Asthma ChronicNCT03788057
Inflammatory Indices in Predicting the Failure of Inhaled Corticosteroids Reduction in Young Participants With Asthma
A study testing ICS dose reduction in people with Asthma Chronic, run by National Institute for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Poland at 1 site in Poland.
Trial summary
A prospective, observational, interventional, single-blind study (blinded for a clinician in the field of inflammatory parameters). The aim of the study is evaluation of the usefulness of induced sputum eosinophilia and other inflammatory indices [exhaled nitric oxide (NO), exhaled breath temperature, bronchial… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma Chronic
- What is being tested?
- ICS dose reduction
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 58 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePoland
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2016to 31 Mar 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- mild or moderate asthma with a stable course of at least 3 months:
- symptoms less than 4x per week,
- use of SABA below 3x a week,
- night awakening below 1x per week,
- FEV1> 80% of predicted
- no dose change in ICS or use of systemic steroids from 3 months
- good adherence to treatment
Who cannot join
- infection or exacerbation of asthma requiring the use of systemic steroids (or changes in the dose of inhaled steroids) in the last 3 months before the study
- other chronic lung diseases or general diseases affecting the respiratory system
- tobacco smoking
- FEV1 below 80% of the predicted value
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Usefulness of Induced Sputum Eosinophilia, eNO and Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness in Predicting the Failure of Inhaled Corticosteroids Dose Reduction in Children and Adolescents With Stable Asthma
A prospective, observational, interventional, single-blind study (blinded for a clinician in the field of inflammatory parameters).
The aim of the study is evaluation of the usefulness of induced sputum eosinophilia and other inflammatory indices [exhaled nitric oxide (NO), exhaled breath temperature, bronchial hyperresponsiveness] in predicting the failure of treatment reduction with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in stable asthma in children and adolescents.
Read more
In participants with a stable course of the asthma (confirmed in the run -in period), every 3 months the dose of ICS is halved (according to GINA guidelines) until the control is lost or the lowest daily ICS dose is reached (200 mcg, calculated as budesonide equivalent). Throughout the treatment reduction period, the participants run an observation card (clinical symptoms) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) measurements. Clinical evaluation is performed every month, with spirometry, exhaled NO and exhaled breath temperature measurements. Before the reduction and then one month after the change of treatment, the hyperresponsiveness measurement is carried out with the sputum induction (combined method using hypertonic saline), and 2 months after the change of treatment with the exercise challenge test.
In the case of loss of asthma control, beta-mimetic will be administered (temporarily) and return to dose of ICS before reduction or further increase of treatment is planned. In severe asthma exacerbations, oral steroids will be considered.
The study is observational: treatment is modified according to GINA guidelines based on clinical data as part of routine medical care. Only difference compared do standard care is supplementary inflammation evaluation (exhaled NO, sputum eosinophilia, bronchial hyperreactivity).
Read the detailed description
Introduction Guidelines for the treatment of asthma recommend the use of the smallest dose of inhaled steroid (ICS), which allows to maintain control of the symptoms of the disease. The GINA 2006 guidelines proposed (and later editions it upheld) that in the case of symptom control by monotherapy with ICS, to reduce their dose every 3 months, up to the lowest dose administered once a day, which should be used for one year before taking possible decision to stop it.
There are no clear of simple and sensitive indicators that would allow detection of a threatening loss of control before the clinical symptoms worsen.
Aim of the study Evaluation of the usefulness of induced sputum eosinophilia and other inflammatory indices [exhaled nitric oxide (NO), exhaled breath temperature (EBT), bronchial hyperresponsiveness] in predicting the failure of treatment reduction with inhaled corticosteroids in stable asthma in children and adolescents.
Subjects Participants aged 12-18 years with stable asthma (mild or moderate), treated in the Allergy Clinic of the Hospital in Lesko with medium doses in ICS. The severity of asthma was initially determined in accordance with the GINA criteria and verified during several years of observation by the assessment of clinical symptoms, functional examinations and the dose of inhaled steroids controlling the disease.
Project description A prospective, observational, single-blind study (blinded for a clinician in the field of inflammatory parameters). Clinician takes decision about possible reduction of ICS dose basing on clinical data only - is not aware of the results of the inflammatory parameters measurement.
