Neoplasm, EsophagealPhase 2NCT03791905
PET Imaging-guided Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
A Phase 2 study testing Paclitaxel, Cisplatin and Oxaliplatin in people with Neoplasm, Esophageal and Squamous Cell Carcinoma, run by Mian XI at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Since multiple studies have demonstrated that PET can identify responders and non-responders to induction chemotherapy, using FDG-PET imaging to guide treatment decisions has prompted interest in clinical practice. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neoplasm, Esophageal, Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Paclitaxel, Cisplatin and Oxaliplatin
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 216 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2019to Dec 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus;
- Absence of hematogenous metastasis disease, confirmed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and PET-CT scan (according to UICC TNM version 8);
- Not suitable for surgery (either for medical reasons or patient's choice);
- Age at diagnosis 18 to 70 years;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2
- No prior cancer therapy;
Show all 11Show fewer
- No history of concomitant or previous malignancy;
- Hematologic function: WBC ≥ 4.0×109/L, PLT ≥ 80×109/L, Hb ≥ 10mg/dL;
- Renal function: Cr ≤ 1.25×UNL;
- Hepatic function: BIL ≤ 1.5×UNL, ALT/AST ≤ 2.5×UNL;
- Documented informed consent to participate in the trial.
Who cannot join
- Younger than 18 or older than 70 years of age;
- ECOG performance status of 3 or above;
- Other cancer history;
- Previous radiotherapy history;
- Subjects with distant metastases;
- Pregnancy or breast feeding. Women of childbearing age must use effective contraception;
- Serious cardiovascular disease (congestive heart failure, uncontrollable arrhythmia, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, serious heart valve disease, resistant hypertension);
- Evidence of bleeding diathesis or serious infection.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Guanzhou, Guangdong, 510060
Mian Xi, MD, +86-20-87343385, ximian@sysucc.org.cn
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Randomized Trial of PET Imaging in Assessing Response to Induction Chemotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy
Since multiple studies have demonstrated that PET can identify responders and non-responders to induction chemotherapy, using FDG-PET imaging to guide treatment decisions has prompted interest in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether changing chemotherapy regimen during radiation based on PET response to induction chemotherapy can improve clinical complete response (cCR) in patients with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
Read the detailed description
A total of 216 patients with baseline PET scan were randomized to one of 2 induction chemotherapy arms: paclitaxel/cisplatin (TP) on days 1, 22 or FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, 5-FU) on days 1, 15, 29. Repeat PET was performed on days 36-42 and changes in max standardized uptake value (SUVmax) from baseline were assessed. Using a predefined cut-off value of a 35% decrease in SUVmax, PET responders (≥35% decrease in SUVmax) continued on the same chemotherapy regimen during radiotherapy, whereas PET non-responders (<35% decrease in SUVmax) crossed over to an alternative chemotherapy regimen concomitantly with radiation. All patients received external-beam radiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The prescribed dose is generally 50-60 Gy in 25-28 fractions, 5 days per week.
- Conditions
- Neoplasm, Esophageal, Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, Oxaliplatin, 5-FU, Leucovorin
- Keywords
- Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PET, Definitive chemoradiotherapy, Induction chemotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PaclitaxelDrug
Also called Taxol
chemotherapy drug
CisplatinDrug
Also called DDP
chemotherapy drug
OxaliplatinDrug
Also called OXA
chemotherapy drug
5-FUDrug
Also called Fluorouracil
chemotherapy drug
LeucovorinDrug
Also called CF
chemotherapy drug
Intensity-modulated radiotherapyRadiation
Also called IMRT
radiotherapy technique
PETDevice
Also called PET-CT
Using PET to evaluate response to induction chemotherapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TP Arm | Experimental | Patients with baseline PET scan assigned to this Arm will receive two cycles of 3-weekly schedule of induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel/cisplatin (TP), consisting of paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 on day 1 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1. Repeat PET was performed on days 36-42 and changes in SUVmax from baseline were assessed. PET responders (≥35% decrease in SUVmax) continued on the same chemotherapy regimen during radiotherapy, whereas PET non-responders (<35% decrease in SUVmax) crossed over to FOLFOX regimen concomitantly with radiation. All patients received external-beam radiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The prescribed dose is generally 50-60 Gy in 25-28 fractions. Receives: Drug: Paclitaxel; Drug: Cisplatin; Radiation: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Device: PET |
| FOLFOX Arm | Experimental | Patients with baseline PET scan assigned to this Arm will receive three cycles of 2-weekly schedule of induction chemotherapy with FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, 5-FU), consisting of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, and 5-FU 2 g/m2 on day 1. Repeat PET was performed on days 36-42 and changes in SUVmax from baseline were assessed. PET responders (≥35% decrease in SUVmax) continued on the same chemotherapy regimen during radiotherapy, whereas PET non-responders (<35% decrease in SUVmax) crossed over to TP regimen concomitantly with radiation. All patients received external-beam radiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The prescribed dose is generally 50-60 Gy in 25-28 fractions. Receives: Drug: Oxaliplatin; Drug: 5-FU; Drug: Leucovorin; Radiation: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Device: PET |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
clinical complete response
RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria was used to determine the tumor response. Tumor response was evaluated 3 months after the completion of treatment based on CT or PET-CT scans, endoscopy with biopsies.
