AzTrials
AzTrials

Opioid UseRACERNCT03781440

Regional Anesthesia for Cardiothoracic Enhanced Recovery

A study testing Bilateral ESP catheter with lidocaine and Bilateral ESP catheter with saline in people with Opioid Use and Anesthesia, Local, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel regional analgesic technique that provides pain relief with a peripheral nerve block catheter. The goal of this study is to see if bilateral ESPB catheters can improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy, such as decreasing the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Opioid Use, Anesthesia, Local, Cardiac Disease
What is being tested?
Bilateral ESP catheter with lidocaine and Bilateral ESP catheter with saline
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Jan 2020to Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Give consent to participate in study
  • planned sternotomy
  • specific procedures: CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting) or AVR (aortic valve repair or replacement) or MVR (mitral valve repair or replacement) or combination of any of 2 of these
  • Primary or first redo sternotomy

Who cannot join

  • Participants who cannot give consent
  • Patients who are clinically unstable or require urgent/emergent intervention
  • more than1 prior sternotomy
  • planned aortic arch procedures
  • preoperative coagulopathy (INR >1.5, PTT >35) or ongoing anticoagulation (heparin infusion, therapeutic low molecular weight heparin, warfarin, dual antiplatelet therapy)
  • Severe ventricular dysfunction (left or right ventricle)
  • Symptomatic heart failure (systolic or diastolic)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Stanford University

    Stanford, California, 94305

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Regional Anesthesia for Cardiothoracic Enhanced Recovery for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Via Sternotomy

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel regional analgesic technique that provides pain relief with a peripheral nerve block catheter. The goal of this study is to see if bilateral ESPB catheters can improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy, such as decreasing the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, need for intravenous opioid medications, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), and improving pain scores.

Being tested
Bilateral ESP catheter with lidocaine, Bilateral ESP catheter with saline
Medical subject headings
Heart Diseases, Acute Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bilateral ESP catheter with lidocaineProcedure or surgery

    All participants will get the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) catheters. Prior to transfer to the operating room, participants will receive bilateral ESP catheters at T7 level under ultrasound guidance. This arm is the treatment group and will receive lidocaine via alternating side automated infusion pump bolus dosing, continued until chest tube removal or postoperative day 5 (whichever occurs earliest).

  • Bilateral ESP catheter with salineProcedure or surgery

    All participants will get the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) catheters. This arm is the control group and will have normal saline administered via ESP catheters, continued until chest tube removal or postoperative day 5 (whichever occurs earliest).

Study groups in NCT03781440
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bilateral ESP catheter with LidocaineExperimentalAll participants will get the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) catheters. Prior to transfer to the operating room, participants will receive bilateral ESP catheters at T7 level under ultrasound guidance. This arm is the treatment group and will receive lidocaine via alternating side automated infusion pump bolus dosing, continued until chest tube removal or postoperative day 5 (whichever occurs earliest).
Receives: Procedure: Bilateral ESP catheter with lidocaine
Bilateral ESP catheter with salinePlacebo comparatorAll participants will get the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) catheters. This arm is the control group and will have normal saline administered via ESP catheters, continued until chest tube removal or postoperative day 5 (whichever occurs earliest).
Receives: Procedure: Bilateral ESP catheter with saline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Opioid Consumption

    IV and PO opioid requirements converted to morphine equivalent

    Measured: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Delirium and agitation post-operatively

    Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score from -5 to +4 (-5 is the most sedation, +4 is the least sedated.

    Measured: Duration of ICU stay (typically 2-5 days)

  2. Determine post-operative pain scores

    11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0-10, 0 signifying no pain, 10 signifying the worse pain.

    Measured: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)

  3. Median time to extubation in patients with ESPB

    duration in mechanical ventilation in hours

    Measured: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)

  4. Length of stay in hospital

    number of post-operative days spent in hospital

    Measured: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)

  5. Length of stay in ICU

    number of post-operative days spent in ICU

    Measured: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)

  6. Quality of recovery at 72 hours

    Survey based (Quality of Recover 15) patient reported outcomes. There are 15 questions based on a scale of 0-10 per questions, 0 signifying the worst outcome, 10 signifying the best, for a score range of 0-150.

    Measured: post-operative day 3

  7. Inflammatory biomarker analysis

    Pro and anti-inflammatory biomarker panel at 4 time points perioperatively. We will be analyzing IL10 concentrations as an anti-inflammatory biomarker and IL6 and TN alpha as pro-inflammatory biomarkers in either a ELISA assay or Luminex.

