Pain MeasurementNCT03764046
Development and Validation of New "SNU Illustrated Pain Rating Scale" as a Tool for Postoperative Pain Assessment
An observational study of Pain Measurement and Acute Pain, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The numeric rating scale (NRS), one of the most widely used pain scales in clinical practice, although convenient, is often subject to bias because it requires abstract thinking from both the patient and the evaluator. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 79 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain Measurement, Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2019to 31 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 79 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 100 adult patients undergoing postoperative pain control after a gynecological or orthopedic surgery at Seoul National University Hospital
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients undergoing a gynecological or orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia
- Administered with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain control
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I-III patients
Who cannot join
- Contraindicated against fentanyl
- Unable to communicate
- Aged less than 18, or more than 79
- Weighs less than 40kg or more than 89kg
- Has severe heart disease(s)
- Pregnant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Development and Validation of New "SNU Illustrated Pain Rating Scale" for Effective Assessment of Acute Postoperative Pain: a Comparative Study With Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale (NRS), one of the most widely used pain scales in clinical practice, although convenient, is often subject to bias because it requires abstract thinking from both the patient and the evaluator. Compared to numbers, traumatic pain, when visualized appropriately, has potential advantage as a means to indicate and communicate the severity of pain. Given that they are standardized in terms of body parts, wound size, and bleeding volume, illustrations of traumatic pain along with external somatic stimuli that caused it can be used to serve as effective visual anchors to supplement a pain scale by giving more concrete information to the patient. The purpose of this study is to develop Seoul National University Illustrated Pain Scale(SNUIPS) using pictures of traumatic pain, and verify the validity and effectiveness of this scale in comparison with those of NRS.
- Conditions
- Pain Measurement, Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Anesthesia, Surgery
- Keywords
- Pain Measurement, Acute Postoperative Pain
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Pain, Pain, Postoperative
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative Pain Scores (NRS)
Self-reported pain intensity based on numeric rating scale evaluated after 24 hours after surgery. Each item is scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst imaginable pain). Retrospective assessment of peak postoperative pain intensity will be included in addition to evaluation of current pain intensity.
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Postoperative Pain Scores (NRS)
Self-reported pain intensity based on numeric rating scale evaluated after 24.5 hours after surgery for validation in terms of test-retest reliability of the scale. Each item is scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst imaginable pain). Retrospective assessment of peak postoperative pain intensity will be included in addition to evaluation of current pain intensity.
Measured: 24.5 hours after surgery
Postoperative Pain Scores (NRS)
Self-reported pain intensity based on numeric rating scale evaluated after 48 hours after surgery for assessment of sensitivity to change. Each item is scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst imaginable pain).
Measured: 48 hours after surgery
Postoperative Pain Scores (SNUIPS)
Self-reported pain intensity based on Seoul National University Illustrated Pain Scale evaluated after 24 hours after surgery. Each item is scored using illustrations that corresponds to 0-10 levels of traumatic pain, beginning from 'no injury and/or pain' to 'causalgia'. Retrospective assessment of peak postoperative pain intensity will be included in addition to evaluation of current pain intensity.
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Postoperative Pain Scores (SNUIPS)
Self-reported pain intensity based on Seoul National University Illustrated Pain Scale evaluated after 24.5 hours after surgery. Each item is scored using illustrations that corresponds to 0-10 levels of traumatic pain, beginning from 'no injury and/or pain' to 'causalgia'. Retrospective assessment of peak postoperative pain intensity will be included in addition to evaluation of current pain intensity.
Measured: 24.5 hours after surgery
Postoperative Pain Scores (SNUIPS)
Self-reported pain intensity based on Seoul National University Illustrated Pain Scale evaluated after 48 hours after surgery. Each item is scored using illustrations that corresponds to 0-10 levels of traumatic pain, beginning from 'no injury and/or pain' to 'causalgia'.
Measured: 48 hours after surgery
Postoperative Consumption of Patient-Controlled and/or Rescue Analgesics
Amount of analgesics consumed through intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and/or administration of rescue analgesics
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Postoperative Consumption of Patient-Controlled and/or Rescue Analgesics
Amount of analgesics consumed through intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and/or administration of rescue analgesics
Measured: 24.5 hours after surgery
Postoperative Consumption of Patient-Controlled and/or Rescue Analgesics
Amount of analgesics consumed through intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and/or administration of rescue analgesics
Measured: 48 hours after surgery
Understandability of Pain Scales
Survey among patients on understandability pain scales
Measured: 48 hours after surgery
Convenience of Pain Scales
Survey among patients on convenience of pain scales
Measured: 48 hours after surgery
Patient Satisfaction of Postoperative Pain Management
Survey among patients on their level of overall satisfaction on postoperative pain management
Measured: 48 hours after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Dec 2018
- Study start1 Jan 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Oct 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pain MeasurementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Seoul National University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jin-Tae Kim, Seoul National University Hospital
- Investigators
- Jin-Tae Kim, Principal investigator, Seoul National University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03764046
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SNUMR2-2
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 30 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 4 Dec 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986 Oct;27(1):117-126. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9.
