AzTrials
AzTrials

Muscle WeaknessNCT03770442

Muscle Wasting in the Critically Ill

A study testing Cycling with FES and Routine physiotherapy in people with Muscle Weakness, run by University of Liverpool at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Muscle wasting is a common consequence of critical illness, and has a profound impact upon the rehabilitation of those who survive admission to critical to care. The investigators intend to assess if the application of 10 sessions over two weeks of passive cycling with electrical stimulation to the lower limbs and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Muscle Weakness
What is being tested?
Cycling with FES and Routine physiotherapy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
32 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
14 Jan 2019to 1 Nov 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients will be recruited in the Intensive Care Unit of the Royal Liverpool University Hospital. All patients will be over 18, and have a critical illness that requires mechanical ventilation with an initial period of sedation. This study will focus on patients with a definite or suspected case of sepsis from any source.
  • Sepsis has been recently redefined as: "Life threatening organ-dysfunction caused by dysregulated host response to infection" whilst septic shock has become a subset of sepsis, defined as: "circulatory and cellular/metabolic dysfunction associated with a higher risk of mortality(44).
  • For the purposes of this study, a patient will be regarded as septic if they have evidence of infection-related organ failure (e.g. sepsis-associated coagulopathy, altered mental state, cardiovascular dysfunction, acute kidney injury, and altered liver function) and require invasive mechanical ventilation with either definite or suspected evidence of infection. This is to allow prompt treatment with FES rather than waiting for a positive microbiological result to be obtained.
  • Within the definition of sepsis "from any source" a list of following is illustrative but not exhaustive:
  • Urogenital sepsis (including urosepsis, pyelonephritis, endometritis and chorioamnionitis)
  • Pneumonia (including community acquired, hospital acquired, and aspiration pneumonia. Ventilator associated pneumonia would be excluded.)
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Neurological infections such as encephalitis and meningitis.
  • Cellulitis, osteomyelitis and infections of soft tissue NOT affecting the lower limb.
  • Surgical infections, including post-operative laparotomy with evidence of peritoneal soiling, and evidence of infection prior to the operation, in patients who require 2 or more organ system support after the operation.
  • Intra-abdominal sepsis, including biliary sepsis, hepatitis, and acute pancreatitis. In the case of acute pancreatitis, evidence of infection is required to fulfil the criteria. Acute pancreatitis with sterile tissue/fluid samples would not be suitable.

Who cannot join

  • Patients under 18
  • Patients who decline consent
  • Pregnancy
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Rhabdomyolysis
  • Lower limb trauma
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Patients unlikely to survive to 96 hours post admission
  • Consent unobtainable within 48 hours of admission
  • Morbid obesity (BMI>40).
  • Presence of a pacemaker or Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD).
  • Unlikely to be mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hours.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Intensive Care Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital

    Liverpool, L7 8XP

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Effect of Early Rehabilitation Using an Active/Passive Cycling Device on Muscle Wasting in the Critically Ill: A Randomised Controlled Study

Muscle wasting is a common consequence of critical illness, and has a profound impact upon the rehabilitation of those who survive admission to critical to care. The investigators intend to assess if the application of 10 sessions over two weeks of passive cycling with electrical stimulation to the lower limbs and abdomen can prevent muscle loss, or at least cause less muscle loss, compared to patients who receive standard daily sessions of physiotherapy. This will be done by comparing the changes in muscle size on ultrasound between the two groups, comparing functional measures at a 3 month follow up, and by performing translational research using tissue samples taken during the study.

Read the detailed description

Patients are mechanically ventilated and sedated with a diagnosis of sepsis (from any source) will be eligible for this study. Provided they meet the inclusion criteria, they will be randomised within 48 hours of admission, to either ten 30 minute sessions of passive cycling with functional electrical stimulation (FES) to the thighs, hamstrings, calves and abdomen over a 14 day period, or to a control group of routine physiotherapy. The trial group will also receive this physiotherapy.

On admission to the study, all patients will receive on day 1:

Ultrasound measurements of:

Rectus femoris cross-sectional area Thickness of rectus femoris and vastus intermedius Thickness, pennation angle and derived fascicle length of vastus lateralis and medial head of gastrocnemius Thickness of rectus abdominis. Thickness of diaphragm

A blood sample taken from an arterial line A urine sample taken from a urinary catheter A muscle biopsy taken from the right vastus lateralis

They will then receive ten 30 minute sessions of passive cycling with functional electrical stimulation over 14 days, or a control group will receive routine physiotherapy during this period.

Repeat ultrasounds will be taken at days 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14. Repeat blood and urine sampling at days 5, 10 and 14. Repeat muscle biopsy at day 14.

