Anesthesia, LocalPhase 2NCT03790540
Pain Assessment During Mandibular Nerve Block Injection With the Aid of Dental Vibe Tool in Pediatric Dental Patients
A Phase 2 study testing DentalVibe and Topical Benzocaine 20% in people with Anesthesia, Local, run by Nourhan M.Aly at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to valuate the effectiveness of DentalVibe(DV) tool in pain reduction during local anesthetic injection compared to traditional injection without aid of DentalVibe in pediatric patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 7 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia, Local
- What is being tested?
- DentalVibe and Topical Benzocaine 20%
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2018to 15 May 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 7 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Age range from 5-7 years.
- Patients who are in need of pulpotomy dental treatment requiring bilateral local anesthesia in the mandible.
- Children free of any systemic disease or special health care needs.
- Positive or definitely positive behavior during preoperative assessments according to the Frankl Scale.
Who cannot join
- Having active sites of pathosis in the area of injection that could affect anesthetic assessment.
- Signs of irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis.
- Radiographs show periapical or bifurcation radiolucency.
- Patients allergic to local anesthesia or having a family history of allergy to local anesthesia.
- Patients with acute oral or facial infection (swelling and/or cellulitis).
- Patients refusing to participate.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Pain Assessment During Mandibular Nerve Block Injection With the Aid of Dental Vibe Tool in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
The purpose of this study is to valuate the effectiveness of DentalVibe(DV) tool in pain reduction during local anesthetic injection compared to traditional injection without aid of DentalVibe in pediatric patients.
Read the detailed description
This study is a crossover randomized controlled clinical trial where (N=60 ) children will be selected from the outpatient clinic of Pediatric Dentistry and Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University after securing necessary consents. These children will be selected based on a need for local anesthesia for pulpotomy treatment on both sides of the mandible. All selected children will be randomly allocated into 2 groups. Group I (assigned to injection with the aid of DentalVibe tool), Group II(assigned to conventional injection). Each group will receive 2 mandibular nerve block injections with two different injection techniques, with 1-2 weeks apart as a washing out period. Mandibular nerve block injection will be either with vibration using DentalVibe at the injection side or topical analgesic (benzocaine 20%) gel will be applied before the injection of local anesthesia at first the appointment, and the alternative technique will be used at the second appointment . Injection with the aid of DentalVibe tool will act as the experimental group while the control group will be the use of topical analgesic (benzocaine 20%).
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, Local
- Being tested
- DentalVibe, Topical Benzocaine 20%
- Keywords
- DentalVibe, Mandibular nerve block injection, Consolability Scale
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DentalVibeDevice
It is a vibrotactile device that aids in reducing pain during local anesthesia injection in pediatric patients
Topical Benzocaine 20%Drug
Topical benzocaine 20% gel on the mucosal injection site prior to injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Injection with the aid of DentalVibe | Experimental | 1 mL of Mepivacaine HCl 2%, 1/20000 Levonordefrin will be injected using a 27 gauge dental needle.
DentalVibe is a small, handheld cordless device that has a charging docking station. A demonstration of DentalVibe (DV) will be performed by putting it into direct contact with the children's nails before applying the device intraorally. Then, the device will be placed on the oral mucosa to enclose the injection site before administering local anesthesia and Potential subject-expectancy effects and pressure from the placement of DV will be controlled. The device will be turned on to stimulate the area of needle penetration. After 5 seconds of vibration, the needle will be inserted. The device will continue vibrating during needle insertion and anesthetic injection. Receives: Device: DentalVibe |
| Injection with topical benzocaine 20% | Active comparator | Topical anesthesia -Benzocaine gel 20%. Tissues will be dried using (2 X 2) gauze to enhance the absorption of the benzocaine gel 20% around the site of the needle penetration and will be left in contact with the soft tissue for one minute. Then the local anesthetic solution (1 ml Mepivacaine HCl 2%, 1/20000 Levonordefrin) will be injected using a 27 gauge dental needle. Receives: Drug: Topical Benzocaine 20% |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Subjective pain reduction during local anesthesia administration.
Pain will be assessed during local anesthesia injection by means of Wong-Baker faces scale. It consists of faces with different facial expression for happiness and pain and is scored from 0-5 as 0 is very happy and feels no pain and 5 is very painful
Measured: during administration of local anesthesia
Objective pain assessment after local anesthesia administration
After performing all the injections, pain reaction will be evaluated by two investigators independently using recorded video tapes by Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC).