PubMed 3785962Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen103. Epub 2008 May 16.
PubMed 18487245Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use? Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):707-714. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
PubMed 29321111Pathak A, Sharma S, Jensen MP. The utility and validity of pain intensity rating scales for use in developing countries. Pain Rep. 2018 Aug 6;3(5):e672. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000672. eCollection 2018 Sep-Oct.
PubMed 30534623Eriksson K, Wikstrom L, Arestedt K, Fridlund B, Brostrom A. Numeric rating scale: patients' perceptions of its use in postoperative pain assessments. Appl Nurs Res. 2014 Feb;27(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
PubMed 24332467Noble B, Clark D, Meldrum M, ten Have H, Seymour J, Winslow M, Paz S. The measurement of pain, 1945-2000. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Jan;29(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.08.007.
PubMed 15652435Bond MR, Pilowsky I. Subjective assessment of pain and its relationship to the administration of analgesics in patients with advanced cancer. J Psychosom Res. 1966 Sep;10(2):203-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(66)90064-x. No abstract available.
PubMed 4165548Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90884-8. No abstract available.
PubMed 4139420Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y. The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001 Dec;95(6):1356-61. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00013.
PubMed 11748392Katz J, Melzack R. Measurement of pain. Surg Clin North Am. 1999 Apr;79(2):231-52. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70381-9.
PubMed 10352653Singer T, Seymour B, O'Doherty J, Kaube H, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science. 2004 Feb 20;303(5661):1157-62. doi: 10.1126/science.1093535.
PubMed 14976305
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Dec 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development and Validation of New "SNU Illustrated Pain Rating Scale" for Effective Assessment of Acute Postoperative Pain: a Comparative Study With Numeric Rating Scale
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03764046
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SNUMR2-2
- Conditions
- Pain Measurement, Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Anesthesia, Surgery
- Keywords
- Pain Measurement, Acute Postoperative Pain
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The numeric rating scale (NRS), one of the most widely used pain scales in clinical practice, although convenient, is often subject to bias because it requires abstract thinking from both the patient and the evaluator. Compared to numbers, traumatic pain, when visualized appropriately, has potential advantage as a means to indicate and communicate the severity of pain. Given that they are standardized in terms of body parts, wound size, and bleeding volume, illustrations of traumatic pain along with external somatic stimuli that caused it can be used to serve as effective visual anchors to supplement a pain scale by giving more concrete information to the patient. The purpose of this study is to develop Seoul National University Illustrated Pain Scale(SNUIPS) using pictures of traumatic pain, and verify the validity and effectiveness of this scale in comparison with those of NRS.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 79 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 100 adult patients undergoing postoperative pain control after a gynecological or orthopedic surgery at Seoul National University Hospital
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult patients undergoing a gynecological or orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia
- Administered with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain control
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I-III patients
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Contraindicated against fentanyl
- Unable to communicate
- Aged less than 18, or more than 79
- Weighs less than 40kg or more than 89kg
- Has severe heart disease(s)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Postoperative Pain Scores (NRS)
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Self-reported pain intensity based on numeric rating scale evaluated after 24 hours after surgery. Each item is scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst imaginable pain). Retrospective assessment of peak postoperative pain intensity will be included in addition to evaluation of current pain intensity.
Postoperative Pain Scores (NRS)
Time frame: 24.5 hours after surgery
Self-reported pain intensity based on numeric rating scale evaluated after 24.5 hours after surgery for validation in terms of test-retest reliability of the scale. Each item is scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst imaginable pain). Retrospective assessment of peak postoperative pain intensity will be included in addition to evaluation of current pain intensity.
Postoperative Pain Scores (NRS)
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
Self-reported pain intensity based on numeric rating scale evaluated after 48 hours after surgery for assessment of sensitivity to change. Each item is scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst imaginable pain).