All cycling, ultrasounds and tissue sampling will end on day 14 regardless of the ventilator status of the patient.

In patients who survive to be discharged from critical care, they will be followed up at 3 months for:

Repeat ultrasound scan of all muscles listed Six minute walk test Hand grip and lower limb dynamometry, Balance testing (by standing upright on a pressure plate for 20 seconds) Psychological assessment using the 36 item Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire

Tissue sampling will be stored in the University of Liverpool for analysis of biomarkers of muscle damage and loss between the two groups.

Conditions
Muscle Weakness
Being tested
Cycling with FES, Routine physiotherapy
Keywords
ICU acquired weakness (ICU-AW), FES, Functional Electrical Stimulation, Rehabilitation
Medical subject headings
Muscle Weakness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cycling with FESDevice

    Also called RT-300 Supine, Restorative Therapies

    As described already

  • Routine physiotherapyOther

    As described already

Study groups in NCT03770442
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cycling with FESExperimentalTen sessions of 14 days in patients consented within 48 hours of arriving in critical care who are sedated and mechanically ventilated with a diagnosis of sepsis from any source. Sessions last a maximum of 30 minutes (with an ideal minimum of 20 minutes), using the Restorative Therapies (RT) 300 Supine with the Sage 12-channel stimulator. Stimulation will provided to the quadriceps, hamstrings, calves and abdomen. Both legs and both sides of the abdomen will be stimulated. Stimulation current settings are individualised for each patient and each muscle group. These patients will also receive their routine physiotherapy that they would have received if they were in the control group (or not in the trial at all).
Receives: Device: Cycling with FES
Control - routine physiotherapyActive comparatorUsual daily physiotherapy, consisting of limb care and mobilisation, and respiratory care and exercises as appropriate.
Receives: Other: Routine physiotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ultrasound assessment of rectus femoris - Change in cross sectional area (cm2)

    Measurement of cross-sectional area of rectus femoris (cm2)

    Measured: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.

  2. Ultrasound assessment of rectus femoris - Change in muscle layer thickness (cm)

    Measurement on muscle layer thickness of rectus femoris (cm)

    Measured: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.

  3. Ultrasound assessment of anterior thigh musculature - Change in muscle layer thickness (cm)

    Measurement of combined muscle layer thickness of rectus femoris and vastus intermedius (cm)

    Measured: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.

  4. Ultrasound assessment of vastus lateralis - change in muscle layer thickness (cm)

    Measurement of the thickness of the vastus lateralis between the superficial and deep aponeuroses (cm)

    Measured: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.

  5. Ultrasound assessment of vastus lateralis - change in fascicle pennation angle (degrees)

    Measurement of the pennation angle of the muscle fascicles as they insert into the deep aponeuroses of the vastus lateralis muscle (degrees)

    Measured: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.

  6. Ultrasound assessment of vastus lateralis - change in fascicle length (cm)

    This is a single measure, derived by trigonometry (the Sine of the pennation angle multiplied by the muscle thickness).

    Measured: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.

  7. Ultrasound assessment of the medial head of gastrocnemius - change in muscle thickness (cm)

    Measurement of the thickness of the medial head of the gastrocnemius between the superficial and deep aponeuroses (cm)

    Measured: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.

  8. Ultrasound assessment of the medial head of gastrocnemius - change in fascicle pennation angle (degrees)

    Measurement of the pennation angle of the muscle fascicles as they insert into the deep aponeuroses of the medial head of gastrocnemius (angles)

    Measured: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.

  9. Ultrasound assessment of the medial head of gastrocnemius - change in fascicle length (cm)

    This is single measure which is mathematically derived by trigonometry using the known pennation angle (degrees) and thickness (cm): the Sine of the pennation angle multiplied by the muscle thickness.

    Measured: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.

  10. Ultrasound assessment of the rectus abdominis muscle - change in muscle layer thickness (cm)

    Measurement of rectus abdominis muscle layer thickness - (cm)

    Measured: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.

  11. Diaphragm thickness assessment by ultrasound - change in end expiratory thickness (mm)

    Assessment of thickness at end expiration (mm)

    Measured: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.

  12. Diaphragm thickness assessment by ultrasound - change in end inspiratory thickness (mm)

    Assessment of thickness at end inspiration (mm)

    Measured: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.

  13. Diaphragm thickness assessment by ultrasound - change in thickening fraction (%)

    Assessment of thickening fraction, derived mathematically from thicknesses at inspiration and expiration (%)

    Measured: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.

