ImmunotherapyPhase 2NCT03763630
MAPS & ITEC Cohorts: 6-8 Years Follow-up
A Phase 2 study testing House dust-mite SLIT and Normal saline in people with Immunotherapy and Allergy and Immunology, run by University of Southampton at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This study represents the follow-up, age 6-8 years, of children recruited at birth into two cohorts. The first cohort, the Mite Allergen Prevention Study (MAPS) was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of the use of house dust-mite immunotherapy in the primary prevention of atopy and asthma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 9 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Immunotherapy, Allergy and Immunology, Asthma
- What is being tested?
- House dust-mite SLIT and Normal saline
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 263 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 15 Sep 2017to 15 Jan 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 9 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- •Inclusion in original study cohorts at birth
- •≥2 first-degree relatives with allergic disease (food allergy, asthma, eczema, rhinoconjunctivitis)
Who cannot join
- Not included in the original study cohorts
- Skin-prick test positive to any allergen (HDM, cat, grass pollen, peanut, egg and milk) age 5 months
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites
David Hyde Asthma and Allergy Centre
Newport, Isle of White, PO30 5TG
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD
About this study
Official title: Primary Prevention of Atopy and Asthma With House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy: 6-8 Years Follow up
This study represents the follow-up, age 6-8 years, of children recruited at birth into two cohorts. The first cohort, the Mite Allergen Prevention Study (MAPS) was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of the use of house dust-mite immunotherapy in the primary prevention of atopy and asthma. The Immune Tolerance in Early Childhood (ITEC) cohort is a separate observational cohort following up infants at high risk of atopy and correlating atopic disease development with epigenetic markers.
Read the detailed description
There is an epidemic of allergic disease in childhood and current preventative strategies have failed to demonstrate effectiveness outside of isolated trials. In a previous study, the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with house dust mite in preventing the development of allergic sensitisation in infants was assessed. The long term objective was to assess the effect of the intervention on the subsequent development of asthma. The hypothesis is that high dose oral immunotherapy will induce immune tolerance and reduce development of allergic sensitisation and later clinical asthma and allergy. A total of 111 infants at high risk of allergy (with ≥2 first degree relatives affected by asthma or allergy) but with no evidence of allergic sensitisation at recruitment were recruited. These infants were randomised at 6 months of age to receive a year of active HDM (House dust-mite) allergen extract delivered as SLIT or placebo intervention. At 18 months of age, there was a significant reduction in cumulative allergic sensitisation in the SLIT intervention group and a trend for reduction in allergic symptoms. They have also been followed up at 3 years of age. The data currently being analysed.
Additionally, an observational cohort (Immune Tolerance in Early Childhood, ITEC) was recruited at birth with the same inclusion criteria as the interventional one and assessed in the same way up to 3 years. This cohort has provided additional control data and samples to utilise in the analyses.
This proposed study is the 6-8 year follow up of these interventional and observational cohorts. The aim of the 6-8 year assessment is to assess the efficacy of prophylactic oral immunotherapy with HDM allergen in preventing the later development of asthma. The hypothesis is that high dose oral immunotherapy will induce immune tolerance and reduce development of allergic sensitisation and later clinical asthma and allergy. Participants will be assessed 6-8 years after finishing the intervention. The assessment will include a questionnaire, skin prick testing to the common aeroallergens and food allergens and lung function. Families and study investigators will both be blinded to participants' original treatment allocations. An additional aim is to investigate the epigenetic and immune mechanisms involved in the development of asthma and allergy and how allergen immunotherapy influence this process.
- Conditions
- Immunotherapy, Allergy and Immunology, Asthma
- Being tested
- House dust-mite SLIT, Normal saline
- Keywords
- Atopy, Early childhood, House Dust-mite, Sublingual immunotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Hypersensitivity, Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
House dust-mite SLITDrug
Also called glycerinated HDM allergen extract (ALK-AbellÓ)
received 2000 standard treatment units of glycerinated HDM allergen extract (ALK-AbellÓ) per day. Normal saline was administered to the placebo group. 11 µg of HDM allergen (equal parts of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae) administered twice daily as oral drops.
