Opioid UseRACERNCT03781440
Regional Anesthesia for Cardiothoracic Enhanced Recovery
A study testing Bilateral ESP catheter with lidocaine and Bilateral ESP catheter with saline in people with Opioid Use and Anesthesia, Local, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel regional analgesic technique that provides pain relief with a peripheral nerve block catheter. The goal of this study is to see if bilateral ESPB catheters can improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy, such as decreasing the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Opioid Use, Anesthesia, Local, Cardiac Disease
- What is being tested?
- Bilateral ESP catheter with lidocaine and Bilateral ESP catheter with saline
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2020to Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Give consent to participate in study
- planned sternotomy
- specific procedures: CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting) or AVR (aortic valve repair or replacement) or MVR (mitral valve repair or replacement) or combination of any of 2 of these
- Primary or first redo sternotomy
Who cannot join
- Participants who cannot give consent
- Patients who are clinically unstable or require urgent/emergent intervention
- more than1 prior sternotomy
- planned aortic arch procedures
- preoperative coagulopathy (INR >1.5, PTT >35) or ongoing anticoagulation (heparin infusion, therapeutic low molecular weight heparin, warfarin, dual antiplatelet therapy)
- Severe ventricular dysfunction (left or right ventricle)
- Symptomatic heart failure (systolic or diastolic)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Regional Anesthesia for Cardiothoracic Enhanced Recovery for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Via Sternotomy
The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel regional analgesic technique that provides pain relief with a peripheral nerve block catheter. The goal of this study is to see if bilateral ESPB catheters can improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy, such as decreasing the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, need for intravenous opioid medications, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), and improving pain scores.
- Conditions
- Opioid Use, Anesthesia, Local, Cardiac Disease, Pain, Acute
- Being tested
- Bilateral ESP catheter with lidocaine, Bilateral ESP catheter with saline
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Diseases, Acute Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bilateral ESP catheter with lidocaineProcedure or surgery
All participants will get the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) catheters. Prior to transfer to the operating room, participants will receive bilateral ESP catheters at T7 level under ultrasound guidance. This arm is the treatment group and will receive lidocaine via alternating side automated infusion pump bolus dosing, continued until chest tube removal or postoperative day 5 (whichever occurs earliest).
Bilateral ESP catheter with salineProcedure or surgery
All participants will get the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) catheters. This arm is the control group and will have normal saline administered via ESP catheters, continued until chest tube removal or postoperative day 5 (whichever occurs earliest).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bilateral ESP catheter with Lidocaine | Experimental | All participants will get the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) catheters. Prior to transfer to the operating room, participants will receive bilateral ESP catheters at T7 level under ultrasound guidance. This arm is the treatment group and will receive lidocaine via alternating side automated infusion pump bolus dosing, continued until chest tube removal or postoperative day 5 (whichever occurs earliest). Receives: Procedure: Bilateral ESP catheter with lidocaine |
| Bilateral ESP catheter with saline | Placebo comparator | All participants will get the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) catheters. This arm is the control group and will have normal saline administered via ESP catheters, continued until chest tube removal or postoperative day 5 (whichever occurs earliest). Receives: Procedure: Bilateral ESP catheter with saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Opioid Consumption
IV and PO opioid requirements converted to morphine equivalent
Measured: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Delirium and agitation post-operatively
Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score from -5 to +4 (-5 is the most sedation, +4 is the least sedated.
Measured: Duration of ICU stay (typically 2-5 days)
Determine post-operative pain scores
11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0-10, 0 signifying no pain, 10 signifying the worse pain.
Measured: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)
Median time to extubation in patients with ESPB
duration in mechanical ventilation in hours
Measured: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)
Length of stay in hospital
number of post-operative days spent in hospital
Measured: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)
Length of stay in ICU
number of post-operative days spent in ICU
Measured: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)
Quality of recovery at 72 hours
Survey based (Quality of Recover 15) patient reported outcomes. There are 15 questions based on a scale of 0-10 per questions, 0 signifying the worst outcome, 10 signifying the best, for a score range of 0-150.
