Neuropathic PainNCT03783624
Measuring the Effects of Complementary Therapies in Chronic Neuropathic Pain
A study testing Hypnosis in people with Neuropathic Pain, run by Chantal Berna at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The objective of the study is to a) assess the presence of a maladaptive stress response, a decreased pain modulation and any cognitive impairment in patients with chronic neuropathic pain in comparison to healthy controls. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuropathic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Hypnosis
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2018to 5 Jul 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- aged 18-90 years,
- interested in complementary medicine
- peripheral neuropathic pain lasting for more than 6 months,
- pain intensity of at least 3/10 VAS over the last two weeks
- matching patients for age and gender,
- no chronic pain condition no acute pain condition requiring daily intake of analgesics,
- no acute medical or psychiatric condition.
Who cannot join
- cognitive deficit (MMSE<24/30),
- severe hearing impairment,
- acute psychiatric (e.g. suicidality, psychotic symptoms) or somatic (e.g. unstable cardiorespiratory condition) co-morbidity preventing full engagement in the 8-week study intervention,
- prior negative experience with hypnosis,
- allergy or intolerance to mannitol.
- Healthy controls:
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized-controlled Clinical Trial of Hypnosis Versus Open Label Placebo for Chronic Neuropathic Pain With an Investigation of Neuro-cognitive Dysfunctions as Maintaining Factors and Therapeutic Targets
The objective of the study is to a) assess the presence of a maladaptive stress response, a decreased pain modulation and any cognitive impairment in patients with chronic neuropathic pain in comparison to healthy controls. and b) evaluate the efficacy of a treatment of hypnosis and of an open label placebo on these neuro-cognitive factors and on clinical pain.
This will be done through a) a prospective observational comparative study of patients (base line measures) with Healthy Controls (HC) and b) an Open label; randomised, hypnosis vs. open label placebo (OLP) vs. treatment as usual control design; with a second phase of exploratory cross-over.
Read the detailed description
The current study, through two sub-studies, aims to investigate through clinical, psychophysical and biological methodology in a population of patients with chronic neuropathic pain (i.e. involving a peripheral or CNS lesion), A) signs of a maladaptive stress response, correlates of decreased pain modulation, and of cognitive impairment, B) test hypnosis vs. open label placebo as potential mechanistic treatments of these suspected maintaining factors.
Patients will be recruited at the CHUV's Pain Center and via collaborating physicians treating patients with neuropathic pain (general practitioner, neurologist…). Controls will be recruited via advertisements posted in public places such as the CHUV, or the University of Lausanne's website and compounds.
Participants will be informed, in a clear and comprehensible way, of the nature of the study, its purpose, the procedures involved, the expected duration, the potential risks and benefits and any discomfort it may entail.
Participants (patients and volunteers) will be first phone or live pre-screened by the study team to ensure they fulfil the inclusion criteria (except the MMSE). Then, eligible participants will be invited to the pain centre for the first study visit. During this visit informed will first be collected by the PI. Following this, a screening of the cognitive function of the participant will be performed through the MMSE test. Participants with a score lower than 24/30 will be excluded and informed of their exclusion and its cause. Pre-screening and/or screening data of non-included participants will be archived anonymously at the pain center in order to document the CONSORT diagram. All other consented participants will then take part in the first study procedures, which consist in a psychophysical assessment to determine their baseline performance. These will be compared between patients and matched volunteers without chronic pain, as well as longitudinally across treatment groups. This assessment lasts approximately 3h and includes physiological recording (cardiac rhythm, pulse-oxymetry, respiratory frequency), cognitive functions evaluation (Wisconsin cards sorting test, Trail Making Test, Complex Figure Copy) and questionnaires (Brief Pain Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, WHO-BREF quality of Life, Brief Resilience Scale, Pain coping, scale and sleep index). During this visit, patients will also undergo sensory testing to evaluate their abilities to modulate pain perception. Moderately painful 10s.heat stimuli will be applied on the forearm with a thermode (Medoc TSA, Israel). In pseudo-random order, participants are instructed to pay attention to the stimulus, vs. use distraction or focused mental imagery (i.e. reappraisal of the sensation). A peripheral blood plasma sample will also be collected for metabolomic analysis, in collaboration with the Metabolomics platform of the University of Lausanne. The day before the psychophysical assessment, participants will receive instructions for saliva collection in order to determine the variation of cortisol levels during the day (4 time points) and metabolomic signature. They will receive kits either directly or by mail. Participants will bring the samples along with them to the study visit.
