Type 1 Diabetes MellitusALERTT1NCT03772600
Comparing Continuous With Flash Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
A study testing Dexcom G6 CGM in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 6 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
The present study wants to compare the Dexcom G6® continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system (experimental group) with the FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system (control group). The ALERTT1 trial will have three phases: a baseline, study, and extension phase. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Dexcom G6 CGM
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 269 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- 29 Jan 2019to 30 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- signed ICF
- diagnosis of type 1 diabetes ≥6 months
- using FreeStyle Libre FGM system ≥6 months
- intensified insulin therapy/insulin pump therapy
- HbA1c ≤10%
- willing to wear the glucose monitoring device >80% of the time
- willing to download glucose monitoring data at regular intervals
Who cannot join
- non-type 1 diabetes participants or diagnosis <6 months
- participant with T1D not on insulin, or on non-intensified insulin therapy
- pregnancy or planning pregnancy within next 6 months
- severe cognitive dysfunction or other disease which makes sensor use difficult
- current treatment with drugs known to have significant interference with glucose metabolism, such as systemic corticosteroids, as judged by the investigator
- abnormal skin at the anticipated glucose sensor insertion sites (excessive hair, burn, inflammation, infection, rash, and/or tattoo)
- presence of concomitant pathology that might cause edema at the insertion sites (such as heart failure, liver failure, kidney failure defined as eGFR <30 mL/min [stage ≥4])
- beta-cell transplantation and c-peptide positive and/or under immunosuppressive therapy
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
Belgium6 sites
Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis Aalst
Aalst, 9300
Imeldaziekenhuis Bonheiden
Bonheiden, 2820
University Hospital Brussels
Jette, 1090
AZ Groeninge Kortrijk
Kortrijk, 8500
University Hospital Leuven
Leuven, 3000
University Hospital Antwerp
Wilrijk, 2650
About this study
The present study wants to compare the Dexcom G6® continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system (experimental group) with the FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system (control group).
The ALERTT1 trial will have three phases: a baseline, study, and extension phase.
Read more
During the baseline phase, eligible patients will be screened for in- and exclusion criteria, wear a blinded Dexcom G6® for 28 days, together with their FreeStyle Libre FGM system, and receive a uniform education moment.
In the study phase, patients will be randomized into two groups (1:1): the experimental group will use an unblinded Dexcom G6® CGM for 6 months, the control group will keep using the FreeStyle Libre FGM system for 6 months. Before the 6 month time point is reached, patients in the control group will wear a blinded Dexcom G6® CGM for 28 days, together with their FreeStyle Libre FGM.
In the extension phase, patients in the initial control group will start using unblinded Dexcom G6® for 30 months. The initial experimental group will keep using the unblinded Dexcom G6® for the next 30 months.
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Dexcom G6 CGM
- Keywords
- Dexcom G6, FreeStyle Libre, time in range, continuous glucose monitoring, flash glucose monitoring
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dexcom G6 CGMDevice
Use of Dexcom G6
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dexcom G6 | Experimental | Use a Dexcom G6 CGM for 36 months Receives: Device: Dexcom G6 CGM |
| FreeStyle Libre | No intervention | Keep using their FreeStyle Libre for 6 months. Before the 6 month time point is reached, patients will wear a blinded Dexcom G6 for 28 days, together with their FreeStyle Libre. Cross-over to Dexcom G6 for 30 months. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in time in range (70-180 mg/dL) between the control and experimental group
measured by Dexcom G6
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (19)
Between group difference in time in clinically important hypoglycemia (<54mg/dL)
measured by Dexcom G6
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference of HbA1c
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in fear of hypoglycemia measured by the hypoglycemia fear survey
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in time in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL)
measured by Dexcom G6
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in time in target (70-140 mg/dL)
measured by Dexcom G6
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in time in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL)
measured by Dexcom G6
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in time in clinically important hyperglycemia (>250 mg/dL)
measured by Dexcom G6
Measured: 6 months
Composite endpoint: between group difference in number of patients with HbA1c <7% without episodes of severe hypoglycemia
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in glycemic variability as measured by coefficient of variation [CV]
measured by Dexcom G6
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in glycemic variability as measured by standard deviation [SD]
measured by Dexcom G6
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in glycemic variability as measured by mean amplitude of glycemic excursions [MAGE]
measured by Dexcom G6
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in mean glucose concentration
measured by Dexcom G6
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in number of low glucose events (LGE)
LGE, measured by Dexcom G6, is defined as sensor glucose values ≤54 mg/dL for at least 15 minutes, preceded by at least 30 minutes with sensor glucose values >54 mg/dL
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in number of severe hypoglycemic episodes
reported by the participant
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in emotional distress due to diabetes measured by the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) questionnaire
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in hypoglycemia awareness measured by the Clarke hypoglycemia awareness survey
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in treatment satisfaction measured by the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ)
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in general quality of life measured by the SF-36 questionnaire
Measured: 6 months
Between group difference in number of patients having allergic reactions to the sensors
confirmed by a dermatologist
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2018
- Study start29 Jan 2019
- Primary completion1 Oct 2020
- Study completion30 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 1 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- multicenter, randomized, double arm, open label, partial cross-over, parallel group clinical trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 269 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- DexCom, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, prof dr Pieter Gillard, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03772600
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- S61830
- Acronym
- ALERTT1
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 5 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 21 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Anonymous data can be shared with participating centers, based on research questions mentioned in this protocol or based on a new study protocol approved by the relevant ethical committees.
