InfertilityPRECiSENCT03764865
PooR Embryo Yield Cleavage Stage Versus blaStocyst Embryo Transfer (PILOT STUDY)
A study testing day 3 uterine transfer and day 5 uterine transfer in people with Infertility, run by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this small-scale pilot study (10 patients) is to test the study protocol for an RCT comparing IVF outcomes between day 3 and day 5 embryo transfer in patients with five or fewer embryos in a fresh embryo transfer in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 44 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Infertility
- What is being tested?
- day 3 uterine transfer and day 5 uterine transfer
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2021to 28 Feb 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 44 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- First autologous IVF cycle
- Written, informed consent
Who cannot join
- Planned gestational carrier
- Planned donor egg
- Morbid obesity: BMI >40
- History of recurrent pregnancy loss (≥2 spontaneous abortions)
- Presence of uterine factor infertility
- Treatment plan includes embryos cultured 'out of protocol'
- Planned preimplantation genetic testing
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Day 3 vs Day 5 Embryo Transfer for Patients With Low Embryo Numbers Going Through in Vitro Fertilization (PILOT STUDY)
The purpose of this small-scale pilot study (10 patients) is to test the study protocol for an RCT comparing IVF outcomes between day 3 and day 5 embryo transfer in patients with five or fewer embryos in a fresh embryo transfer in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. Information derived from this RCT would allow us to maximize the chances of success for these patients undergoing IVF.
Read the detailed description
Embryos created with assisted reproductive technology (ART, e.g. in vitro fertilization (IVF)) are commonly transferred into a woman's uterus at either the cleavage stage (day 3 after egg retrieval) or blastocyst stage (day 5 after egg retrieval). Until recently, most IVF cycles transferred embryos at the cleavage stage. However, with improvements in in vitro culture technique there has been a steady shift in practice to transfer embryos at the blastocyst stage (day 5 after egg retrieval) as this timing is about the same as when embryos reach the endometrial cavity in natural conception.
There now is a general consensus that, for good prognosis patients, those with a high embryo from the IVF cycle, it is beneficial to transfer the embryo on day 5 rather than day 3. The rationale for this is to allow for self-selection of embryos, meaning those that develop to blastocyst in vitro are more likely to be viable in vivo and result in a viable pregnancy. In addition, transferring an embryo on day 5 improves uterine/embryonic synchronicity and thereby improves outcomes. This allows the transfer of fewer embryos and decreases the likelihood of multiples (twins, triplets, etc.).
As a result, day 5 transfer has become standard of care for good prognosis patients in the United States. The American Society of Reproductive Medicine1 issued a committee opinion in 2013 to this effect stating that in "good prognosis" patients, blastocyst transfer results in a significant increase in live birth rates compared to transfer of an equal number of cleavage stage embryos (50.5% vs. 30.1%, P< .01)2-5. In addition, for unselected and poor prognosis patients, no high-quality studies have evaluated whether blastocyst transfer increases live birth rates when compared to cleavage stage transfer.
It is possible that the attrition of day 3 embryos in vivo is lower than the attrition in vitro and that day 5 transfer leads to loss of embryos that may have survived in vivo. In addition, women undergoing blastocyst culture are expected to have a higher incidence of cycle cancellation due to failure of the embryo to develop to a blastocyst6 and of having fewer embryos cryopreserved (frozen)7. Because of this, in Europe and Asia, day 3 transfer is the most common practice.
On the other hand, transferring embryos on day 3 decreases our ability to select the best embryo, increases laboratory costs and may increase multiple pregnancy rates as, typically, more embryos are transferred at this time. In addition, in vivo, day 3 embryos are in transit through the fallopian tube during natural conception and are exposed to a different developmental and nutritional environment than day 3 IVF embryos transferred into the uterine cavity. Thus, it is possible that exposing day 3 embryos to the physiologically premature uterine environment (particularly one that has been subjected to superovulation and thus high levels of estrogen) increases embryo attrition compared to day 5 transfer, particularly in poor prognosis patients.
