Septic ShockNCT03782454
Quantification of Bacterial DNA in Sepsis
An observational study of Septic Shock and Sepsis Bacterial, run by Region Örebro County at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether bacterial DNA clearance measured with droplet digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (ddPCR) can be used as a measure of bacterial load in septic intensive care patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Septic Shock, Sepsis Bacterial, Sepsis
- What is being tested?
- Blood sampling
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 7 Jan 2019to 31 May 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients at the emergency department
Who may be able to join
- Adult patient at the emergency department with verified or suspected sepsis and who is in need of intensive care.
- Informed Consent by patient or legal representative.
- Indication for beta-lactam antibiotics
Who cannot join
- < 18 years
- Patients and/or relatives unable to understand study information.
- Anaphylactic allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics
- Patients already treated with antibiotics
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Sweden1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital in Örebro
Örebro, 701 85
Johanna Savilampi, MD, +46196020266, johanna.savilampi@orebroll.se
About this study
Official title: Quantification of Bacterial DNA in Septic Intensive Care Patients in Relation to Concentration of Antibiotics and Clinical Outcome: A Prospective Observation Study
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether bacterial DNA clearance measured with droplet digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (ddPCR) can be used as a measure of bacterial load in septic intensive care patients. Furthermore, the aim is to examine a possible relation between clearance of bacterial DNA and clinical outcome in the septic patient, and the relationship between concentration of beta-lactam antibiotics and the clearance of bacterial DNA.
Read the detailed description
Septic syndrome caused by bloodstream infections represents a major healthcare problem worldwide and is the leading cause of mortality in the non-cardiac intensive care unit (ICU). Despite ongoing research efforts in sepsis, the mortality remains as high as 12-30%.
In severe sepsis, the time to adequate antibiotic therapy has been clearly linked to survival. However, in the emergency room, it is challenging to identify the cause behind the clinical presentation and identify patients who would benefit the most from antibiotic treatment. An indiscriminate use of antibiotics inevitably leads to bacterial resistance and unacceptable adverse events. Thus, there is a great and unmet medical need to develop novel diagnostic instruments that could inform the clinician about who would need antibiotics and who would not benefit from it. Furthermore, early identification of the causal microorganism and the inflammatory status of the patients would improve decisions about treatments and reduce administration of antibiotics.
Today the gold standard for diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSI) is blood culture followed by identification of species and resistance pattern by standard laboratory procedures. This procedure is associated with a high specificity but also with a low sensitivity. Probable reasons for a negative blood culture despite a strong clinical suspicion could be insufficient blood volume in the culture bottles or antibiotic treatment prior to blood sampling with a subsequent failure of the bacteria to grow in the bottles.
In recent years Polymerase Chain reaction (PCR) has been proposed as a method to determine bacterial DNA based on amplification of specific subunits (16S and 18S) of bacterial ribosomal RNA. PCR require very small amount of DNA. Another advantage is the possibility to determine bacterial species from non-viable bacteria by multiplex PCRs. However most of those multiplex PCRs have shown a limited sensitivity even though they also found clinical relevant pathogens that were not detected with blood cultures. Another limitation is that multiplex-PCR only detects at maximum 95% of all sepsis causing pathogens. In a recent published study the author concluded that a tested multiplex PCR "on whole blood specimens" in adjunct to current culture-based methods provided a clinical add-on value. The future role of PCR and other molecular techniques in the clinical setting needs further evaluation.
A new method that could improve the diagnostics of sepsis and also have the possibility to follow the bacterial DNA load during antibiotic treatment is Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR). This technique enables an absolute quantification of the sepsis causing pathogen targeting either a species specific gene or the 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene, present in several copies per bacteria. In ddPCR, the sample is divided into about 20.000 water-in-oil droplets, and in all of them the PCR-reaction occurs. Following PCR, each droplet is analyzed to determine the fraction of PCR-positive droplets giving the amount of bacterial DNA in the original sample. The absolute target DNA template concentration can then be calculated, since the size of the droplets is known, and by using Poisson distribution statistics for the correction of more than one positive reaction in the same droplet.
To identify the sepsis causing pathogen sequencing of the 16S rDNA gene or a shotgun metagenomics approach could be used. In the latter, all DNA in a sample is sequenced using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and the sepsis causing pathogen can be both detected and aims to be quantified through bioinformatics data analysis.
During the septic course the patient go from vasodilation to vascular leakage and finally a hypotension. This together with added intravenous fluid treatment will increase the distribution volume with an altered pharmacokinetic state for added antibiotics. Furthermore, decreased kidney function is common in ICU patients and augmented creatinine clearance during the acute phase of sepsis is described with increasing frequency. Therefore, it is difficult to anticipate the optimal antibiotic dose for the septic patient. Indeed, it is shown that in a considerable portion of ICU patients an adequate antibiotic exposure is not achieved and this is associated with negative clinical outcome.