    Measured: First panel pre-incision; second panel 6hrs (+/-3hrs) post-procedure; third panel 24hrs (+/-3hrs) post-procedure; fourth panel 48hrs (+/-3hrs) post-procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Dec 2018
  2. Study start1 Jan 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2021
  4. Study completionDec 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03781440
Sponsor's protocol ID
47647
Acronym
RACER
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
18 Dec 2018
Last updated
22 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Wheeler M, Oderda GM, Ashburn MA, Lipman AG. Adverse events associated with postoperative opioid analgesia: a systematic review. J Pain. 2002 Jun;3(3):159-80. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2002.123652. No abstract available.

    PubMed 14622770
  • Zhu F, Lee A, Chee YE. Fast-track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD003587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003587.pub2.

    PubMed 23076899
  • Baikoussis NG, Papakonstantinou NA, Verra C, Kakouris G, Chounti M, Hountis P, Dedeilias P, Argiriou M. Mechanisms of oxidative stress and myocardial protection during open-heart surgery. Ann Card Anaesth. 2015 Oct-Dec;18(4):555-64. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.166465.

    PubMed 26440242
  • Giomarelli P, Scolletta S, Borrelli E, Biagioli B. Myocardial and lung injury after cardiopulmonary bypass: role of interleukin (IL)-10. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Jul;76(1):117-23. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00194-2.

    PubMed 12842524
  • Fragiadakis GK, Gaudilliere B, Ganio EA, Aghaeepour N, Tingle M, Nolan GP, Angst MS. Patient-specific Immune States before Surgery Are Strong Correlates of Surgical Recovery. Anesthesiology. 2015 Dec;123(6):1241-55. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000887.

    PubMed 26655308
  • Gaudilliere B, Fragiadakis GK, Bruggner RV, Nicolau M, Finck R, Tingle M, Silva J, Ganio EA, Yeh CG, Maloney WJ, Huddleston JI, Goodman SB, Davis MM, Bendall SC, Fantl WJ, Angst MS, Nolan GP. Clinical recovery from surgery correlates with single-cell immune signatures. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Sep 24;6(255):255ra131. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009701.

    PubMed 25253674
  • Eljezi V, D'Ostrevy N. Local Anesthetic Diffusion of Bilateral Sternal Block After Cardiac Surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):418-419. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000577. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28419054
  • Chaudhary V, Chauhan S, Choudhury M, Kiran U, Vasdev S, Talwar S. Parasternal intercostal block with ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Jun;26(3):439-42. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.10.012. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

    PubMed 22176767
  • Olivier JF, Bracco D, Nguyen P, Le N, Noiseux N, Hemmerling T; Perioperative Cardiac Surgery Research Group (PeriCARG). A novel approach for pain management in cardiac surgery via median sternotomy: bilateral single-shot paravertebral blocks. Heart Surg Forum. 2007;10(5):E357-62. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20071082.

    PubMed 17855198
  • Canto M, Sanchez MJ, Casas MA, Bataller ML. Bilateral paravertebral blockade for conventional cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia. 2003 Apr;58(4):365-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03082_2.x.

    PubMed 12688271
  • Lockwood GG, Cabreros L, Banach D, Punjabi PP. Continuous bilateral thoracic paravertebral blockade for analgesia after cardiac surgery: a randomised, controlled trial. Perfusion. 2017 Oct;32(7):591-597. doi: 10.1177/0267659117715507. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

    PubMed 28592166
  • Svircevic V, Nierich AP, Moons KG, Diephuis JC, Ennema JJ, Brandon Bravo Bruinsma GJ, Kalkman CJ, van Dijk D. Thoracic epidural anesthesia for cardiac surgery: a randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2011 Feb;114(2):262-70. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318201d2de.

    PubMed 21239976
  • Chakravarthy M, Thimmangowda P, Krishnamurthy J, Nadiminti S, Jawali V. Thoracic epidural anesthesia in cardiac surgical patients: a prospective audit of 2,113 cases. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005 Feb;19(1):44-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.11.008.

    PubMed 15747268
  • Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.

    PubMed 27501016
  • Kose HC, Kose SG, Thomas DT. Lumbar versus thoracic erector spinae plane block: Similar nomenclature, different mechanism of action. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Aug;48:1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 Apr 9. No abstract available.

    PubMed 29649625

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bilateral ESP catheter with lidocaine and Bilateral ESP catheter with saline in people with Opioid Use and Anesthesia, Local, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Opioid Consumption (time frame: Duration of postoperative recovery (typically 1-2 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03781440, which also lists 18 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in