Postoperative Pain Scores (SNUIPS)
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Self-reported pain intensity based on Seoul National University Illustrated Pain Scale evaluated after 24 hours after surgery. Each item is scored using illustrations that corresponds to 0-10 levels of traumatic pain, beginning from 'no injury and/or pain' to 'causalgia'. Retrospective assessment of peak postoperative pain intensity will be included in addition to evaluation of current pain intensity.
Postoperative Pain Scores (SNUIPS)
Time frame: 24.5 hours after surgery
Self-reported pain intensity based on Seoul National University Illustrated Pain Scale evaluated after 24.5 hours after surgery. Each item is scored using illustrations that corresponds to 0-10 levels of traumatic pain, beginning from 'no injury and/or pain' to 'causalgia'. Retrospective assessment of peak postoperative pain intensity will be included in addition to evaluation of current pain intensity.
Postoperative Pain Scores (SNUIPS)
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
Self-reported pain intensity based on Seoul National University Illustrated Pain Scale evaluated after 48 hours after surgery. Each item is scored using illustrations that corresponds to 0-10 levels of traumatic pain, beginning from 'no injury and/or pain' to 'causalgia'.
Postoperative Consumption of Patient-Controlled and/or Rescue Analgesics
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Amount of analgesics consumed through intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and/or administration of rescue analgesics
Postoperative Consumption of Patient-Controlled and/or Rescue Analgesics
Time frame: 24.5 hours after surgery
Amount of analgesics consumed through intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and/or administration of rescue analgesics
Postoperative Consumption of Patient-Controlled and/or Rescue Analgesics
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
Amount of analgesics consumed through intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and/or administration of rescue analgesics
Understandability of Pain Scales
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
Survey among patients on understandability pain scales
Convenience of Pain Scales
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
Survey among patients on convenience of pain scales
Patient Satisfaction of Postoperative Pain Management
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
Survey among patients on their level of overall satisfaction on postoperative pain management
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Dec 2018.
- Background: PubMed 3785962Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986 Oct;27(1):117-126. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9.
- Background: PubMed 18487245Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen103. Epub 2008 May 16.
- Background: PubMed 29321111Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use? Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):707-714. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
- Background: PubMed 30534623Pathak A, Sharma S, Jensen MP. The utility and validity of pain intensity rating scales for use in developing countries. Pain Rep. 2018 Aug 6;3(5):e672. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000672. eCollection 2018 Sep-Oct.
- Background: PubMed 24332467Eriksson K, Wikstrom L, Arestedt K, Fridlund B, Brostrom A. Numeric rating scale: patients' perceptions of its use in postoperative pain assessments. Appl Nurs Res. 2014 Feb;27(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
- Background: PubMed 15652435Noble B, Clark D, Meldrum M, ten Have H, Seymour J, Winslow M, Paz S. The measurement of pain, 1945-2000. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Jan;29(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.08.007.
- Background: PubMed 4165548Bond MR, Pilowsky I. Subjective assessment of pain and its relationship to the administration of analgesics in patients with advanced cancer. J Psychosom Res. 1966 Sep;10(2):203-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(66)90064-x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 4139420Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90884-8. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11748392Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y. The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001 Dec;95(6):1356-61. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00013.
- Background: PubMed 10352653Katz J, Melzack R. Measurement of pain. Surg Clin North Am. 1999 Apr;79(2):231-52. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70381-9.
- Background: PubMed 14976305Singer T, Seymour B, O'Doherty J, Kaube H, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science. 2004 Feb 20;303(5661):1157-62. doi: 10.1126/science.1093535.
Related trials for Pain Measurement
Active, not recruiting
Objective Measurement of Pain Regulation in Individuals Who Have Received Internet-delivered Exposure-based Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Fibromyalgia
Recruiting
Perfusion Index for Postoperative Pain Assessment in Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy
Postoperative Pain, Adenotonsillectomy
Enrolling by invitation
The Influence of Hydration on the Viscoelastic Properties of Soft Tissues, Pain and Mobility of Patients
Low Back Pain (LBP), Fascial Manipulation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Prediction Via Machine Learning: Electrical Thresholds and Interoception
University Students
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Pain During Heat Treatment for Lower Extremity Varicose Veins: Radiofrequency vs. Microwave
Lower Extremity Varicose Veins, Radiofrequency Ablation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jin-Tae Kim principal investigator
Seoul National University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pain Measurement and Acute Pain, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jin-Tae Kim, MD, PhD (+82-2-2072-3664, jintae73@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative Pain Scores (NRS) (time frame: 24 hours after surgery). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03764046, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2018.