The study is consisting of two periods:
First period (run - in):
A four-week run - in period in which clinical symptoms and the use of short acting beta2 agonists (SABA) and PEFR are monitored. At the end of this period, in participants with stable disease the following parameters are measured: eNO, EBT, spirometry, and sputum induction with hyperosmolar saline in combination with the hyperresponsiveness. Before the reduction of treatment on another day, an exercise challenge test is also performed.
The criteria for the stability of asthma in the run - in period are:
- symptoms no more than 3 times a week
- SABA use less than 3 times a week
- without night wake up
- PEFR variability below 20%
- FEV1 above 80% of predicted
Second period of the study - reduction of anti-inflammatory therapy. In participants with previously stable course of the asthma (confirmed in the run -in period), the control of asthma is monitored regularly throughout the observation period. All participants run an observation card (clinical symptoms) and PEFR measurements. Monthly spirometry, exhaled NO and exhaled breath temperature measurements are performed. Every 3 months and one month after the change of treatment (i.e in months 0, 1, 3, 4, 6 and 7), the hyperresponsiveness measurement is carried out with the sputum induction (combined method, [7]). Two months after the dose change (months 2, 5, 8) the exercise challenge test is carried out.
Every 3 months control of the asthma symptoms is evaluated taking account the clinical data, and possible change of ICS dose is considered. Results of bronchial reactivity measurements and sputum cytology are not known to clinician who decide on a possible ICS dose change - he is blinded to the results of tests and the therapeutic decision is based solely on clinical evaluation.
In participants with a stable course of the disease over past 3 months, the dose of ICS is halved, in accordance with GINA guidelines. In the case of loss of asthma control, appropriate treatment modifications are administered and the patient is withdrawn from the study.
Participation in the study is continued until asthma control is lost or the lowest daily dose is reached (200 mcg, calculated as budesonide equivalent) - without losing asthma control at next visit.
Measurements
- Daily clinical evaluation by the patient:
- symptoms score according to the Santanello questionnaire
- PEFR measurement
- Every month
- Asthma Control Test
- spirometry [forced expiratory flow in 1st second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25-75)]
- eNO measurement
- exhaled breath temperature measurement (EBT)
- every 3 months
- quality of life test (QoL, Polish version of the questionnaire), i.e. months 3, 6, 9
- cytological evaluation of induced sputum (i.e. months 0, 1, 3, 4, 6, 7)
- assessment of bronchial hyperresponsiveness:
- one month after the ICS dose reduction and then before each subsequent dose reduction in ICS ((i.e. months 0, 1, 3, 4, 6, 7) - during the sputum induction with hyperosmolar salt (combined method)
- 2 months after each treatment reduction (i.e. months 2, 5, 8): exercise challenge test (6-minute free-running test monitored by pulse)
Criteria for loss of control [1, 6] - any of the following:
- use of bronchodilators> 5 times a week
- the need for treatment with oral corticosteroids
- PEFR decrease above 20% for 2 consecutive days, compared to the average run-in period In the case of loss of asthma control, beta-mimetic will be administered (temporarily) and return to the chronic administration of the previous, twice higher dose of ICS is restored (or further increase of treatment). In severe exacerbations, inclusion of oral steroids will be considered.
Criteria for discontinuation of participation in the study
- Loss of asthma control (treatment strategy: beta-mimetic temporarily, return to dose of ICS before reduction or further increase of treatment; in severe exacerbations, inclusion of oral steroids).
- Lack of adherence to the recommendations or failure to report.
The staff of the center has experience in the production of sputum induction in participants with asthma [Ciółkowski J, Mazurek H, Stasiowska B. Evaluation of step - down therapy from an inhaled steroid to montelukast in childhood asthma. Allergologia et immunopathologia (Madr.), 2014: Jul - Aug; 42 (4): 282 - 288].
The test will be performed in conditions ensuring patient safety, with the availability of an anaesthesiologist and anti-shock kit.
- Conditions
- Asthma Chronic
- Being tested
- ICS dose reduction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ICS dose reductionOther
If control of symptoms is maintained (evaluation based on clinical symptoms solely), every 3 months the dose of ICS is halved according to GINA guidelines, until the control is lost or the lowest daily dose is reached (200 mcg, calculated as budesonide equivalent).
In the case of loss of asthma control, beta-mimetic will be administered (temporarily) and return to the chronic administration of the previous, twice higher dose of ICS is restored (or further increase of treatment). In severe exacerbations, inclusion of oral steroids will be considered.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| stable asthma | Other | In patients with previously stable course of the asthma, every 3 months the symptoms are evaluated and the dose of ICS is customized - in accordance with the GINA guidelines. This decision is based solely on clinical data (control of symptoms) and is the same as in patients not participating in the study.