  14. Ultrasound assessment of change in diaphragmatic excursion (cm)

    Assessment of maximal excursion of diaphragm, measured with M-mode ultrasonography (mm)

    Measured: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Measurement of change in blood biomarkers (microRNA analysis for markers of muscle loss, expressed as a percentage fold increase/decrease compared to baseline).

    Blood samples taken during the study period and analysed for markers of muscle loss/degradation

    Measured: Samples taken on days 1, 5, 10 and 14

  2. Measurement of change in urinary biomarkers (microRNA analysis for markers of muscle loss, expressed as a percentage-fold increase/decrease compared to baseline).

    Blood and urine samples taken during the study period and analysed for markers of muscle loss/degradation

    Measured: Samples taken on days 1, 5, 10 and 14

  3. Measurement of the number of biomarkers expressed from muscle biopsies (microRNA analysis for markers of muscle loss, expressed as the number and type of micro-RNAs expressed within the samples).

    Muscle biopsy samples taken during the study period and analysed for markers of muscle loss/degradation. Number and type of micro-RNAs to be noted).

    Measured: Samples taken on day 1 and 14

  4. Measurement of muscle fibre cross sectional area from muscle biopsies (mm2)

    Histological staining and analysis of muscle fibre composition, expressed in square millimetres and as a percentage-fold increase/decrease compared to baseline).

    Measured: Samples taken on day 1 and 14

  5. Follow up testing - Distance achieved in a 6 minute walk test, metres)

    Distance achieved during a 6 minute shuttle walk of 20 metres length

    Measured: At 3 month follow up

  6. Follow up testing - Hand grip dynamometry (hand grip strength, Newtons)

    Strength of hand grip in both hands

    Measured: At 3 month follow up

  7. Follow up - Lower limb strength assessment - Force generated at maximal contraction for knee extension (Newtons)

    Strength of extension at the knee in both legs using a hand held dynamometry device (microFET 2 wireless device). Measured in Newtons.

    Measured: At 3 month follow up

  8. Follow up testing - Balance assessment - Comparison of changes in center of pressure on a pressure plate.

    Comparison of changes in centre of pressure on a pressure plate. The centre of pressure is measured over 20 seconds with the participant standing still. Maximal variation in lateral and anterior-posterior sway is recorded by the pressure plate.

    Measured: At 3 month follow up

  9. Follow up testing - Psychological assessment - Comparison of total scores obtained from the SF-36 questionnaire (maximum score 100, minimum score zero).

    Comparison of scores obtained from the SF-36 questionnaire between the two groups. A lower score indicates greater disability.

    Measured: At 3 month follow up

  10. Follow Up - Maximal Inspiratory Pressure monitoring in kilopascals (kPa)

    Using the Power Breathe K2 device

    Measured: At 3 month follow up

  11. Incidence of delirium during the trial period - using the CAM-ICU tool.

    Assessed by twice daily Cambridge Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) assessments

    Measured: Days 1-14

  12. Incidence of renal replacement therapy during the trial period

    Daily monitoring to see if patient has required renal replacement therapy (defined as either haemofiltration or haemodialysis).

    Measured: Days 1-14

  13. Total dose of noradrenaline given per day

    Daily monitoring of doses of inotropic and vasopressor drugs

    Measured: Day 1-14

  14. Overall fluid balance (in mls) at the end of each study day

    Daily noting of 24 hour fluid balance

    Measured: Day 1-14

  15. Total Insulin doses (in international units) required per day

    Daily monitoring of exogenous insulin requirements

    Measured: Day 1-14

  16. Blood glucose concentration (mmol/L)

    Daily monitoring of glucose levels

    Measured: Day 1-14

  17. Heart rate variability

    Measured via a wireless skin patch

    Measured: Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions)

  18. Safety - number of times an endotracheal/tracheostomy tube is dislodged during the cycling sessions

    Expressed as a simple count of how many times an airway device dislodges

    Measured: Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions)

  19. Safety - number of times an nasogastric tube is dislodged during the cycling sessions

    Expressed as a simple count of how many times a nasogastric feed tube dislodges.

    Measured: Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions).

  20. Safety - number of times an a central or arterial line device is dislodged during the cycling sessions

    Expressed as a simple count of how many times a central or arterial line dislodges.

    Measured: Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Dec 2018
  2. Study start14 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
32 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03770442
Sponsor's protocol ID
UoL001367
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
15 Oct 2018
Last updated
4 Nov 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: Translational research will take place in the Institute of Aging and Chronic Disease. Only the participant number of the sample will be shared with any staff working with tissue samples.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cycling with FES and Routine physiotherapy in people with Muscle Weakness, run by University of Liverpool at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ultrasound assessment of rectus femoris - Change in cross sectional area (cm2) (time frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.). The study lists 14 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in