Urinary Tract Infection BacterialNCT03774940
Blood Parameters as a Predictor of Fever After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
A study testing peripheric blood count in people with Urinary Tract Infection Bacterial and Nephrolithiasis, run by TC Erciyes University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
To investigate the relationship between neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio (NLR), and postoperative fever in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Tract Infection Bacterial, Nephrolithiasis
- What is being tested?
- peripheric blood count
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 519 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2005to 31 Jan 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- underwent PNL operation
- preoperative white blood cell count between 4,000 and 12,000/µL
Who cannot join
- preoperative urinary system obstruction
- proliferation in preoperative and/or postoperative urine culture
- preoperative and/or postoperative blood transfusions
- a preoperative urinary diversion and/or intervention
- the presence of a postoperative residual stone
- the presence of malignancy,
- the presence of a hematologic disease.
- patients with postoperative complications graded as Clavien 2 and above
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine Department of Urology
Kayseri, 38039
About this study
Official title: Neutrophil and Lymphocyte Counts and the Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Fever Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients Without Risk Factors
To investigate the relationship between neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio (NLR), and postoperative fever in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL).
Read the detailed description
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is a minimally invasive treatment commonly used for renal calculi. However, the prevalence of postoperative fever is reported to be 16.7%-35%, even with appropriate prophylactic antibiotic therapy and a sterile urine culture. The most probable causes are urinary extravasation and bacteremia. Although it is important to postoperatively isolate the causative bacteria, bacterial isolation may not always be possible, and urinary and blood cultures may prove negative. In addition, establishing the etiology of fever could be time-consuming and the techniques involved may generate pseudo-negative results owing to several factors, especially the antibiotics used prophylactically. This can result in a prolonged hospital stay and increased the cost of patient care.
The most commonly used parameters for the early diagnosis of bacterial infections, despite their limited use, are C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, and neutrophil count . Superior parameters include procalcitonin, pro-adrenomedullin, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-8, but their use is limited by their lack of availability in some centers and their higher costs. Recently, the ratio of neutrophil count to lymphocyte count (NLR) has been proposed as an effective, simple, and useful biomarker for the early diagnosis of bacterial infections. However, these tests are used after the emergence of fever. As yet, no single parameter has been proposed for predicting postoperative fever in the absence of preoperative factors known to cause fever.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and NLR obtained from routine preoperative blood tests could be used in predicting fever following PNL in patients with no risk factors for infection.
- Conditions
- Urinary Tract Infection Bacterial, Nephrolithiasis
- Being tested
- peripheric blood count
- Keywords
- fever, bacteremia, lymphocytes, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio
- Medical subject headings
- Nephrolithiasis, Fever, Bacteremia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
peripheric blood countDiagnostic test
preoperative peripheric blood count
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| fever | Experimental | patients that have fever after PNL Receives: Diagnostic Test: peripheric blood count |
| No fever | Active comparator | Patients without fever after PNL Receives: Diagnostic Test: peripheric blood count |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
White blood cell count
white blood cell count
Measured: preoperative
Neutrophil count
neutrophil count
Measured: preoperative
N/L
ratio of neutrophil count to lymphocyte count
Measured: preoperative
Lymphocyte count
Lymphocyte count
Measured: preoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Dec 2018
- Study start1 Jan 2005
- Primary completion1 Dec 2013
- Study completion31 Jan 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urinary Tract Infection BacterialStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by TC Erciyes UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 519 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- TC Erciyes University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Abdullah Demirtas, TC Erciyes University
- Investigators
- Abdullah Demirtas, MD, Principal investigator, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03774940
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2013/198
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 9 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 13 Dec 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Draga RO, Kok ET, Sorel MR, Bosch RJ, Lock TM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: factors associated with fever after the first postoperative day and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. J Endourol. 2009 Jun;23(6):921-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0041.
PubMed 19473071Cadeddu JA, Chen R, Bishoff J, Micali S, Kumar A, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Clinical significance of fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 1998 Jul;52(1):48-50. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00146-0.
PubMed 9671869Sharifi Aghdas F, Akhavizadegan H, Aryanpoor A, Inanloo H, Karbakhsh M. Fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: contributing factors. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006 Aug;7(4):367-71. doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.7.367.
PubMed 16978080Nuutila J, Lilius EM. Distinction between bacterial and viral infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2007 Jun;20(3):304-10. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3280964db4.
PubMed 17471042Lutfiyya MN, Henley E, Chang LF, Reyburn SW. Diagnosis and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Am Fam Physician. 2006 Feb 1;73(3):442-50.