In patients participating in the study, inflammatory parameters are also measured (sputum eosinophilia, eNO, EBT, bronchial reactivity), but results are not known to clinician taking decision about possible ICS dose reduction. Receives: Other: ICS dose reduction |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Percentage of Patients With Loss of Asthma Control
Criteria for loss of control (any of the following):
- use of bronchodilators > 5 times a week
- the need for treatment with oral corticosteroids
- PEFR decrease >20% for 2 consecutive days, compared to the average run-in period
Measured: at 9 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in Sputum Eosinophilia
eosinophil percentage in induced sputum compared to baseline
Measured: at 1, 3, 4, 6 and 7 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Dec 2018
- Study start1 Feb 2016
- Primary completion31 Mar 2019
- Study completion31 Mar 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Asthma ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- A prospective, observational, interventional, single blind study. Clinician takes decision about possible reduction of ICS dose basing on clinical data only - is not aware of the results of the inflammatory parameters measurement.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Poland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Rzeszow, The Regional Public Hospital in Lesko, Poland
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03788057
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NITLD
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 12 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
www.ginasthma.org
Zacharasiewicz A, Wilson N, Lex C, Erin EM, Li AM, Hansel T, Khan M, Bush A. Clinical use of noninvasive measurements of airway inflammation in steroid reduction in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 May 15;171(10):1077-82. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200409-1242OC. Epub 2005 Feb 11.
PubMed 15709050Green RH, Brightling CE, McKenna S, Hargadon B, Parker D, Bradding P, Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. Asthma exacerbations and sputum eosinophil counts: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002 Nov 30;360(9347):1715-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11679-5.
PubMed 12480423Fleming L, Wilson N, Regamey N, Bush A. Use of sputum eosinophil counts to guide management in children with severe asthma. Thorax. 2012 Mar;67(3):193-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.156836. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
PubMed 21825081Jayaram L, Pizzichini MM, Cook RJ, Boulet LP, Lemiere C, Pizzichini E, Cartier A, Hussack P, Goldsmith CH, Laviolette M, Parameswaran K, Hargreave FE. Determining asthma treatment by monitoring sputum cell counts: effect on exacerbations. Eur Respir J. 2006 Mar;27(3):483-94. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00137704.
PubMed 16507847Li AM, Tsang TW, Lam HS, Sung RY, Chang AB. Predictors for failed dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids in childhood asthma. Respirology. 2008 May;13(3):400-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2007.01222.x.
PubMed 18399863Prieto L, Bruno L, Gutierrez V, Uixera S, Perez-Frances C, Lanuza A, Ferrer A. Airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate and exhaled nitric oxide measurements: predictive value as markers for reducing the dose of inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic subjects. Chest. 2003 Oct;124(4):1325-33. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.4.1325.
PubMed 14555562Deykin A, Lazarus SC, Fahy JV, Wechsler ME, Boushey HA, Chinchilli VM, Craig TJ, Dimango E, Kraft M, Leone F, Lemanske RF, Martin RJ, Pesola GR, Peters SP, Sorkness CA, Szefler SJ, Israel E; Asthma Clinical Research Network, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/NIH. Sputum eosinophil counts predict asthma control after discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroids. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Apr;115(4):720-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.12.1129.
PubMed 15805990Belda J, Parameswaran K, Lemiere C, Kamada D, O'Byrne PM, Hargreave FE. Predictors of loss of asthma control induced by corticosteroid withdrawal. Can Respir J. 2006 Apr;13(3):129-33. doi: 10.1155/2006/189127.
PubMed 16642226Jatakanon A, Lim S, Barnes PJ. Changes in sputum eosinophils predict loss of asthma control. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Jan;161(1):64-72. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.1.9809100.
PubMed 10619799Leuppi JD, Salome CM, Jenkins CR, Anderson SD, Xuan W, Marks GB, Koskela H, Brannan JD, Freed R, Andersson M, Chan HK, Woolcock AJ. Predictive markers of asthma exacerbation during stepwise dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;163(2):406-12. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.9912091.