Healthy volunteers will only participate in this unique visit. Patients will be randomized in equal proportions into the "Hypnosis", "Open Label Placebo" or the "treatment as usual" arm.
After 4 weeks, brief questionnaires will be filled regarding pain levels. After 8 weeks, all the patients will participate in the same psychophysical assessment as described above. Patients will also participate in the assessment of their hypnotisability. Afterward, we will proceed with an exploratory, patient-choice cross-over i.e. patients randomized in the "standard of care" arm will choose between the "hypnosis" or "open label placebo" arm. Those that initially received hypnosis treatment will be free to practice self hypnosis as taught during the treatment sessions, or switch to "open label placebo". Those in the "open label placebo" can choose to continue OLP or switch to hypnosis. All participants can also choose no further intervention.
After 16 and 24 weeks a follow-up questionnaire will evaluate the longer-term efficacy of the intervention and its impact on daily life, as well as adherence to treatment and satisfaction. Questionnaires will be filled online, from home.
The intervention consists in
- . Hypnosis. This represents 6 individual script-based sessions lasting 1h, distributed over 8 weeks, administered by a certified expert in therapeutic hypnosis. A set of standardized recordings are provided to use at home for self-hypnosis. Suggestions address deep relaxation, sensory substitution or transformation, pain intensity reduction, decreased pain unpleasantness and intensity, sense of control. A brief example of such suggestions: "in this deeply relaxed state, you can imagine that your feet are covered in anesthetic… a deep layer of a powerful anesthetic medication, creating protective, soothing socks with which you can walk again…".
- . Open label placebo. This consists in information provided with a placebo pill. Patients are asked to take the placebo pills as a self-healing ritual. The information relies on 4 points of explanation, i.e. (1) the placebo effect can be powerful, (2) the body automatically can respond to taking placebo pills like Pavlov dogs who salivated when they heard a bell, (3) a positive attitude can be helpful but is not necessary, and (4) taking the pills faithfully for the full duration of treatment is critical.
The active treatments are compared treatment as usual. Treatment as usual involves medications, interventional pain therapy, physical therapy, and psychotherapy as needed, provided by the patient's current physicians. Patients are required to be on stable medication 1 month prior to enrollment, and have no novel medication or procedures introduced during the 2 first months of the trial.
- Conditions
- Neuropathic Pain
- Being tested
- Hypnosis, Open label placebo
- Keywords
- hypnosis, open label placebo, neurocognitive measures, stress, induced pain, HRV
- Medical subject headings
- Neuralgia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HypnosisBehavioural
A 6 session course of individual hypnosis therapy will be offered.
Open label placeboBehavioural
Ritual intake of 2 placebo capsules twice a day
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hypnosis | Experimental | This represents 6 individual script-based sessions lasting 1h, distributed over 8 weeks, administered by a certified expert in therapeutic hypnosis. A set of standardized recordings are provided to use at home for self-hypnosis. Suggestions address deep relaxation, sensory substitution or transformation, pain intensity reduction, decreased pain unpleasantness and intensity, sense of control. A brief example of such suggestions: "in this deeply relaxed state, you can imagine that your feet are covered in anesthetic… a deep layer of a powerful anesthetic medication, creating protective, soothing socks with which you can walk again…". Receives: Behavioral: Hypnosis |
| Open Label placebo | Placebo comparator | This consists in information provided with a placebo pill. Patients are asked to take the placebo pills as a self-healing ritual. The information relies on 4 points of explanation, i.e. (1) the placebo effect can be powerful, (2) the body automatically can respond to taking placebo pills like Pavlov dogs who salivated when they heard a bell, (3) a positive attitude can be helpful but is not necessary, and (4) taking the pills faithfully for the full duration of treatment is critical. Receives: Behavioral: Open label placebo |
| Usual care | No intervention | Patients continue with their usual treatments |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Interference due to pain (BPI interference)
Brief Pain Inventory, mean interference with function score (score 0-10), with higher scores meaning higher interference.
Measured: at 8 weeks
pain severity (BPI pain scale)
Brief Pain Inventory, mean pain intensity score over last 2 weeks (score 0-10) with higher scores meaning higher pain
Measured: at 8 weeks
fMRI of pain regulating circuitry (BOLD signal changes)
BOLD signal will be measured during pain perception
Measured: 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (14)
Stress response measured through Cortisol awakening response
Four sequential salivary samples at awakening will be collected and allow dosing of salivary cortisol levels (Cortisol Awakening Response curve).