Publications
Aernouts C, Belde SPW, Lambrechts J, Mertens J, Ledeganck KJ, Francque SM, De Block CEM. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease is associated with worse time in ranges in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Sep;26(9):3781-3790. doi: 10.1111/dom.15723. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
PubMed 38924290Visser MM, Van Muylder A, Charleer S, Isitt JJ, Roze S, De Block C, Maes T, Vanhaverbeke G, Nobels F, Keymeulen B, Mathieu C, Luyten J, Gillard P, Verhaeghe N. Cost-utility analysis of Dexcom G6 real-time continuous glucose monitoring versus FreeStyle Libre 1 intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes in Belgium. Diabetologia. 2024 Apr;67(4):650-662. doi: 10.1007/s00125-023-06084-2. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
PubMed 38236409Visser MM, Charleer S, Fieuws S, De Block C, Hilbrands R, Van Huffel L, Maes T, Vanhaverbeke G, Dirinck E, Myngheer N, Vercammen C, Nobels F, Keymeulen B, Mathieu C, Gillard P. Effect of switching from intermittently scanned to real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes: 24-month results from the randomised ALERTT1 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023 Feb;11(2):96-108. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00352-7.
PubMed 36702566Visser MM, Charleer S, Fieuws S, De Block C, Hilbrands R, Van Huffel L, Maes T, Vanhaverbeke G, Dirinck E, Myngheer N, Vercammen C, Nobels F, Keymeulen B, Mathieu C, Gillard P. Comparing real-time and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes (ALERTT1): a 6-month, prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 Jun 12;397(10291):2275-2283. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00789-3. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
PubMed 34089660
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparing Continuous With Flash Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03772600
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ALERTT1 / S61830
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Dexcom G6, FreeStyle Libre, time in range, continuous glucose monitoring, flash glucose monitoring
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 269 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- DexCom, Inc.
- Study start
- 29 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The present study wants to compare the Dexcom G6® continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system (experimental group) with the FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system (control group).
The ALERTT1 trial will have three phases: a baseline, study, and extension phase.
During the baseline phase, eligible patients will be screened for in- and exclusion criteria, wear a blinded Dexcom G6® for 28 days, together with their FreeStyle Libre FGM system, and receive a uniform education moment.
In the study phase, patients will be randomized into two groups (1:1): the experimental group will use an unblinded Dexcom G6® CGM for 6 months, the control group will keep using the FreeStyle Libre FGM system for 6 months. Before the 6 month time point is reached, patients in the control group will wear a blinded Dexcom G6® CGM for 28 days, together with their FreeStyle Libre FGM.