PubMed 16477891Shapiro MF, Greenfield S. The complete blood count and leukocyte differential count. An approach to their rational application. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Jan;106(1):65-74. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-1-65.
PubMed 3538968Seebach JD, Morant R, Ruegg R, Seifert B, Fehr J. The diagnostic value of the neutrophil left shift in predicting inflammatory and infectious disease. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997 May;107(5):582-91. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/107.5.582.
PubMed 9128272Wyllie DH, Bowler IC, Peto TE. Bacteraemia prediction in emergency medical admissions: role of C reactive protein. J Clin Pathol. 2005 Apr;58(4):352-6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2004.022293.
PubMed 15790696Chalupa P, Beran O, Herwald H, Kasprikova N, Holub M. Evaluation of potential biomarkers for the discrimination of bacterial and viral infections. Infection. 2011 Oct;39(5):411-7. doi: 10.1007/s15010-011-0126-4. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
PubMed 21720792de Jager CP, van Wijk PT, Mathoera RB, de Jongh-Leuvenink J, van der Poll T, Wever PC. Lymphocytopenia and neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio predict bacteremia better than conventional infection markers in an emergency care unit. Crit Care. 2010;14(5):R192. doi: 10.1186/cc9309. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
PubMed 21034463Terradas R, Grau S, Blanch J, Riu M, Saballs P, Castells X, Horcajada JP, Knobel H. Eosinophil count and neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio as prognostic markers in patients with bacteremia: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042860. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
PubMed 22912753Mariappan P, Smith G, Moussa SA, Tolley DA. One week of ciprofloxacin before percutaneous nephrolithotomy significantly reduces upper tract infection and urosepsis: a prospective controlled study. BJU Int. 2006 Nov;98(5):1075-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06450.x.
PubMed 17034608Dogan HS, Sahin A, Cetinkaya Y, Akdogan B, Ozden E, Kendi S. Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study in 81 patients. J Endourol. 2002 Nov;16(9):649-53. doi: 10.1089/089277902761402989.
PubMed 12490017Seyrek M, Binbay M, Yuruk E, Akman T, Aslan R, Yazici O, Berberoglu Y, Muslumanoglu AY. Perioperative prophylaxis for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: randomized study concerning the drug and dosage. J Endourol. 2012 Nov;26(11):1431-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0242. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
PubMed 22612061Demirtas A, Yildirim YE, Sofikerim M, Kaya EG, Akinsal EC, Tombul ST, Ekmekcioglu O, Gulmez I. Comparison of infection and urosepsis rates of ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone prophylaxis before percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective and randomised study. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:916381. doi: 10.1100/2012/916381. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
PubMed 23319889
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Dec 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neutrophil and Lymphocyte Counts and the Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Fever Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients Without Risk Factors
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03774940
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2013/198
- Conditions
- Urinary Tract Infection Bacterial, Nephrolithiasis
- Keywords
- fever, bacteremia, lymphocytes, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 519 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- TC Erciyes UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2005 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To investigate the relationship between neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio (NLR), and postoperative fever in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL).
Detailed description
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is a minimally invasive treatment commonly used for renal calculi. However, the prevalence of postoperative fever is reported to be 16.7%-35%, even with appropriate prophylactic antibiotic therapy and a sterile urine culture. The most probable causes are urinary extravasation and bacteremia. Although it is important to postoperatively isolate the causative bacteria, bacterial isolation may not always be possible, and urinary and blood cultures may prove negative. In addition, establishing the etiology of fever could be time-consuming and the techniques involved may generate pseudo-negative results owing to several factors, especially the antibiotics used prophylactically. This can result in a prolonged hospital stay and increased the cost of patient care.
The most commonly used parameters for the early diagnosis of bacterial infections, despite their limited use, are C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, and neutrophil count . Superior parameters include procalcitonin, pro-adrenomedullin, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-8, but their use is limited by their lack of availability in some centers and their higher costs. Recently, the ratio of neutrophil count to lymphocyte count (NLR) has been proposed as an effective, simple, and useful biomarker for the early diagnosis of bacterial infections. However, these tests are used after the emergence of fever. As yet, no single parameter has been proposed for predicting postoperative fever in the absence of preoperative factors known to cause fever.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and NLR obtained from routine preoperative blood tests could be used in predicting fever following PNL in patients with no risk factors for infection.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| fever | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: peripheric blood countpatients that have fever after PNL |
| No fever | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: peripheric blood countPatients without fever after PNL |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- underwent PNL operation
- preoperative white blood cell count between 4,000 and 12,000/µL
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- preoperative urinary system obstruction
- proliferation in preoperative and/or postoperative urine culture
- preoperative and/or postoperative blood transfusions
- a preoperative urinary diversion and/or intervention
- the presence of a postoperative residual stone
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| peripheric blood countpreoperative peripheric blood count | Diagnostic test | No fever, fever |
Primary outcome
White blood cell count
Time frame: preoperative
white blood cell count
Neutrophil count
Time frame: preoperative
neutrophil count
N/L
Time frame: preoperative
ratio of neutrophil count to lymphocyte count
Lymphocyte count
Time frame: preoperative
Lymphocyte count
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Dec 2018.