Measured: at 8 weeks
Stress response measured through Heart rate variability (HRV)
ECG collection over times of rest and induced stress will allow to calculate HRV (based mainly on the RR interval)
Measured: at 8 weeks
Pain modulation: modulation of induced pain through mental imagery and expectations. The outcome measure is on pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for unpleasantness
induced heat pain will be modulated through different instructions provided with visual cues: e.g. participants will be asked to imagine the stimulus is delivered in different contexts (more or less pleasant). The responses are given on a Pain unpleasantness Visual analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (not at all unpleasant: better outcome) to 10 (as much as can be unpleasant: worse outcome).
Measured: at 8 weeks
Pain modulation: modulation of induced pain through mental imagery and expectations. The outcome measure is on pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for intensity
induced heat pain will be modulated through different instructions provided with visual cues: e.g. participants will be asked to imagine the stimulus is delivered in different contexts (more or less pleasant). The responses are given on a Pain intensity Visual analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (not at all intense- better outcome) to 10 (as much as can be intense- worse outcome).
Measured: at 8 weeks
Trail making test (outcomes in time, seconds)
Neuro-cognitive functioning testing
Measured: at 8 weeks
Wisconsin card sorting task
Standardized cognitive flexibility task
Measured: at 8 weeks
Rey-Osterrieth figure test
Prospective thinking task
Measured: at 8 weeks
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which measures anxiety and depression symptoms in patients with somatic medical diagnosis. This scale ranges from 0-42 points, where higher scores indicate more depression/Anxiety. There are 2 sub-scales, each with 21 points, one for depression, teh other one for anxiety. The global scale score is calculated as a total
Measured: at 8 weeks
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Tampa scale of fear of movement (i.e. Kinesiophobia): A scale with results ranging from 11-44 points, with teh higher points suggesting more severe kinesiophobia (worse fear of movement, worse outcome).
Measured: at 8 weeks
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
This scale measures the Catastrophizing thinking regarding pain scale. The score ranges between 0-52 with the higher scores indicating more severe catastrophizing, i.e. worse negative thinking regarding pain.
Measured: at 8 weeks
Coping Strategies Questionnaire
Scale measuring the cognitive coping strategies used to deal with pain, with scores ranging from 0 to 78 points total, with higher scores indicating higher coping skills
Measured: at 8 weeks
patient satisfaction with care
Subjective measure of satisfaction with the treatment, on a VAS scale: How satisfied are you with your attributed treatment? VAS 0: not at all; 10: very much satisfied
Measured: 4 and 8 weeks
Evaluation of patient compliance
Subjective measures of compliance: adequate adherence to treatment recommendations: question : "were you able to follow the treatment plan as instructed? " Yes/no" if no: why. NUmber of patients reporting adequate compliance.
Measured: 4 and 8 weeks
Blood metabolomics
Metabolomics is the analysis of the metabolic state (metabolites in the blood, saliva or other bodily fluid) at a given time. It is a growing technology that allows to analyse the biological response from a broader perspective and offers a sensitive way to investigate poorly-explored biochemical pathways in disease. The analysis of metabolites may provide a technically and bioinformatically tractable, physiologically relevant, chemically comprehensive method to better understand complex chronic diseases. For example, a recent study on chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) showed an objectively identifiable chemical signature in both men and women with CFS distinct from healthy controls. Metabolomics showed that CFS is a highly concerted hypometabolic response to environmental stress that traces to the mitochondria.
Measured: 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Dec 2018
- Study start15 Nov 2018
- Primary completion15 Mar 2024
- Study completion5 Jul 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Neuropathic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chantal Berna
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Chantal Berna, University of Lausanne Hospitals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03783624
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CER-VD 2017- 00924
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 28 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Anonymized data can be made accessible to interested researchers upon request
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized-controlled Clinical Trial of Hypnosis Versus Open Label Placebo for Chronic Neuropathic Pain With an Investigation of Neuro-cognitive Dysfunctions as Maintaining Factors and Therapeutic Targets
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03783624
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CER-VD 2017- 00924
- Conditions
- Neuropathic Pain
- Keywords
- hypnosis, open label placebo, neurocognitive measures, stress, induced pain, HRV
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chantal BernaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Jul 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of the study is to a) assess the presence of a maladaptive stress response, a decreased pain modulation and any cognitive impairment in patients with chronic neuropathic pain in comparison to healthy controls. and b) evaluate the efficacy of a treatment of hypnosis and of an open label placebo on these neuro-cognitive factors and on clinical pain.