Therefore, a clinical dilemma exists for poor prognosis patients (those with ≤5 embryos available on day 1 after egg retrieval). Currently, many practices in the United States transfer embryos from these patients on day 3 due to the risk of not having embryos available to transfer on day 5. Any remaining embryos are then frozen if they meet criteria on day 5/6.
Retrospective data from Boston IVF, BIDMC's affiliated infertility treatment center, demonstrates that the live birth rate per transfer among poor prognosis patients is 18% among those who have a cleavage stage transfer and 38% among those who have a blastocyst transfer.
At Boston IVF, about 35% of patients have a day 3 embryo transfer, which is consistent with national trends. For a patient undergoing an IVF cycle at Boston IVF, a physician may choose to transfer an embryo on day 3 or day 5 or allow the laboratory to make that decision, based on the number of embryos the patient has on day 1 after egg retrieval and the patient's age. This decision typically is made prior to the IVF cycle. As demonstrated above, pregnancy rates are far lower in the cleavage stage transfer group and there is the possibility that, within a select cohort of these patients, we are unrealistically raising patient's expectations of a live birth.
The purpose of this study is to compare IVF outcomes among poor prognosis patients (≤5 embryos with two pronuclei) who have a day 3 transfer to those who have a day 5 transfer.
- Conditions
- Infertility
- Being tested
- day 3 uterine transfer, day 5 uterine transfer
- Keywords
- cleavage embryo, blastocyst, embryo transfer, in vitro fertilization
- Medical subject headings
- Infertility
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
day 3 uterine transferProcedure or surgery
uterine transfer of embryo on day 3 after fertilization (cleavage stage)
day 5 uterine transferProcedure or surgery
uterine transfer of embryo on day 5 after fertilization (blastocyst stage)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| day 3 embryo transfer | Experimental | embryo transfer 3 days after fertilization Receives: Procedure: day 3 uterine transfer |
| day 5 embryo transfer | Experimental | embryo transfer 5 days after fertilization Receives: Procedure: day 5 uterine transfer |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
live birth
defined as delivery of a live born infant ≥22 weeks of gestation
Measured: 9 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Clinical pregnancy
defined by confirmation of a gestational sac on ultrasound
Measured: 14 days
Ongoing pregnancy
defined by ultrasound confirmation of a gestational sac with at least one fetal pole with a fetal heartbeat
Measured: 9 months
Multiple pregnancy
defined as twins or higher-order gestations
Measured: 9 months
Time to pregnancy/live birth
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Dec 2018
- Study start1 Mar 2021
- Primary completion28 Feb 2022
- Study completion28 Feb 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InfertilityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- non-inferiority
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boston IVF
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Werner Neuhausser, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
- Investigators
- Werner Neuhausser, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03764865
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018P000530
- Acronym
- PRECiSE
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 4 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 8 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinical-assisted reproduction: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013 Mar 1;99(3):667-72. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.087.
PubMed 23714439Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998 Dec;13(12):3434-40. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434.
PubMed 9886530Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, Blake D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 30;(6):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5.
PubMed 27357126Papanikolaou EG, D'haeseleer E, Verheyen G, Van de Velde H, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P, Tournaye H. Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2005 Nov;20(11):3198-203. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei217. Epub 2005 Jul 29.
PubMed 16055454Papanikolaou EG, Camus M, Kolibianakis EM, Van Landuyt L, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos. N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 16;354(11):1139-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa053524.
PubMed 16540614Marek D, Langley M, Gardner DK, Confer N, Doody KM, Doody KJ. Introduction of blastocyst culture and transfer for all patients in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1999 Dec;72(6):1035-40. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00409-4.
PubMed 10593377Tsirigotis M. Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits. Too soon to abandon current practice? Hum Reprod. 1998 Dec;13(12):3285-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3285. No abstract available.
PubMed 9886498Neuhausser WM, Vaughan DA, Sakkas D, Hacker MR, Toth T, Penzias A. Non-inferiority of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in poor prognosis IVF patients (PRECiSE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Health. 2020 Jan 30;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-0870-y.