The scale comprises the following parameters:
(1) Face, (2) Legs, (3) Activity, (4) Cry, and (5) Consolability. Each of the five categories is scored from 0 to 2, which results in a minimum score of 0 and maximum of 10. According to this scale 0 = relaxed and comfortable (no pain), 1-3 = mild discomfort, 4-6 = moderate pain, and 7-10 = severe discomfort or pain, A lower score represents less physical reaction than does a higher number.
Measured: after performing all injections
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Dec 2018
- Study start1 Dec 2018
- Primary completion10 Mar 2019
- Study completion15 May 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anesthesia, LocalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Each group will receive 2 mandibular nerve block injections with two different injection techniques, with 1-2 weeks apart as a washing out period .Mandibular nerve block injection will be either with vibration using DentalVibe at the injection side or topical analgesic (benzocaine 20%) gel will be applied before the injection of local anesthesia at first the appointment, and the alternative technique will be used at the second appointment. Injection with the aid of DentalVibe tool will act as the experimental group while the control group will be the use of topical analgesic (benzocaine 20%).
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nourhan M.Aly
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alexandria University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Nourhan M.Aly, University of Alexandria
- Investigators
- Passant H Hassanein, BDS, Principal investigator, Alexandria UniversityAmani M Khalil, PhD, Study director, Alexandria UniversityDalia AM Talaat, PhD, Study director, Alexandria University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03790540
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DentalVibe during LA
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 10 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Sermet Elbay U, Elbay M, Yildirim S, Kaya E, Kaya C, Ugurluel C, BaydemIr C. Evaluation of the injection pain with the use of DentalVibe injection system during supraperiosteal anaesthesia in children: a randomised clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Sep;26(5):336-45. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12204. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
PubMed 26369274Hutchins HS Jr, Young FA, Lackland DT, Fishburne CP. The effectiveness of topical anesthesia and vibration in alleviating the pain of oral injections. Anesth Prog. 1997 Summer;44(3):87-9.
PubMed 9481967Ram D, Peretz B. The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe. J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 May-Aug;70(2):130-3.
PubMed 14528773Nanitsos E, Vartuli R, Forte A, Dennison PJ, Peck CC. The effect of vibration on pain during local anaesthesia injections. Aust Dent J. 2009 Jun;54(2):94-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01100.x.
PubMed 19473149
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pain Assessment During Mandibular Nerve Block Injection With the Aid of Dental Vibe Tool in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03790540
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DentalVibe during LA
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, Local
- Keywords
- DentalVibe, Mandibular nerve block injection, Consolability Scale
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nourhan M.AlyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alexandria University
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to valuate the effectiveness of DentalVibe(DV) tool in pain reduction during local anesthetic injection compared to traditional injection without aid of DentalVibe in pediatric patients.
Detailed description
This study is a crossover randomized controlled clinical trial where (N=60 ) children will be selected from the outpatient clinic of Pediatric Dentistry and Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University after securing necessary consents. These children will be selected based on a need for local anesthesia for pulpotomy treatment on both sides of the mandible. All selected children will be randomly allocated into 2 groups. Group I (assigned to injection with the aid of DentalVibe tool), Group II(assigned to conventional injection). Each group will receive 2 mandibular nerve block injections with two different injection techniques, with 1-2 weeks apart as a washing out period. Mandibular nerve block injection will be either with vibration using DentalVibe at the injection side or topical analgesic (benzocaine 20%) gel will be applied before the injection of local anesthesia at first the appointment, and the alternative technique will be used at the second appointment . Injection with the aid of DentalVibe tool will act as the experimental group while the control group will be the use of topical analgesic (benzocaine 20%).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Each group will receive 2 mandibular nerve block injections with two different injection techniques, with 1-2 weeks apart as a washing out period .Mandibular nerve block injection will be either with vibration using DentalVibe at the injection side or topical analgesic (benzocaine 20%) gel will be applied before the injection of local anesthesia at first the appointment, and the alternative technique will be used at the second appointment. Injection with the aid of DentalVibe tool will act as the experimental group while the control group will be the use of topical analgesic (benzocaine 20%).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Injection with the aid of DentalVibe | Experimental | Device: DentalVibe1 mL of Mepivacaine HCl 2%, 1/20000 Levonordefrin will be injected using a 27 gauge dental needle. DentalVibe is a small, handheld cordless device that has a charging docking station. A demonstration of DentalVibe (DV) will be performed by putting it into direct contact with the children's nails before applying the device intraorally. Then, the device will be placed on the oral mucosa to enclose the injection site before administering local anesthesia and Potential subject-expectancy effects and pressure from the placement of DV will be controlled. The device will be turned on to stimulate the area of needle penetration. After 5 seconds of vibration, the needle will be inserted. The device will continue vibrating during needle insertion and anesthetic injection. |
| Injection with topical benzocaine 20% | Active comparator | Drug: Topical Benzocaine 20%Topical anesthesia -Benzocaine gel 20%. Tissues will be dried using (2 X 2) gauze to enhance the absorption of the benzocaine gel 20% around the site of the needle penetration and will be left in contact with the soft tissue for one minute. Then the local anesthetic solution (1 ml Mepivacaine HCl 2%, 1/20000 Levonordefrin) will be injected using a 27 gauge dental needle. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 7 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age range from 5-7 years.