PubMed 11179114Cabral AL, Vollmer WM, Barbirotto RM, Martins MA. Exhaled nitric oxide as a predictor of exacerbation in children with moderate-to-severe asthma: a prospective, 5-month study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009 Sep;103(3):206-11. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60183-4.
PubMed 19788017
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Usefulness of Induced Sputum Eosinophilia, eNO and Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness in Predicting the Failure of Inhaled Corticosteroids Dose Reduction in Children and Adolescents With Stable Asthma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03788057
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NITLD
- Conditions
- Asthma Chronic
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, PolandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Rzeszow, The Regional Public Hospital in Lesko, Poland
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 19 Sep 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A prospective, observational, interventional, single-blind study (blinded for a clinician in the field of inflammatory parameters).
The aim of the study is evaluation of the usefulness of induced sputum eosinophilia and other inflammatory indices [exhaled nitric oxide (NO), exhaled breath temperature, bronchial hyperresponsiveness] in predicting the failure of treatment reduction with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in stable asthma in children and adolescents.
In participants with a stable course of the asthma (confirmed in the run -in period), every 3 months the dose of ICS is halved (according to GINA guidelines) until the control is lost or the lowest daily ICS dose is reached (200 mcg, calculated as budesonide equivalent). Throughout the treatment reduction period, the participants run an observation card (clinical symptoms) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) measurements. Clinical evaluation is performed every month, with spirometry, exhaled NO and exhaled breath temperature measurements. Before the reduction and then one month after the change of treatment, the hyperresponsiveness measurement is carried out with the sputum induction (combined method using hypertonic saline), and 2 months after the change of treatment with the exercise challenge test.
In the case of loss of asthma control, beta-mimetic will be administered (temporarily) and return to dose of ICS before reduction or further increase of treatment is planned. In severe asthma exacerbations, oral steroids will be considered.
The study is observational: treatment is modified according to GINA guidelines based on clinical data as part of routine medical care. Only difference compared do standard care is supplementary inflammation evaluation (exhaled NO, sputum eosinophilia, bronchial hyperreactivity).
Detailed description
Introduction Guidelines for the treatment of asthma recommend the use of the smallest dose of inhaled steroid (ICS), which allows to maintain control of the symptoms of the disease. The GINA 2006 guidelines proposed (and later editions it upheld) that in the case of symptom control by monotherapy with ICS, to reduce their dose every 3 months, up to the lowest dose administered once a day, which should be used for one year before taking possible decision to stop it.
There are no clear of simple and sensitive indicators that would allow detection of a threatening loss of control before the clinical symptoms worsen.
Aim of the study Evaluation of the usefulness of induced sputum eosinophilia and other inflammatory indices [exhaled nitric oxide (NO), exhaled breath temperature (EBT), bronchial hyperresponsiveness] in predicting the failure of treatment reduction with inhaled corticosteroids in stable asthma in children and adolescents.
Subjects Participants aged 12-18 years with stable asthma (mild or moderate), treated in the Allergy Clinic of the Hospital in Lesko with medium doses in ICS. The severity of asthma was initially determined in accordance with the GINA criteria and verified during several years of observation by the assessment of clinical symptoms, functional examinations and the dose of inhaled steroids controlling the disease.
Project description A prospective, observational, single-blind study (blinded for a clinician in the field of inflammatory parameters). Clinician takes decision about possible reduction of ICS dose basing on clinical data only - is not aware of the results of the inflammatory parameters measurement.
The study is consisting of two periods:
First period (run - in):
A four-week run - in period in which clinical symptoms and the use of short acting beta2 agonists (SABA) and PEFR are monitored. At the end of this period, in participants with stable disease the following parameters are measured: eNO, EBT, spirometry, and sputum induction with hyperosmolar saline in combination with the hyperresponsiveness. Before the reduction of treatment on another day, an exercise challenge test is also performed.
The criteria for the stability of asthma in the run - in period are:
- symptoms no more than 3 times a week
- SABA use less than 3 times a week
- without night wake up
- PEFR variability below 20%
- FEV1 above 80% of predicted
Second period of the study - reduction of anti-inflammatory therapy. In participants with previously stable course of the asthma (confirmed in the run -in period), the control of asthma is monitored regularly throughout the observation period. All participants run an observation card (clinical symptoms) and PEFR measurements. Monthly spirometry, exhaled NO and exhaled breath temperature measurements are performed. Every 3 months and one month after the change of treatment (i.e in months 0, 1, 3, 4, 6 and 7), the hyperresponsiveness measurement is carried out with the sputum induction (combined method, [7]). Two months after the dose change (months 2, 5, 8) the exercise challenge test is carried out.