PubMed 32000803
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Day 3 vs Day 5 Embryo Transfer for Patients With Low Embryo Numbers Going Through in Vitro Fertilization (PILOT STUDY)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03764865
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRECiSE / 2018P000530
- Conditions
- Infertility
- Keywords
- cleavage embryo, blastocyst, embryo transfer, in vitro fertilization
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boston IVF
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this small-scale pilot study (10 patients) is to test the study protocol for an RCT comparing IVF outcomes between day 3 and day 5 embryo transfer in patients with five or fewer embryos in a fresh embryo transfer in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. Information derived from this RCT would allow us to maximize the chances of success for these patients undergoing IVF.
Detailed description
Embryos created with assisted reproductive technology (ART, e.g. in vitro fertilization (IVF)) are commonly transferred into a woman's uterus at either the cleavage stage (day 3 after egg retrieval) or blastocyst stage (day 5 after egg retrieval). Until recently, most IVF cycles transferred embryos at the cleavage stage. However, with improvements in in vitro culture technique there has been a steady shift in practice to transfer embryos at the blastocyst stage (day 5 after egg retrieval) as this timing is about the same as when embryos reach the endometrial cavity in natural conception.
There now is a general consensus that, for good prognosis patients, those with a high embryo from the IVF cycle, it is beneficial to transfer the embryo on day 5 rather than day 3. The rationale for this is to allow for self-selection of embryos, meaning those that develop to blastocyst in vitro are more likely to be viable in vivo and result in a viable pregnancy. In addition, transferring an embryo on day 5 improves uterine/embryonic synchronicity and thereby improves outcomes. This allows the transfer of fewer embryos and decreases the likelihood of multiples (twins, triplets, etc.).
As a result, day 5 transfer has become standard of care for good prognosis patients in the United States. The American Society of Reproductive Medicine1 issued a committee opinion in 2013 to this effect stating that in "good prognosis" patients, blastocyst transfer results in a significant increase in live birth rates compared to transfer of an equal number of cleavage stage embryos (50.5% vs. 30.1%, P< .01)2-5. In addition, for unselected and poor prognosis patients, no high-quality studies have evaluated whether blastocyst transfer increases live birth rates when compared to cleavage stage transfer.
It is possible that the attrition of day 3 embryos in vivo is lower than the attrition in vitro and that day 5 transfer leads to loss of embryos that may have survived in vivo. In addition, women undergoing blastocyst culture are expected to have a higher incidence of cycle cancellation due to failure of the embryo to develop to a blastocyst6 and of having fewer embryos cryopreserved (frozen)7. Because of this, in Europe and Asia, day 3 transfer is the most common practice.
On the other hand, transferring embryos on day 3 decreases our ability to select the best embryo, increases laboratory costs and may increase multiple pregnancy rates as, typically, more embryos are transferred at this time. In addition, in vivo, day 3 embryos are in transit through the fallopian tube during natural conception and are exposed to a different developmental and nutritional environment than day 3 IVF embryos transferred into the uterine cavity. Thus, it is possible that exposing day 3 embryos to the physiologically premature uterine environment (particularly one that has been subjected to superovulation and thus high levels of estrogen) increases embryo attrition compared to day 5 transfer, particularly in poor prognosis patients.
Therefore, a clinical dilemma exists for poor prognosis patients (those with ≤5 embryos available on day 1 after egg retrieval). Currently, many practices in the United States transfer embryos from these patients on day 3 due to the risk of not having embryos available to transfer on day 5. Any remaining embryos are then frozen if they meet criteria on day 5/6.
Retrospective data from Boston IVF, BIDMC's affiliated infertility treatment center, demonstrates that the live birth rate per transfer among poor prognosis patients is 18% among those who have a cleavage stage transfer and 38% among those who have a blastocyst transfer.
