Pain, AcutePAINGENNCT03781570
Brain and Genetic Predictors of Individual Differences in Pain and Analgesia
An observational study of Pain, Acute, run by Trustees of Dartmouth College at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to gain a better understanding of pain processing in the brain. Our understanding of how pain is processed in the brain is limited. We are testing for individual differences in pain perception and emotion. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Acute
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 541 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Nov 2018to 1 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: The CTS includes 727 same-sex twin pairs between 26-38 years old (as of Spring 2017), originally derived from the Colorado Twin Registry, a population based registry, housed at the Institute for Behavioral Genetics (IBG) at the University of Colorado since 1984, with three previous waves of data collection (1997-2002, 2002-2008, and 2009-2014).
Who may be able to join
- Participants must be registered in the Colorado Community Twin Sample (CTS).
Who cannot join
- Not being registered in the Colorado Community Twin Sample (CTS).
- Any MRI contraindications.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Colorado, Boulder
Boulder, Colorado, 80309
About this study
The purpose of the study is to gain a better understanding of pain processing in the brain. Our understanding of how pain is processed in the brain is limited. We are testing for individual differences in pain perception and emotion.
- Conditions
- Pain, Acute
- Being tested
- Placebo Cream, Control Cream
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Placebo CreamBehavioural
In the Placebo intervention, participants are given an inert cream with instructions that it is "Prodicaine, an effective pain-relieving drug". The cream is applied to two fingers on the left hand.
Control CreamBehavioural
In the Control intervention, participants are given an inert cream with instructions that it is "a control cream with no effects" . The cream is applied to two fingers on the left hand.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single group | All participants are administered Control and Placebo creams (two interventions), with thermal and mechanical painful stimuli delivered repeatedly after each intervention. The order of intervention testing is Control, Placebo, Placebo, Control in a fixed order. All interventions are completed within a single testing session. Receives: Behavioral: Placebo Cream; Behavioral: Control Cream |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Rating Scores Made on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Self reported pain using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0-100 (with 0 representing "no pain at all" and 100 representing "most intense pain imaginable (in the context of the experiment)). Higher scores indicate more pain. 0 is the minimum value and 100 is the maximum value. This scale is used for both thermal and mechanical pain. Reported values reflect averages of VAS ratings for individual stimuli for each of thermal and mechanical pain.
Measured: Measured during pain tasks at a single 4 hour experimental session (within one month of screening completion).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Dec 2018
- Study start7 Nov 2018
- Primary completion1 Oct 2023
- Study completion1 Oct 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Pain, AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 541 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Trustees of Dartmouth College
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tor Wager, University of Colorado, Boulder
- Investigators
- Tor Wager, PHD, Principal investigator, University of Colorado, Boulder
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03781570
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pain Genetics
- Acronym
- PAINGEN
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 4 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Brain and Genetic Predictors of Individual Differences in Pain and Analgesia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03781570
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PAINGEN / Pain Genetics
- Conditions
- Pain, Acute
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 541 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Trustees of Dartmouth CollegeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
- Study start
- 7 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 21 May 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to gain a better understanding of pain processing in the brain. Our understanding of how pain is processed in the brain is limited. We are testing for individual differences in pain perception and emotion.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single group | – | Behavioral: Placebo Cream, Behavioral: Control CreamAll participants are administered Control and Placebo creams (two interventions), with thermal and mechanical painful stimuli delivered repeatedly after each intervention. The order of intervention testing is Control, Placebo, Placebo, Control in a fixed order. All interventions are completed within a single testing session. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- The CTS includes 727 same-sex twin pairs between 26-38 years old (as of Spring 2017), originally derived from the Colorado Twin Registry, a population based registry, housed at the Institute for Behavioral Genetics (IBG) at the University of Colorado since 1984, with three previous waves of data collection (1997-2002, 2002-2008, and 2009-2014).
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participants must be registered in the Colorado Community Twin Sample (CTS).
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Not being registered in the Colorado Community Twin Sample (CTS).
- Any MRI contraindications.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo CreamIn the Placebo intervention, participants are given an inert cream with instructions that it is "Prodicaine, an effective pain-relieving drug". The cream is applied to two fingers on the left hand. | Behavioural | Single group |
| Control CreamIn the Control intervention, participants are given an inert cream with instructions that it is "a control cream with no effects" . The cream is applied to two fingers on the left hand. | Behavioural | Single group |
Primary outcome
Pain Rating Scores Made on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Measured during pain tasks at a single 4 hour experimental session (within one month of screening completion).
Self reported pain using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0-100 (with 0 representing "no pain at all" and 100 representing "most intense pain imaginable (in the context of the experiment)). Higher scores indicate more pain. 0 is the minimum value and 100 is the maximum value. This scale is used for both thermal and mechanical pain. Reported values reflect averages of VAS ratings for individual stimuli for each of thermal and mechanical pain.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jun 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Pain, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Human Experimental Models of Pain (HEMP)
Acute Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
REctus Sheath Trial
Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of MK-6916 in Participants With Pain After Bunion Removal Surgery (MK-6916-007)
Pain Management
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Investigating the Analgesic Potential of (2R,6R)-HNK in Acute Pain in Healthy Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers
Not yet recruiting
Post-operative Pain and Clinical Outcome After Single-cone Obturation With a Calcium Silicate-based Versus Epoxy Resin Sealer
Post Operative Pain, Acute, Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tor Wager, PHD principal investigator
University of Colorado, Boulder
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pain, Acute, run by Trustees of Dartmouth College at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 May 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Rating Scores Made on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (time frame: Measured during pain tasks at a single 4 hour experimental session (within one month of screening completion).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2025.