Measured: post-operative day 3
Inflammatory biomarker analysis
Pro and anti-inflammatory biomarker panel at 4 time points perioperatively. We will be analyzing IL10 concentrations as an anti-inflammatory biomarker and IL6 and TN alpha as pro-inflammatory biomarkers in either a ELISA assay or Luminex.
Measured: First panel pre-incision; second panel 6hrs (+/-3hrs) post-procedure; third panel 24hrs (+/-3hrs) post-procedure; fourth panel 48hrs (+/-3hrs) post-procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Dec 2018
- Study start1 Jan 2020
- Primary completion30 Sep 2021
- Study completionDec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Opioid UseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chi-Ho Ban Tsui, Stanford University
- Investigators
- Jessica Brodt, MD, Principal investigator, Stanford UniversityBan Tsui, MD, Principal investigator, Stanford University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03781440
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 47647
- Acronym
- RACER
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 18 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 22 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Wheeler M, Oderda GM, Ashburn MA, Lipman AG. Adverse events associated with postoperative opioid analgesia: a systematic review. J Pain. 2002 Jun;3(3):159-80. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2002.123652. No abstract available.
PubMed 14622770Zhu F, Lee A, Chee YE. Fast-track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD003587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003587.pub2.
PubMed 23076899Baikoussis NG, Papakonstantinou NA, Verra C, Kakouris G, Chounti M, Hountis P, Dedeilias P, Argiriou M. Mechanisms of oxidative stress and myocardial protection during open-heart surgery. Ann Card Anaesth. 2015 Oct-Dec;18(4):555-64. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.166465.
PubMed 26440242Giomarelli P, Scolletta S, Borrelli E, Biagioli B. Myocardial and lung injury after cardiopulmonary bypass: role of interleukin (IL)-10. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Jul;76(1):117-23. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00194-2.
PubMed 12842524Fragiadakis GK, Gaudilliere B, Ganio EA, Aghaeepour N, Tingle M, Nolan GP, Angst MS. Patient-specific Immune States before Surgery Are Strong Correlates of Surgical Recovery. Anesthesiology. 2015 Dec;123(6):1241-55. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000887.
PubMed 26655308Gaudilliere B, Fragiadakis GK, Bruggner RV, Nicolau M, Finck R, Tingle M, Silva J, Ganio EA, Yeh CG, Maloney WJ, Huddleston JI, Goodman SB, Davis MM, Bendall SC, Fantl WJ, Angst MS, Nolan GP. Clinical recovery from surgery correlates with single-cell immune signatures. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Sep 24;6(255):255ra131. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009701.
PubMed 25253674Eljezi V, D'Ostrevy N. Local Anesthetic Diffusion of Bilateral Sternal Block After Cardiac Surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):418-419. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000577. No abstract available.
PubMed 28419054Chaudhary V, Chauhan S, Choudhury M, Kiran U, Vasdev S, Talwar S. Parasternal intercostal block with ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Jun;26(3):439-42. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.10.012. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
PubMed 22176767Olivier JF, Bracco D, Nguyen P, Le N, Noiseux N, Hemmerling T; Perioperative Cardiac Surgery Research Group (PeriCARG). A novel approach for pain management in cardiac surgery via median sternotomy: bilateral single-shot paravertebral blocks. Heart Surg Forum. 2007;10(5):E357-62. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20071082.
PubMed 17855198Canto M, Sanchez MJ, Casas MA, Bataller ML. Bilateral paravertebral blockade for conventional cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia. 2003 Apr;58(4):365-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03082_2.x.
PubMed 12688271Lockwood GG, Cabreros L, Banach D, Punjabi PP. Continuous bilateral thoracic paravertebral blockade for analgesia after cardiac surgery: a randomised, controlled trial. Perfusion. 2017 Oct;32(7):591-597. doi: 10.1177/0267659117715507. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
PubMed 28592166Svircevic V, Nierich AP, Moons KG, Diephuis JC, Ennema JJ, Brandon Bravo Bruinsma GJ, Kalkman CJ, van Dijk D. Thoracic epidural anesthesia for cardiac surgery: a randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2011 Feb;114(2):262-70. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318201d2de.
