (time frame: At baseline and at 6-8 weeks following the completion of therapy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03760744, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2025.