AzTrials
AzTrials

Female InfertilityNCT03777358

Three-dimensional Ultrasonography Versus Hysteroscopy in Evaluation of Uterine Cavity in Infertile Women

An observational study of Female Infertility, run by Hatem AbuHashim at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hysteroscopy has now become a gold-standard technique carried out for uterine cavity assessment in infertile women. Apart from direct visualizing of the endometrium by the naked eye, pathologies missed by other modalities of investigation can be picked up and managed appropriately. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Female Infertility
What is being tested?
3D-TVS
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Jan 2019to 1 Jan 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Study population: Infertile women (primary or secondary) aged between 18 and 40 years.

Who may be able to join

  • Infertile women (primary or secondary)
  • Age between 18 and 40 years.

Who cannot join

  • age<18 years and˃ 40 years.
  • pelvic inflammatory disease.
  • .Active uterine bleeding

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Mansoura University Hospitals

    Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Study Comparing Three-dimensional Ultrasonography Versus Hysteroscopy in Evaluation of Uterine Cavity in Infertile Women

Hysteroscopy has now become a gold-standard technique carried out for uterine cavity assessment in infertile women. Apart from direct visualizing of the endometrium by the naked eye, pathologies missed by other modalities of investigation can be picked up and managed appropriately. Unfortunately, the procedure itself is not free from complications e.g. perforation, cervical laceration, bleeding, limited access in cases of cervical stenosis and considered as an invasive procedure.

Two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography (2D-TVS)and Three-dimensional TVS (3D-TVS) are non-invasive methods for evaluating the uterine cavity. The3D-TVS is superior to 2D-TVS in identifying uterine cavity abnormalities due to its ability to obtain a view of three different planes of the uterus, which could be used to locate the position of intracavitary pathology. Reports vary regarding the diagnostic accuracy of 3D-TVS that was reported to have 41.3-81.5% sensitivity and 94.6-98.7% specificity. So it became clear that 3D-TVS is a non-invasive and safe diagnostic tool for evaluation of the uterine cavity abnormalities but its sensitivity, specificity and accuracy still a matter of debate and warrants more evaluation.

Being tested
3D-TVS
Medical subject headings
Infertility, Female

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 3D-TVSDevice

    The 3D-TVS will be done by an experienced gynecological sonographer. The uterine cavity will be assessed by obtaining a mid-coronal view. Then hysteroscopy will be performed

Study groups in NCT03777358
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography (3D-TVS)The 3D-TVS will be done by an experienced gynecological sonographer. The uterine cavity will be assessed by obtaining a mid-coronal view. Then, hysteroscopy will be performed.
Receives: Device: 3D-TVS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of 3D-TVS

    The diagnostic accuracy of 3D-TVS in comparison with hysteroscopy for evaluation of uterine cavity abnormalities in infertile women.

    Measured: At 1 week postmenstrual

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Dec 2018
  2. Study start1 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
300 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03777358
Sponsor's protocol ID
MD.18.10.99
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
14 Dec 2018
Last updated
16 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Ahmadi F, Rashidy Z, Haghighi H, Akhoond M, Niknejadi M, Hemat M, Shamsipour M. Uterine cavity assessment in infertile women: Sensitivity and specificity of three-dimensional Hysterosonography versus Hysteroscopy. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013 Dec;11(12):977-82.

    PubMed 24639723

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Female Infertility, run by Hatem AbuHashim at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic accuracy of 3D-TVS (time frame: At 1 week postmenstrual). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03777358, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in