SepsisNCT03789838
Effect of Sepsis Response Team in the Emergency Department
An observational study of Sepsis, run by Oslo University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
Does sepsis response team in the emergency department increase the portion of sepsis patient who receive adequate treatment within one hour? Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sepsis
- What is being tested?
- Sepsis rapid response team
- How many people
- 245 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- 15 May 2017to 15 May 2018
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Year
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients with suspected sepsis in emergency department
Who may be able to join
- Patients with suspected sepsis
Who cannot join
- Patients who was consider not to need antibiotics
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prospective Cohort Study Examining the Effect of a Sepsis Rapid Response Team in the Emergency Department
Does sepsis response team in the emergency department increase the portion of sepsis patient who receive adequate treatment within one hour?
Read the detailed description
Does sepsis response team in the emergency department increase the portion of sepsis patient who receive adequate treatment within one hour? The time from the patients arrive at the emergency department to an adequate antibiotic is given, before and after introduction of a sepsis response team, was registered.
- Conditions
- Sepsis
- Being tested
- Sepsis rapid response team
- Medical subject headings
- Sepsis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sepsis rapid response teamOther
Patients with suspected sepsis is managed by a sepsis rapid response team in a structured manner.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Before of sepsis rapid response team | Time from arrival at the Emergency Department to antibiotic is administered, before introduction of sepsis response team in the Emergency Department. | |
| Sepsis rapid response team | Time from arrival at the Emergency Department to antibiotic is administered, with sepsis response team in the Emergency Department. Receives: Other: Sepsis rapid response team |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time from arrival the emergency department to antibiotic is given.
Time from arrival the emergency department to antibiotic is given.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Dec 2018
- Study start15 May 2017
- Primary completion15 May 2018
- Study completion15 May 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SepsisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Oslo University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 245 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 1 Year
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oslo University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Aleksander Rygh Holten, Oslo University Hospital
- Investigators
- Aleksander Holten, Phd, MD, Principal investigator, Oslo University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03789838
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Ulleval sepsis-01
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 27 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 3 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Trydal E, Martinsen AB, Beisland F, Jacobsen D, Holten AR. [Structured evaluation on arrival of patients with sepsis and initiation of antibiotics]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2019 May 27;139(9). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.18.0216. Print 2019 May 28. Norwegian.
PubMed 31140244
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Cohort Study Examining the Effect of a Sepsis Rapid Response Team in the Emergency Department
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03789838
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Ulleval sepsis-01
- Conditions
- Sepsis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 245 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oslo University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 May 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 May 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Does sepsis response team in the emergency department increase the portion of sepsis patient who receive adequate treatment within one hour?
Detailed description
Does sepsis response team in the emergency department increase the portion of sepsis patient who receive adequate treatment within one hour? The time from the patients arrive at the emergency department to an adequate antibiotic is given, before and after introduction of a sepsis response team, was registered.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Year
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Before of sepsis rapid response team | – | –Time from arrival at the Emergency Department to antibiotic is administered, before introduction of sepsis response team in the Emergency Department. |
| Sepsis rapid response team | – | Other: Sepsis rapid response teamTime from arrival at the Emergency Department to antibiotic is administered, with sepsis response team in the Emergency Department. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients with suspected sepsis in emergency department
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with suspected sepsis
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who was consider not to need antibiotics
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sepsis rapid response teamPatients with suspected sepsis is managed by a sepsis rapid response team in a structured manner. | Other | Sepsis rapid response team |
Primary outcome
Time from arrival the emergency department to antibiotic is given.
Time frame: 6 months
Time from arrival the emergency department to antibiotic is given.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 May 2022.
- Results publication: PubMed 31140244Trydal E, Martinsen AB, Beisland F, Jacobsen D, Holten AR. [Structured evaluation on arrival of patients with sepsis and initiation of antibiotics]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2019 May 27;139(9). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.18.0216. Print 2019 May 28. Norwegian.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sepsis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Extended and Intermittent Infusion of Beta-lactams in Critically Ill Paediatric Patients
Infection, Sepsis
Not yet recruiting
Double Plasma Separation and Adsorption in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (DPMAS-ACLF Trial)
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Thymosin Alpha 1 and IgM Levels in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aleksander Holten, Phd, MD principal investigator
Oslo University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Sepsis, run by Oslo University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time from arrival the emergency department to antibiotic is given. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03789838, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2022.