A dysregulated host response is a cornerstone of the current understanding of sepsis pathophysiology. Initially during the sepsis course a proinflammatory response is induced by early activation genes, including cytokines associated with inflammation: tumor necrosis factor (TNF), Interleukin-1(IL-1), IL-12 and IL-18. Simultaneously an immune suppression is induced by anti-inflammatory cytokines i.e IL-10 and transforming growth factor. A disrupted homeostasis of the pro- and anti-inflammatory response is suggested to be part of the dysregulated host response in sepsis although clinically available biomarkers for its identification are lacking. Furthermore, the regulatory mediators involved in this process and the association to bacterial clearance during sepsis needs further investigation.
The gastrointestinal tract may be a source of bacteria and a worsening of the septic inflammation in ICU patients, if the epithelial barrier is disrupted. Thus intact gastrointestinal function is critical in severely diseased patients. There are no clinically available biomarkers of gastrointestinal function; however the recently described acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) score has been shown to correlate with adverse outcome in ICU-patients.
The aim of the study is to investigate whether bacterial DNA in whole blood measured with ddPCR can be used for assessment of bacterial clearance in septic intensive care patients. To do so the investigators will search for a potential association between bacterial DNA clearance and clearance of bacteremia detected by blood cultures.
Further, the aim is to examine a possible relation between clearance of bacterial DNA, biomarkers of dysregulated host response, and clinical outcome in the septic patient. Outcome is measured as: mortality on ICU, mortality <28 days, days in the ICU, change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score(SOFA), time in assisted ventilation, lactate clearance, need of vasopressors, and severity of gastrointestinal injury. Further, the aim is to study the relationship between concentration of beta-lactam antibiotics i.e. the minimal inhibitory concentration for the bacteria (T>MIC) detected and the clearance of bacterial DNA. The material collected will also contribute to reveal the relationship between ddPCR and shot gun sequencing in detecting the sepsis causing bacteria.
- Conditions
- Septic Shock, Sepsis Bacterial, Sepsis
- Being tested
- Blood sampling
- Keywords
- Bacterial DNA clearance, Droplet digital PCR, Betalactam antibiotics, Acute gastrointestinal index, Cytokines
- Medical subject headings
- Shock, Septic, Sepsis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood samplingDiagnostic test
Blood samples taken every third hour during the first 48 hours of intensive care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| intensive care patients with sepsis | Adult patients with verified or suspected sepsis admitted to the intensive care department from the emergency department Receives: Diagnostic Test: Blood sampling |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Bacterial DNA measured by 16S ddPCR
copies/mL
Measured: 48 hours
Secondary outcomes (18)
Concentration of beta-lactam antibiotics
mg/mL
Measured: 48 hours
Lactate clearance
mmol/L, clearance %
Measured: 48 hours
SOFA
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, from 0(normal) to 24(highest organ dysfunction)
Measured: ICU stay up to 30 days
Time in assisted ventilation
hours
Measured: ICU stay up to 30 days
Need of vasopressors
mcg/kg/hour
Measured: ICU stay up to 30 days
Days in the ICU
Days
Measured: ICU stay up to 30 days
AGI score
Acute Gastrointestinal Injury Score 0(normal) to 4(life-threatening GI complications)
Measured: ICU stay up to 30 days
ICU mortality
Occurence of death during ICU stay
Measured: ICU stay up to 30 days
28-day mortality
Occurence of death at day 28
Measured: 28 days
Gastrointestinal complications
Occurence of gastrointestinal complications including GI-bleeding, GI-ischemia, pancreatitis and ileus
Measured: 28 days
Intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP)
picogram/mL, biomarker of gastrointestinal injury
Measured: 48 hours
Citrulline
nmol/mL, biomarker of gastrointestinal injury
Measured: 48 hours
Nuclear DNA
copies/mL
Measured: 48 hours
Cytokines (Th1 and Th2 signature panel)
pg/ml
Measured: 48 hours
Blood cell populations
Mean fluorescence intensity/ Antibodies/cell. Monocytes, granulocytes, T-cells, and myeloid derived stem cells including surface markers such as PD-1(Programmed cell death protein 1),PD-L1 (Programmed death ligand 1), and HLA-DR (Human leukocyte Antigen - DR isotype)
Measured: 48 hours
HLA-DR messenger RNA (mRNA)
ratio/reference gene
Measured: 48 hours
Procalcitonin
mcg/L
Measured: 48 hours
MicroRNA (miRNA)
Relative expression/ratio reference gene, transcriptomic and quantitative PCR based measurement
Measured: 48 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Dec 2018
- Study start7 Jan 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion31 May 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Septic ShockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Region Örebro County
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jan Källman, PhD, Principal investigator, Region Örebro CountyHans Hjelmqvist, Phd, Principal investigator, Region Örebro County
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03782454
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- JS008
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 4 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 29 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Quantification of Bacterial DNA in Septic Intensive Care Patients in Relation to Concentration of Antibiotics and Clinical Outcome: A Prospective Observation Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03782454
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- JS008
- Conditions
- Septic Shock, Sepsis Bacterial, Sepsis
- Keywords
- Bacterial DNA clearance, Droplet digital PCR, Betalactam antibiotics, Acute gastrointestinal index, Cytokines
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Region Örebro CountyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether bacterial DNA clearance measured with droplet digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (ddPCR) can be used as a measure of bacterial load in septic intensive care patients. Furthermore, the aim is to examine a possible relation between clearance of bacterial DNA and clinical outcome in the septic patient, and the relationship between concentration of beta-lactam antibiotics and the clearance of bacterial DNA.