Every 3 months control of the asthma symptoms is evaluated taking account the clinical data, and possible change of ICS dose is considered. Results of bronchial reactivity measurements and sputum cytology are not known to clinician who decide on a possible ICS dose change - he is blinded to the results of tests and the therapeutic decision is based solely on clinical evaluation.
In participants with a stable course of the disease over past 3 months, the dose of ICS is halved, in accordance with GINA guidelines. In the case of loss of asthma control, appropriate treatment modifications are administered and the patient is withdrawn from the study.
Participation in the study is continued until asthma control is lost or the lowest daily dose is reached (200 mcg, calculated as budesonide equivalent) - without losing asthma control at next visit.
Measurements
- Daily clinical evaluation by the patient:
- symptoms score according to the Santanello questionnaire
- PEFR measurement
- Every month
- Asthma Control Test
- spirometry [forced expiratory flow in 1st second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25-75)]
- eNO measurement
- exhaled breath temperature measurement (EBT)
- every 3 months
- quality of life test (QoL, Polish version of the questionnaire), i.e. months 3, 6, 9
- cytological evaluation of induced sputum (i.e. months 0, 1, 3, 4, 6, 7)
- assessment of bronchial hyperresponsiveness:
- one month after the ICS dose reduction and then before each subsequent dose reduction in ICS ((i.e. months 0, 1, 3, 4, 6, 7) - during the sputum induction with hyperosmolar salt (combined method)
- 2 months after each treatment reduction (i.e. months 2, 5, 8): exercise challenge test (6-minute free-running test monitored by pulse)
Criteria for loss of control [1, 6] - any of the following:
- use of bronchodilators> 5 times a week
- the need for treatment with oral corticosteroids
- PEFR decrease above 20% for 2 consecutive days, compared to the average run-in period In the case of loss of asthma control, beta-mimetic will be administered (temporarily) and return to the chronic administration of the previous, twice higher dose of ICS is restored (or further increase of treatment). In severe exacerbations, inclusion of oral steroids will be considered.
Criteria for discontinuation of participation in the study
- Loss of asthma control (treatment strategy: beta-mimetic temporarily, return to dose of ICS before reduction or further increase of treatment; in severe exacerbations, inclusion of oral steroids).
- Lack of adherence to the recommendations or failure to report.
The staff of the center has experience in the production of sputum induction in participants with asthma [Ciółkowski J, Mazurek H, Stasiowska B. Evaluation of step - down therapy from an inhaled steroid to montelukast in childhood asthma. Allergologia et immunopathologia (Madr.), 2014: Jul - Aug; 42 (4): 282 - 288].
The test will be performed in conditions ensuring patient safety, with the availability of an anaesthesiologist and anti-shock kit.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- A prospective, observational, interventional, single blind study. Clinician takes decision about possible reduction of ICS dose basing on clinical data only - is not aware of the results of the inflammatory parameters measurement.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| stable asthma | Other | Other: ICS dose reductionIn patients with previously stable course of the asthma, every 3 months the symptoms are evaluated and the dose of ICS is customized - in accordance with the GINA guidelines. This decision is based solely on clinical data (control of symptoms) and is the same as in patients not participating in the study. In patients participating in the study, inflammatory parameters are also measured (sputum eosinophilia, eNO, EBT, bronchial reactivity), but results are not known to clinician taking decision about possible ICS dose reduction. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- mild or moderate asthma with a stable course of at least 3 months:
- good adherence to treatment
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- infection or exacerbation of asthma requiring the use of systemic steroids (or changes in the dose of inhaled steroids) in the last 3 months before the study
- other chronic lung diseases or general diseases affecting the respiratory system
- tobacco smoking
- FEV1 below 80% of the predicted value
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ICS dose reductionIf control of symptoms is maintained (evaluation based on clinical symptoms solely), every 3 months the dose of ICS is halved according to GINA guidelines, until the control is lost or the lowest daily dose is reached (200 mcg, calculated as budesonide equivalent). In the case of loss of asthma control, beta-mimetic will be administered (temporarily) and return to the chronic administration of the previous, twice higher dose of ICS is restored (or further increase of treatment). In severe exacerbations, inclusion of oral steroids will be considered. | Other | stable asthma |
Primary outcome
The Percentage of Patients With Loss of Asthma Control
Time frame: at 9 months
Criteria for loss of control (any of the following): * use of bronchodilators > 5 times a week * the need for treatment with oral corticosteroids * PEFR decrease >20% for 2 consecutive days, compared to the average run-in period
1 secondary outcome
Change in Sputum Eosinophilia
Time frame: at 1, 3, 4, 6 and 7 month
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publicationwww.ginasthma.org
- Results publication: PubMed 15709050Zacharasiewicz A, Wilson N, Lex C, Erin EM, Li AM, Hansel T, Khan M, Bush A. Clinical use of noninvasive measurements of airway inflammation in steroid reduction in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 May 15;171(10):1077-82. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200409-1242OC. Epub 2005 Feb 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 12480423Green RH, Brightling CE, McKenna S, Hargadon B, Parker D, Bradding P, Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. Asthma exacerbations and sputum eosinophil counts: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002 Nov 30;360(9347):1715-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11679-5.
