Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationQRCPNCT03771911
Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Guided by AED vs Telephone-assistance
A study testing AED and Telephone in people with Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, run by Bionorte at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The aim of this research is to evaluate and to compare the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) among untrained laypeople under two different scenarios: automated external defibrillator (AED) guided CPR or dispatcher-assisted CPR. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- What is being tested?
- AED and Telephone
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 14 Dec 2018to 27 May 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- untrained laypeople
- Volunteers
Who cannot join
- Pregnants, leg/arm injuried people, chronic back pain.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The aim of this research is to evaluate and to compare the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) among untrained laypeople under two different scenarios: automated external defibrillator (AED) guided CPR or dispatcher-assisted CPR. Secondarily, to evaluate the quality of the dispatcher-assisted instructions provided from the emergency call center.
Read the detailed description
A simulation study will beperformed. 42 volunteers selected by non-probabilistic sampling will be randomized in two scenarios of cardiac arrest on mannequin: (A) AED-guided CPR and (T) dispatcher-assisted CPR. Simulations last 9 minutes. The quality of CPR will be evaluated by metric monitoring of the chest compressions and timing of actions. A peer's content analysis of the telephone instructions will be performed using a checklist.
- Conditions
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Being tested
- AED, Telephone
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AEDDevice
Instructions provided by an AED
TelephoneDevice
Instructions provided by emergency Call Center (telephonically) with the help of an AED.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AED guided | Other | Laypeople will be guided by an Automatic External Defibrillator's (AED) voice instructions during the cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
No other help is available. Receives: Device: AED |
| Telephone guided | Other | Laypeople will be guided by telephone assistance (from an Emergency Call Center) during the cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
AED voice instructions are also available. Receives: Device: AED; Device: Telephone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitations strated
nº of CPR strated by bystander
Measured: 9 minutes
Secondary outcomes (4)
Chest compressions rate
Chest compression/minute
Measured: 9 minutes
Chest compressions depth/recoil
% os chest compressions with correct depth/recoil
Measured: 9 minutes
Time under CPR
% of time applying chest compressions
Measured: 8 minutes
Hands on chest
% of chest compressions with a correct position of hands
Measured: 9 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2018
- Study start14 Dec 2018
- Primary completion19 Apr 2019
- Study completion27 May 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bionorte
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Osakidetza
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Irrintzi Fernández-Aedo, PhD, Study chair, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)Gorka Vallejo-De la Hoz, PhD, Study chair, OsakidetzaAlejandro Etayo-Sancho, RN, Study chair, AmbuibericaAsier Alonso-Pinillos, RN, Study chair, OsakidetzaSendoa Ballesteros-Peña, PhD, Study director, Osakidetza
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03771911
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- QRCP
- Acronym
- QRCP
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 2 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Guided by AED vs Telephone-assistance
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03771911
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- QRCP / QRCP
- Conditions
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BionorteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Osakidetza
- Study start
- 14 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this research is to evaluate and to compare the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) among untrained laypeople under two different scenarios: automated external defibrillator (AED) guided CPR or dispatcher-assisted CPR. Secondarily, to evaluate the quality of the dispatcher-assisted instructions provided from the emergency call center.
Detailed description
A simulation study will beperformed. 42 volunteers selected by non-probabilistic sampling will be randomized in two scenarios of cardiac arrest on mannequin: (A) AED-guided CPR and (T) dispatcher-assisted CPR. Simulations last 9 minutes. The quality of CPR will be evaluated by metric monitoring of the chest compressions and timing of actions. A peer's content analysis of the telephone instructions will be performed using a checklist.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AED guided | Other | Device: AEDLaypeople will be guided by an Automatic External Defibrillator's (AED) voice instructions during the cardiopulmonary resuscitation. No other help is available. |
| Telephone guided | Other | Device: AED, Device: TelephoneLaypeople will be guided by telephone assistance (from an Emergency Call Center) during the cardiopulmonary resuscitation. AED voice instructions are also available. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- untrained laypeople
- Volunteers
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pregnants, leg/arm injuried people, chronic back pain.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AEDInstructions provided by an AED | Device | AED guided, Telephone guided |
| TelephoneInstructions provided by emergency Call Center (telephonically) with the help of an AED. | Device | Telephone guided |
Primary outcome
Cardiopulmonary resuscitations strated
Time frame: 9 minutes
nº of CPR strated by bystander
4 secondary outcomes
Chest compressions rate
Time frame: 9 minutes
Chest compressions depth/recoil
Time frame: 9 minutes
Time under CPR
Time frame: 8 minutes
Hands on chest
Time frame: 9 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Not yet recruiting
Compression-Only Versus Standard Basic Life Support Training in Nursing Students
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruiting
Execution of Prehospital Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Patients With Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA)
Active, not recruiting
The REVIVE-PEEP Trial: Positive End-expiratory Pressure Versus Sham Valve/Zero End-expiratory Pressure in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Manual Ventilation to Improve Neurological Outcomes at Discharge in Adult Patients Suffering an Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Cardiac Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital
Active, not recruiting
RACE-CARS - RAndomized Cluster Evaluation of Cardiac ARrest Systems
Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiac Arrest - Ultrasound Detection of Occult Perfusion
Cardiac Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital, Hypotension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Irrintzi Fernández-Aedo, PhD study chair
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
Gorka Vallejo-De la Hoz, PhD study chair
Osakidetza
Alejandro Etayo-Sancho, RN study chair
Ambuiberica
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing AED and Telephone in people with Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, run by Bionorte at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cardiopulmonary resuscitations strated (time frame: 9 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2019.