Normal salineDrug
Also called Normal saline placebo control
Normal saline administered in same frequency and manner as intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Active comparator | House dust-mite SLIT Receives: Drug: House dust-mite SLIT |
| Control arm | Placebo comparator | Normal saline Receives: Drug: Normal saline |
| Observation cohort | No intervention | ITEC observational cohort, no intervention administered |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical Asthma - parental questionnaire
Comparison of clinical asthma, as assessed by parental questionnaire, at age 6 years between control and intervention groups. Clinical asthma will be defined as either doctor diagnosed asthma or presence of wheeze and asthma medication use within the past year.
Measured: Age 6 years
Clinical Asthma- spirometry with reversibility
Comparison of clinical asthma, as assessed by lung function testing, at age 6 years between control and intervention groups. Clinical asthma will be defined as in improvement in FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second) of 12% or more following administration of salbutamol inhaler (bronchodilator).
Measured: 6 years
Secondary outcomes (7)
Bronchial hyper-responsiveness
Comparison of bronchial hyperresponsiveness, as determined by methacholine bronchial allergen challenge, at age 6 years.
Measured: Age 6 years
Asthma comparison
Comparison of asthma, as defined by wheeze plus bronchial hyperreactivity
Measured: Age 6 years
Airway inflammation level- exhaled nitric oxide measurement
Comparison of airway inflammation level, as assessed by exhaled nitric oxide, between placebo and intervention group age 6 years
Measured: Age 6 years
Cumulative sensitization
Comparison of cumulative sensitization to one or more of 6 common allergens, as assessed by skin prick test, up to 6-8 years of age between control and interventions groups.
Measured: Age 6 years
Cumulative aeroallergen sensitization
Comparison of cumulative sensitization to one or more of 6 common aeroallergens, as assessed by skin prick test, up to 6-8 years of age between control and interventions groups.
Measured: Age 6 years
House dust-mite sensitization
Comparison of sensitization to house dust mite, as assessed by skin prick test, at 18 months, 3 years and 6-8 years of age between control and intervention groups.
Measured: Age 6 years
Clinical atopic disease- parental questionnaire
Comparison of clinical allergic diseases/symptoms (atopic eczema, wheeze, allergic rhinitis, food allergy) at 18 months, 3 years and 6 years of age between control and intervention groups. Presence of clinical disease evaluated through parental questionnaires
Measured: Age 6 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Dec 2018
- Study start15 Sep 2017
- Primary completion5 Dec 2018
- Study completion15 Jan 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ImmunotherapyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 263 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southampton
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Isle of Wight NHS Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Graham Roberts, Prof, Principal investigator, University of Southampton
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03763630
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Southampton CHI0808
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 22 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 4 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Zolkipli Z, Roberts G, Cornelius V, Clayton B, Pearson S, Michaelis L, Djukanovic R, Kurukulaaratchy R, Arshad SH. Randomized controlled trial of primary prevention of atopy using house dust mite allergen oral immunotherapy in early childhood. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Dec;136(6):1541-1547.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.04.045. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
PubMed 26073754
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Primary Prevention of Atopy and Asthma With House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy: 6-8 Years Follow up
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03763630
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Southampton CHI0808
- Conditions
- Immunotherapy, Allergy and Immunology, Asthma
- Keywords
- Atopy, Early childhood, House Dust-mite, Sublingual immunotherapy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 263 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of SouthamptonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Isle of Wight NHS Trust
- Study start
- 15 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study represents the follow-up, age 6-8 years, of children recruited at birth into two cohorts. The first cohort, the Mite Allergen Prevention Study (MAPS) was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of the use of house dust-mite immunotherapy in the primary prevention of atopy and asthma. The Immune Tolerance in Early Childhood (ITEC) cohort is a separate observational cohort following up infants at high risk of atopy and correlating atopic disease development with epigenetic markers.
Detailed description
There is an epidemic of allergic disease in childhood and current preventative strategies have failed to demonstrate effectiveness outside of isolated trials. In a previous study, the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with house dust mite in preventing the development of allergic sensitisation in infants was assessed. The long term objective was to assess the effect of the intervention on the subsequent development of asthma. The hypothesis is that high dose oral immunotherapy will induce immune tolerance and reduce development of allergic sensitisation and later clinical asthma and allergy. A total of 111 infants at high risk of allergy (with ≥2 first degree relatives affected by asthma or allergy) but with no evidence of allergic sensitisation at recruitment were recruited. These infants were randomised at 6 months of age to receive a year of active HDM (House dust-mite) allergen extract delivered as SLIT or placebo intervention. At 18 months of age, there was a significant reduction in cumulative allergic sensitisation in the SLIT intervention group and a trend for reduction in allergic symptoms. They have also been followed up at 3 years of age. The data currently being analysed.
