AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostate CancerNCT03787823

RCT-evaluation of Retzius-sparing Robotic Prostatectomy

A study testing robotic Prostatectomy (RARP) in people with Prostate Cancer and Urinary Incontinence, run by Heidelberg University at 1 site in Germany.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prospective randomized blinded RCT comparing Transdouglas Prostatectomy to classical transperitoneal anterior radical prostatectomy Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
What is being tested?
robotic Prostatectomy (RARP)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
186 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
27 Aug 2018to 30 Nov 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Indication for radical prostatectomy
  • >18 years old
  • Literate
  • Preoperatively continent
  • informed signed consent for study

Who cannot join

  • cT4-Cancer
  • Withdrawl of consent to study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • University of Heidelberg

    Heidelberg

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Robotic Retzius-sparing Radical Prostatectomy- a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Transdouglas-RARP

Prospective randomized blinded RCT comparing Transdouglas Prostatectomy to classical transperitoneal anterior radical prostatectomy

Read the detailed description

We will evaluate functional urinary and sexual recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications in patients over a follow up period of 12 months

Being tested
robotic Prostatectomy (RARP)
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms, Urinary Incontinence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • robotic Prostatectomy (RARP)Procedure or surgery

    Modification of robotic Prostatectomy Arm A classic technique/ anterior transperitoneal RARP Arm B Transdouglas Technique/retzius-sparing RARP

Study groups in NCT03787823
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Retzius-sparing RARPOtherArm B randomizes men with an indication for radical robotic Prostatectomy (RARP) to retzius-sparing transdouglas RARP
Receives: Procedure: robotic Prostatectomy (RARP)
anterior transperitoneal RARPOtherArm A randomizes men with an indication for radical robotic Prostatectomy (RARP) to anterior transperitoneal RARP
Receives: Procedure: robotic Prostatectomy (RARP)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Urinary continence

    Pad use

    Measured: 1 Week after Prostatectomy

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Resection margine

    Measured: pathology report, approximately 1 week postoperatively

  2. Urinary continence

    Pad use

    Measured: 3, 6 and 12 months after Prostatectomy

  3. Postoperative complications

    Measured: First 12 months after Prostatectomy

  4. postoperative PSA

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Dec 2018
  2. Study start27 Aug 2018
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
186 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03787823
Sponsor's protocol ID
Transdouglas RCT-Study
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
4 Sep 2018
Last updated
24 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: So far, no sharing planed

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing robotic Prostatectomy (RARP) in people with Prostate Cancer and Urinary Incontinence, run by Heidelberg University at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Urinary continence (time frame: 1 Week after Prostatectomy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in