Detailed description
Septic syndrome caused by bloodstream infections represents a major healthcare problem worldwide and is the leading cause of mortality in the non-cardiac intensive care unit (ICU). Despite ongoing research efforts in sepsis, the mortality remains as high as 12-30%.
In severe sepsis, the time to adequate antibiotic therapy has been clearly linked to survival. However, in the emergency room, it is challenging to identify the cause behind the clinical presentation and identify patients who would benefit the most from antibiotic treatment. An indiscriminate use of antibiotics inevitably leads to bacterial resistance and unacceptable adverse events. Thus, there is a great and unmet medical need to develop novel diagnostic instruments that could inform the clinician about who would need antibiotics and who would not benefit from it. Furthermore, early identification of the causal microorganism and the inflammatory status of the patients would improve decisions about treatments and reduce administration of antibiotics.
Today the gold standard for diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSI) is blood culture followed by identification of species and resistance pattern by standard laboratory procedures. This procedure is associated with a high specificity but also with a low sensitivity. Probable reasons for a negative blood culture despite a strong clinical suspicion could be insufficient blood volume in the culture bottles or antibiotic treatment prior to blood sampling with a subsequent failure of the bacteria to grow in the bottles.
In recent years Polymerase Chain reaction (PCR) has been proposed as a method to determine bacterial DNA based on amplification of specific subunits (16S and 18S) of bacterial ribosomal RNA. PCR require very small amount of DNA. Another advantage is the possibility to determine bacterial species from non-viable bacteria by multiplex PCRs. However most of those multiplex PCRs have shown a limited sensitivity even though they also found clinical relevant pathogens that were not detected with blood cultures. Another limitation is that multiplex-PCR only detects at maximum 95% of all sepsis causing pathogens. In a recent published study the author concluded that a tested multiplex PCR "on whole blood specimens" in adjunct to current culture-based methods provided a clinical add-on value. The future role of PCR and other molecular techniques in the clinical setting needs further evaluation.
A new method that could improve the diagnostics of sepsis and also have the possibility to follow the bacterial DNA load during antibiotic treatment is Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR). This technique enables an absolute quantification of the sepsis causing pathogen targeting either a species specific gene or the 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene, present in several copies per bacteria. In ddPCR, the sample is divided into about 20.000 water-in-oil droplets, and in all of them the PCR-reaction occurs. Following PCR, each droplet is analyzed to determine the fraction of PCR-positive droplets giving the amount of bacterial DNA in the original sample. The absolute target DNA template concentration can then be calculated, since the size of the droplets is known, and by using Poisson distribution statistics for the correction of more than one positive reaction in the same droplet.
To identify the sepsis causing pathogen sequencing of the 16S rDNA gene or a shotgun metagenomics approach could be used. In the latter, all DNA in a sample is sequenced using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and the sepsis causing pathogen can be both detected and aims to be quantified through bioinformatics data analysis.
During the septic course the patient go from vasodilation to vascular leakage and finally a hypotension. This together with added intravenous fluid treatment will increase the distribution volume with an altered pharmacokinetic state for added antibiotics. Furthermore, decreased kidney function is common in ICU patients and augmented creatinine clearance during the acute phase of sepsis is described with increasing frequency. Therefore, it is difficult to anticipate the optimal antibiotic dose for the septic patient. Indeed, it is shown that in a considerable portion of ICU patients an adequate antibiotic exposure is not achieved and this is associated with negative clinical outcome.