This will be done through a) a prospective observational comparative study of patients (base line measures) with Healthy Controls (HC) and b) an Open label; randomised, hypnosis vs. open label placebo (OLP) vs. treatment as usual control design; with a second phase of exploratory cross-over.
Detailed description
The current study, through two sub-studies, aims to investigate through clinical, psychophysical and biological methodology in a population of patients with chronic neuropathic pain (i.e. involving a peripheral or CNS lesion), A) signs of a maladaptive stress response, correlates of decreased pain modulation, and of cognitive impairment, B) test hypnosis vs. open label placebo as potential mechanistic treatments of these suspected maintaining factors.
Patients will be recruited at the CHUV's Pain Center and via collaborating physicians treating patients with neuropathic pain (general practitioner, neurologist…). Controls will be recruited via advertisements posted in public places such as the CHUV, or the University of Lausanne's website and compounds.
Participants will be informed, in a clear and comprehensible way, of the nature of the study, its purpose, the procedures involved, the expected duration, the potential risks and benefits and any discomfort it may entail.
Participants (patients and volunteers) will be first phone or live pre-screened by the study team to ensure they fulfil the inclusion criteria (except the MMSE). Then, eligible participants will be invited to the pain centre for the first study visit. During this visit informed will first be collected by the PI. Following this, a screening of the cognitive function of the participant will be performed through the MMSE test. Participants with a score lower than 24/30 will be excluded and informed of their exclusion and its cause. Pre-screening and/or screening data of non-included participants will be archived anonymously at the pain center in order to document the CONSORT diagram. All other consented participants will then take part in the first study procedures, which consist in a psychophysical assessment to determine their baseline performance. These will be compared between patients and matched volunteers without chronic pain, as well as longitudinally across treatment groups. This assessment lasts approximately 3h and includes physiological recording (cardiac rhythm, pulse-oxymetry, respiratory frequency), cognitive functions evaluation (Wisconsin cards sorting test, Trail Making Test, Complex Figure Copy) and questionnaires (Brief Pain Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, WHO-BREF quality of Life, Brief Resilience Scale, Pain coping, scale and sleep index). During this visit, patients will also undergo sensory testing to evaluate their abilities to modulate pain perception. Moderately painful 10s.heat stimuli will be applied on the forearm with a thermode (Medoc TSA, Israel). In pseudo-random order, participants are instructed to pay attention to the stimulus, vs. use distraction or focused mental imagery (i.e. reappraisal of the sensation). A peripheral blood plasma sample will also be collected for metabolomic analysis, in collaboration with the Metabolomics platform of the University of Lausanne. The day before the psychophysical assessment, participants will receive instructions for saliva collection in order to determine the variation of cortisol levels during the day (4 time points) and metabolomic signature. They will receive kits either directly or by mail. Participants will bring the samples along with them to the study visit.
Healthy volunteers will only participate in this unique visit. Patients will be randomized in equal proportions into the "Hypnosis", "Open Label Placebo" or the "treatment as usual" arm.
After 4 weeks, brief questionnaires will be filled regarding pain levels. After 8 weeks, all the patients will participate in the same psychophysical assessment as described above. Patients will also participate in the assessment of their hypnotisability. Afterward, we will proceed with an exploratory, patient-choice cross-over i.e. patients randomized in the "standard of care" arm will choose between the "hypnosis" or "open label placebo" arm. Those that initially received hypnosis treatment will be free to practice self hypnosis as taught during the treatment sessions, or switch to "open label placebo". Those in the "open label placebo" can choose to continue OLP or switch to hypnosis. All participants can also choose no further intervention.
After 16 and 24 weeks a follow-up questionnaire will evaluate the longer-term efficacy of the intervention and its impact on daily life, as well as adherence to treatment and satisfaction. Questionnaires will be filled online, from home.
The intervention consists in
- . Hypnosis. This represents 6 individual script-based sessions lasting 1h, distributed over 8 weeks, administered by a certified expert in therapeutic hypnosis. A set of standardized recordings are provided to use at home for self-hypnosis. Suggestions address deep relaxation, sensory substitution or transformation, pain intensity reduction, decreased pain unpleasantness and intensity, sense of control. A brief example of such suggestions: "in this deeply relaxed state, you can imagine that your feet are covered in anesthetic… a deep layer of a powerful anesthetic medication, creating protective, soothing socks with which you can walk again…".