Measured: 3 months after the treatment (plus or minus 7 days)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Overall survival
From the enrollment to the date of death from any cause or date of lost follow-up
Measured: 3 years after randomization
Progression-free survival
From the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or last follow-up
Measured: 3 years after randomization
Chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity
Treatment-related toxicity
Measured: From the date of randomization to the 3 months after treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jan 2019
- Study start15 Jan 2019
- Primary completionJul 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neoplasm, EsophagealStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized parallel study
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mian XI
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Mian XI, Sun Yat-sen University
- Investigators
- Mian XI, MD, Study chair, Sun Yat-sen University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03791905
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PETESCC
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 31 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ku GY, Kriplani A, Janjigian YY, Kelsen DP, Rusch VW, Bains M, Chou J, Capanu M, Wu AJ, Goodman KA, Ilson DH. Change in chemotherapy during concurrent radiation followed by surgery after a suboptimal positron emission tomography response to induction chemotherapy improves outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2016 Jul 1;122(13):2083-90. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30028. Epub 2016 May 6.
PubMed 27152857
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Randomized Trial of PET Imaging in Assessing Response to Induction Chemotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03791905
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PETESCC
- Conditions
- Neoplasm, Esophageal, Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Keywords
- Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PET, Definitive chemoradiotherapy, Induction chemotherapy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mian XIUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Since multiple studies have demonstrated that PET can identify responders and non-responders to induction chemotherapy, using FDG-PET imaging to guide treatment decisions has prompted interest in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether changing chemotherapy regimen during radiation based on PET response to induction chemotherapy can improve clinical complete response (cCR) in patients with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
Detailed description
A total of 216 patients with baseline PET scan were randomized to one of 2 induction chemotherapy arms: paclitaxel/cisplatin (TP) on days 1, 22 or FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, 5-FU) on days 1, 15, 29. Repeat PET was performed on days 36-42 and changes in max standardized uptake value (SUVmax) from baseline were assessed. Using a predefined cut-off value of a 35% decrease in SUVmax, PET responders (≥35% decrease in SUVmax) continued on the same chemotherapy regimen during radiotherapy, whereas PET non-responders (<35% decrease in SUVmax) crossed over to an alternative chemotherapy regimen concomitantly with radiation. All patients received external-beam radiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The prescribed dose is generally 50-60 Gy in 25-28 fractions, 5 days per week.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized parallel study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TP Arm | Experimental | Drug: Paclitaxel, Drug: Cisplatin, Radiation: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, Device: PETPatients with baseline PET scan assigned to this Arm will receive two cycles of 3-weekly schedule of induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel/cisplatin (TP), consisting of paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 on day 1 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1. Repeat PET was performed on days 36-42 and changes in SUVmax from baseline were assessed. PET responders (≥35% decrease in SUVmax) continued on the same chemotherapy regimen during radiotherapy, whereas PET non-responders (<35% decrease in SUVmax) crossed over to FOLFOX regimen concomitantly with radiation. All patients received external-beam radiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The prescribed dose is generally 50-60 Gy in 25-28 fractions. |
| FOLFOX Arm | Experimental | Drug: Oxaliplatin, Drug: 5-FU, Drug: Leucovorin, Radiation: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, Device: PETPatients with baseline PET scan assigned to this Arm will receive three cycles of 2-weekly schedule of induction chemotherapy with FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, 5-FU), consisting of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, and 5-FU 2 g/m2 on day 1. Repeat PET was performed on days 36-42 and changes in SUVmax from baseline were assessed. PET responders (≥35% decrease in SUVmax) continued on the same chemotherapy regimen during radiotherapy, whereas PET non-responders (<35% decrease in SUVmax) crossed over to TP regimen concomitantly with radiation. All patients received external-beam radiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The prescribed dose is generally 50-60 Gy in 25-28 fractions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus;
- Absence of hematogenous metastasis disease, confirmed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and PET-CT scan (according to UICC TNM version 8);
- Not suitable for surgery (either for medical reasons or patient's choice);
- Age at diagnosis 18 to 70 years;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Younger than 18 or older than 70 years of age;
- ECOG performance status of 3 or above;
- Other cancer history;
- Previous radiotherapy history;
- Subjects with distant metastases;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PaclitaxelAlso: Taxolchemotherapy drug | Drug | TP Arm |
| CisplatinAlso: DDPchemotherapy drug | Drug | TP Arm |
| OxaliplatinAlso: OXAchemotherapy drug | Drug | FOLFOX Arm |
| 5-FUAlso: Fluorouracilchemotherapy drug | Drug | FOLFOX Arm |
| LeucovorinAlso: CFchemotherapy drug | Drug | FOLFOX Arm |
| Intensity-modulated radiotherapyAlso: IMRTradiotherapy technique | Radiation | FOLFOX Arm, TP Arm |
| PETAlso: PET-CTUsing PET to evaluate response to induction chemotherapy | Device | FOLFOX Arm, TP Arm |
Primary outcome
clinical complete response
Time frame: 3 months after the treatment (plus or minus 7 days)
RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria was used to determine the tumor response. Tumor response was evaluated 3 months after the completion of treatment based on CT or PET-CT scans, endoscopy with biopsies.
3 secondary outcomes
Overall survival
Time frame: 3 years after randomization
Progression-free survival
Time frame: 3 years after randomization
Chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the 3 months after treatment
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 27152857Ku GY, Kriplani A, Janjigian YY, Kelsen DP, Rusch VW, Bains M, Chou J, Capanu M, Wu AJ, Goodman KA, Ilson DH. Change in chemotherapy during concurrent radiation followed by surgery after a suboptimal positron emission tomography response to induction chemotherapy improves outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2016 Jul 1;122(13):2083-90. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30028. Epub 2016 May 6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neoplasm, Esophageal
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mian XI, MD study chair
Sun Yat-sen University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Paclitaxel, Cisplatin and Oxaliplatin in people with Neoplasm, Esophageal and Squamous Cell Carcinoma, run by Mian XI at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mian XI, MD (+86-20-87343385, ximian@sysucc.org.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
clinical complete response (time frame: 3 months after the treatment (plus or minus 7 days)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03791905, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2021.