- Results publication: PubMed 21825081Fleming L, Wilson N, Regamey N, Bush A. Use of sputum eosinophil counts to guide management in children with severe asthma. Thorax. 2012 Mar;67(3):193-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.156836. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 16507847Jayaram L, Pizzichini MM, Cook RJ, Boulet LP, Lemiere C, Pizzichini E, Cartier A, Hussack P, Goldsmith CH, Laviolette M, Parameswaran K, Hargreave FE. Determining asthma treatment by monitoring sputum cell counts: effect on exacerbations. Eur Respir J. 2006 Mar;27(3):483-94. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00137704.
- Results publication: PubMed 18399863Li AM, Tsang TW, Lam HS, Sung RY, Chang AB. Predictors for failed dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids in childhood asthma. Respirology. 2008 May;13(3):400-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2007.01222.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 14555562Prieto L, Bruno L, Gutierrez V, Uixera S, Perez-Frances C, Lanuza A, Ferrer A. Airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate and exhaled nitric oxide measurements: predictive value as markers for reducing the dose of inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic subjects. Chest. 2003 Oct;124(4):1325-33. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.4.1325.
- Results publication: PubMed 15805990Deykin A, Lazarus SC, Fahy JV, Wechsler ME, Boushey HA, Chinchilli VM, Craig TJ, Dimango E, Kraft M, Leone F, Lemanske RF, Martin RJ, Pesola GR, Peters SP, Sorkness CA, Szefler SJ, Israel E; Asthma Clinical Research Network, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/NIH. Sputum eosinophil counts predict asthma control after discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroids. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Apr;115(4):720-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.12.1129.
- Results publication: PubMed 16642226Belda J, Parameswaran K, Lemiere C, Kamada D, O'Byrne PM, Hargreave FE. Predictors of loss of asthma control induced by corticosteroid withdrawal. Can Respir J. 2006 Apr;13(3):129-33. doi: 10.1155/2006/189127.
- Results publication: PubMed 10619799Jatakanon A, Lim S, Barnes PJ. Changes in sputum eosinophils predict loss of asthma control. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Jan;161(1):64-72. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.1.9809100.
- Results publication: PubMed 11179114Leuppi JD, Salome CM, Jenkins CR, Anderson SD, Xuan W, Marks GB, Koskela H, Brannan JD, Freed R, Andersson M, Chan HK, Woolcock AJ. Predictive markers of asthma exacerbation during stepwise dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;163(2):406-12. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.9912091.
- Results publication: PubMed 19788017Cabral AL, Vollmer WM, Barbirotto RM, Martins MA. Exhaled nitric oxide as a predictor of exacerbation in children with moderate-to-severe asthma: a prospective, 5-month study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009 Sep;103(3):206-11. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60183-4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Asthma Chronic
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
Recruiting
THERMotherapy Against Persistent Bacterial LUNG Infections
Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Bronchiectasis
Not yet recruiting
Reducing Exposure With Air Cleaners and Technology
Asthma, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
RecruitingPhase 2
Rademikibart IV for Acute Asthma and COPD Exacerbation
Asthma Acute, COPD Exacerbation Acute
Not yet recruiting
Asthma Ctrl SMART Trial
Asthma in Children, Asthma Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ICS dose reduction in people with Asthma Chronic, run by National Institute for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Poland at 1 site in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Sep 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Percentage of Patients With Loss of Asthma Control (time frame: at 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03788057, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.