PubMed 21239976Chakravarthy M, Thimmangowda P, Krishnamurthy J, Nadiminti S, Jawali V. Thoracic epidural anesthesia in cardiac surgical patients: a prospective audit of 2,113 cases. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005 Feb;19(1):44-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.11.008.
PubMed 15747268Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
PubMed 27501016Kose HC, Kose SG, Thomas DT. Lumbar versus thoracic erector spinae plane block: Similar nomenclature, different mechanism of action. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Aug;48:1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 Apr 9. No abstract available.
PubMed 29649625
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Regional Anesthesia for Cardiothoracic Enhanced Recovery for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Via Sternotomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03781440
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RACER / 47647
- Conditions
- Opioid Use, Anesthesia, Local, Cardiac Disease, Pain, Acute
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel regional analgesic technique that provides pain relief with a peripheral nerve block catheter. The goal of this study is to see if bilateral ESPB catheters can improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy, such as decreasing the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, need for intravenous opioid medications, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), and improving pain scores.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bilateral ESP catheter with Lidocaine | Experimental | Procedure: Bilateral ESP catheter with lidocaineAll participants will get the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) catheters. Prior to transfer to the operating room, participants will receive bilateral ESP catheters at T7 level under ultrasound guidance. This arm is the treatment group and will receive lidocaine via alternating side automated infusion pump bolus dosing, continued until chest tube removal or postoperative day 5 (whichever occurs earliest). |
| Bilateral ESP catheter with saline | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Bilateral ESP catheter with salineAll participants will get the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) catheters. This arm is the control group and will have normal saline administered via ESP catheters, continued until chest tube removal or postoperative day 5 (whichever occurs earliest). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Give consent to participate in study
- planned sternotomy
- specific procedures: CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting) or AVR (aortic valve repair or replacement) or MVR (mitral valve repair or replacement) or combination of any of 2 of these
- Primary or first redo sternotomy
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Participants who cannot give consent
- Patients who are clinically unstable or require urgent/emergent intervention
- more than1 prior sternotomy
- planned aortic arch procedures
- preoperative coagulopathy (INR >1.5, PTT >35) or ongoing anticoagulation (heparin infusion, therapeutic low molecular weight heparin, warfarin, dual antiplatelet therapy)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bilateral ESP catheter with lidocaineAll participants will get the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) catheters. Prior to transfer to the operating room, participants will receive bilateral ESP catheters at T7 level under ultrasound guidance. This arm is the treatment group and will receive lidocaine via alternating side automated infusion pump bolus dosing, continued until chest tube removal or postoperative day 5 (whichever occurs earliest). | Procedure or surgery | Bilateral ESP catheter with Lidocaine |
| Bilateral ESP catheter with salineAll participants will get the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) catheters. This arm is the control group and will have normal saline administered via ESP catheters, continued until chest tube removal or postoperative day 5 (whichever occurs earliest). | Procedure or surgery | Bilateral ESP catheter with saline |
Primary outcome
Opioid Consumption
Time frame: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)
IV and PO opioid requirements converted to morphine equivalent
7 secondary outcomes
Delirium and agitation post-operatively
Time frame: Duration of ICU stay (typically 2-5 days)
Determine post-operative pain scores
Time frame: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)
Median time to extubation in patients with ESPB
Time frame: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)
Length of stay in hospital
Time frame: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)
Length of stay in ICU
Time frame: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)
Quality of recovery at 72 hours
Time frame: post-operative day 3
Inflammatory biomarker analysis
Time frame: First panel pre-incision; second panel 6hrs (+/-3hrs) post-procedure; third panel 24hrs (+/-3hrs) post-procedure; fourth panel 48hrs (+/-3hrs) post-procedure
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Sep 2023.
- Background: PubMed 14622770Wheeler M, Oderda GM, Ashburn MA, Lipman AG. Adverse events associated with postoperative opioid analgesia: a systematic review. J Pain. 2002 Jun;3(3):159-80. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2002.123652. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23076899Zhu F, Lee A, Chee YE. Fast-track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD003587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003587.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 26440242Baikoussis NG, Papakonstantinou NA, Verra C, Kakouris G, Chounti M, Hountis P, Dedeilias P, Argiriou M. Mechanisms of oxidative stress and myocardial protection during open-heart surgery. Ann Card Anaesth. 2015 Oct-Dec;18(4):555-64. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.166465.