In the extension phase, patients in the initial control group will start using unblinded Dexcom G6® for 30 months. The initial experimental group will keep using the unblinded Dexcom G6® for the next 30 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- multicenter, randomized, double arm, open label, partial cross-over, parallel group clinical trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dexcom G6 | Experimental | Device: Dexcom G6 CGMUse a Dexcom G6 CGM for 36 months |
| FreeStyle Libre | No intervention | –Keep using their FreeStyle Libre for 6 months. Before the 6 month time point is reached, patients will wear a blinded Dexcom G6 for 28 days, together with their FreeStyle Libre. Cross-over to Dexcom G6 for 30 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- signed ICF
- diagnosis of type 1 diabetes ≥6 months
- using FreeStyle Libre FGM system ≥6 months
- intensified insulin therapy/insulin pump therapy
- HbA1c ≤10%
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- non-type 1 diabetes participants or diagnosis <6 months
- participant with T1D not on insulin, or on non-intensified insulin therapy
- pregnancy or planning pregnancy within next 6 months
- severe cognitive dysfunction or other disease which makes sensor use difficult
- current treatment with drugs known to have significant interference with glucose metabolism, such as systemic corticosteroids, as judged by the investigator
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dexcom G6 CGMUse of Dexcom G6 | Device | Dexcom G6 |
Primary outcome
Difference in time in range (70-180 mg/dL) between the control and experimental group
Time frame: 6 months
measured by Dexcom G6
19 secondary outcomes
Between group difference in time in clinically important hypoglycemia (<54mg/dL)
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference of HbA1c
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in fear of hypoglycemia measured by the hypoglycemia fear survey
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in time in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL)
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in time in target (70-140 mg/dL)
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in time in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL)
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in time in clinically important hyperglycemia (>250 mg/dL)
Time frame: 6 months
Composite endpoint: between group difference in number of patients with HbA1c <7% without episodes of severe hypoglycemia
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in glycemic variability as measured by coefficient of variation [CV]
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in glycemic variability as measured by standard deviation [SD]
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in glycemic variability as measured by mean amplitude of glycemic excursions [MAGE]
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in mean glucose concentration
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in number of low glucose events (LGE)
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in number of severe hypoglycemic episodes
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in emotional distress due to diabetes measured by the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) questionnaire
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in hypoglycemia awareness measured by the Clarke hypoglycemia awareness survey
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in treatment satisfaction measured by the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ)
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in general quality of life measured by the SF-36 questionnaire
Time frame: 6 months
Between group difference in number of patients having allergic reactions to the sensors
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Dec 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38924290Aernouts C, Belde SPW, Lambrechts J, Mertens J, Ledeganck KJ, Francque SM, De Block CEM. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease is associated with worse time in ranges in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Sep;26(9):3781-3790. doi: 10.1111/dom.15723. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38236409Visser MM, Van Muylder A, Charleer S, Isitt JJ, Roze S, De Block C, Maes T, Vanhaverbeke G, Nobels F, Keymeulen B, Mathieu C, Luyten J, Gillard P, Verhaeghe N. Cost-utility analysis of Dexcom G6 real-time continuous glucose monitoring versus FreeStyle Libre 1 intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes in Belgium. Diabetologia. 2024 Apr;67(4):650-662. doi: 10.1007/s00125-023-06084-2. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36702566Visser MM, Charleer S, Fieuws S, De Block C, Hilbrands R, Van Huffel L, Maes T, Vanhaverbeke G, Dirinck E, Myngheer N, Vercammen C, Nobels F, Keymeulen B, Mathieu C, Gillard P. Effect of switching from intermittently scanned to real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes: 24-month results from the randomised ALERTT1 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023 Feb;11(2):96-108. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00352-7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34089660Visser MM, Charleer S, Fieuws S, De Block C, Hilbrands R, Van Huffel L, Maes T, Vanhaverbeke G, Dirinck E, Myngheer N, Vercammen C, Nobels F, Keymeulen B, Mathieu C, Gillard P. Comparing real-time and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes (ALERTT1): a 6-month, prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 Jun 12;397(10291):2275-2283. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00789-3. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Anonymous data can be shared with participating centers, based on research questions mentioned in this protocol or based on a new study protocol approved by the relevant ethical committees.
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
RecruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Comparison of Bmab1700 and Opdivo® as Adjuvant Monotherapy in Participants With Melanoma
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Botensilimab and Balstilimab for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Inter-Arm Differences in Continuous Glucose Monitor Readings in Adults With Diabetes
Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dexcom G6 CGM in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 6 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in time in range (70-180 mg/dL) between the control and experimental group (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03772600, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Dec 2022.