- Patients who are in need of pulpotomy dental treatment requiring bilateral local anesthesia in the mandible.
- Children free of any systemic disease or special health care needs.
- Positive or definitely positive behavior during preoperative assessments according to the Frankl Scale.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Having active sites of pathosis in the area of injection that could affect anesthetic assessment.
- Signs of irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis.
- Radiographs show periapical or bifurcation radiolucency.
- Patients allergic to local anesthesia or having a family history of allergy to local anesthesia.
- Patients with acute oral or facial infection (swelling and/or cellulitis).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DentalVibeIt is a vibrotactile device that aids in reducing pain during local anesthesia injection in pediatric patients | Device | Injection with the aid of DentalVibe |
| Topical Benzocaine 20%Topical benzocaine 20% gel on the mucosal injection site prior to injection | Drug | Injection with topical benzocaine 20% |
Primary outcome
Subjective pain reduction during local anesthesia administration.
Time frame: during administration of local anesthesia
Pain will be assessed during local anesthesia injection by means of Wong-Baker faces scale. It consists of faces with different facial expression for happiness and pain and is scored from 0-5 as 0 is very happy and feels no pain and 5 is very painful
Objective pain assessment after local anesthesia administration
Time frame: after performing all injections
After performing all the injections, pain reaction will be evaluated by two investigators independently using recorded video tapes by Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC). The scale comprises the following parameters: (1) Face, (2) Legs, (3) Activity, (4) Cry, and (5) Consolability. Each of the five categories is scored from 0 to 2, which results in a minimum score of 0 and maximum of 10. According to this scale 0 = relaxed and comfortable (no pain), 1-3 = mild discomfort, 4-6 = moderate pain, and 7-10 = severe discomfort or pain, A lower score represents less physical reaction than does a higher number.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Apr 2020.
- Background: PubMed 26369274Sermet Elbay U, Elbay M, Yildirim S, Kaya E, Kaya C, Ugurluel C, BaydemIr C. Evaluation of the injection pain with the use of DentalVibe injection system during supraperiosteal anaesthesia in children: a randomised clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Sep;26(5):336-45. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12204. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
- Background: PubMed 9481967Hutchins HS Jr, Young FA, Lackland DT, Fishburne CP. The effectiveness of topical anesthesia and vibration in alleviating the pain of oral injections. Anesth Prog. 1997 Summer;44(3):87-9.
- Background: PubMed 14528773Ram D, Peretz B. The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe. J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 May-Aug;70(2):130-3.
- Background: PubMed 19473149Nanitsos E, Vartuli R, Forte A, Dennison PJ, Peck CC. The effect of vibration on pain during local anaesthesia injections. Aust Dent J. 2009 Jun;54(2):94-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01100.x.
Related trials for Anesthesia, Local
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Recruiting
Minimum Effective Local Anesthetic Volume for Ultrasound Guided Superior Trunk Block
Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Changes to Prostate Procedures
Prostate Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Sulphate as an Adjuvant in Combined Costoclavicular Block and Suprascapular Block Versus Interscalene Block for Ambulatory Shoulder Arthroscopy
Postoperative Pain, Shoulder Arthroscopy
Recruiting
Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia With Intrathecal Morphine Versus PENG Block With or Without Dexamethasone in Hip Arthroplasty
Arthropathy of Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Passant H Hassanein, BDS principal investigator
Alexandria University
Amani M Khalil, PhD study director
Alexandria University
Dalia AM Talaat, PhD study director
Alexandria University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing DentalVibe and Topical Benzocaine 20% in people with Anesthesia, Local, run by Nourhan M.Aly at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Subjective pain reduction during local anesthesia administration. (time frame: during administration of local anesthesia). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03790540, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2020.