- . Open label placebo. This consists in information provided with a placebo pill. Patients are asked to take the placebo pills as a self-healing ritual. The information relies on 4 points of explanation, i.e. (1) the placebo effect can be powerful, (2) the body automatically can respond to taking placebo pills like Pavlov dogs who salivated when they heard a bell, (3) a positive attitude can be helpful but is not necessary, and (4) taking the pills faithfully for the full duration of treatment is critical.
The active treatments are compared treatment as usual. Treatment as usual involves medications, interventional pain therapy, physical therapy, and psychotherapy as needed, provided by the patient's current physicians. Patients are required to be on stable medication 1 month prior to enrollment, and have no novel medication or procedures introduced during the 2 first months of the trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hypnosis | Experimental | Behavioral: HypnosisThis represents 6 individual script-based sessions lasting 1h, distributed over 8 weeks, administered by a certified expert in therapeutic hypnosis. A set of standardized recordings are provided to use at home for self-hypnosis. Suggestions address deep relaxation, sensory substitution or transformation, pain intensity reduction, decreased pain unpleasantness and intensity, sense of control. A brief example of such suggestions: "in this deeply relaxed state, you can imagine that your feet are covered in anesthetic… a deep layer of a powerful anesthetic medication, creating protective, soothing socks with which you can walk again…". |
| Open Label placebo | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: Open label placeboThis consists in information provided with a placebo pill. Patients are asked to take the placebo pills as a self-healing ritual. The information relies on 4 points of explanation, i.e. (1) the placebo effect can be powerful, (2) the body automatically can respond to taking placebo pills like Pavlov dogs who salivated when they heard a bell, (3) a positive attitude can be helpful but is not necessary, and (4) taking the pills faithfully for the full duration of treatment is critical. |
| Usual care | No intervention | –Patients continue with their usual treatments |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- aged 18-90 years,
- interested in complementary medicine
- peripheral neuropathic pain lasting for more than 6 months,
- pain intensity of at least 3/10 VAS over the last two weeks
- matching patients for age and gender,
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- cognitive deficit (MMSE<24/30),
- severe hearing impairment,
- acute psychiatric (e.g. suicidality, psychotic symptoms) or somatic (e.g. unstable cardiorespiratory condition) co-morbidity preventing full engagement in the 8-week study intervention,
- prior negative experience with hypnosis,
- allergy or intolerance to mannitol.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HypnosisA 6 session course of individual hypnosis therapy will be offered. | Behavioural | Hypnosis |
| Open label placeboRitual intake of 2 placebo capsules twice a day | Behavioural | Open Label placebo |
Primary outcome
Interference due to pain (BPI interference)
Time frame: at 8 weeks
Brief Pain Inventory, mean interference with function score (score 0-10), with higher scores meaning higher interference.
pain severity (BPI pain scale)
Time frame: at 8 weeks
Brief Pain Inventory, mean pain intensity score over last 2 weeks (score 0-10) with higher scores meaning higher pain
fMRI of pain regulating circuitry (BOLD signal changes)
Time frame: 8 weeks
BOLD signal will be measured during pain perception
14 secondary outcomes
Stress response measured through Cortisol awakening response
Time frame: at 8 weeks
Stress response measured through Heart rate variability (HRV)
Time frame: at 8 weeks
Pain modulation: modulation of induced pain through mental imagery and expectations. The outcome measure is on pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for unpleasantness
Time frame: at 8 weeks
Pain modulation: modulation of induced pain through mental imagery and expectations. The outcome measure is on pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for intensity
Time frame: at 8 weeks
Trail making test (outcomes in time, seconds)
Time frame: at 8 weeks
Wisconsin card sorting task
Time frame: at 8 weeks
Rey-Osterrieth figure test
Time frame: at 8 weeks
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time frame: at 8 weeks
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Time frame: at 8 weeks
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time frame: at 8 weeks
Coping Strategies Questionnaire
Time frame: at 8 weeks
patient satisfaction with care
Time frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Evaluation of patient compliance
Time frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Blood metabolomics
Time frame: 8 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Anonymized data can be made accessible to interested researchers upon request
Related trials for Neuropathic Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Low Dose Naltrexone Therapy for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Chronic Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Trigeminal Neuralgia Electrophysiology
Trigeminal Neuralgia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hypnosis in people with Neuropathic Pain, run by Chantal Berna at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Interference due to pain (BPI interference) (time frame: at 8 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2026.