- Background: PubMed 19473071Draga RO, Kok ET, Sorel MR, Bosch RJ, Lock TM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: factors associated with fever after the first postoperative day and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. J Endourol. 2009 Jun;23(6):921-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0041.
- Background: PubMed 9671869Cadeddu JA, Chen R, Bishoff J, Micali S, Kumar A, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Clinical significance of fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 1998 Jul;52(1):48-50. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00146-0.
- Background: PubMed 16978080Sharifi Aghdas F, Akhavizadegan H, Aryanpoor A, Inanloo H, Karbakhsh M. Fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: contributing factors. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006 Aug;7(4):367-71. doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.7.367.
- Background: PubMed 17471042Nuutila J, Lilius EM. Distinction between bacterial and viral infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2007 Jun;20(3):304-10. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3280964db4.
- Background: PubMed 16477891Lutfiyya MN, Henley E, Chang LF, Reyburn SW. Diagnosis and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Am Fam Physician. 2006 Feb 1;73(3):442-50.
- Background: PubMed 3538968Shapiro MF, Greenfield S. The complete blood count and leukocyte differential count. An approach to their rational application. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Jan;106(1):65-74. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-1-65.
- Background: PubMed 9128272Seebach JD, Morant R, Ruegg R, Seifert B, Fehr J. The diagnostic value of the neutrophil left shift in predicting inflammatory and infectious disease. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997 May;107(5):582-91. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/107.5.582.
- Background: PubMed 15790696Wyllie DH, Bowler IC, Peto TE. Bacteraemia prediction in emergency medical admissions: role of C reactive protein. J Clin Pathol. 2005 Apr;58(4):352-6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2004.022293.
- Background: PubMed 21720792Chalupa P, Beran O, Herwald H, Kasprikova N, Holub M. Evaluation of potential biomarkers for the discrimination of bacterial and viral infections. Infection. 2011 Oct;39(5):411-7. doi: 10.1007/s15010-011-0126-4. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
- Background: PubMed 21034463de Jager CP, van Wijk PT, Mathoera RB, de Jongh-Leuvenink J, van der Poll T, Wever PC. Lymphocytopenia and neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio predict bacteremia better than conventional infection markers in an emergency care unit. Crit Care. 2010;14(5):R192. doi: 10.1186/cc9309. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
- Background: PubMed 22912753Terradas R, Grau S, Blanch J, Riu M, Saballs P, Castells X, Horcajada JP, Knobel H. Eosinophil count and neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio as prognostic markers in patients with bacteremia: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042860. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
- Background: PubMed 17034608Mariappan P, Smith G, Moussa SA, Tolley DA. One week of ciprofloxacin before percutaneous nephrolithotomy significantly reduces upper tract infection and urosepsis: a prospective controlled study. BJU Int. 2006 Nov;98(5):1075-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06450.x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Urinary Tract Infection Bacterial
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparative Study of the Genomic Characteristics of Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli According to the Severity of Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections in Guadeloupe (COLIGENURI)
Urinary Tract Infections
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Impact of De-implementing Urine Dipsticks for Diagnosis of UTIs in Hospitals
Urinary Tract Infections, Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Prediction and Prevention of Bloodstream Infections After Kidney Transplantation
Kidney Transplant Infection, Bloodstream Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Evaluate of the Use of Uromune as a Potential Non-antibiotic Prophylactic Strategy for Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection in Patients With Long-term Catheterization.
Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Among Pregnant Women With Pre-eclampsia in Women Health Hospital Assiut University
Pre-Eclampsia, Asymptomatic Bacteriuria
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Abdullah Demirtas, MD principal investigator
Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing peripheric blood count in people with Urinary Tract Infection Bacterial and Nephrolithiasis, run by TC Erciyes University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
White blood cell count (time frame: preoperative). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03774940, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2018.