AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationARCFANCT03774550

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Radiofrequency or Cryoablation?

An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study aims to compare 3 techniques routinely used for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: radiofrequency catheter ablation without contact-force, radiofrequency catheter ablation with contact-force and cryoablation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation
How many people
206 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
25 Jan 2019to 1 May 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients who had an atrial fibrillation for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs, between 01/01/2014 and 30/09/2017 in CHR Metz-Thionville

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who had an atrial fibrillation for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs, between 01/01/2014 and 30/09/2017 in CHR Metz-Thionville

Who cannot join

  • Patients not willing to participate via using their medical files

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHR Metz Thionville

    Metz, Moselle, 57085

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A Comparison of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation With or Without Contact-force and Cryoablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

The study aims to compare 3 techniques routinely used for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: radiofrequency catheter ablation without contact-force, radiofrequency catheter ablation with contact-force and cryoablation. The hypothesis is the non-inferiority between the 3 techniques in terms of free-from atrial fibrillation survival (primary criteria). It will also compare lenght of procedure, radioscopy time and immediate complications (secondary criteria).

Keywords
Atrial Fibrillation, Catheter ablation, Radiofrequency, Contact-force, Cryoablation
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Atrial Fibrillation survival

    Free from atrial fibrillation survival

    Measured: Day 1

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Immediate complications

    The number of immediate complications encountered

    Measured: Day 1

  2. Radioscopy duration

    Radioscopy duration

    Measured: Day 1

  3. Lenght of procedure

    Overall duration of the procedure

    Measured: Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Dec 2018
  2. Study start25 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2019
  4. Study completion1 May 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
206 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03774550
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-05Obs-CHRMT
Acronym
ARCFA
Status last verified
Dec 2018
First submitted
12 Dec 2018
Last updated
14 May 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Atrial Fibrillation survival (time frame: Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in