At Boston IVF, about 35% of patients have a day 3 embryo transfer, which is consistent with national trends. For a patient undergoing an IVF cycle at Boston IVF, a physician may choose to transfer an embryo on day 3 or day 5 or allow the laboratory to make that decision, based on the number of embryos the patient has on day 1 after egg retrieval and the patient's age. This decision typically is made prior to the IVF cycle. As demonstrated above, pregnancy rates are far lower in the cleavage stage transfer group and there is the possibility that, within a select cohort of these patients, we are unrealistically raising patient's expectations of a live birth.
The purpose of this study is to compare IVF outcomes among poor prognosis patients (≤5 embryos with two pronuclei) who have a day 3 transfer to those who have a day 5 transfer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- non-inferiority
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| day 3 embryo transfer | Experimental | Procedure: day 3 uterine transferembryo transfer 3 days after fertilization |
| day 5 embryo transfer | Experimental | Procedure: day 5 uterine transferembryo transfer 5 days after fertilization |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 44 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- First autologous IVF cycle
- Written, informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Planned gestational carrier
- Planned donor egg
- Morbid obesity: BMI >40
- History of recurrent pregnancy loss (≥2 spontaneous abortions)
- Presence of uterine factor infertility
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| day 3 uterine transferuterine transfer of embryo on day 3 after fertilization (cleavage stage) | Procedure or surgery | day 3 embryo transfer |
| day 5 uterine transferuterine transfer of embryo on day 5 after fertilization (blastocyst stage) | Procedure or surgery | day 5 embryo transfer |
Primary outcome
live birth
Time frame: 9 months
defined as delivery of a live born infant ≥22 weeks of gestation
4 secondary outcomes
Clinical pregnancy
Time frame: 14 days
Ongoing pregnancy
Time frame: 9 months
Multiple pregnancy
Time frame: 9 months
Time to pregnancy/live birth
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Nov 2023.
- Background: PubMed 23714439Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinical-assisted reproduction: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013 Mar 1;99(3):667-72. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.087.
- Background: PubMed 9886530Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998 Dec;13(12):3434-40. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434.
- Background: PubMed 27357126Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, Blake D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 30;(6):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5.
- Background: PubMed 16055454Papanikolaou EG, D'haeseleer E, Verheyen G, Van de Velde H, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P, Tournaye H. Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2005 Nov;20(11):3198-203. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei217. Epub 2005 Jul 29.
- Background: PubMed 16540614Papanikolaou EG, Camus M, Kolibianakis EM, Van Landuyt L, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos. N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 16;354(11):1139-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa053524.
- Background: PubMed 10593377Marek D, Langley M, Gardner DK, Confer N, Doody KM, Doody KJ. Introduction of blastocyst culture and transfer for all patients in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1999 Dec;72(6):1035-40. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00409-4.
- Background: PubMed 9886498Tsirigotis M. Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits. Too soon to abandon current practice? Hum Reprod. 1998 Dec;13(12):3285-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3285. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32000803Neuhausser WM, Vaughan DA, Sakkas D, Hacker MR, Toth T, Penzias A. Non-inferiority of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in poor prognosis IVF patients (PRECiSE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Health. 2020 Jan 30;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-0870-y.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Infertility
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Follitropin Alfa/Lutropin Alfa Versus hMG in Japanese Participants With LH and FSH Deficiency Undergoing ART (HINATA)
Infertility
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Fresh Versus Vitrified-Warmed Donor Oocytes: Embryological and Clinical Outcomes
Infertility, Donor Oocyte Assisted Reproduction
RecruitingObservational study
Safety and Efficacy of Corifollitropin Alfa N02 Injection in Elderly Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)
Infertility
Active, not recruiting
Automation of the In Vitro Fertilization Laboratory
Infertility, ART
Not yet recruiting
Implementing IVM for Fertility Treatment in Clinical Practice
Infertility
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Werner Neuhausser, MD PhD principal investigator
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing day 3 uterine transfer and day 5 uterine transfer in people with Infertility, run by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
live birth (time frame: 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03764865, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2023.