- Background: PubMed 12842524Giomarelli P, Scolletta S, Borrelli E, Biagioli B. Myocardial and lung injury after cardiopulmonary bypass: role of interleukin (IL)-10. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Jul;76(1):117-23. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00194-2.
- Background: PubMed 26655308Fragiadakis GK, Gaudilliere B, Ganio EA, Aghaeepour N, Tingle M, Nolan GP, Angst MS. Patient-specific Immune States before Surgery Are Strong Correlates of Surgical Recovery. Anesthesiology. 2015 Dec;123(6):1241-55. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000887.
- Background: PubMed 25253674Gaudilliere B, Fragiadakis GK, Bruggner RV, Nicolau M, Finck R, Tingle M, Silva J, Ganio EA, Yeh CG, Maloney WJ, Huddleston JI, Goodman SB, Davis MM, Bendall SC, Fantl WJ, Angst MS, Nolan GP. Clinical recovery from surgery correlates with single-cell immune signatures. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Sep 24;6(255):255ra131. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009701.
- Background: PubMed 28419054Eljezi V, D'Ostrevy N. Local Anesthetic Diffusion of Bilateral Sternal Block After Cardiac Surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):418-419. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000577. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22176767Chaudhary V, Chauhan S, Choudhury M, Kiran U, Vasdev S, Talwar S. Parasternal intercostal block with ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Jun;26(3):439-42. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.10.012. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
- Background: PubMed 17855198Olivier JF, Bracco D, Nguyen P, Le N, Noiseux N, Hemmerling T; Perioperative Cardiac Surgery Research Group (PeriCARG). A novel approach for pain management in cardiac surgery via median sternotomy: bilateral single-shot paravertebral blocks. Heart Surg Forum. 2007;10(5):E357-62. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20071082.
- Background: PubMed 12688271Canto M, Sanchez MJ, Casas MA, Bataller ML. Bilateral paravertebral blockade for conventional cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia. 2003 Apr;58(4):365-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03082_2.x.
- Background: PubMed 28592166Lockwood GG, Cabreros L, Banach D, Punjabi PP. Continuous bilateral thoracic paravertebral blockade for analgesia after cardiac surgery: a randomised, controlled trial. Perfusion. 2017 Oct;32(7):591-597. doi: 10.1177/0267659117715507. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
- Background: PubMed 21239976Svircevic V, Nierich AP, Moons KG, Diephuis JC, Ennema JJ, Brandon Bravo Bruinsma GJ, Kalkman CJ, van Dijk D. Thoracic epidural anesthesia for cardiac surgery: a randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2011 Feb;114(2):262-70. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318201d2de.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Opioid Use
Active, not recruiting
Pain and Opioids: Integrated Treatment In Veterans
Chronic Pain, Opioid-use Disorder
Active, not recruiting
Healing Opioid Misuse and Pain Through Engagement (HOPE) Trial
Opioid Use Disorder, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Peer-led, Mobile App Supported Linkage to Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Opioid Use Disorder
Active, not recruiting
Effective Caregiving for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Testing an Instructional Mobile Technology Platform for High-Risk Pregnant Women
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome, Opioid-use Disorder
Not yet recruiting
QAIAx - SGI/SI Smart Health Cities: Microcity Enclave Program (Quantum SI/AGI Agency a/k/a AI City Hall Project - UPSTO App Nos. 64/074,526, 64/063,557, 64/105,164, 63/903,181, 63/729,428, 64/125,360; USPTO EO 9424 Assignment ID: 2101042 / ARN: REEL/FRAME: 76481/0026 - OUSD-R&E, Department of War)
Asperger's Disorder, Asperger Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jessica Brodt, MD principal investigator
Stanford University
Ban Tsui, MD principal investigator
Stanford University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bilateral ESP catheter with lidocaine and Bilateral ESP catheter with saline in people with Opioid Use and Anesthesia, Local, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Opioid Consumption (time frame: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03781440, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.