Additionally, an observational cohort (Immune Tolerance in Early Childhood, ITEC) was recruited at birth with the same inclusion criteria as the interventional one and assessed in the same way up to 3 years. This cohort has provided additional control data and samples to utilise in the analyses.
This proposed study is the 6-8 year follow up of these interventional and observational cohorts. The aim of the 6-8 year assessment is to assess the efficacy of prophylactic oral immunotherapy with HDM allergen in preventing the later development of asthma. The hypothesis is that high dose oral immunotherapy will induce immune tolerance and reduce development of allergic sensitisation and later clinical asthma and allergy. Participants will be assessed 6-8 years after finishing the intervention. The assessment will include a questionnaire, skin prick testing to the common aeroallergens and food allergens and lung function. Families and study investigators will both be blinded to participants' original treatment allocations. An additional aim is to investigate the epigenetic and immune mechanisms involved in the development of asthma and allergy and how allergen immunotherapy influence this process.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Active comparator | Drug: House dust-mite SLITHouse dust-mite SLIT |
| Control arm | Placebo comparator | Drug: Normal salineNormal saline |
| Observation cohort | No intervention | –ITEC observational cohort, no intervention administered |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 9 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- •Inclusion in original study cohorts at birth
- •≥2 first-degree relatives with allergic disease (food allergy, asthma, eczema, rhinoconjunctivitis)
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Not included in the original study cohorts
- Skin-prick test positive to any allergen (HDM, cat, grass pollen, peanut, egg and milk) age 5 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| House dust-mite SLITAlso: glycerinated HDM allergen extract (ALK-AbellÓ)received 2000 standard treatment units of glycerinated HDM allergen extract (ALK-AbellÓ) per day. Normal saline was administered to the placebo group. 11 µg of HDM allergen (equal parts of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae) administered twice daily as oral drops. | Drug | Intervention arm |
| Normal salineAlso: Normal saline placebo controlNormal saline administered in same frequency and manner as intervention | Drug | Control arm |
Primary outcome
Clinical Asthma - parental questionnaire
Time frame: Age 6 years
Comparison of clinical asthma, as assessed by parental questionnaire, at age 6 years between control and intervention groups. Clinical asthma will be defined as either doctor diagnosed asthma or presence of wheeze and asthma medication use within the past year.
Clinical Asthma- spirometry with reversibility
Time frame: 6 years
Comparison of clinical asthma, as assessed by lung function testing, at age 6 years between control and intervention groups. Clinical asthma will be defined as in improvement in FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second) of 12% or more following administration of salbutamol inhaler (bronchodilator).
7 secondary outcomes
Bronchial hyper-responsiveness
Time frame: Age 6 years
Asthma comparison
Time frame: Age 6 years
Airway inflammation level- exhaled nitric oxide measurement
Time frame: Age 6 years
Cumulative sensitization
Time frame: Age 6 years
Cumulative aeroallergen sensitization
Time frame: Age 6 years
House dust-mite sensitization
Time frame: Age 6 years
Clinical atopic disease- parental questionnaire
Time frame: Age 6 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Oct 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 26073754Zolkipli Z, Roberts G, Cornelius V, Clayton B, Pearson S, Michaelis L, Djukanovic R, Kurukulaaratchy R, Arshad SH. Randomized controlled trial of primary prevention of atopy using house dust mite allergen oral immunotherapy in early childhood. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Dec;136(6):1541-1547.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.04.045. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Immunotherapy
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
SBRT With Immunotherapy and Atezo-Bev in HCC With Major Portal Vein Thrombosis
HCC
RecruitingPhase 3
Measuring if Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy is Better Than Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Aggressive Poorly Differentiated Sarcomas
Metastatic Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma, Metastatic Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Graham Roberts, Prof principal investigator
University of Southampton
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing House dust-mite SLIT and Normal saline in people with Immunotherapy and Allergy and Immunology, run by University of Southampton at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical Asthma - parental questionnaire (time frame: Age 6 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03763630, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2021.