AzTrials
AzTrials

Somatic Symptom DisordersNCT03773354

Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders: A Treatment Group and Mixed-Methods Investigation

A study testing Cognitive-behavioural therapy group for individuals with somatic symptom disorders in people with Somatic Symptom Disorders, run by St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) group for individuals with a somatic symptom disorder (i.e., Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders from the DSM-5). Patients with somatic symptom and related disorders are underserved by the medical system. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Somatic Symptom Disorders
What is being tested?
Cognitive-behavioural therapy group for individuals with somatic symptom disorders
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 May 2019to 3 Feb 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years or older,
  • formally diagnosed with a somatic symptom or related disorder,
  • registered patients of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, and
  • subjective psychological complaints and somatic complaints causing distress and/or functional impairment.

Who cannot join

  • acute and severe depression/suicidal ideation,
  • severe PTSD symptoms,
  • current psychosis,
  • current substance use disorder, or
  • severe cognitive impairment will be excluded from the study and referred to a more appropriate intervention.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Katherine Jongsma, MA contact

905-522-1155 ext. 39365

kjongsma@stjoes.ca

Emily MacKillop, PhD C.Psych contact

905-522-1155 ext. 35592

emackill@stjosham.on.ca

About this study

Official title: Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders: A Pilot Treatment Group and Mixed-Methods Investigation

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) group for individuals with a somatic symptom disorder (i.e., Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders from the DSM-5). Patients with somatic symptom and related disorders are underserved by the medical system. Further, there is currently a paucity of research aimed at evaluating treatments for patients with somatic symptom disorders. The limited existing research literature supports CBT as an efficacious treatment in this population, but a standardized means of modifying CBT for somatic symptom disorders has not been developed, and it is unclear if group CBT is effective. In this study, the investigators will evaluate the effectives of a new six session CBT group designed specifically to address commonly-reported difficulties among individuals with somatic symptom disorders, such as somatic symptoms, psychological distress, and related cognitive interference. This study will allow us to validate a new intervention for somatic symptom disorders, and will help to fill the current void of evidence-supported evaluation and treatment protocols to better serve patients with somatic symptom disorders.

Being tested
Cognitive-behavioural therapy group for individuals with somatic symptom disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cognitive-behavioural therapy group for individuals with somatic symptom disordersBehavioural

    The intervention is a cognitive-behavioural therapy group for designed for individuals with a formal diagnosis of a somatic symptom disorder (i.e., Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders from the DSM-5) who are interested in learning self-management skills to cope with somatic symptoms and reduce emotional dysregulation, increasing their understanding of factors that contribute to somatic symptoms, and learning relaxation skills to help reduce stress.

Study groups in NCT03773354
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalThere is no control group for this study, and all participants receive the intervention. Although a few participants will be asked to give additional information during the intake and after the study concludes for quality improvement purposes. Effects of these additional interview questions will be considered during analysis
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive-behavioural therapy group for individuals with somatic symptom disorders

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline self-reported distress related to somatic symptoms at 6 weeks

    Will be measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire 15-Item (PHQ-15) Somatic Symptom Severity. Scores are added to form a total score ranging from 0-30 with higher values indicating more severe distress related to somatic symptoms.

    Measured: Week 1 (prior to intervention), week 6 (post-intervention)

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Baseline estimated level of intellectual ability

    Will be measured with the Advanced Clinical Solutions - Test of Premorbid Functioning (copyrighted), which results in a total raw score ranging from 0-70, and is normatively scored based on respondents' age resulting in standard scores (mean = 100). Higher values indicate a higher premorbid level of intellect.

    Measured: Week 1 (prior to intervention)

  2. Change from baseline intellectual functioning at 6 weeks

    Will be measured with the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence - 2nd Edition (copyrighted), which results in a total raw score (full scale intellectual quotient) ranging from 0-205, and is normatively scored based on respondents' age resulting in standard scores (mean = 100). Higher values indicate a higher level of intellect.

    Measured: Week 1 (prior to intervention), week 6 (post-intervention)

  3. Baseline performance validity

    Measured with the Victoria Symptom Validity Test (copyrighted), which has two subtests of Easy Items (raw scores ranging from 0-24) and Hard Items (raw scores ranging from 0-24), which higher scores indicating better performance.

    Measured: Week 1 (prior to intervention)

  4. Performance validity at 6 weeks

    Measured with the Victoria Symptom Validity Test (copyrighted), which has two subtests of Easy Items (raw scores ranging from 0-24) and Hard Items (raw scores ranging from 0-24), which higher scores indicating better performance.

    Measured: Week 6 (post-intervention)

  5. Change from baseline auditory working memory at 6 weeks

    Measured with the Digit Span subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - 4th Edition (copyrighted), which results in three subtests (Digit Span Forward, Digit Span Backward, and Digit Span Sequencing), each ranging from a raw score of 0-16 and scored normatively resulting in scaled score (mean = 10). Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Measured: Week 1 (prior to intervention), week 6 (post-intervention)

  6. Change from baseline visual attention and speed at 6 weeks

    Will be measured with Trails A \& B. The participants' response time on each of the two tasks is scored normatively resulting in a t-score (mean = 50). Higher t-scores indicate better performance.

    Measured: Week 1 (prior to intervention), week 6 (post-intervention)

  7. Change from baseline motor speed at 6 weeks

    Will be measured on Grooved Pegboard. The time taken to complete the task with each hand will be normatively scored, resulting in a t-score. Higher t-scores are indicative of better performance.

    Measured: Week 1 (prior to intervention), week 6 (post-intervention)

  8. Change from baseline verbal fluency at 6 weeks

    Will be measured with phonemic fluency (FAS) and semantic fluency (animals) tasks. The number of words they provide is normatively scored resulting in t-scores. Higher t-scores are indicative of better performance.

    Measured: Week 1 (prior to intervention), week 6 (post-intervention)

  9. Change from baseline overall neurocognitive performance at 6 weeks

    Will be measured with the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update (copyrighted), which results in 12 subtests that are normatively scored, summed together, and normatively scored to result in a index score (mean = 100) with higher values indicating better performance.

    Measured: Week 1 (prior to intervention), week 6 (post-intervention)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Dec 2018
  2. Study start1 May 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion3 Dec 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion3 Feb 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03773354
Sponsor's protocol ID
5498
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
5 Dec 2018
Last updated
4 Apr 2019
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cognitive-behavioural therapy group for individuals with somatic symptom disorders in people with Somatic Symptom Disorders, run by St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Katherine Jongsma, MA (905-522-1155 ext. 39365, kjongsma@stjoes.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline self-reported distress related to somatic symptoms at 6 weeks (time frame: Week 1 (prior to intervention), week 6 (post-intervention)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in