A dysregulated host response is a cornerstone of the current understanding of sepsis pathophysiology. Initially during the sepsis course a proinflammatory response is induced by early activation genes, including cytokines associated with inflammation: tumor necrosis factor (TNF), Interleukin-1(IL-1), IL-12 and IL-18. Simultaneously an immune suppression is induced by anti-inflammatory cytokines i.e IL-10 and transforming growth factor. A disrupted homeostasis of the pro- and anti-inflammatory response is suggested to be part of the dysregulated host response in sepsis although clinically available biomarkers for its identification are lacking. Furthermore, the regulatory mediators involved in this process and the association to bacterial clearance during sepsis needs further investigation.
The gastrointestinal tract may be a source of bacteria and a worsening of the septic inflammation in ICU patients, if the epithelial barrier is disrupted. Thus intact gastrointestinal function is critical in severely diseased patients. There are no clinically available biomarkers of gastrointestinal function; however the recently described acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) score has been shown to correlate with adverse outcome in ICU-patients.
The aim of the study is to investigate whether bacterial DNA in whole blood measured with ddPCR can be used for assessment of bacterial clearance in septic intensive care patients. To do so the investigators will search for a potential association between bacterial DNA clearance and clearance of bacteremia detected by blood cultures.
Further, the aim is to examine a possible relation between clearance of bacterial DNA, biomarkers of dysregulated host response, and clinical outcome in the septic patient. Outcome is measured as: mortality on ICU, mortality <28 days, days in the ICU, change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score(SOFA), time in assisted ventilation, lactate clearance, need of vasopressors, and severity of gastrointestinal injury. Further, the aim is to study the relationship between concentration of beta-lactam antibiotics i.e. the minimal inhibitory concentration for the bacteria (T>MIC) detected and the clearance of bacterial DNA. The material collected will also contribute to reveal the relationship between ddPCR and shot gun sequencing in detecting the sepsis causing bacteria.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| intensive care patients with sepsis | – | Diagnostic Test: Blood samplingAdult patients with verified or suspected sepsis admitted to the intensive care department from the emergency department |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients at the emergency department
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult patient at the emergency department with verified or suspected sepsis and who is in need of intensive care.
- Informed Consent by patient or legal representative.
- Indication for beta-lactam antibiotics
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- < 18 years
- Patients and/or relatives unable to understand study information.
- Anaphylactic allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics
- Patients already treated with antibiotics
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood samplingBlood samples taken every third hour during the first 48 hours of intensive care | Diagnostic test | intensive care patients with sepsis |
Primary outcome
Bacterial DNA measured by 16S ddPCR
Time frame: 48 hours
copies/mL
18 secondary outcomes
Concentration of beta-lactam antibiotics
Time frame: 48 hours
Lactate clearance
Time frame: 48 hours
SOFA
Time frame: ICU stay up to 30 days
Time in assisted ventilation
Time frame: ICU stay up to 30 days
Need of vasopressors
Time frame: ICU stay up to 30 days
Days in the ICU
Time frame: ICU stay up to 30 days
AGI score
Time frame: ICU stay up to 30 days
ICU mortality
Time frame: ICU stay up to 30 days
28-day mortality
Time frame: 28 days
Gastrointestinal complications
Time frame: 28 days
Intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP)
Time frame: 48 hours
Citrulline
Time frame: 48 hours
Nuclear DNA
Time frame: 48 hours
Cytokines (Th1 and Th2 signature panel)
Time frame: 48 hours
Blood cell populations
Time frame: 48 hours
HLA-DR messenger RNA (mRNA)
Time frame: 48 hours
Procalcitonin
Time frame: 48 hours
MicroRNA (miRNA)
Time frame: 48 hours
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jan 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Septic Shock
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Thymosin Alpha 1 and IgM Levels in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Not yet recruiting
Vitamin C for Acute Kidney Injury in ACLF With Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Not yet recruiting
ICU-SUCCEED for Survivors of Acute Respiratory Failure and Their Caregivers
Acute Respiratory Failure, Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Trajectories of Myocardial Work in Patients With Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock Hyperdynamic
RecruitingObservational study
Immunothrombosis With Septic Shock Undergoing Renal Replacement Therapy With the OXIRIS Membrane
Sepsis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jan Källman, PhD principal investigator
Region Örebro County
Hans Hjelmqvist, Phd principal investigator
Region Örebro County
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Septic Shock and Sepsis Bacterial, run by Region Örebro County at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Johanna Savilampi, PhD (+460196020266, johanna.savilampi@regionorebrolan.se), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Bacterial DNA measured by 16S ddPCR (time frame: 48 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2019.